scholarly journals Post-Translational Modifications of Nuclear Receptors and Human Disease

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. nrs.10001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muralidharan Anbalagan ◽  
Brandy Huderson ◽  
Leigh Murphy ◽  
Brian G. Rowan

Nuclear receptors (NR) impact a myriad of physiological processes including homeostasis, reproduction, development, and metabolism. NRs are regulated by post-translational modifications (PTM) that markedly impact receptor function. Recent studies have identified NR PTMs that are involved in the onset and progression of human diseases, including cancer. The majority of evidence linking NR PTMs with disease has been demonstrated for phosphorylation, acetylation and sumoylation of androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor α (ERα), glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARΓ). Phosphorylation of AR has been associated with hormone refractory prostate cancer and decreased disease-specific survival. AR acetylation and sumoylation increased growth of prostate cancer tumor models. AR phosphorylation reduced the toxicity of the expanded polyglutamine AR in Kennedy's Disease as a consequence of reduced ligand binding. A comprehensive evaluation of ERα phosphorylation in breast cancer revealed several sites associated with better clinical outcome to tamoxifen therapy, whereas other phosphorylation sites were associated with poorer clinical outcome. ERα acetylation and sumoylation may also have predictive value for breast cancer. GR phosphorylation and acetylation impact GR responsiveness to glucocorticoids that are used as anti-inflammatory drugs. PPARγ phosphorylation can regulate the balance between growth and differentiation in adipose tissue that is linked to obesity and insulin resistance. Sumoylation of PPARγ is linked to repression of inflammatory genes important in patients with inflammatory diseases. NR PTMs provide an additional measure of NR function that can be used as both biomarkers of disease progression, and predictive markers for patient response to NR-directed treatments.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Ho Kim ◽  
David D. Moore

Background: The liver undergoes major changes in substrate utilization and metabolic output over the daily feeding and fasting cycle. These changes occur acutely in response to hormones such as insulin and glucagon, with rapid changes in signaling pathways mediated by protein phosphorylation and other post-translational modifications. They are also reflected in chronic alterations in gene expression in response to nutrient-sensitive transcription factors. Among these, the nuclear receptors farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α (PPARα) provide an intriguing, coordinated response to maintain energy balance in the liver. FXR is activated in the fed state by bile acids returning to the liver, while PPARα is activated in the fasted state in response to the free fatty acids produced by adipocyte lipolysis or possibly other signals. Key Messages: Previous studies indicate that FXR and PPARα have opposing effects on each other's primary targets in key metabolic pathways including gluconeogenesis. Our more recent work shows that these 2 nuclear receptors coordinately regulate autophagy: FXR suppresses this pathway of nutrient and energy recovery, while PPARα activates it. Another recent study indicates that FXR activates the complement and coagulation pathway, while earlier studies identify this as a negative target of PPARα. Since secretion is a very energy- and nutrient-intensive process for hepatocytes, it is possible that FXR licenses it in the nutrient-rich fed state, while PPARα represses it to spare resources in the fasted state. Energy balance is a potential connection linking FXR and PPARα regulation of autophagy and secretion, 2 seemingly unrelated aspects of hepatocyte function. Conclusions: FXR and PPARα act coordinately to promote energy balance and homeostasis in the liver by regulating autophagy and potentially protein secretion. It is quite likely that their impact extends to additional pathways relevant to hepatic energy balance, and that these pathways will in turn interface with other well-known nutrient-responsive mechanisms of energy control.


Oncogene ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (13) ◽  
pp. 2355-2366
Author(s):  
Laura C. A. Galbraith ◽  
Ernest Mui ◽  
Colin Nixon ◽  
Ann Hedley ◽  
David Strachan ◽  
...  

AbstractPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARG) is one of the three members of the PPAR family of transcription factors. Besides its roles in adipocyte differentiation and lipid metabolism, we recently demonstrated an association between PPARG and metastasis in prostate cancer. In this study a functional effect of PPARG on AKT serine/threonine kinase 3 (AKT3), which ultimately results in a more aggressive disease phenotype was identified. AKT3 has previously been shown to regulate PPARG co-activator 1 alpha (PGC1α) localisation and function through its action on chromosome maintenance region 1 (CRM1). AKT3 promotes PGC1α localisation to the nucleus through its inhibitory effects on CRM1, a known nuclear export protein. Collectively our results demonstrate how PPARG over-expression drives an increase in AKT3 levels, which in turn has the downstream effect of increasing PGC1α localisation within the nucleus, driving mitochondrial biogenesis. Furthermore, this increase in mitochondrial mass provides higher energetic output in the form of elevated ATP levels which may fuel the progression of the tumour cell through epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and ultimately metastasis.


2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-318330
Author(s):  
Rohan Verma ◽  
Dongseok Choi ◽  
Allison J Chen ◽  
Christina A Harrington ◽  
David J Wilson ◽  
...  

