scholarly journals Sobre la equidad contractual y la obligatoriedad del vínculo: Una mirada a la luz de la protección jurídica del contratante débil

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 174-206
Author(s):  
Renzo Munita Marambio ◽  

Contractual fairness and the will’s role on the bindingness of contracts can be regarded as essential elements for the task of juridically argument that it is possible to find enough tools within the law of obligations to protect the contracting party that is in a weak position with respect to the other. In this sense, it is not necessary to have the status of a consumer to be entitled to the aforementioned protection, since such regime can be articulated from particular notions integrated to our legal system. In this framework, the modern interpretation of legitimate trust and contractual equilibrium are stressed. These notions can be inspired by the favor debilis criterion rather than the notion of good faith. This criterion is fundamental to define the directive line of this work.

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 441
Author(s):  
Indah Esti Cahyani ◽  
Aryani Witasari

Nominee agreement is an agreement made between someone who by law can not be the subject of rights to certain lands (property rights), in this case that foreigners (WNA) and Indonesian Citizen (citizen), with the intention that the foreigners can master land de facto property rights, but legal-formal (de jure) land property rights are assigned to his Indonesian citizen. The purpose of this paper isto assess the position of the nominee agreement in Indonesia's legal system and the legal consequences arising in terms of the draft Civil Code and the Law on Agrarian. Agreement is an agreement unnamed nominee made based on the principle of freedom of contract and good faith of the parties. However, it should be noted that the law prohibits foreigners make agreements / related statement stock wealth / property (land) for and on behalf of others, sehingga the legal consequences of the agreement is the nominee of the agreement is not legally enforceable because the agreement was made on a false causa.Keywords: Nominee Agreement; Property Rights; Foreigners.


1963 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wallace Mendelson

A generation ago “legal realists” led by Jerome Frank and Karl Llewellyn dismissed law as a myth—a function of what judges had for breakfast. The important thing, they insisted, was what a court did, not what it said. No doubt this was good medicine for the times. Yet, however broad Frank's 1930 language, later on the bench he loyally acknowledged the compulsive force of legal rules. As a lower court judge, he decided cases in accordance with what he found the law to be—and on occasion he made clear in addenda what he thought it ought to be.Llewellyn, too, changed his mind. In 1934 he had said, “The theory that rules decide cases seems for a century to have fooled, not only library-ridden recluses, but judges.” Seventeen years later he confessed that his earlier behavioral descriptions of law contained “unhappy words when not more fully developed, and they are plainly at best a very partial statement of the whole truth.”In short, after their initial enthusiasm, these and other legal realists recognized that there is and must be law in the judicial process, as well as discretion. This was inevitable, for society can no more dispense with order and coherence than it can deny the demands of changing circumstance. We must have stability, yet we cannot stand still; and so the legal system inevitably has both static and dynamic qualities. Holmes put it in a thimble: “The … law is always approaching, and never reaching, consistency. It is forever adopting new principles from life at one end, and it always retains old ones from history at the other, which have not been absorbed or sloughed off. It will become entirely consistent only when it ceases to grow.”


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Baines

This article addresses a research gap by analysing the way the Australian legal system is balancing the right to religious autonomy of organisations and the right of lgbti individuals not to be discriminated against, and considers what ought to be the case. I argue that the Australian legal system recognises the value of religious freedom on the one hand, and on the other hand, does not place a high priority on protecting it as an existing human right. My findings reveal that the Australian legal system is not always defining the religion and society relationship in ways that reflect the lived reality of religion in society. The issue is compounded by the wording of religious exemptions under anti-discrimination law which is contested within faith communities. As a consequence, religious freedom can be unfairly restricted. I conclude with recommendations to improve the status quo.


Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

Many of the contracts written by non-specialists who cannot set them correctly but sometimes it happened that the most accurate contracts need the interpretation, too. In this case, the parties may have to refer to the court and the judge is obligated to discover the real intention of parties. Courts for solving disputes arising from contracts, need specific rules to prevent disagreements. The rules of interpretation of the contracts in Afghan law and Iranian law are in two categories: inside rules that search in the text. The most important inside rules are positive interpretation (terms to be given effect), pay attention to the nature of the contract, analogy, and reference to the contract as a whole. The judges in Afghanistan and Iran do not limit themself to the contracts. They also pay attention to outside rules like the interpretation of the contracts in favor of promisor, good faith, the law, and contra proferentem rule. In Iranian law –despite Afghanistan- the rules of interpretation of the contracts are not explained and merely mentions scattered examples.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Mansari Mansari ◽  
Reza Maulana

ABSTRAKAnak yang telah mumayiz diberikan kebebasan memilih tinggal bersama ibu atau ayahnya. Kesempatan untuk memilih harus dinyatakan secara eksplisit dalam putusan untuk menghindari konflik di kemudian hari antara kedua orang tuanya. Berbeda dalam Putusan Nomor 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA yang tidak langsung menetapkan anak yang telah mumayiz diasuh oleh ibu atau ayahnya. Hal ini dikhawatirkan akan menimbulkan persoalan hukum di kemudian hari demi memperebutkan anak tersebut. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana aspek kepastian hukum terhadap pemeliharaan anak mumayiz dalam Putusan Nomor 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA, dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi anak mumayiz yang belum menentukan pilihannya? Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian empiris dan datanya diperoleh melalui wawancara hakim dan putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Nomor 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA tidak mencerminkan kepastian hukum bagi anak yang telah mumayiz. Hal ini dikarenakan anak yang berumur 14 dan 18 tahun tidak jelas berada di bawah pengasuhan ibu atau ayahnya. Perlindungan hukum bagi anak mumayiz yang belum menentukan sikap/pilihan menjadi kewajiban bersama kedua orang tua untuk mengasuh dan memeliharanya. Jika anak sudah menentukan pilihan dan memilih ibu sebagai pengasuhnya, maka ia wajib memelihara dan mengasuhnya hingga dewasa dan ayah berkewajiban memberikan nafkah kepadanya. Sebaliknya, jika ayah menjadi pilihannya, kewajiban mengasuh, merawat, dan menafkahi menjadi kewajibannya.Kata kunci: kepastian hukum, pengasuhan, perceraian, anak mumayiz. ABSTRACTA Minor who has been mumayiz is given freedom to choose to live either with the mother or father. The decision should be explicitly stated in court decision to avoid future conflicts between the parents. In contrast, Court Decision Number 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA did not in a straight line determine the status of a minor who has been mumayiz to be raised by either the mother or father. This could lead to legal dispute of fighting over the minor in the future. The question is how the legal certainty in the custody of minors with mumayyiz status in Court Decision Number 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA and how the law provide protection for them who have not made their choice yet? This study is done by empirical research and the data collected through interviews of judges and the ruling of Syar’iyah Court of Banda Aceh. The results show that the Court Decision Number 175/ PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA does not reflect legal certainty for the minors with the status of mumayiz. This is because the law does not set off that minors aged of 14 and 18 are in care of their mother or father. While the law has set for minors who have not mumayiz because of the existence of parenting to the mother has been confirmed in the verdict. Legal protection for undecided custody of mumayiz minors will be obliged to their both parents to nurture and raise. If the child has made a choice and chooses the mother as the caregiver, then she is obliged to care and nurture the child to adulthood, and the father is obliged to provide a livelihood for the child. On the other hand, if the father becomes the child’s choice, the obligation to care, nurture, and provide a livelihood becomes his duty.Keywords: legal certainty, custody, divorce, mumayiz minors.


