The Acute Effects of Static Stretching on the Sprint Performance of Collegiate Men in the 60- and 100-m Dash After a Dynamic Warm-Up

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 2280-2284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon M Kistler ◽  
Mark S Walsh ◽  
Thelma S Horn ◽  
Ronald H Cox
Keyword(s):  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Warm Up

Acute Effects of Ballistic vs. Passive Static Stretching Involved in a Prematch Warm-up on Vertical Jump and Linear Sprint Performance in Soccer Players

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel López Mariscal ◽  
Víctor Sánchez Garcia ◽  
José C. Fernández-García ◽  
Eduardo Sáez de Villarreal
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Warm Up

scholarly journals The Acute Effects of Dynamic and Static Stretching on Tennis Serve Targeting Performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Bulent Turna ◽  
Asuman Sahan ◽  
Bahar Yilmaz
Keyword(s):  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Dynamic Stretching ◽  
Paired Samples ◽  
Tennis Serve ◽  
Playing Time ◽  
Homogeneous Data ◽  
Stretching Exercises

The study investigates the acute effects of dynamic and static stretching on the tennis serve targeting performance of amateur tennis players. Twenty male athletes who were between the ages of 16-24 years and played tennis for at least 1 year (21.40±2.16 years, 181±0.06 cm, 71.85±7.42 kg, tennis playing time 1.55±0.88 years) voluntarily participated in the study.Prior to the pre-tests and after applying the traditional warm-up protocol, serve targeting test (STT) was applied to all participants. In the post-tests, STT was used after applying three different warm-up methods on three different days (48-hour rest interval). The warm-up stages included No Treatment (NT) (jogging, rally), Static Stretching (SS) and Dynamic Stretching (DS).In the statistical analysis, the homogeneity of the data was investigated using the Shapiro Wilk test. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the pre-test and post-test results of the non-homogeneous data; Friedman test was used to compare the three different stretching methods with each other; in the paired comparisons of the groups, the paired samples t-test was used for the homogenous data and Wilcoxon test was used for the non-homogeneous data. In conclusion, stretching exercises before serving increased the serve targeting performance and the increase in the dynamic stretching exercises was higher than that in static stretching exercises.

Effects of Static Stretching in Warm-Up on Repeated Sprint Performance

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 2155-2162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Y Sim ◽  
Brian T Dawson ◽  
Kym J Guelfi ◽  
Karen E Wallman ◽  
Warren B Young
Keyword(s):  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Repeated Sprint

Effects of static stretching in warm-up on repeated sprint performance

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S60 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Dawson ◽  
A. Sim ◽  
K. Wallman ◽  
K. Guelfi ◽  
W. Young
Keyword(s):  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Repeated Sprint

scholarly journals Acute Effects of a Static vs. a Dynamic Stretching Warm-up on Repeated-Sprint Performance in Female Handball Players

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Zmijewski ◽  
Patrycja Lipinska ◽  
Anna Czajkowska ◽  
Anna Mróz ◽  
Paweł Kapuściński ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Average Power ◽  
Young Female ◽  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Linear Modeling ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Dynamic Stretching ◽  
Repeated Sprint

AbstractThis randomized cross-over study examined the effects of typical static and dynamic stretching warm-up protocols on repeated-sprint performance. Thirteen young female handball players performed a 5 min aerobic warm-up followed by one of three stretching protocols for the lower limbs: (1) static stretching, (2) dynamic-ballistic stretching, and (3) no stretching before performing five all-out sprints on a cycle ergometer. Each protocol was performed on a different occasion, separated by 2-3 days. Range of movement (ROM) was also measured before and after the warm-up protocols with a sit-and-reach test. Fixed and random effects of each stretching protocol on repeated sprint performance were estimated with mixed linear modeling and data were evaluated via standardization and magnitude-based inferences. In comparison to no stretching, there were small increases in ROM after dynamic stretching (12.7%, ±0.7%; mean, ±90% confidence limits) and static stretching (19.2%, ±0.9%). There were small increases in the average power across all sprints with dynamic stretching relative to static stretching (3.3%, ±2.4%) and no stretching (3.0%, ±2.4%) and trivial to small increases in the average power in the 1st and 5th trials with dynamic stretching compared to static stretching (3.9%, ±2.6%; 2.6%, ±2.6%, respectively) and no stretching (2.0%, ±2.7%; 4.1%, ±2.8%, respectively). There were also trivial and small decreases in power across all sprints with static relative to dynamic stretching (-1.3%, ±2.8%) and no stretching (-3.5%, ±2.9%). Dynamic stretching improved repeated-sprint performance to a greater extent than static stretching and no stretching.

scholarly journals The Acute Effects of Foam Rolling and Dynamic Stretching on Athletic Performance: A Critically Appraised Topic

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Bethany L. Anderson ◽  
Rod A. Harter ◽  
James L. Farnsworth
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Performance ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Dynamic Stretching ◽  
Foam Rolling ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
And Performance

Clinical Scenario: Dynamic stretching and foam rolling are commonly used by athletes to reduce injury and enhance recovery, thereby improving athletic performance. In contrast to dynamic stretching, little research has been conducted on the acute effects of foam rolling as part of the preexercise warm-up routine. Previously, when researchers implemented foam rolling with static stretching as a warm-up, some found that foam rolling slightly improved flexibility and performance outcomes. More recent research has shown that dynamic stretching is favorable to static stretching when used as a warm-up strategy. Therefore, adding foam rolling to dynamic stretching is hypothesized to create more significant improvements in flexibility and performance compared with adding foam rolling to static stretching. Focused Clinical Question: In active individuals, does foam rolling in addition to dynamic stretching lead to enhanced performance compared with dynamic stretching alone? Summary of Key Findings: Four randomized controlled trials were included. Two studies concluded that the addition of foam rolling to dynamic stretching increased vertical jump height more than dynamic stretching alone, while 2 studies found no difference between these treatment groups. Two studies concluded that the addition of foam rolling increased agility performance compared with dynamic stretching alone, while one study found no difference between treatment groups and one study did not measure agility. All 4 studies reviewed concluded that foam rolling did not improve flexibility more than dynamic stretching alone. Clinical Bottom Line: Foam rolling in conjunction with dynamic stretching may further improve an athlete’s agility and power output; however, little improvement has been observed with foam rolling in regard to athlete flexibility when compared with completing dynamic stretching programs alone. Strength of Recommendation: Inconsistent findings from 4 randomized controlled trials suggest there is Grade C evidence to support the inclusion of foam rolling in a dynamic warm-up.

