scholarly journals Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in a Digital Economy: Is There a Need for Change?

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 114-126
Author(s):  
Natalya Buzova ◽  
Marina Karelina
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Moscow City ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection ◽  
Selection Of

The paper looks at improving the judicial system in Russia facing the rapid technological change of modern society in which new relationships are largely associated with different areas of intellectual property. Today biotechnology, digital rights, computer programs and scientific research materials have become widely used in civil circulation and their intellectual property rights should be effectively protected. The paper discusses different issues of protecting intellectual rights provided for by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, aimed at both suppressing and preventing their infringement, and assesses the statistical indicators of the courts. The practice of the Intellectual Property Rights Court and the Moscow City Court shows that specialization yields positive results. The selection of judges, their professional development including their distinctive competencies in addition to legal ones, also help to find effective ways of resolving intellectual property disputes. With the protection of intellectual property rights being of great concern not only in Russia, but also in most developed countries of the world, their experience has also been thoroughly analyzed. The paper suggests a possible way of improving the judicial system under the current circumstances. Certain changes in the judicial system and the creation of additional specialized intellectual property courts could help to ensure an affordable, legitimate and effective mechanism for resolving disputes related to the violation of intellectual property rights.

Foreign Direct Investment, Intellectual Property Rights, and Productivity Growth

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 1440009
Author(s):  
Sasatra Sudsawasd ◽  
Santi Chaisrisawatsuk
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Productivity Growth ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Outward Fdi ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ipr Protection

Using panel data for 57 countries over the period of 1995–2012, this paper investigates the impact of intellectual property rights (IPR) processes on productivity growth. The IPR processes are decomposed into three stages — innovation process, commercialization process, and protection process. The paper finds that better IPR protection is directly associated with productivity improvements only in developed economies. In addition, the contribution of IPR processes on growth through foreign direct investment (FDI) appears to be quite limited. Only inward FDI in developed countries which creates better innovative capability leads to higher growth. In connection with outward FDI, only the increase in IPR protection and commercialization are proven to improve productivity in the case of developing countries, particularly when the country acts as the investing country.

scholarly journals Innovation IT-Payment Technologies as a Know-how and an Object of Intellectual Property Rights

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (Especial II) ◽  
pp. 518-535
Author(s):  
Ernest Gramatskyy ◽  
Inha Kryvosheyina ◽  
Volodymyr Makoda ◽  
Liydmyla Panova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Know How ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
System Method

The modern society necessitates the introduction of new IT-solutions to meet its needs. With the spread of know-how, the need for its detailed analysis with the further determination of the direction of development. The purpose is to carry out an analysis of the introduction and functioning of know-how, as well as to determine the vectors of its use, taking into account the needs of participants in legal relations arising in this area. The subject of research – information technologies (know-how) as objects of intellectual property rights in their use. The methodological basis consists of the method of analysis, the method of synthesis, the dialectical method, the comparative-legal method, the system method, and the logical-legal method. The result of this work is to identify the importance of the information technologies in everyday life of modern society and the level of popularity of their use, outlining possible vectors of development in the economics in the direction of digitalization and justification of the need to improve the provisions of current legislation within the considered topic, expressing the idea of the direction of innovative information policy in the direction of active use of blockchain and maximum compliance with the protection of personal data of customers.

scholarly journals The Practice of Review of Cases on Challenging Statutory Acts of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property by the Intellectual Property Rights Court: Keeping Going over the Same Ground

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Yu. Andreeva ◽  
◽  
Moisey I. Lifson ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Reasonable Time ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the institution of challenging the normative legal acts of Rospatent in the Court on Intellectual Rights on the example of several cases examined by the Court. The authors highlight a number of problems in this area. Since the consideration of a public objection to a patent for a controversial utility model or invention and the decision on the results of the consideration of such an objection is within the competence of Rospatent, and the PIS performs only a supervisory function, it is difficult to solve this problem within a reasonable time. The authors propose: all disputes related to intellectual property after issuing a security document should be resolved not in an administrative - judicial manner, but only in a judicial one, by analogy with the violation of the patent of the Russian Federation for intellectual property objects.