Author(s):  
G.D. Gabarashvili

The reign of Hadrian (117-138 A.D.) is characterized by important changes in the legal system. This article examines the activities of Hadrian and his lawyers concerning the systematization of the edicts of the praetors and preparation of Edictum perpetuum, a key source for the further development of not only Roman, but also world law. In particular, extracts from the works of Salvius Julianus, Hadrian's leading lawyer, were included in Justinian's Digests. Hadrian's attempts to centralize legislative power in the hands of the Princeps are noted, on the one hand, and the weakening of the influence of lawyers, magistrates, and the Senate on the regulation of law, on the other. The changes in Roman law made by Hadrian, the improvement of the status of freedmen and slaves, and the destruction of the ancient Patriarchal family are indicated. The article analyzes the constitutions of the Princeps, their features and differences from the lawmaking of magistrates, and attempts to summarize the significance of the legislative policy of the Emperor Hadrian.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Andryan Dwi Prabawa ◽  
Hernawan Hadi

<p>Abstract<br />This study aims to determine about status tender committe and law enforcement on the tender committe in the case of bid rigging in Indonesia. The research methods is normative descriptive law with the legislation (statue approach) to the regulations relating to The Article 22 of The Act Anti Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition.The kind of data which was used was secondary data which was obtained by using literature review data collecting technique, the next was analyzed by doing law interpretation systematically . The results of the study,  the status tender committe in bid rigging cases in Indonesia according to the elements of The Article 22 of The Act Anti Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition is categorized as the other parties elements vertically. Law enforcement on the tender committee can not be implemented by KPPU because the limited authority of KPPU in enforcing the law against the tender committee.</p><p>Keyword: Business Competition; Bid Rigging; Tender Committee</p><p>Abstrak<br />Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang kedudukan hukum panitia tender dan penegakan hukum terhadap panitia tender dalam kasus persekongkolan tender di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan terhadap peraturan yang berkaitan dengan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Anti Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jenis data yang digunakan berupa data sekunder yang diperoleh dengan teknik pengumpulan data berdasarkan studi kepustakaan yang selanjutnya dianalisis dengan melaksanakan penafsiran hukum secara sistematis. Adapun hasil kajian yaitu kedudukan hukum panitia tender dalam kasus persekongkolan tender di Indonesia menurut unsur yang terkandung dalam Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Anti  Monopoli  dan  Persaingan  Usaha Tidak  Sehat  dikategorikan  sebagai  unsur  pihak  lain secara vertikal. Penegakan hukum terhadap panitia tender tidak dapat dilaksanakan oleh KPPU karena terbatasnya kewenangan KPPU dalam penegakan hukum terhadap panitia tender.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Persaingan Usaha; Persekongkolan Tender; Panitia Tender</p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 222-250
Author(s):  
Stuart Banner

This chapter examines the status of natural law in the legal system over the past century. In law schools, natural law never ceased to be a topic of study. This academic interest in natural law has had almost no effect on the working legal system, where natural law has been relied upon by only the most idiosyncratic of judges and lawyers. The history of our use of natural law has nevertheless continued to exert influence on the legal system, which still contains doctrines and practices that were once based on the law of nature.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-42
Author(s):  
Folker Bittmann

The aim of German criminal procedural law is not to convict the accused at any cost. Even a guilty party can only be convicted if the criminal procedure is held in accordance with the law. If this is not possible, the German legal system accepts the risk of possibly acquitting a guilty party; it finds this more tolerable than the irregular conviction of the culprit. A criminal procedure seeks the truth. Only on the basis of a judicial conviction of the crime and its culprit may a sentence be imposed. This, though, can only be based on the so-calledprocedural truth.On the one hand, the past can never be reconstructed precisely; on the other hand, clarification can only be found through legal means and by following designated paths allowed by procedural law. Therefore, further investigation must cease if it is only possible to proceed by violating procedural law.


1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. I. Lukashuk

The principle that treaty obligations must be fulfilled in good faith is one aspect of the fundamental rule that requires all subjects of international law to exercise in good faith their rights and duties under that law.In the sociopolitical sphere, this fundamental principle may be seen as manifesting the need perceived by states for an international legal system that can ensure international order and prevent arbitrary behavior and chaos. In the legal sphere, the principle is confirmation of the character of international law as law. Subjects of international law are legally bound under the principle to implement what the law prescribes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document