scholarly journals Eksploitasi Jasa Anak Menurut Undang-Undang ‎Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 dan Hukum Pidana Islam

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-302
Author(s):  
Shofiyul Fuad Hakiky

Abstract: Exploitation to a child is an inhumane act. Although a ban on the exploitation of child’s services is legally mentioned in legislation, but it is different in reality. We can see some adult people take their babies to begging, singing under traffic light, even they are recruited as factory workers and others. It is because the exploiters of the children’s service are less fear or underestimate to the existing sanctions under the child protection legislation No. 23 of 2002. The criminal sanction against perpetrators of child exploitation as contained in Law No. 23 of 2002 section 83, 84, and 88 is considered less straight.  On Islamic jurisprudence perspective, a child is in need of special attention. It can be in the form of guidance, education, and legal protection. Whatever is done by a child, it has not been subjected to the burden of law. So that even if the child was given a penalty, then the punishment should be an educational one, not to exceed the limit of a child’s ability. On the other hands, considering the mental and psychological effects of the child is quite important for his/her development in the future. Keywords: Exploitation, children’s services, law, Islamic criminal law.   Abstrak: Eksploitasi anak merupakan tindakan yang tidak berperikemanusiaan. Meskipun larangan eksploitasi jasa anak ada dalam undang-undang, tetapi pada kenyataannya masih terjadi, contohnya; anak bayi yang diajak orang tuanya mengemis, mengamen di pingir perempatan lampu lalu lintas, buruh pabrik, dan lain-lain. Hal tersebut dikarenakan pelaku eksploitasi jasa anak kurang takut atau meremehkan sanksi yang ada dalam undang-undang perlindungan anak No.23 tahun 2002. Sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku eksploitasi jasa anak yang tercantum dalam Undang-undang No. 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak terletak pada pasal 83, 84, dan 88. Dalam pandangan fiqh anak-anak perlu mendapat perhatian khusus, berupa pembinaan, pendidikan, dan perlindungan hukum. Apapun yang dilakukan oleh anak-anak belum dikenai beban hukum, sehingga kalaupun anak itu diberikan sanksi, maka sanksinya harus bersifat pendidikan, tidak melampaui batas kemampuan anak, dan harus mempertimbangkan efeknya terhadap perkembangan jiwa anak. Kata Kunci: Eksploitasi, jasa, anak, undang-undang, Hukum pidana Islam.

2016 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-263
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Ahadi

The present paper constitutes an attempt towards questioning the adequacy of the prevalent approached employed by Islamic jurisprudence and statute law in dealing with mens rea and its manifestations. It also provides a kind of reinterpretation of the concept since it attaches itself to the perspective that the concepts employed in criminal law need evolution in order to preserve their function and practicality; the conditions appertaining thereto necessitating adaptability of the concepts with the contextual conditions as well as the principles of the criminal law. Under criminal law, mens rea is referred to as ‘criminal intent or the state of mind indicating culpability which is required by statute as an element of a crime’ (see, for example, Staples v United States, 511 US 600 (1994)). Under Islamic jurisprudence it is defined as ‘rebellion intent’. These conceptualisations of the mens rea may be subject to evolution as well as the other concepts. The present paper provides a reformulation of these definitions wherein mens rea is considered to be ‘the culpable linkage of mind with the forbidden conduct’. Through this reformulation the author replaces the ‘state’ with ‘linkage’ presupposing that the interpretation of the term ‘culpable’, as an independent constituent, shall vary according to the provisions of common sense and the contextual conditions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Blerta Arifi ◽  
Besa Kadriu

