scholarly journals PRESUMPTION IN MODERN LAW: CONCEPT AND LEGAL MEANING

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
E.A. Anchishina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Aspect ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Simultaneous Existence ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Meaning

This article presents an analysis of the main existing approaches to the definition of the concept of legal presumption and its essence (logical-philosophical, legal and normative). The author's point of view on the presumption as a method of legal technique is substantiated, which is reflected both directly and indirectly in regulatory legal acts, as well as in the legal provisions of judicial practice, which is confirmed by specific examples from the Resolutions of the Plenums of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation and other acts of judicial interpretation. In the course of researching the legal meaning of presumptions, the author highlighted its legal and practical aspect, which is expressed in overcoming the state of uncertainty regarding the existence of certain legal phenomena by fixing a certain assumption and, as a result, releasing a person interested in recognizing the existence of a fact from proving this existence. Particular attention is paid to the problem of determining the limits of the application of various legal presumptions and the admissibility of their simultaneous existence on the example of presumptions in civil law.

On the Problems of Acts Qualification as Violations of Antimonopoly Legislation in Administrative and Judicial Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
К. А. Pisenkо ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Illegal Acts ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

The article is devoted to defining the main approaches to classifying acts as violations of аntimonopoly legislation. On administrative and judicial practice discusses current issues and problems of definition of illegal acts, both from the point of view of antimonopoly regulation, and the delineation of antimonopoly violations and violations of other mandatory requirements established by the legislation of the Russian Federation.

Dissemination of damaging information (defamation) as a type of civil tort: concept definition

2020 ◽  
pp. 378-382
Author(s):  
Valeriya Smorchkova
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
European Court ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

We consider such category as defamation, which is widespread in many foreign countries. Defamation is the dissemination of damaging information, which, however, is true. This concept has become widespread in the last century, many states have adopted special legislation that mediates relations in this area. For example, the United Kingdom has the “Defamation Act 1996” and Singapore has the “Defamation Ordinance 1960”. We emphasize that in the same 1960s in our country “the system of defamation seemed absolutely unacceptable and contrary to the spirit of society”. In the course of study, comparative legal methods are used to analyze the legislation of states with the Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic legal system. Based on the study of the doctrinal points of view of scientists and the positions of higher courts, the definition of this category is formed from the position of civil tort. The following definition is proposed: “Defamation is a violation of civil legislation, which consists in the dissemination of false information damaging the honor, dignity and business reputation of a person and also the dissemination of truthful personal information, the disclosure of which violates the conservation law are listed in the intangible benefits of the citizens”. We analyze the provisions of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of February 24, 2005 no. 3 “On judicial practice in cases of protecting the honor and dignity of citizens, as well as the business reputation of citizens and legal entities”. We conclude that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation borrowed advanced provisions from the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.

Law enforcement practice in the field of budget: theoretical-legal and judicial-arbitration aspects

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hristina Peshkova ◽  
Vladimir Pachkun
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Financial Control ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Educational Organizations ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The monograph examines the practical aspects of the application of the budget legislation of the Russian Federation in judicial practice — the practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and arbitration courts, as well as the functions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the interpretation of budget legislation. The article analyzes the theoretical and legal provisions of law enforcement activities in the field of the budget, as well as the categories of budget and legal science. For legal scientists, graduate students, students of legal educational organizations, as well as practitioners of courts, financial control bodies and other state and municipal institutions.

scholarly journals Points at Issue With the Definition of Forgery (the Case Study of Article 326 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Mikhailovich Trubin ◽  
Stanislav Igorevich Golubev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
State Registration

The object of the research is the definition of forgery as it is used by the legislation, in particular, in Article 326 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The authors see the following problems: no legal definition, no single point of view in the doctrine of criminal law and incoordinations with other terms used in law. The wording 'forgery or counterfeiting state registration sign' used in Article 326 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation makes the situation even more complicated. Thus, the subject of this research is different doctrinal interpretations of the term 'forgery' and judicial practice. The methodological framework of the research covers such methods as analysis and synthesis, comparative law analysis, system-structured and formal law approaches, theoretical prognistic method and interpretation of legal provisions. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author offer their own definition of the term 'forgery' and concludes that forgery and forgery documents/items are compatible and intersecting terms. The authors also conclude what criteria of truth and authenticity can be used to describe items/documents as forgery-counterfeiting, forgery but not counterfeiting and counterfeiting but not forgery. They also make recommendations on what amendments should be made in the applicable law. 

