WITH REGARD TO THE QUESTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT DECISIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION’S COUNTER-TERRORISM BODIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-92
Author(s):  
Artem V. Rudenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
System Construction ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Laws ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The relevance of the article stems from the adoption by the constituent entities of the Russian Federation of rules on administrative liability for failure to implement decisions of the anti-terrorist bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in situations of conflict with federal law regulations, caused by adoption of the Federal Law No. 82-FZ of 18 April 2018. This contradiction calls into question the conformity of the adopted norms of the laws on administrative liability of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation with the principle of legality, as one of the basic principles of the State’s legal system construction. The purpose of the article is to develop a position on legal conduct in a situation of con-flict with the legal norms of federal legislation in establishing administrative liability by the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The possibility of establishing administrative liability at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation After the adoption of the Federal Law No 82-FZ of 18 April 2018 «On Amendments to the articles 5 and 5.1 of the Federal Law «On Counteracting Terrorism» legal conflict in the regulation of these powers has arisen. These changes affected not only the regulation of the above-mentioned powers of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, but also the system of sources of administrative liability, since Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation states: administrative liability source system refers only to the Code and the laws of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The article contains an analysis of possible interpretations of the provisions of federal laws on the powers of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation to establish adminis-trative liability for failure to implement decisions of the anti-terrorist bodies of the constituent entities of the Federation. Possible interpretations of the term «decisions of an anti-terrorist body» are analyzed from the point of view of the goals and tasks of formation of these bodies, their powers and organizational-steam form. The study concludes that it is necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation when determining responsibility for failure to implement decisions of the anti-terrorist bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. It is recommended that the legislatures of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation refrain from adopting such norms. It is recommended that the judicial authorities should take into account the provisions of the Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 24 March 2005 No 5 « On certain issues raised by the courts in the application of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation».

Environmental and legal problems of ensuring biological safety in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-69
Author(s):  
Natalia Zhavoronkova ◽  
Vyacheslav Agafonov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Zone ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Biological Safety ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the study of modern theoretical and legal problems of ensuring biological security in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. The published Draft of Federal law No. 850485-7“On biological security of the Russian Federation”provides an opportunity to take a closer look at the problem of legal provision of biological security in relation to the most vulnerable ecosystems, and, first of all, the Arctic. The article considers the most important features and potential risks of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation of critical importance from the point of view of biological hazards, the features (specificity) of biological safety problems from the point of view of organizational-legal features and, in particular, from the perspective of environmental law. It is proved that, given the special situation of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, in addition to the base Federal law“About biological safety” required a specific law on biological and ecological safety of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, which should be generated on a slightly different model than the draft Federal law «On biological safety”, to wear the most specific, applied nature.

scholarly journals Novels of the Criminal Code on responsibility for abusesin public procurement: background and problems of qualification

2018 ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
A. Ya. Asnis
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Service Contract ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Contract Managers

The article deals with the criminological grounds and background of the adoption of the Federal law of April 23, 2018 № 99-FZ, which introduced criminal liability for abuse in the procurement of goods, works and services for state or municipal needs (Art. 2004 of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and for bribery of employees of contract service, contract managers, members of the Commission on the implementation of the procurement of persons engaged in the acceptance of the delivered goods, performed works or rendered services, other authorized persons, representing interests of customer in the scope of the relevant procurement (Art. 2005 of the Criminal Code).The author formulates private rules of qualification of the corresponding crimes and differentiation of their structures from structures of adjacent crimes and administrative offenses. The necessity of changing the position of the legislator regarding generic and direct objects of these crimes, the adoption of a special resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to explain the practice of applying the relevant innovations.

scholarly journals Concerning certain issues of legal regulation, goal-setting, management and work of the bank of Russia

2019 ◽  
pp. 66-80
Author(s):  
O. V. Morozov ◽  
M. A. Vasiliev ◽  
A. G. Biryukov
Keyword(s):  
Central Bank ◽  
Goal Setting ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
State Governance ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Laws ◽  
Working Out ◽  
Reserve System

The Central Bank, the emission center, the reserve system, the federal treasury all these and other names are used to show the element of economy of a concrete state functioning, which controls money, i.e. estimates and administrates the money mass, buying capacity of residents in respect of goods, jobs and services, exerts influence on inflation processes and so on. The article provides results of researching the standing of normative and legal regulation, practice of using authority and responsibility, specific features of the Bank of Russia functioning as a relatively independent body of state governance and on this basis the articles studies the trends of improving management, norms of work development, procedures of working out and submitting to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation reports on federal laws bills, whose regulation is included in the competence of the Central Bank. Proposals dealing with amendments to the Federal law ‘About the Central Bank (the Bank of Russia)’ were formulated.