In this paper the author will analyze the legal treatment of juvenile delinquency in Republic of Macedonia, in historical aspect of the development of its legislation. In this way it will be presented the place of the criminal law for juveniles in the criminal legal system of the country and its development during today. The study will be focused on the innovation of legal protection of delinquent children, especially it will be analyzed the sanctioning of juvenile perpetrators and their special treatment from the majors in Republic of Macedonia. It will be a chronological comparison reflect of the juvenile sanctioning based on some of laws in Macedonia such as: Criminal Code of Former Yugoslavia, Criminal Code of Republic of Macedonia (1996), Law on Juvenile Justice (2007) and Law on Child protection (2013). The purpose of the study is to bring out the types of criminal sanctions for juveniles in Republic of Macedonia from its independence until today which, above all, are aimed on protecting the interests of the juvenile delinquents. Also the author of this paper will attach importance to the so-called “Measures of assistance and protection” provided by the Law on Child protection of Republic of Macedonia, which represent an innovation in the country's criminal law. This study is expected to draw conclusions about how it started to become independent itself the delinquency of minors as a separate branch from criminal law in the broad sense – and how much contemporary are the sanctions to minors from 1996 until today.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-192
Author(s):  
Tengku Fachreza Akhbar A ◽  
Maswandi Maswandi ◽  
Arie Kartika

Protection of children as perpetrators of crime will never stop throughout the history of life, because children are the next generation of the nation and the next generation of development, that is, the generation prepared as subjects for implementing sustainable development and controlling the future of a country. This type of research is normative juridical and descriptive analyst. The legal arrangements for the theft of violence with the result that the death of a victim is regulated in Article 365 of the Criminal Law Act, linked to Law 35 of 2014 Amendment to Law No.23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and Law No. 11 of 2012 Amendment to Law No. 3 of 1997 concerning Juvenile Courts. Legal protection that children get protection, accompanied by a Legal Counsel, Psychologist, the existence of peace efforts between the parties concerned. Sanctions and sentences in Decision No. 37 / Pid.Sus-Anak / 2017 / PN. Mdn because the perpetrators violated Article 365 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Code, considering Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children, the offender was sentenced to a prison sentence of six years.


Author(s):  
Marina Simović ◽  
Vladimir Simović

Life imprisonment is the term for a prison sentence based on which a convicted person remains in prison for their whole life. After the death penalty, it is the severest criminal sanction. Many countries have introduced it in their legislation as a substitute for the death penalty. On the other hand, many legislations have, along with the long-term sentence, introduced the possibility of the convicts’ release, most often conditional release. From the second half of the 20th century onwards, life imprisonment as well as the death penalty has most often been regarded an inhumane and inefficient sanction, given that people sentenced to life imprisonment are considered permanently excluded from society, that is, losing any kind of interest in rehabilitation. This paper analyses the issues related to long-term sentences - life imprisonment in the countries of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) and in the contemporary European criminal law.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih

Problems of sexual offenses against children arising from the enforcement of the criminal law has not been oriented to the protection of victims, especially justice, but rather on the application of penalties on the offender. As a result, not make people afraid of committing a crime of morality, even more perpetrators of rape and sexual abuse against children. the problem in this research is how the provisions of the legal protection of children as victims of sexual offenses under criminal law are positive today.Legal protection of child victims of crime in the criminal law of chastity positive current on Article 287, 290, 292, 293, 294 and 295 of the Criminal Code and Article 81 and 82 of the Act.No. 23/2002, as amended. Act. No. 35 of 2014 as amended by Government Regulation No.1 / 2016 on the amendment of the Law No. 23/2002 on Child Protection, and when the victims are included in the scope of the household, then apply the provisions of Articles 46 and 47 of the Law. No. 23/2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence, and Law No. 31/2014 on Witnessand Victim Protection. weakness that emerged in the Act. No. 31/2014 is the absence of a provision governing the sanctions when players do not give restitution to the victims.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
Ratna Azis Prasetyo

