scholarly journals Petty crime: quo vadis?

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-29
Author(s):  
Elena Aleksandrovna Suponina ◽  
Igor' Petrovich Dolgikh
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Academic Community ◽  
Public Place ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Quo Vadis ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of this research is the normative gaps that have been an intrinsic part of petty crime for many years. Among most discussible within the academic community problems related to such legal violation, the author selected the following: absence of legal definition of the concept of obscenities in the national legislation; complexity of delimitation of petty crime from the adjacent administrative and criminal offences; disaccord in interpretation of the concept of “public place”. Particular attention is paid to the prospects of optimization of administrative-legal norms established in the Article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The main conclusion of the conducted research lies in the statement that from the perspective of legal technique, the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation is in a permanent motion. However, this motion is chaotic and inconsequential. The introduced amendments to the text of codified law did not enhanced the protection of public order, as well as created the additional difficulties for the law enforcer. This article makes an attempt of systemic analysis of provisions of the Federal Law No.28-FZ of 03.18.2019 that complemented the article 20.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with the Sections 3-5.

On the issue of understanding administrative proceedings

2020 ◽  
pp. 135-140
Author(s):  
Valentin Nazarov ◽  
Tat’yana Akimova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Judicial Procedure ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

We point out some trends observed in the development of Russian justice. We note the features of the historical development of the state that have influenced the legislative consolidation of administrative legal proceedings. Exploring the main approaches to the definition of administrative legal proceedings, we conditionally combine them into three large groups and characterize each of them. The various positions of legal scholars on the legal nature of administrative legal proceedings are illustrated. It is indicated that with the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure, there was a separation of administrative proceedings from other types, the result of which is the creation of administrative and legal means to ensure and protect public interests as well as the practical implementation of constitutional legal norms on administrative legal proceedings. We specify that the independent nature of administrative legal proceedings is determined by the specifics of this process. The features characteristic for this type of legal proceedings are analyzed. We express an opinion on the need for a more clear and unambiguous formulation of the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation and its normative consolidation. Despite the fact that more than four years have passed since the adoption of the Code, the controversy surrounding the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation continues to this day. In addition, we reveal the most important results of the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure.

scholarly journals Deficiencies in the Legislative Support of Innovative Activities in Contemporary Russia and Ways of Addressing them

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Popkova ◽  
Anastasia Sozinova ◽  
Oksana Grechenkovа ◽  
Vera Menshchikova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
State Management ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Support ◽  
Innovative Economy ◽  
Definition Of

The goal of this article is to verify the presented hypothesis and to research the prospects of improving the existing legal norms in order to increase the effectiveness of crime counteraction in the sphere of overcoming corruption barriers in building an innovative economy in Russia. The problems that remain urgent are: the state of economy as a cause of different types and forms of crime and the inadequate legal regulation of innovative activities. Poor legal regulation in this sphere stimulates the corruption processes. This brings about the necessity to conduct interdisciplinary economic-legal research that would stimulate further development of legal support for innovative activities with an anti-criminogenic potential. The working hypothesis of this research is that the existing legal norms make it impossible to achieve high efficiency in overcoming corruption barriers to building an innovative economy in Russia. The authors analyze the existing normative legislative support of building an innovative economy in Russia through the prism of four key spheres of state management of building an innovative economy: support of innovative small business, stimulation of innovative entrepreneurship, support of the creation and development of innovative territorial clusters and the registration of intellectual property. In order to bridge the gaps in the existing legislative support of this sphere, the authors recommend the adoption of a federal law «On State Management of Building an Innovative Economy in the Russian Federation» that would include a definition of innovative activities in a formalized format, i.e. it should be confirmed by facts. The authors present a definition of innovative activities for different businesses and recommendations for their stimulation in the Russian Federation that could be included in the suggested draft law. They predict that the federal law «On State Management of Building an Innovative Economy in the Russian Federation» could have a positive impact on the dynamics of crime and unlawfulness in the innovative sphere of modern Russia. The reduction of the share of subjectivism in the process of state management of building an innovative economy will reduce opportunities for corruption activities in the innovative sphere.