DOES A COMPETENCE (NOT JURISDICTION) EXIST NOW? (TEACHING, SCIENCE, PRACTICE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 13-46
Author(s):  
A.F. VORONOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Science Practice ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Case ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Definition Of

The article is devoted to the legal institution and the definition of “competence” and the related institution and the definition of “jurisdiction”. Using historical, comparative, system- structural and other methods of cognition, the author analyzes the doctrinal content and consolidation in legislation of these institutions in their development. The relevance of the research topic is justified by the fact that in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and in the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the term “competence” is now not used. The author substantiates the point of view that this does not mean the loss of the meaning of the definition for science, legal education and judicial practice. Taking into account the provisions of the new legislation, an algorithm for determining the competence and jurisdiction of a legal case is proposed. As one of the conclusions, the author points out that there are no grounds for refusing to use the concept of “jurisdiction” either in practice, or in the science of civil and arbitration proceedings, or in the process of teaching these disciplines. In addition, the researcher notes that the analysis of judicial practice since the beginning of 2020 shows that the courts continue to actively use the term “jurisdiction”, both referring to the decisions of the plenums of the RF Supreme Court and the RF Supreme Arbitration Court, and directly.

scholarly journals Features of Mental Elements of Bribery Facilitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim Zamaraev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Factors ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article provides a description of relevant features of the mental elements of the crime regulated by Article 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The paper also examines the general actor of the specific corruption act by applying a criminological approach and analyzing the empirical base for this category of criminal encroachment. The author researches the "physical" and "intellectual" bribery facilitation ways defined in the literature. Detailed attention is paid to optional features of the mental elements of mediation in bribery, such as: "motive" and "purpose" of the crime. The author proposes his definition of the mental elements of mediation in bribery, and provides the list of the social factors that influence the commission of a crime under Articles 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation having studied law enforcement practice and interviewed representatives of the general population of the Russian Federation. The results of this study can be used for further improvement of the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation, in terms of amendments and additions to the qualifying factors of bribery facilitation and the introduction of appropriate explanations in the current resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 24 of 09 July 2013 "On judicial practice in cases of bribery and other corruption-related crimes".

Theft and Fraud Committed Using Electronic Payment Systems (Regional Judicial and Investigative Practice)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 66-79
Author(s):  
S. L. Morozov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Payment Systems ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Electronic Payments ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The advent of the electronic currency and the effecting of electronic payments has caused new forms of thefts and types of acquisitive crimes. The judicial investigative practice of criminal cases of embezzlement committed using bank cards and other types of electronic payments has encountered problems with the qualification of such acts. The author identifies the most common enforcement problemsand their causesby a retrospective study of judicial practice, the changing norms of the criminal law. At the same time, a ten-year period of work of the judicial investigating authorities was studied. On the basis of traditional general scientific methods of cognition, as a result of a system-legal analysis of the considered set of specific situations, the author gives an author's view of the complex of causes that cause a lack of uniformity in judicial investigative practice. Using the hermeneutic approach, the author paid special attention to the application by the courts of the interpretation of the criminal law by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in different years. In conclusion, ways of resolving contentious issues of qualification of thefts and fraud in the field of electronic means of payment are proposed. It has been ascertained that high-quality and uniform law enforcement can provide additional clarification on the delimitation of related and competing theft from the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. It is concluded that in general, the current concept of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation does not contain contradictions with the novels of the criminal law, but can be improved. The rationale and edition of possible additions to the relevant decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are given.

Criminal-Legal Characteristics of Encroachment on the Health, Personal Integrity, Honor and Dignity of a Representative of the Authorities

2021 ◽  
pp. 96-103
Author(s):  
N. Yu. Borzunova ◽  
O. S. Matorina ◽  
E. P. Letunova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Personal Integrity ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The authors of the article consider the criminal- legal characteristics of crimes against representatives of the authorities, in particular, encroachment with the purpose of causing harm to the health, personal integrity, honor and dignity of a representative of the authorities. The definition of the term “representative of the authorities”is given. The main characteristics of a representative of the government are analyzed. Statistical data on the number of convictions and types of punishments in accordance with the provisions of articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Articles 318, 319) are summarized. Examples of judicial practice are considered. The ways of improving the criminal legislation are proposed.

Scientific Commentary on the Review of Judicial Practice on Some Issues of the Application of Legislation on Business Entities

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
V. K. Andreev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Law Making

The article discusses the forms of clarification on matters of judicial practice by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the Presidium of the Supreme Court, as well as in the Review of judicial practice on some issues of the application of legislation on business companies dated December 25, 2019. Clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on issues of judicial practice are characterized as the positions of the courts identified in the course of studying and summarizing the judicial practice of the corresponding category of cases, which are acts of individual regulation of public relations. Focusing on Art. 6 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Section 6, Art. 12 of the APC RF shows the validity of dividing wrong into two types of wrong: the «moderate» type of «judicial law-making and the position of the court» and the «radical» type of «judicial law-making», when the court develops the rule of law, which contradicts the constitutional principle of separation of powers. When resolving corporate disputes, it is necessary to investigate whether the charter of a non-public company does not contain the rights and obligations of its participants, which they themselves created by making a unanimous decision and including them in the charter of the company (paragraph 3 of Art. 66.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, paragraph 3 of Art. 14 of the Law about LLC).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document