Abstract. This article aims to explain the concept of pedophilia in terms of the perpetrators, criminality and child protection aspects. During this time children who are victims of pedophiliac suffer prolonged psychological injuries and even lead to death. Meanwhile, the legal settlement is not yet comparable to the injuries suffered by the victims and light punishment tends to make the sexual violence repeated. One of the light sentences for pedophiliacs is that the criminal law in this country has not specifically regulated criminal offenses and on the other hand, the concept of pedophilia is still considered as a mental disorder. Therefore, in handling it is not enough to rely on a legal approach, more than that the handling orientation needs to be directed at child protection. This is done by taking preventive measures such as fostering social sensitivity of the community, optimizing the role of social agents such as local social and institutional organizations and instilling early sex education in children.  Abstrak. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan konsep pedophilia ditinjau dari aspek pelaku, kriminalitas dan perlindungan anak. Selama ini anak-anak yang menjadi korban para pedophiliac mengalami luka psikologis berkepanjangan dan bahkan berujung kematian. Sementara itu, penyelesaian secara hukum dirasa belum sebanding dengan luka yang dialami korban dan hukuman yang ringan cenderung membuat tindakan kekerasan seksual tersebut terulang. Hukuman yang ringan bagi para pedophiliac ini salah satunya karena hukum pidana di negara ini belum mengatur secara khusus dalam delik pidana dan disisi lain, konsep pedophilia ini masih dianggap sebagai salah satu gangguan mental. Oleh sebab itu, dalam penanganannya tidak cukup dengan mengandalkan pendekatan hukum, lebih dari itu orientasi penanganan perlu diarahkan pada perlindungan anak. Caranya dengan melakukan upaya-upaya preventif seperti menumbuhkan kepekaan sosial masyarakat, mengoptimalkan peran agen-agen sosial seperti organisasi kemasyarakatan dan kelembagaan lokal dan menanamkan pendidikan seks usia dini pada anak-anak. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Didi Wahyudi Sunansyah ◽  
Aryani Witasari

The formulation in this study were 1) How allotment setting penalty in child protection legislation in order to protect the child as a victim? 2) How is the effectiveness of the penalty in the Child Protection Act?Method sociological approach juridical law and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. Even sources and types of data in this study are primary data obtained from interviews with field studies Supervising Officers Society Child (PK Child) of the Penal Hall Cirebon and Head of Correctional Cirebon, And secondary data obtained from the study of literature. Data were analyzed qualitatively. The problems studied by the theory of progressive legal protection and law.Based on the results of this study concluded under Appropriation settings Criminal Penalty In Child Protection Act is not describe protect children as victims, because the penalty to be paid by the convict is intended for countries not intended for children who are victims of crime. Appropriation effectiveness Criminal Judge Penalty That Dropped In Case of Children in the Context of the Protection of Children As Victims are Criminal penalties in the Law on Child Protection was not effective in reality, as more convicts chose imprisonment in lieu of penalty are not paid, compared to paying the penalty, it has implications for the expenditure of state finances are more likely to pay for convicts in prisons and to make prisons more crowded or over capacity.Keywords: Effectiveness; Penalty; Justice; Protection; Child.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-398
Author(s):  
M. Imam Tarmudzi

Abstract: This paper explains that Islamic criminal law had already set and explained the legal protection for child. Even, Islam itself protects child from anything that may harm him. The protections include: the childcare, supervision, protection and education. While in Law No. 23 Year 2002 on protection of child explains mechanism of a labor child protection which includes juridical protection, non judicial protection, and protection from slavery and exploitation of child. These laws equally prohibit child to work if it is not in accordance with the existing law. The difference is that law distinguishes between crime and violation based on the heavy and light of the punishment, while Islamic criminal law does not distinguish both. They  all are called jarîmah (crime) by their nature of the crime.Keywords: Legal protection, child labor, informal sector, Islamic criminal law. Abstrak: Tulisan ini menjelaskan bahwa hukum pidana Islam sudah mengatur dan menjelaskan tentang perlindungan hukum bagi anak.I Islam  mengatur tentang perlindungan terhadap anak dari sesuatu yang dapat membahayakan dirinya, yang meliputi; pengasuhan, pengawasan, perlindungan dan pendidikan. Dalam Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak menjelaskan tentang mekanisme perlindungan terhadap anak yang menjadi pekerja anak yang meliputi; perlindungan dalam bidang yuridis dan non yuridis, selain itu pula ada perlindungan dari perbudakan dan eksploitasi anak. Kedua hukum tersebut, hukum Islam dan Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, sama-sama melarang anak bekerja jika tidak sesuai dengan syarat-syarat hukum yang berlaku, adapun perbedaannya adalah dalam Undang-undang membedakan antara kejahatan atau pelanggaran mengingat berat ringannya hukuman, sedangkan hukum pidana Islam tidak membedakannya, semuanya disebut jarîmah mengingat sifat pidananya.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan hukum, pekerja anak, sektor informal.  