scholarly journals Problems of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-45
Author(s):  
Viktoriya Viktorovna Kalinkina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is a set of legal norms that regulate relations in the sphere of challenging of transactions of the debtor, as well as the law enforcement practice. The object of this research is the social relations that develop in the context of challenging of transactions of the debtor in bankruptcy case. The article discusses the problems faced by the arbitration and financial executives at the stage of claim preparation for challenging of transactions of the debtor, i.e. formation of evidence, as well as at the stage of execution of the corresponding court ruling. The purpose goal of this article lies in articulation of the problem, substantiation of the need for legislative regulation, and formulation of recommendation for the improvement of current legislation on the subject matter. The scientific novelty consists in addressed the issues that have not previously become the subject of separate research; as well as in the author’s conclusions and recommendations aimed at the improvement of the Federal Law No. 127-FZ of. October 26, 2002 “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)” and other normative legal acts regulating this field. The acquired results can also be used in the Russian legal science for further elaboration on the issues related to the effectiveness of the mechanism for challenging of transactions of the debtor, and as well  as improvement of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and law enforcement practice that regulate this field.

scholarly journals Aggregate as a type of multiplicity of administrative offences: concept and legal formalization

2020 ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Natal'ya Anatol'evna Akhtanina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Law Schools ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

The object of this research is social relations emerged on the basis of administrative-legal norms, which regulate the aggregate of administrative offences. The subject of this research is the scientific literature, normative legal acts and law enforcement practice related to the concept of the aggregate of administrative offences. The author examines approaches of the scientists of various law schools to the concept of aggregate of administrative offences, its development and transformation in time. The author indicated the flaws in the current administrative legislation in part of the absence of legislative consolidation of the concept of “aggregate” of offence, which results in occurrence of a number of problems. The article explores the legal norms that regulate aggregate of offences in administrative legislation of the Russian Federation. A comparative analysis is conducted on consolidation of the aggregate of offences in administrative and criminal law. The scientific novelty is defined by upcoming changes in administrative legislation. This is the reason why improvement of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation with regards to regulation of the question of the aggregate of administrative offences gains more relevance. A conclusion is made on the need for establishing in law the unified detailed definition of the “aggregate” of administrative offences, which would allow ensuring more effective application of legal norms. A need is also underlined for the need of legislative consolidation of such feature of offences that are a part of the aggregate as “absence of bringing to accountability for earlier commission of an unlawful act”.  

scholarly journals Legal regulation of the work of tour guides, guides-interpreters and guides-instructors: the experience of the constituent entities if the Russian Federation and prospects for federal regulation

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Aleksei Savichev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Tourism Industry ◽  
Federal Regulation ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Federal Level ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Tour Guides ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the legal norms regulating the work of tour guides, guides-interpreters and guides-instructors in the Russian Federation. The author analyzes the positions of the Federal Law of 11.24.1996 No.132-FZ “On the Basics of Tourism in the Russian Federation” and draft Federal Law No.864169-7 “On Amendments to Separate Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation for the Purposes of Improving Legal Regulation of Tour guides, Guides-Interpreters and Guides-Instructors”, as well as regional normative legal acts, establishing requirements on mandatory of voluntary accreditation of these specialist in particular constituent entities if the Russian Federation. The author concludes that the systems existing in the separate constituent entities if the Russian Federation for accreditation of tour guides, guides-interpreters and guides-instructors require improvements. Solution of the problem is seen in organization of the work of the aforementioned subjects of the tourism industry by establishing uniform legal regulation on the federal level. The result of the analysis of the draft Federal Law No.864169-7 produced a number of proposals aimed at improving separate aspect of legal regulation of the work tour guides, guides-interpreters and guides-instructor.

The Legal Status of Cryptocurrencies in the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Sidorenko
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Virtual Currency ◽  
Content Analysis Method ◽  
Crypto Currency ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Definition Of

The paper focuses on the definition of the legal status of the cryptocurrency in the framework of the current Russian legislation. The subject of the research is the principal scientific and practical approaches to determining the object of civil rights and the object of acquisitive crimes in terms of their adaptability to cryptocurrencies. The purposes of the work were the search for a universal algorithm for resolving civil disputes related to the turnover of the crypto currency, and the qualification of the virtual currency theft (fraud). By using historical, comparative legal and dialectical methods as well as the content analysis method parallels between cryptocurrencies and individual objects of civil rights (a thing, property rights, other property) were drawn, and a number of options for qualifying the actions related to the non-repayable withdrawal of the cryptocurrency were proposed. Finally, the paper analyzes the draft laws prepared by the RF Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and presents the author’s vision of the prospects for legalizing the cryptocurrency as an object of civil rights.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

scholarly journals Land dispute as an object of arbitration process

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-122
Author(s):  
M. A. Magomedova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Correct Definition ◽  
Arbitration Process ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Definition Of