The antitrust immunity of intellectual property in Russia

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
S. S. Burchik
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Law ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Immunity

The growing importance of intellectual property as an asset raises the question whether exercising of the intellectual property rights shall be regulated by antitrust law to protect against possible abuses and ensure the efficiency of the economy. The study aims to improve the existing regulation in the Russian Federation and align it with the idea of balancing private and public interests while fostering competition and encouraging innovation.

scholarly journals MAIN PROBLEMS OF COMMERCIALIZATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FACILITIES IN KAZAKHSTAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Anargul' Kulembaeva ◽  
Al'mira Ksembaeva ◽  
Rysty Sartova ◽  
Mayra Kushenova ◽  
Gul'mira Nurbaeva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Trade Secrets ◽  
Know How ◽  
Improve Efficiency ◽  
Property Data ◽  
Commercial Organization

Commercialization allows customers to have a wider range of products and allows companies to generate more revenue, improve efficiency, and reduce costs. In the article, the authors characterize the main problems of commercialization of intellectual property objects, as well as the conditions that ensure the effectiveness of this process. The rights to commercialize intellectual property objects come from a commercial organization, and the owner retains the rights throughout his life as a legal leverage over competitors. Intellectual property rights broadly include patents, trade secrets, know-how, property data, registered designs, copyrights and trademarks, among others. The study revealed the experience of developed countries, which showed the importance and high efficiency of the commercialization of intellectual property objects. The authors identified the main directions of improving the process of commercialization of intellectual property objects.

scholarly journals LEGAL ASPECTS OF EXISTENCE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE INTERNET

2020 ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
O.V. Boychenko ◽  
O.Yu. Smirnova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Protecting Intellectual Property

The article considers the legal aspects of the existence of intellectual property on the Internet. The main regulatory documents governing the relationship between the use of intellectual property on the Internet are analyzed, such as: the WIPO international convention, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part 4; Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 09.02.2012; The latest edition of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In the form of a structural and didactic scheme are presented: objects of intellectual property, means of individualization; an algorithm for the interaction of participants in the legislative process to seize illegal content. Features of the problems of protecting intellectual property rights on the Internet, the main causes of violation of intellectual property rights and ways of protecting intellectual property are presented. The losses of various sectors of society from Internet piracy are given. The basic tools of copyright infringement on the Internet are described, as well as existing methods of confirming copyright in content.

Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nigerian Courts

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-645
Author(s):  
Nkem Itanyi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
Comprehensive System ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Adequate Number ◽  
Property System ◽  
Enforcement Mechanisms ◽  
Protecting Intellectual Property

Abstract There is no point in making comprehensive provisions for the protection of various intellectual property rights without also providing a corresponding comprehensive system for enforcing the same when the rights are or about to be infringed. Therefore, an accessible, sufficient and adequate system/procedure is paramount in any worthwhile intellectual property system. Right holders must be granted means to enforce their rights just as is obtainable in other forms of tangible and intangible properties. To this end, all intellectual property systems need an effective judicial system that is empowered to deal with both civil wrongs and criminal offences while being presided over by adequate number of judges with the requisite experience in intellectual property law. This paper therefore examines: the raison-d’être for protecting intellectual property rights; the various enforcement mechanisms via the courts; sanctions and remedies for infringement of intellectual property rights amongst other incidental matters. The paper concludes with a call for the review of the sanctions for infringing intellectual property rights.

scholarly journals Protection of intellectual property of an architect

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 05029
Author(s):  
Nicolay Zhilskiy ◽  
Emma Shariapova ◽  
Marina Matveeva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Creative Activity ◽  
Protection Mechanism ◽  
Categorical Framework ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

In the paper, the authors raise the issue of protecting the copyright of an architect. One of the ways to protect it is the trial. The RF Constitution guarantees judicial protection of rights and freedoms. Recently, in the Russian Federation, the number of appeals to the court for copyright protection has increased, indicating a large number of infringements of intellectual property rights of architects. The study of the authors showed that often the cause of litigation is the discrepancy of the values of the objects of copyright of the architect. To interpret such concepts as “architectural solution”, “architectural design”, “architect’s concept”, “architect’s idea” and others, the court is forced to involve specialists whose opinions in the court decision become the source of law, which contradicts the theory of state and law. The authors believe that the legislative consolidation of clear, certain essential features of the conceptual and categorical framework used in architectural activity is the improvement of the protection mechanism for the works of architects that are the result of their creative activity.

IT Security Governance Legal Issues

2012 ◽  
pp. 47-73
Author(s):  
Gemma María Minero Alejandre
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Protection Measures ◽  
Security Governance ◽  
Database Right ◽  
Substantial Investment ◽  
Copy Protection ◽  
Made In

The protection of the investment and creativity made in producing computer programs and databases by intellectual property rights is still not harmonised internationally. Taking into account that IT is used not only to produce these goods, but also to infringe their intellectual property rights, national laws nowadays also protect the so-called technological protection measures, such as passwords, encryption or copy-protection software, created to protect the intellectual property rights. Besides, IT must fulfill the privacy protection regulations currently in force and the companies using it must carry out the international auditing standards. But intellectual property rights cannot protect simple data and information, apart from the substantial investment made in either obtaining, verification, or presentation of data, by sui generis right over databases (or database right). This chapter examines and compares the current legislations of developed countries in order to find the characteristics -and the criticism- in common.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document