Digital economy of the Russian Federation: A conceptual analysis of the national program

Author(s):  
Viktor Ivanovich Blanutza ◽  

The Government “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” Program describes future economic development of Russia, its regions and industries. However, this Program has not been scrutinized for the modern economic theories and inner conceptual inconsistencies. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to identify the Program’s conceptual uncertainties which could give rise to the alternative scenarios of the economic development of Russia and to inconsistent managerial decisions resulted in the dramatic differences in unfolding the digital economy in different regions and industries. It has been found that the Program contains three definitions for the digital economy – declared (with the focus on the digital data), latent (with the focus on the digital platforms), and promising (with the focus on the artificial intelligence) ones. The Program’s content was compared with the modern economic theories, which revealed five levels of strategic uncertainty: 1) cluster or platform economy; 2) dispersed or agglomeration economy; 3) linear or circular economy; 4) homogeneous or heterogeneous economic landscape; 5) smart cities, smart agglomerations or smart regions. The reviewed Program lacks a clearly defined priority in the development of the cluster or post-cluster (platform) economy in Russia, which creates the theoretical (conceptual) and practical (connected with the development of the social and economic strategy) uncertainties for the industries and regions. With a stronger focus on the latent definition of the Program, there is a risk of extreme monopolization of the digital markets in Russia by the platform leading companies which are mainly located in Moscow and established with the public support under this Program implementation. The article offers to expand the concept of platform economy with a new type of digital ecosystem – a territorial digital platform to construct regional digital platforms and to develop business-ecosystems around them. It has been found that the digital economy in Russia is developed together with the implementation of the previously adopted spatial development strategy aimed to diminish the inter-regional differences, therefore, the dispersed digital economy should be seen as a promising approach. At the same time, there is a risk to activate the process of extreme territorial concentration of digital economic activities as the reviewed Program contains no measures aimed to disperse the agents of digital economy with any financial and other public mechanisms. One more strategic uncertainty induced by the fact that the Program lacks any priorities in preserving or expanding value chain is connected with linear or circular economy dichotomy. This uncertainty misinforms the domestic economic agents and could lead to the technological retardation of Russia from the leading countries in the circular digital economy. The advent of the artificial intelligence gives rise to the debate about the alternative routes of development with the homogeneous (human only) types of agents or heterogeneous (humans, intelligent machines and human-machine systems) economic landscape. It has been shown that the Program does not regulate the interaction of the different economic agents and the development of the economic landscapes, which could result in the unwanted transformation of the Russian economic space. In connection with the smart territorial units, the conclusion is that the Program does not contain any instructions concerning a preferable theory for the territorial organization of digital economy (smart city, smart region, smart agglomeration). This could lead to the situation when different regions observe different theories, with their implementation violating the equilibrium in the digital economic space of Russia. Interception of all alternative theories gives 48 possible development scenarios for digital economy in Russia. It has been established that Russia is likely to follow the platform agglomeration linear digital economy in homogeneous landscapes and smart cities. It is noted that the development of platform dispersed circular digital economy in heterogeneous landscapes and smart regions is seen to be the most favorable scenario in terms of modern studies and digital economy practices in other countries. The practical value of the study is determined by the adjustment of the existing Program or a development of a new document. Further studies are seen to be performed in the field of finding new uncertainty levels, one of them being “4G-, 5G- or 6G-determined digital economy”.

