scholarly journals THE PANC 3 SCORE PREDICTING SEVERITY OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo Gamba BEDUSCHI ◽  
André Luiz Parizi MELLO ◽  
Bruno VON-MÜHLEN ◽  
Orli FRANZON
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Positive Score

Background: About 20% of cases of acute pancreatitis progress to a severe form, leading to high mortality rates. Several studies suggested methods to identify patients that will progress more severely. However, most studies present problems when used on daily practice. Objective: To assess the efficacy of the PANC 3 score to predict acute pancreatitis severity and its relation to clinical outcome. Methods: Acute pancreatitis patients were assessed as to sex, age, body mass index (BMI), etiology of pancreatitis, intensive care need, length of stay, length of stay in intensive care unit and mortality. The PANC 3 score was determined within the first 24 hours after diagnosis and compared to acute pancreatitis grade of the Revised Atlanta classification. Results: Out of 64 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis, 58 met the inclusion criteria. The PANC 3 score was positive in five cases (8.6%), pancreatitis progressed to a severe form in 10 cases (17.2%) and five patients (8.6%) died. Patients with a positive score and severe pancreatitis required intensive care more often, and stayed for a longer period in intensive care units. The PANC 3 score showed sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 100%, accuracy of 91.4%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 90.6% in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis. Conclusion: The PANC 3 score is useful to assess acute pancreatitis because it is easy and quick to use, has high specificity, high accuracy and high predictive value in prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Rhinocerebral mucormycosis secondary to severe acute pancreatitis and diabetic ketoacidosis: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinjing Wang ◽  
Yao Li ◽  
Shuai Luo ◽  
Hong Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Optimal Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis ◽  
Patient Prognosis ◽  
Treatment Window

Abstract Introduction Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is a rare and severe form of opportunistic fungal infection that can develop rapidly and cause significant mortality, particularly among diabetic patients suffering from ketoacidosis. Diagnosing rhinocerebral mucormycosis during the early stages of infection is challenging. Case presentation We describe a case of rhinocerebral mucormycosis secondary to severe acute pancreatitis in a patient suffering from diabetic ketoacidosis. In this case, the condition was not diagnosed during the optimal treatment window. we therefore provide a thorough overview of related clinical findings and histopathological characteristics, and we discuss potential differential diagnoses. Conclusions In summary, we described a case of rhinocerebral mucormycosis secondary to severe acute pancreatitis in a patient suffering from diabetic ketoacidosis, with the optimal treatment window for this condition having been missed. This report suggests that a definitive mucormycosis diagnosis can be made based upon tissue biopsy that reveals the presence of characteristic hyphae. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential in order to improve patient prognosis.

scholarly journals Oxid Comparative Analysis of the Significance of BISAP and MEWS Score for an Early Assessment of Illness Severity and Treatment Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivera Marinkovic ◽  
Slađana Trpkovic ◽  
Ana Sekulic ◽  
Aleksandra N. Ilic ◽  
Nataša Zdravkovc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Additional Costs ◽  
Vital Parameters

Abstract The aim of this study was to determine the significance of the use of the BISAP score, which is specific for patients with AP, in relation to the application of the MEWS score that is important for assessing the condition of critically ill patients in intensive care units, but is not specific for patients with AP. The research was conducted as a cohort prospective study and included patients of both sexes, older than 18 and diagnosed with AP. BISAP and MEWS score were monitored at least at four time points: on admission to the hospital (zero), 48 hours, 72 hours and 7 days after admission to the hospital. High levels of discrimination between patients with fatal outcome and cured patients are determined in both cases, with discrimination at MEWS being somewhat higher than BISAP score. The BISAP0 had the best discrimination for BISAP score, AUROC (0.807) and also MEWS0 for MEWS score, AUROC (0.899). In our research, the highest sensitivity was shown by BISAP7d (92.1%) and MEWS48 (88.1%), and a high specificity of 87.5% had BISAP score, 48h, 72h and MEWS score at all four points of measurement. BISAP score has a better prognostic value in relation to the form of pancreatitis, the development of complications and the outcome. However, the calculation of the MEWS score is based on monitoring the basic vital parameters so that its application is much simpler and does not require additional costs.

scholarly journals Comparison of BISAP and Ranson’s score for predicting severe acute pancreatitis and establish the validity of BISAP score

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1473
Author(s):  
Amulya Aggarwal ◽  
Alok V. Mathur ◽  
Ram K. Verma ◽  
Megha Gupta ◽  
Dheeraj Raj
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Clinical Scoring