Acute Effects of Different Warm-Up Protocols on Anaerobic Performance in Teenage Athletes

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avery D. Faigenbaum ◽  
Jie Kang ◽  
James McFarland ◽  
Jason M. Bloom ◽  
James Magnatta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Random Order ◽  
Youth Programs ◽  
Dynamic Exercise ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Event Dynamic ◽  
Accepted Practice ◽  
Shuttle Run

Although pre-event static stretching (SS) is an accepted practice in most youth programs, pre-event dynamic exercise (DY) is becoming popular. The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of pre-event SS, DY, and combined SS and DY (SDY) on vertical jump (VJ), medicine-ball toss (MB), 10-yard sprint (SP), and pro-agility shuttle run (AG) in teenage athletes (15.5 ± 0.9 years). Thirty athletes participated in three testing sessions in random order on three nonconsecutive days. Before testing, participants performed 5 min of walking/jogging followed by one of the following 10 min warm-up protocols: a) five static stretches (2 × 30 s), b) nine moderate-to-high-intensity dynamic movements (2 × 10 yards), or c) five static stretches (1 × 30 s) followed by the same nine dynamic movements (1 × 10 yards). Statistical analysis of the data revealed that performance on the VJ, MB, and SP were significantly (p < .05) improved after DY and SDY as compared with SS. There were no significant differences in AG after the 3 warm-up treatments. The results of this study indicate that pre-event dynamic exercise or static stretching followed by dynamic exercise might be more beneficial than pre-event static stretching alone in teenage athletes who perform power activities.

scholarly journals Backward Running: Acute Effects on Sprint Performance in Preadolescent Boys

Sports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Petrakis ◽  
Eleni Bassa ◽  
Anastasia Papavasileiou ◽  
Anthi Xenofondos ◽  
Dimitrios A. Patikas
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Exertion ◽  
Acute Effect ◽  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Sprint Speed ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Alternative Means ◽  
Rest Time ◽  
Positive Effect

The aim of this study was to examine the acute effect of backward running (BwR) during warm-up on a 20-m sprint of boys’ performance, compared to forward running (FwR). Fourteen recreationally active preadolescent boys (aged 12.5 ± 0.5 years) were examined in 3 protocols: warm-up (control condition), warm-up with 3 × 10 m additional BwR sprints and warm-up with 3 × 10 m additional FwR sprints. Participants were evaluated 4 minutes after each protocol on a 20-m sprint and intermediate distances, as well as the rate of perceived exertion (RPE). Sprint speed across 10-20 m was significantly higher for the BwR warm-up compared to the regular warm-up (p < 0.05) and a significantly higher RPE after the BwR and FwR protocols compared to the control condition was recorded (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected across the distances 0–5, 5–10, 0–10 and 0–20 m. Although adding 3 × 10-m sprints of BwR or FwR after the warm-up did not enhance performance in a 20 m sprint of preadolescent boys, the positive effect of BwR across 10–20 m distance suggests that BwR could be an alternative means for enhancing performance for certain phases of a sprint for this age. However, preadolescent boys’ response to different sprint conditioning exercise stimuli and the optimization of rest time to maximize performance remain to be determined.

scholarly journals Complementing Warm-up with Stretching Routines: Effects in Sprint Performance

2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (03) ◽  
pp. E101-E106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Marinho ◽  
Maria Gil ◽  
Mario Cardoso Marques ◽  
Tiago Barbosa ◽  
Henrique Neiva
Keyword(s):  
Time Trial ◽  
Sprint Performance ◽  
Tympanic Temperature ◽  
Static Stretching ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Dynamic Stretching ◽  
College Age ◽  
Physiological Variables ◽  
Repeated Sprint ◽  
The Common

AbstactThe present study aimed to examine the effects of using static or dynamic stretching added to the common warm-up routine for short sprint distances and to repeated sprint performance. In 3 different sessions, 16 college-age men (n=10) and women (n=6) performed one of 3 warm-ups followed by a 2×60 m dash sprint time trial (5 min of rest) in a counterbalanced design. The control warm-up consisted of 10 min of light-intensity running, and the 2 experimental warm-ups included a static or dynamic stretching routine (5 exercises) in the control warm-up. Performance (time) and physiological variables (tympanic temperature, heart rate) were monitored. In the first 60 m time trial, there were no differences between the 3 warm-ups tested (F=0.21, p=0.73; ηp 2=0.01), as opposed to that observed in the second (F=7.04, p<0.01; ηp 2=0.32). The participants were 1.7% faster after the static stretching warm-up compared with the control warm-up. The sum of the time performed in the 2 sprints emphasizes these results, with better performances after the static stretching warm-up than the control (1%) or dynamic stretching warm-up (0.7%). These results suggest that including a set of static or dynamic stretching exercises may enhance sprinting performance. The better performance in the second trial after the warm-up including static stretching suggests that this type of stretching may positively influence repeated sprint performance (<10 s sprint).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document