BackgroundOrbital inflammatory disease (OID) encompasses a wide range of pathology including thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), sarcoidosis and non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI), accounting for up to 6% of orbital diseases. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology of OID can improve diagnosis and help target therapy.AimsTo test the hypothesis that shared signalling pathways are activated in different forms of OID.MethodsIn this secondary analysis, pathway analysis was performed on the previously reported differentially expressed genes from orbital adipose tissue using patients with OID and healthy controls who were characterised by microarray. For the original publications, tissue specimens were collected from oculoplastic surgeons at 10 international centres representing four countries (USA, Canada, Australia and Saudi Arabia). Diagnoses were independently confirmed by two masked ocular pathologists (DJW, HEG). Gene expression profiling analysis was performed at the Oregon Health & Science University. Eighty-three participants were included: 25 with TAO, 6 with orbital GPA, 7 with orbital sarcoidosis, 25 with NSOI and 20 healthy controls.ResultsAmong the 83 subjects (mean (SD) age, 52.8 (18.3) years; 70% (n=58) female), those with OID demonstrated perturbation of the downstream gene expressions of the IGF-1R (MAPK/RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), adipocytokine and AMPK signalling pathways compared with healthy controls. Specifically, GPA samples differed from controls in gene expression within the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R, PI3K-Akt (p=0.001), RAS (p=0.005)), PPARγ (p=0.002), adipocytokine (p=0.004) or AMPK (p=<0.001) pathways. TAO, sarcoidosis and NSOI samples were also found to have statistically significant differential gene expression in these pathways.ConclusionsAlthough OID includes a heterogenous group of pathologies, TAO, GPA, sarcoidosis and NSOI share enrichment of common gene signalling pathways, namely IGF-1R, PPARγ, adipocytokine and AMPK. Pathway analyses of gene expression suggest that other forms of orbital inflammation in addition to TAO may benefit from blockade of IGF-1R signalling pathways.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153303381989367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhun Yu ◽  
Qi He ◽  
Guoping Xu

Background: Gene expression profiles from early-onset breast cancer and normal tissues were analyzed to explore the genes and prognostic factors associated with breast cancer. Methods: GSE109169 and GSE89116 were obtained from the database of Gene Expression Omnibus. We firstly screened the differentially expressed genes between tumor samples and normal samples from patients with early-onset breast cancer. Based on database for annotation, visualization and intergrated discovery (DAVID) tool, functional analysis was calculated. Transcription factor-target regulation and microRNA-target gene network were constructed using the tool of transcriptional regulatory relatitionships unraveled by sentence-based text mining (TRRUST) and miRWalk2.0, respectively. The prognosis-related survival information was compiled based on The Cancer Genome Atlas breast cancer clinical data. Results: A total of 708 differentially expressed genes from GSE109169 data sets and 358 differentially expressed genes from GSE89116 data sets were obtained, of which 122 common differentially expressed genes including 102 uniformly downregulated genes and 20 uniformly upregulated genes were screened. Protein–protein interaction network with a total of 83 nodes and 157 relationship pairs was obtained, and genes in protein–protein interaction, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, FGF2, adiponectin, and PCK1, were recognized as key nodes in protein–protein interaction. In total, 66 transcription factor–target relationship pairs were obtained, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ was the only one downregulated transcription factor. MicroRNA-target gene network contained 368 microRNA-target relationship pairs. Moreover, 16 differentially expressed genes, including 2 upregulations and 14 downregulations, were related to a significant correlation with the prognosis, including SQLE and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. Conclusions: SQLE and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ might be important prognostic factors in breast cancers, and adiponectin might be important in breast cancer pathogenesis regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ.


2008 ◽  
Vol 295 (1) ◽  
pp. G54-G62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria J. Monte ◽  
Ruben Rosales ◽  
Rocio I. R. Macias ◽  
Valeria Iannota ◽  
Almudena Martinez-Fernandez ◽  
...  

Bile acids (BAs) are natural ligands of nuclear receptors, in particular farnesoid X receptor (FXR). Whether, in addition to protein-mediated cytosolic-nuclear BA translocation, other mechanisms are involved in the access of BAs to nuclear FXR was investigated. When rat hepatocytes were incubated with radiolabeled taurocholic acid, taurodeoxycholic acid, taurochenodeoxycholic acid, and tauroursodeoxycholic acid, their nuclear accumulation was proportional to their intracellular levels. With the use of flow cytometry analysis, the accumulation by nuclei isolated from rat liver cells was found to differ for several fluorescent compounds of similar molecular weight and different charge, including fluorescein-tagged BAs [cholylglycyl amidofluorescein (CGamF), ursodeoxycholylglycyl amidofluorescein, or chenodeoxycholylglycyl amidofluorescein]. When we varied nuclear volume by incubation with different sucrose concentrations, a similar relationship between nuclear volume and content of FITC and 4-kDa FITC-dextran was found. In contrast, this relationship was markedly lower for CGamF. Confocal microscopy studies revealed that fluorescein-tagged BAs, but also FITC or 10-kDa FITC-dextran were found in the nuclear envelope and concentrated in regions where DNA was less densely packed. In contrast to the cytosolic subcellular localization of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α, FXR and nucleolin (a marker of transcriptional active chromatin) were also localized by immunoreactivity in these intranuclear regions. In conclusion, although intranuclear levels of small organic molecules including conjugated BAs depend on their concentrations in the extranuclear space, the existence of certain molecular selectivity (not strictly dependent on molecular weight or charge) suggests that, in addition to simple diffusional exchange, other mechanisms may be also involved in determining their overall nuclear content in regions where these compounds coincide and may interact with nuclear receptors such as FXR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document