PUNISHMENT FOR SLANDER

2021 ◽  
pp. 50-63
Author(s):  
Tatyana A. Plaksina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Response ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Previous Edition ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Explanatory Memorandum ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
High Share

Federal Law No. 538-FZ of 30 December 2020 substantially tightened the sanctions of the libel article, which previously contained only fines and compulsory labour, by including com-pulsory labour, arrest and imprisonment in most of them. The explanatory memorandum to the bill explained the changes by the need to provide the court with the choice of fair punish-ment, without specifying this provision in detail. As part of the research described in the article, statistics for the Russian Federation for 2013-2020 were taken from the reports of the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to study the practice of punishment for defamation. The analysis showed that law enforcers used the potential of sanctions of Article 128-1 of the Criminal Code in their previous edition to a very limited extent. This was reflected in the high share of fines among penalties imposed, as well as in insignificant amounts of fines even for qualified and especially qualified types of libel, despite the fact that sanctions provide for high maxi-mum fine limits - from RUB 500,000 in part 1 of Article 128-1 of the Criminal Code to RUB 5 million in part 5. In particular, the share of fine among penalties imposed for simple libel was over 85%, and the average fine was equal in 2018 to RUB 11,500. - 11.5 thousand roubles, in 2019 - 13.7 thousand roubles, in 2020. - 16.3 thousand roubles. In 2018, the average fine for public libel (part 2, article 128-1 of the Criminal Code) was 19,500 rubles; in 2020 - 23,100 rubles. - The sanction allowed for a fine of up to 1 million roubles, while the sanction allowed for a fine of up to 1 million roubles. Moreover, over a quarter of those convicted for especially qualified defamation under part 5 of article 128-1 of the Criminal Code were sentenced to a fine of 5,000 rubles, i.e., one thousand times less than the maximum limit established by the sanction. Only in single cases of slander convictions, the fine exceeded 100 thousand rubles. The establishment of custodial sentences for qualified and especially qualified types of defamation seems excessive: a verbal crime against a person's honour and dignity does not require such a harsh criminal legal response. Moreover, the legislator has designed sanctions with too broad a framework, fraught with the risk of arbitrariness in sentencing and the for-mation of contradictory judicial practice (for example, under part 5 of article 128-1 of the RF Criminal Code, both a fine of 5 thousand rubles, and imprisonment for the period of 5 years can be imposed). The inclusion of arrest in the sanction cannot be considered justified, as this type of punishment has not been introduced yet. The optimum way to improve the sanctions for the part 2 to 5 parts of Article 128-1 of the Criminal Code of the RF would be to enhance them with correctional labour and restriction of freedom. These types of punishments corre-spond to the typical level of public danger of qualified and especially qualified types of slan-der and perpetrators of such deeds. Their inclusion in the sanctions would compensate for the disadvantages of the latter, related to the restrictions enshrined in the law on imposing com-pulsory works and large fines.

Digital Financial Assets: Problems and Prospects of Legal Regulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 43-54
Author(s):  
T. E. Rozhdestvenskaya ◽  
A. G. Guznov
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Financial Assets ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Digital Rights ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Laws ◽  
And Diffusion ◽  
Digital Assets

The emergence and diffusion of digital assets, especially cryptocurrencies, necessitated their legal regulation. The paper investigates the main approaches to the legal regulation, which is already implemented in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and other federal laws. Particular attention is paid to the novelties of the legal regulation that have been envisaged in the draft Federal Law “On Digital Financial Assets.” The draft Federal Law is being currently debated in the State Duma of the Russian Federation. The paper analyses in detail the concept of digital financial assets as a specific type of digital rights. The author also compares the concepts of uncertified securities and non-cash money. The author investigates the issues of digital financial assets issuance and peculiarities of their circulation. The paper substantiates the requirements applied to information systems and their operators included into the draft law in compliance with which the issue of digital financial assets is carried out.

Occupational Standards in Russia: Point of No Return Is Crossed

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Лебедев ◽  
V. Lebedev
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Independent Evaluation ◽  
Point Of No Return ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Laws ◽  
Occupational Standards ◽  
Legal Forms

The article considers the stages of development of human resources policy, carried out the analysis of the amendments made to the Labour Code of the Russian Federation, of the professional standards; considers the main provisions of the federal laws “On the independent evaluation of the qualification”, “On Amendments to Part Two of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in connection with adoption of the Federal Law” On the independent evaluation of the qualification”, “On Making Amendments to the Labor Code of Russian Federation in connection with adoption of the Federal law “On the independent evaluation of the qualification”, that shall enter into force on 1 January 2017. The author offers to specify the legislator proposed initiatives, in particular on the organizational and legal forms and requirements to the personal composition of the evaluation centers.

scholarly journals Normative acts in the system of national tax security provision

