Wheel traffic can lead to compaction and degradation of soil physical
properties. This study, as part of a study of controlled traffic farming,
assessed the impact of compaction from wheel traffic on soil that had not been
trafficked for 5 years. A tractor of 40 kN rear axle weight was used to apply
traffic at varying wheelslip on a clay soil with varying residue cover to
simulate effects of traffic typical of grain production operations in the
northern Australian grain belt. A rainfall simulator was used to determine
infiltration characteristics.
Wheel traffic significantly reduced time to ponding, steady infiltration rate,
and total infiltration compared with non-wheeled soil, with or without residue
cover. Non-wheeled soil had 4—5 times greater steady infiltration
rate than wheeled soil, irrespective of residue cover. Wheelslip greater than
10% further reduced steady infiltration rate and total infiltration
compared with that measured for self-propulsion wheeling (3% wheelslip)
under residue-protected conditions. Where there was no compaction from wheel
traffic, residue cover had a greater effect on infiltration capacity, with
steady infiltration rate increasing proportionally with residue cover
(R 2 = 0.98). Residue
cover, however, had much less effect on inf iltration when wheeling was
imposed.
These results demonstrated that the infiltration rate for the non-wheeled soil
under a controlled traffic zero-till system was similar to that of virgin
soil. However, when the soil was wheeled by a medium tractor wheel,
infiltration rate was reduced to that of long-term cropped soil. These results
suggest that wheel traffic, rather than tillage and cropping, might be the
major factor governing infiltration. The exclusion of wheel traffic under a
controlled traffic farming system, combined with conservation tillage,
provides a way to enhance the sustainability of cropping this soil for
improved infiltration, increased plant-available water, and reduced
runoff-driven soil erosion.