Background: Pancreatitis can lead to serious complications with severe morbidity and mortality. So an early, quick and accurate scoring system is necessary to stratify the patients according to their severity so as to enable early initiation of required management and care. Scoring system commonly used have some drawbacks. This study aimed to compare bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) and Ranson’s score to predict severe acute pancreatitis and establish the validity of a simple and accurate clinical scoring system for stratifying patients.Methods: This is a prospective comparative study on 100 patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis admitted in department of general surgery. Parameters included in the BISAP and Ranson’s criteria were studied at the time of admission and after 48 hours. Result of these two were compared with that of revised Atlanta classification.Results: As per the BISAP score, the sensitivity and specificity were 95.8 % (95% CI, 76.8-99.8), 94.7 % (95% CI, 86.3-98.3) whereas positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio 18.21 (95% CI, 6.9-47.44), 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.30) and accuracy was 95 % (95% CI, 88.72%-98.36%). On using Ranson’s score, the sensitivity and specificity were 91.6 (95% CI, 71.5-98.5) and 89.4 (95% CI, 79.8-95) with a positive predictive value 8.71 (95% CI, 4.47-18.96) and negative predictive value of 0.09 (95% CI, 0.02-0.35) and accuracy of 90% (95% CI, 82.38%-95.10%)..Conclusions: BISAP score outperformed Ranson’s score in terms of Sensitivity and specificity of prediction of severe pancreatitis. The authors recommend inclusion of BISAP Scoring system in standard treatment protocol of management of acute pancreatitis.

Hospital Length of Stay Among Patients Receiving Intermittent Versus Prolonged Piperacillin/Tazobactam Infusion in the Intensive Care Units

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannie D. Chan ◽  
Timothy H. Dellit ◽  
John B. Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Average Duration ◽  
Intermittent Infusion ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Prolonged Infusion

Objectives: We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) patients following a hospital-wide initiative of prolonged piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) infusion. Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients >18 years old who was hospitalized in the ICU receiving PIP/TAZ for >72 hours during the preimplementation (June 1, 2010 to May 31, 2011) and postimplementation (July 7, 2011 to June 30, 2014) periods. Results: There were 124 and 429 patients who met inclusion criteria with average age of 54.3 and 56.9 years, and average duration of PIP/TAZ therapy was 6.1 ± 2.8 days and 5.9 ± 3.4 days in the pre- and postimplementation period, respectively. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay (LOS) following initiation of PIP/TAZ were 8.0 ± 8.4 days versus 6.4 ± 6.8 days and 26.3 ± 22.8 days versus 20.4 ± 16.1 days among patients in the pre- and postimplementation periods, respectively. Compared to patients who received intermittent PIP/TAZ infusion, the adjusted difference in ICU and hospital LOS was 0.6 ± 0.8 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.9 to 2.1 days) and 5.6 ± 2.1 days (95% CI: 1.4 - 9.7 days) shorter among patients who received prolonged PIP/TAZ infusion. At hospital discharge, 19 (15.3%) intermittent infusion and 74 (17.2%) prolonged infusion recipients had died. In comparison to intermittent infusion recipients, the adjusted odds ratio for mortality was 1.17 (95% CI: 0.65-2.1) with prolonged infusion. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a reduction in hospital LOS with prolonged PIP/TAZ infusion among critically ill patients. Randomized trials are needed to further validate these findings.

Predictive value of apolipoprotein B and A-I ratio in severe acute pancreatitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 548-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Huh ◽  
Saehyun Jung ◽  
Seung Kook Cho ◽  
Kyong Joo Lee ◽  
Jae Woo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Apolipoprotein B