In the current legislation of the Russian Federation, there is no concept of a land dispute, which causes difficulties in determining the competence of an arbitration court in cases in which the object of the dispute is land. The article analyzes the general legal concept of a dispute and the sectoral concept of a land dispute developed by scientists. The author identified the characteristic features of a land dispute and its structural elements. The work reveals the influence of the structural elements of the land dispute on the type of production in which the dispute will be considered. In addition, the author concludes that the correct definition of the structural elements of the land dispute enables the arbitration court to determine the appropriate persons participating in the case, the subject of proof, the relevance and admissibility of evidence, and ultimately make a lawful and wellgrounded court decision.

scholarly journals Structure of the Russian institute of mediation: present, past, and future

2020 ◽  
pp. 47-63
Author(s):  
Olga Vecherina ◽  
Irina Borisovna Putalova
Keyword(s):  
Professional Community ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Radical Reform ◽  
Systemic Analysis ◽  
Current State ◽  
Traditional Structure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Further Development

This article is dedicated to examination of the traditional structure of the Russian institute of mediation and its possible transformations in light of the provisions of the new draft law “On Settlement of the Disputes Trough Mediation in the Russian Federation". Based on the principle of historicism and systemic analysis, the authors consider the established structure of the Institute, and highlight the three stages in development: latent, euphoria and stagnation. It is assumed that such peculiarities of development are substantiated by its implementation “from the top”. The current state of the institute of mediation, despite the fact that it remains at the “initial” level of development, can be characterizes as a years-long stagnation. Therefore, the draft of the new Federal Law on Mediation, developed by the Ministry of Justice, which in case of enactment significantly changes the structure and functional concept of mediation, became the subject of intense discussion within the professional community, since the intended radical reform is planned to be implemented “from the top”, without consideration of the opinion of professional community and interested stakeholders. Having analyzed separate elements of the institute of mediation and changes therein, the authors came to the following conclusions. One of the three key reasons for the established situation in the area of mediation is the low level of professional qualifications of mediators; incompetence of mediators impedes conducting mass mediation and further development of the institute of mediation. The second reason consists in incompetence and disunity of the professional community of mediators, absence of an authoritative body nationwide. The third reason lies in discrepancy of the development of two vectors of mediation — traditional and academic as a special trend in reconstructive approach. The presented analysis allows reassessing the current state and potential of the Russian Institute of mediation, as well as forecasting further ways of its development.

WITH REGARD TO THE QUESTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY IN ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT DECISIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION’S COUNTER-TERRORISM BODIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 82-92
Author(s):  
Artem V. Rudenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
System Construction ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Laws ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The relevance of the article stems from the adoption by the constituent entities of the Russian Federation of rules on administrative liability for failure to implement decisions of the anti-terrorist bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in situations of conflict with federal law regulations, caused by adoption of the Federal Law No. 82-FZ of 18 April 2018. This contradiction calls into question the conformity of the adopted norms of the laws on administrative liability of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation with the principle of legality, as one of the basic principles of the State’s legal system construction. The purpose of the article is to develop a position on legal conduct in a situation of con-flict with the legal norms of federal legislation in establishing administrative liability by the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The possibility of establishing administrative liability at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation After the adoption of the Federal Law No 82-FZ of 18 April 2018 «On Amendments to the articles 5 and 5.1 of the Federal Law «On Counteracting Terrorism» legal conflict in the regulation of these powers has arisen. These changes affected not only the regulation of the above-mentioned powers of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, but also the system of sources of administrative liability, since Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation states: administrative liability source system refers only to the Code and the laws of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The article contains an analysis of possible interpretations of the provisions of federal laws on the powers of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation to establish adminis-trative liability for failure to implement decisions of the anti-terrorist bodies of the constituent entities of the Federation. Possible interpretations of the term «decisions of an anti-terrorist body» are analyzed from the point of view of the goals and tasks of formation of these bodies, their powers and organizational-steam form. The study concludes that it is necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation when determining responsibility for failure to implement decisions of the anti-terrorist bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. It is recommended that the legislatures of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation refrain from adopting such norms. It is recommended that the judicial authorities should take into account the provisions of the Decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 24 March 2005 No 5 « On certain issues raised by the courts in the application of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation».

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document