2022 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 148-158
Author(s):  
K. V. Maslov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Economic Management ◽  
Russian Government ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Russian Constitution ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject. The article characterizes the role of Russian Constitution, federal laws and bylaws in ensuring tax security.The purpose of the article is to identify legal norms that ensure the tax security of the state, and to confirm the hypothesis that such norms hat such norms are effective in systemic interaction.The methodology. The author uses methods of system analysis of scientific papers devoted to the provision of various types of security. Formal logical and legal interpretation of Russian regulatory legal acts is used also.The main results. Regulatory documents in the field of tax security can be classified into: the Constitution of the Russian Federation at the highest level; program documents (conventions, strategies, charters, concepts, programs, doctrines, standards, directives) as acts of the first level, the legislation of the Russian Federation and its constituent entities is at the second level; departmental regulatory legal acts are at the third level. The law on security should be an act of direct action that determines the content of the management activities of public authorities to ensure security by fixing its goals, principles, the most general forms and means of implementation. The basis of legal provision of tax security at the legislative level should be defined in the federal law on security as well as in the federal law "On Tax Authorities of the Russian Federation" (in intra-governmental relations context because tax authorities are the main subjects of tax administration) and in the Russian Tax Code (concerning relations between public administration bodies and private entities). Any draft legislative acts affecting issues of tax relations and economic management should be examined for compliance with national interests in the field of tax security and the effectiveness of minimizing threats. Each legislative act should take into account the implementation of the goals and principles of ensuring tax security (as well as other types of security) enshrined in the concept document. Such expertise is possible in the process of approving draft laws by the Russian Government as well as when registering relevant bylaws by the Russian Ministry of JusticeConclusions. The Russian Constitution should consolidate a unified approach to the essence of security as a whole. Legislative acts (first of all, the laws on security, on tax authorities, the Tax Code of the Russian Federation) should provide for the main directions of countering threats to tax security arising in the relevant areas of regulation. By-laws and regulations are designed to fix specific managerial ways of dealing with such threats.

scholarly journals Important Legislative Initiative (Draft Bill “On Amending the Federal Law ‘On Legal Deposit Copy of Documents’”)

2015 ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai A. Sakharov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Electronic Copy ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Initiative ◽  
Federal Laws ◽  
Draft Bill ◽  
The One

There is reviewed the Draft Bill, prepared by the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, providing for introduction into the one of the basic Federal laws in the field of librarianship “On Legal Deposit Copy of Documents” the concept of “Electronic Copy of Printed Publications”, relating to the types of documents included into the Legal Deposit Copy. Special attention is paid to the proposal to significantly reduce the number of the hard copies of legal deposit publications to be sent to the largest libraries of the Russian Federation and other organizations.

scholarly journals PRESUMPTION IN MODERN LAW: CONCEPT AND LEGAL MEANING

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
E.A. Anchishina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Aspect ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Simultaneous Existence ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Meaning

This article presents an analysis of the main existing approaches to the definition of the concept of legal presumption and its essence (logical-philosophical, legal and normative). The author's point of view on the presumption as a method of legal technique is substantiated, which is reflected both directly and indirectly in regulatory legal acts, as well as in the legal provisions of judicial practice, which is confirmed by specific examples from the Resolutions of the Plenums of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation and other acts of judicial interpretation. In the course of researching the legal meaning of presumptions, the author highlighted its legal and practical aspect, which is expressed in overcoming the state of uncertainty regarding the existence of certain legal phenomena by fixing a certain assumption and, as a result, releasing a person interested in recognizing the existence of a fact from proving this existence. Particular attention is paid to the problem of determining the limits of the application of various legal presumptions and the admissibility of their simultaneous existence on the example of presumptions in civil law.

scholarly journals Petty crime: quo vadis?

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-29
Author(s):  
Elena Aleksandrovna Suponina ◽  
Igor' Petrovich Dolgikh
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Public Place ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Quo Vadis ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of this research is the normative gaps that have been an intrinsic part of petty crime for many years. Among most discussible within the academic community problems related to such legal violation, the author selected the following: absence of legal definition of the concept of obscenities in the national legislation; complexity of delimitation of petty crime from the adjacent administrative and criminal offences; disaccord in interpretation of the concept of “public place”. Particular attention is paid to the prospects of optimization of administrative-legal norms established in the Article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The main conclusion of the conducted research lies in the statement that from the perspective of legal technique, the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation is in a permanent motion. However, this motion is chaotic and inconsequential. The introduced amendments to the text of codified law did not enhanced the protection of public order, as well as created the additional difficulties for the law enforcer. This article makes an attempt of systemic analysis of provisions of the Federal Law No.28-FZ of 03.18.2019 that complemented the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with the Sections 3-5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document