scholarly journals Factors Impacting the Performance Characteristics of Bile Duct Brushings: A Clinico-Cytopathologic Analysis of 253 Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (7) ◽  
pp. 863-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezgi Hacihasanoglu ◽  
Bahar Memis ◽  
Burcin Pehlivanoglu ◽  
Vaidehi Avadhani ◽  
Alexa A. Freedman, ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Performance Characteristics ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Current State ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Context.— Literature on factors impacting bile duct brushings (BDBs) performance characteristics remain limited. Objective.— To capture the current state of daily practice with BDB sign-out. Design.— Two hundred fifty-three of 444 BDBs signed out by more than 7 cytopathologists, with histopathologic and/or clinical follow-up of at least 18 months, were examined. Results.— One hundred thirty-five of 253 BDBs (53%) had histologically confirmed malignancies, 22 (9%) had cancer-related deaths, and 96 (38%) were benign. Cytologic diagnoses in the 444 BDBs were nondiagnostic (11 [2.5%]), negative (284 [64%]), atypical (62 [13.9%]), suspicious (34 [7.7%]), and malignant (53 [11.9%]). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of malignancy detection were 35%, 100%, 100%, 58%, and 66%, respectively. When atypical, suspicious, and malignant (ASM) categories were combined, sensitivity increased (58%), specificity and PPV dropped (97%), and accuracy increased (73%). Carcinoma type (bile-duct versus pancreatic-ductal) had no effect on accuracy (P = .60) or diagnostic class (P = .84), nor did time of performance (first 7.5 versus latter 7.5 years, P = .13). Interestingly, ThinPrep + cell block (n = 41) had higher sensitivity (61%) and lower specificity (80%) than ThinPrep only (versus 51% and 100%, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity were higher (47% and 100%) in nonstented than stented specimens (59% and 97%). Relative risk of malignancy for “suspicious” (2.30) and “atypical” (2.28) categories was lower but not very different from that of “malignant” category (2.41). Conclusions.— Bile duct brushings had fairly low sensitivity but high specificity and PPV with no false positives. Sensitivity almost doubled and specificity dipped minimally when ASM categories were combined, highlighting the need for better classification criteria for atypical/suspicious cases. Higher specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy but lower sensitivity in stented BDBs suggest that they be called malignant only when evidence is overwhelmingly convincing.

Su1019 Predictive Value of Pre-Transplant Cardiopulmonary Testing on Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay for Liver Transplantation

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-1040
Author(s):  
Mark R. Pedersen ◽  
Bryan A. Morse ◽  
Laya Nasrollah ◽  
Bobby R. Kakati ◽  
Myunghan Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Length ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Testing

scholarly journals Monitoring Approach of Fatality Risk Factors for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. A Retrospective, Monocentric Study

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2013
Author(s):  
Tudorel Mihoc ◽  
Cristi Tarta ◽  
Ciprian Duta ◽  
Raluca Lupusoru ◽  
Greta Dancu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Secondary Objective

Acute pancreatitis is an unpredictable disease affecting the pancreas and it is characterized by a wide range of symptoms and modified lab tests, thus there is a continuing struggle to classify this disease and to find risk factors associated with a worse outcome. The main objective of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with the fatal outcome of the intensive care unit’s patients diagnosed and admitted for severe acute pancreatitis, the secondary objective was to investigate the prediction value for the death of different inflammatory markers at the time of their admission to the hospital. This retrospective study included all the patients with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Emergency County Hospital Timisoara between 1 January 2016 and 31 May 2021. The study included 53 patients diagnosed with severe acute pancreatitis, out of which 21 (39.6%) survived and 32 (60.4%) died. For the neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio, a cut-off value of 12.4 was found. When analyzing age, we found out that age above 52 years old can predict mortality, and for the platelets/lymphocytes ratio, a cut-off value of 127 was found. Combining the three factors we get a new model for predicting mortality, with an increased performance, AUROC = 0.95, p < 0.001. Multiple persistent organ failure, age over 50, higher values of C reactive protein, and surgery were risk factors for death in the patients with severe acute pancreatitis admitted to the intensive care unit. The model design from the neutrophils/lymphocytes ratio, platelets/lymphocytes ratio, and age proved to be the best in predicting mortality in severe acute pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Pathophysiological aspects of severe acute pancreatitis-associated lung injury

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 76-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Surbatovic ◽  
Krsta Jovanovic ◽  
Sonja Radakovic ◽  
Nikola Filipovic
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Acute Lung Injury ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Lung Injury ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Very High ◽  
Intensive Medicine

Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory process which occurs in severe form in 20% of all patients, out of whom 1596-25% will die. The incidence of severe acute pancreatitis-associated lung injury (APALI) varies from 15% to 55% and its severity varies from mild hypoxemia to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Acute lung injury (ALI) and ARDS are the most significant manifestations of extra abdominal dysfunctions in severe acute pancreatitis with mortality rate as high as 60% in the first week of the onset of illness. Different pathophysiological mechanisms of severe acute pancreatitis-associated lung injury have been described. The role of enzymes, adhesion molecules, neutrophils, fibronectin and various inflammatory mediators has been emphasized. Mechanism of the acute lung injury associated with the acute pancreatitis is very complex and has not been clear yet. There is no specific therapeutic procedure and mortality rate is very high. Therefore, further studies are necessary to address this acute and growing problem in intensive medicine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document