Shadow Economy in Russian Regions: an Estimation with the MIMIC Model

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 2015-2032
Author(s):  
D.Yu. Fedotov ◽  
◽  
E.N. Nevzorova ◽  
E.N. Orlova ◽  
◽  
...  

OALib ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (07) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ahmed Magdy Abd El Aziz Mansour ◽  
Iman Moheb Zaki

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 78-86
Author(s):  
Tatiana E. Badokina ◽  
◽  
Olga M. Lizina ◽  

The shadow economy remains one of the main threats to Russia's national security. The close intertwining of the legal and illegal sectors of the economy negatively affects both economic and political, social and cultural processes in the country and individual regions. Assessing the scale of the spread of the shadow economy in Russian regions is important for development, determining the goals and development priorities of the Russian state and its subjects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-82
Author(s):  
Olga M. Lizina ◽  

Introduction. The level of the shadow economy is important for the development of any state, identifying the goals and priorities of its development. The shadow economy in Russia is the leading one among the problems that destroy the state system and pose a serious threat to national economic security. Materials and Methods. To identify the state of the shadow economy in the Russian Federation in the context of its regions, the tax approach was used, on the basis of which the GRP indicators and components were analyzed. Results. A comparison of statistical data with those provided by the Federal Tax Service made it possible to identify the scale of the shadow economy in Russian regions over the period from 2007 to 2018. An analysis of the data showed that from 2007 to 2009. there was a decrease in the level of the shadow economy, and, since 2009, its growth has been noted in most regions. Conclusion. The presence of unaccounted economic activity in all Russian regions poses a threat not only to the economic security of individual regions but also to the safe and sustainable development of the entire state. Analysis of the state of the shadow economy in Russian regions showed the unevenness of its development in different regions. To conduct an effective policy of countering shadow economic processes, it is important to identify their scale and take regional characteristics into account.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-301
Author(s):  
D. Yu. Fedotov ◽  

The study is devoted to verification the hypothesis that a higher tax burden does not necessarily lead to the growth in the shadow economy in Russian regions. The cross-regional comparative analysis was undertaken to measure the influence of the tax burden on the shadow economy. The analysis used Rosstat workforce surveys data about the number of informal workers nationwide and by sector from 2007 to 2019. Stochastic factor analysis was used to examine the relationship between the share of informal workers and such factors as the tax burden, GRP per capita, advanced production technologies, innovation activities of organizations, industrial sectors’ and social sectors’ contribution to GRP. To determine the strength of the relationship between the factors and the resultant indicator, a correlation and cluster analysis were conducted. It has shown that there is an inverse correlation between the tax burden and informal employment. Regions with a lower tax burden tend to have higher rates of informal employment (in 2019, the correlation coefficient was –0.4274). A similar inverse correlation is observed for the level of informal employment and the macro-economic indicators – GRP per capita, innovation, and the contribution of industrial sectors to GRP. There is a direct correlation between informal employment and the contribution of social sectors to GRP. These findings shed light on the key factors conducive to the growth in the shadow economy: what matters most is the economic and innovation lag in the development of certain regions. The results of this research can be useful for policy-makers seeking to address the problem of the shadow economy in regions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-77
Author(s):  
A. P. Kireenko ◽  
E. N. Nevzorova

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-304
Author(s):  
Olga Lizina ◽  
Dinara Bistyaykina ◽  
Eka Ermakova ◽  
Tatyana Badokina ◽  
Tatiana Solovyeva

The research into the shadow economy has scientific and practical value. Any state is interested in evaluating the size of the shadow economy as it affects the goals and priorities of the country’s development. This study presents a model for evaluating the shadow economy in the Russian Federation. The authors developed and analyzed an approach to measuring the shadow economy based on factor analysis and a MIMIC model. The study features the factor analysis of the official statistics for Russia over the period from 1992 to 2019, with more than 150 indicators characterizing different spheres of the life of the country. The authors determined the factors affected by the shadow economy, built a MIMIC model on this basis, and estimated the size of the shadow economy in Russia. Assessing the size of shadow activity is important for analyzing economic development and the impact of government regulations on the shadow sector


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-350
Author(s):  
Attiqa Jabbar ◽  
Javed Iqbal

This paper explicitly presents the estimation of the size and development of the shadow economy. The study examines the impact of multiple exogenous causes (observed variables) on the shadow economy (latent variable) and the size of the shadow economy influencing the performance of multiple macroeconomic indicators. In order to accomplish this econometric analysis, a MIMIC Model (Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes Model) is applied over the period 2011 to 2021. The results indicate that the tax burden, business freedom, unemployment rate, and Gross Domestic Product are the key driving forces of the shadow economy in Pakistan. The findings are potentially beneficial for the policymakers in identifying and dealing with the shadow economic activities as well as developing the strategies relevant to the economic policy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document