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Blerta Arifi ◽  
Besa Kadriu

In this paper the author will analyze the legal treatment of juvenile delinquency in Republic of Macedonia, in historical aspect of the development of its legislation. In this way it will be presented the place of the criminal law for juveniles in the criminal legal system of the country and its development during today. The study will be focused on the innovation of legal protection of delinquent children, especially it will be analyzed the sanctioning of juvenile perpetrators and their special treatment from the majors in Republic of Macedonia. It will be a chronological comparison reflect of the juvenile sanctioning based on some of laws in Macedonia such as: Criminal Code of Former Yugoslavia, Criminal Code of Republic of Macedonia (1996), Law on Juvenile Justice (2007) and Law on Child protection (2013). The purpose of the study is to bring out the types of criminal sanctions for juveniles in Republic of Macedonia from its independence until today which, above all, are aimed on protecting the interests of the juvenile delinquents. Also the author of this paper will attach importance to the so-called “Measures of assistance and protection” provided by the Law on Child protection of Republic of Macedonia, which represent an innovation in the country's criminal law. This study is expected to draw conclusions about how it started to become independent itself the delinquency of minors as a separate branch from criminal law in the broad sense – and how much contemporary are the sanctions to minors from 1996 until today.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
NFN NURCHALIS

Penghindaran pajak yang dilakukan dengan skema tertentu oleh wajib pajak badan, dalam hal ini korporasi telah menjadi permasalahan yang sulit diatasi dengan instrumen perundang-undangan yang ada saat ini khususnya melalui ketentuan pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas Undang Undang Ketentuan Umum Perpajakan Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 sebagaimana telah diubah berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 (selanjutnya disebut UU KUP), spesifik ketentuan pidananya dalam mengatasi penghindaran pajak oleh wajib pajak badan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data disajikan secara deskriptif untuk mendapatkan kesimpulan yang terkait setiap pokok penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan masih kurang memadainya perangkat pidana dalam UU KUP, diindikasikan dengan masih tingginya nilai penghindaran pajak oleh wajib pajak badan. Pembinaan wajib pajak sebagai tujuan pidana pajak tidaklah berjalan semestinya, terlihat dari kultur pajak wajib pajak badan yang masih menganggap pajak sebagai beban untuk diefisienkan, mulai dari pelaku usaha, hingga akademisi. Dalam penerapannya, pidana pajakpun diterapkan sesuai unsur subjektif dan objektif ketentuan pidana Pasal 38-39 UU KUP. Namun UU KUP ternyata masih menganut pemidanaan terhadap orang pribadi sebagaimana dianut KUHP/KUHAP tanpa ada penjelasan lebih lanjut, sehingga menjadi masalah dalam penerapannya terhadap korporasi. Namun dengan adanya Perma Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 maka hal itu dapat dilakukan, meskipun bersifat formil. Disisi lain, pidana UU perpajakan meskipun dikatakan menganut asas ultimum remedium namun kenyataannya, ketentuan pidananya masih banyak yang menganut pidana sebagai premium remedium.Tax evasion by the corporate taxpayer has become difficult to overcome with existing legislation instrument especially by criminal law. This research analyzes the effectiveness of Law Number 6 of 1983 on General Provisions of Taxation as amended by Law Number 16 of 2009 (hereinafter UU KUP), Specifically through its criminal provision, against the corporate taxpayer. This research was a normative legal research with qualitative analysis method. The research was presented descriptively in order to draw the conclusion about each subject of the research. The research result showed the inadequate enforcement of UU KUP showing the high indication of the tax evasion by the corporate taxpayer. The control system of the taxpayer through criminal sanction had not run effectively, it was seen by the culture of the corporate taxpayer who still regards taxes as burdens to be addressed, ranging from business actors to academics. Furthermore, the tax crime was applied according to the subjective and objective elements of the criminal regulation Article 38-39 of UU KUP. However, UU KUP holds punishment system against only individuals as a law subject without any further explanation, as adopted by KUHP / KUHAP. Thus becoming a problem in its application to corporations. Nevertheless, with the presence of Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016, this case could be done, although it is still a formal regulation. On the other hand, the taxation law, though it was said that it held the principle of ultimum remedium, in reality, its criminal provision was still much embraced the crime as the premium remedium.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document