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.38) ◽  
pp. 1227
Author(s):  
T. L. Shugunov ◽  
T. Yu. Khashirova ◽  
A. S. Ksenofontov ◽  
M. A. Georgieva ◽  
S. M. Arvanova

This article discusses the burning issues of ensuring information security in modern economic conditions. The purpose of this study is to analyze the current state of the effectiveness of information security in the conditions of the emerging digital economy in the Russian Federation. According to the research conducted, the number of cybercrimes in the economic sphere increases every year. The largest percentage of cybercrime is committed in the banking sector of the economy. Banks of the Russian Federation have developed information security systems and services that deal with issues of ensuring the security of economic operations. One of the key security tools is the use of cryptography. The Russian Federation is actively developing software products in the field of encryption, but these programs do not have recognition in the global information security market. The obtained results allow us to make a conclusion about the development of the market of information products in the field of protection of economic security, but it is necessary to develop software products that will meet international standards in the field of information security. The results obtained are of theoretical and practical importance for specialists in the field of security and economics. The results obtained can serve as a foundation for conducting more extensive research on the state of the information security system of the digital economy in the Russian Federation.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 08011
Author(s):  
Elena Klochko ◽  
Elena Vorobey ◽  
Rustem Shichiyakh

In article, development of ethnoeconomy is considered as a possibility of overcoming an imbalance in the agrarian sector of the Russian Federation. The carried-out analysis of the definition “ethnoeconomy” has revealed the need of addition of innovative component in interpretation of this term. It will allow giving a new look to traditional forms of managing or carrying out production of ethnic goods according to the latest technologies. Prospects of a clustering of business activity in the sphere of ethnic economy in Krasnodar Region are considered. It is defined that it promotes increase in efficiency of interaction of subjects of small and medium business and also growth of their internal potential in modern economic conditions. It is revealed that the lack of infrastructure for realization of the ethnic production is one of the main problems of ethnic economy of any region of the Russian Federation. The authors consider that “successful” ethnic production should have a certain popularity, to be eco-friendly, to conform to the quality standards, and to possess original packing. The authors have considered theoretical prerequisites of formation of the Cossack farms of innovative type as innovative elements of economic space of the territory.


2019 ◽  
Vol 943 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
A.V. Koshkarev

Geoinformatics as one of the information technologies that ensures the circulation of spatial data has long been ready for the further migration of its products and services to the digital environment. A detailed analysis of the Action Plan for the Information Infrastructure Program of the Digital Economy of the Russian Federation Program in the part related to section 04.03.016 “To create domestic digital platforms for the capturing, processing and dissemination of spatial data and remote sensing satellite data that meet the needs of citizens, business and government”, the de facto spatial data infrastructure (SDI), is given. The Plan of Activities also provides for the creation of the Common (Unified) Electronic Base Map (ersatz of fundamental spatial datasets), the federal spatial data portal (geoportal in international terminology), and the implementation of the “Digital Earth” from space project. The scientific GIS community, including the academic, will not remain aloof from the solution of the set tasks, in turn expecting from full-scale implementation of SDI of the Russian Federation better digital spatial data and simplification of access to them.


Author(s):  
L.V. Khlebenskikh

According to the text of the Instruction of the Government of the Russian Federation of 28.07.2017 №1632-r, the term “digital economy” means “the program aimed at creation of eco-system in which the data in the digital form are the key production factor in all spheres of social and economic activity …» [1]. Digital platforms are the key tool of digital economy transformation. Now there is no uniform definition or approach to the concept of “digital platform”. We will consider only some of them.


Urban Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko ◽  
Markus Laine ◽  
Henrik Lönnqvist

The aim of this article is to shed light on how ongoing structural change towards the global digital economy condition urban economic development. Discussion starts with a brief reference to the growth machine thesis and its emphasis on the interests of local land and real estate owners. This theory serves as a contrasting point for the second element of our framework, the platform economy, which brings digital platforms and the transnational capitalist class into the picture. The transition from the urban growth machines of the industrial age to the digital growth platforms of the information age imply a radical change in the context of urban economic development. On this basis, we discuss cities’ need to adjust their growth strategies to the conditions of the emerging platform economy. Our illustrative case is the capital region of Finland. We interviewed officials and experts who hold key positions in the design of economic development policy in the three largest cities of this area. The empirical results show that the platform economy is rather vaguely conceptualized, and its challenges are ambiguously addressed. Cities have, however, started to adopt platform and ecosystem thinking in their strategies and established urban innovation platforms, talent and start-up attraction programs, and open data initiatives that reflect the gradual adoption of platform logic in urban economic development.


Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Vu Ha

By 2020, the global economy is in decline in every sector except for the digital economy. The core of the digital economy is the digital sector (IT/ICT). However, the scope of the digital economy is even broader than that, encompassing a set of emerging digital business models such as digital services, the platform economy, the sharing economy, and more. Recently, the digital economy has had a high growth rate and is widely applied to other economic fields, especially in the period of COVID-19. This article aims to analyze the current situation of Vietnam's digital economy development through five key pillars: i) digital infrastructure; ii) digital platforms; iii) digital financial services; iv) digital entrepreneurship, and v) digital skills. Based  on these assessments, the paper gives some recommendations for Vietnam in developing a digital economy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 2479-2502
Author(s):  
Evgenii V. POPOV ◽  
Anna Yu. VERETENNIKOVA ◽  
Sergei A. FEDOREEV

Subject. The article addresses crowdlending platforms as an alternative way to invest resources. Objectives. We focus on identifying opportunities and limitations for the development of crowdlending platforms. Methods. The paper draws on the systems analysis tools. It also applies a structure-behavior-result (SBR) model, which enables to characterize the external environment of crowdlending platforms to identify their opportunities and constrains. Results. We identify opportunities and limitations of stakeholders involved in the development of crowdlending, including investors, borrowers, operators of digital platforms, the State and banks. The paper shows that both the demand and supply for the development of crowdlending are created. However, the main limitations in the development of this type of activity are associated mainly with institutional factors. Transparency in the activity of crowdlending platforms will mitigate risks, increase the level of trust of owners and users of resources. The improvement of legislation in this field will help preclude misconduct of economic agents in using this tool. Conclusions. The findings can be used by federal and regional authorities in strategy implementation for the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Russian Federation, as well as by bodies of legislative power in the development of regulatory framework for collective investment tools dissemination in Russia.


2020 ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Yu. V. Vertakova ◽  
O. A. Kryzhanovskaya

The article characterizes the main trends in the development of organizations in modern economic conditions: the spread of coronavirus infection, a new industrial revolution, a shift in political courses, an increase in economic nationalism, a desire to maintain sustainability, digital transformation. To achieve the goal - to identify the features of the development of organizations in the context of digital transformation - the authors investigated the status of digital transformation in the Russian Federation by industry, the priorities of the digital transformation directions of Russian companies, the success factors of digital transformation. The paper analyses the use and implementation of modern technological solutions in the activities of enterprises in the context of digital transformation. In conclusion, the authors emphasize the role of the head of an organization that implements digital technologies to achieve strategic goals in the context of the transformation of the economic space.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 2410-2426
Author(s):  
A.N. Savrukov ◽  
N.T. Savrukov

Subject. This article examines the set of economic relations and problems emerging within the spatial development of settlements and constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Objectives. The article aims to develop key indicators and methods for assessing transport accessibility, potential market capacity, taking into account socio-economic characteristics, geographical location and the level of connectivity of areas. Methods. For the study, we used the methods of economic, statistical analysis and synthesis, comparison, and the k-means method. Results. The article proposes a system of cost-benefit equations for economic agents, and criteria, and a methodology for assessing the Transport Accessibility Index. Based on the clustering of Russian subjects by k-means, the article describes four groups of regions by level of transport accessibility. Conclusions and Relevance. The practical use of the approach presented to assess the Transport Accessibility Index will help form the basis for management decisions aimed at improving efficiency in the planning of spatial development and assessing the socio-economic effects of the proposed measures. The developed Transport Accessibility Index should be used as part of the analysis and monitoring of the effectiveness of infrastructure expenditures affecting changes in the transport accessibility of settlements within individual regions (municipalities).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document