COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF PRINCIPLES OF CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION IN INTERNATIONAL AND RUSSIAN REGULATORY DOCUMENTATION AND THE QUESTION OF THE CONSERVATION OF SOVIET AVANT-GARDE ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE IN RUSSIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
Simon Christopher BUSS

This article poses the question of the correlation of Russian legal and statutory regulation on the conservation of historical cultural heritage with the fundamental international charters, agreements and conventions. Comparative analysis of Federal Law No.73 of 2002 “On Objects of the Cultural Heritage (Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation” against 14 positions and principles previously defi ned in the author’s research of 6 of the fundamental international documents, describes both the general characteristics and areas of signifi cant disparity in the approaches to the conservation of historical and cultural heritage. It is noted that the harmonisation of Russian norms with internationally recognised principles should render the conservation of soviet avant-garde architecture more eff ective, however the lack of a complete body of methodological guidance is a hindrance to this process.

Author(s):  
Eleonora A. Shevchenko ◽  
Andrej A. Lukashev

Disputes around such a type of cultural heritage object as "Places of Interest" have not ceased since the adoption, in 2002, of Federal Law No. 73-FZ "On objects of cultural heritage (historical and cultural monuments) of the peoples of the Russian Federation", which introduced it this new kind of cultural heritage object. The main problem lies in a deep misunderstanding of the meaning, the essence, the importance for the preservation of the historical environment of the populated areas, as the actual genome of the city of this unique Object of cultural heritage. The purpose of this article is to reveal the deep essence of one of the types of cultural heritage object, often identified with such a category of "Objects" heritage as a historical settlement and, often, equated with such kind of cultural heritage object as "Monument". The importance of defining it as an integral object of real estate with the most complex composition and structure is explained by the need to take urgent measures to preserve the authenticity and uniqueness of the populated areas and territories involved in the strategic development of Russia. The interdepartmental nature of Landmarks is proved, which determines its interdisciplinary peculiarities of determining the boundaries of a given object, which are at the same time the boundaries of its territory. Considered all listed in the law of varieties of Sightseeing Places.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-136
Author(s):  
Гончарук ◽  
Natalya Goncharuk ◽  
Кулаженкова ◽  
Nataliya Kulazhenkova

In the article the phenomenon of discussion in legal science and practice, of administrative responsibility for violation of the law on banks and banking activities is discussed. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the fact that the litigation of violations in this sphere causes difficulties in judicial practice, because the rules of banks and banking activities are also contained in other federal laws, causing significant controversy in determining proper measures of responsibility. The article provides a comparative analysis of the legal liability for violation of the law on banks and banking activities, provided by the rules of the Administrative Code and the Federal Law «On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)»; types of interventions provided for banking offenses are discussed and the ways of solving the problem are indicated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 05021
Author(s):  
Victoriia Zhivitsa ◽  
Victoriia Sidorova ◽  
Dmitry Mosyakin

“Everyone is obliged to take care of the preservation of historical and cultural heritage, to preserve historical and cultural monuments” (Article 44 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). The study is aimed at considering the most promising methods of safekeeping, maintenance, popularization and museum presentation of cultural heritage. When working on the study, the methods of theoretical analysis and synthesis and the analogy method were used. The authors have identified and analyzed applied areas of safekeeping, maintenance, popularization and modern use of cultural heritage objects, namely: monuments of archeology, architecture and urban planning. Various techniques for inclusion of such objects in the modern socio-cultural and architectural-urban context were analysed. Criteria are selected for choosing monuments of architecture, urban planning and archeology for museification, as well as for their introduction into the tourist and recreational infrastructure of the region. Also the scenario of attracting the population, in particular youth, to the problem of preservation of cultural heritage objects is considered. The authors propose improvement of territory and construction of modular youth centers, and organization of cultural and entertainment events (festivals, exhibitions, historical quests, thematic fairs, performances) near or in the territory of the monument protection zones.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-46
Author(s):  
I. V. Buromskiy ◽  
Yu. V. Ermakova ◽  
E. S. Sidorenko

The article presents a comparative analysis of the procedural position of the expert in criminal and civil proceeding. There are considered main differences and similarities of the rights, duties and responsibilities of the expert which regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Civil Law Code of the Russian Federation, the Federal Law «About state forensic expert activity in the Russian Federation», the Order of organization and production of forensic medical examination in the state forensic expert institutions of the Russian Federation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-258
Author(s):  
Artur D. Fedorenko

The relevance of the study lies in the absence of a theoretically developed approach to a concrete understanding of the need for a deeper analysis of the work performed in relation to buildings from the Unified State Register of Cultural Heritage (Historical and Cultural Monuments), the List of Unesco Architectural Heritage Sites and newly identified objects. In the last decade, interest in the architectural heritage in Europe and Russia has increased markedly, but the method of reflection remains reduced to the construction of visual images that mirror today's privileged norms of attitudes towards monuments, (for example, the exhibitions "RUIN LUST" in the British gallery Tate 2014 and "MODERNISM AS A RUIN. An Archeology of the Present” at the General Foundation, Vienna 2009), while theorization of modern approaches to global work with monuments is a rather rare phenomenon. [1] Lack of information in this area often entails irrational financial losses in attempts to preserve ruined objects that do not have a historically confirmed background, in the restoration of destroyed monuments by means of digital anastilosis and in rare adaptive and reconstruction works that go to great compromises.


Author(s):  
Viktor Lebedev ◽  
Elena Lebedeva

The article considers the state’s initiatives for the further development of remote forms of labor relations. The features of providing medical care in a remote format are considered. Comparative analysis: draft decree of the RF Government “On peculiarities of legal regulation of labor relations in 2020” from 27.05.2020 and draft Federal law “On introducing amendments to article 57 of the Labor code of the Russian Federation” dated 02.06.2020 offering to regulate temporary and partial shift on the remote (remote) work; the main provisions of the employment contract and the peculiarities of employment contract for remote workers.


Author(s):  
Aleksandr Ivanovich Lebedev ◽  
Tamara Anatolevna Pushkareva ◽  
Svetlana Yur'evna Samokhodova

The object of this research is the immovable cultural heritage. The subject of this research is the activity of the local self-government for the conservation, use, and popularization of cultural heritage sites owned by the municipalities, located in their territories, as well as state protection of cultural heritage sites of local (municipal) significance. Such authority is set in by the Federal Law “On Cultural Heritage Sites (Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law No.131-FZ “On General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation). Leaning on the experience of the colleagues and analysis of the activity of Ufa City Municipal District Administration  of the Republic of Bashkortostan, positive and negative results obtained in the course of exercising the authority granted by the legislation in this sphere, the author acknowledges the need for a more integrated approach towards conservation of immovable cultural heritage of the local (municipal) significance; it includes the stage of its identification, and registration (with the municipal authorities), as well as organization of their rational use, such as leasing, privatization, etc. The article provides a number of recommendations, which are based on the practical experience and comprehension of theoretical material.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-275
Author(s):  
I. V. Siluyanova

Aim: to assess the compliance of legal norms regulating surrogate motherhood and moral concepts about motherhood and childhood in society.Materials and Methods. The Articles 55 (clause 9) of the Federal Law "On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation", the principles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and traditional moral concepts common in society of the Russian Federation underwent a comparative analysis.Results. Discrepancies between moral and legal norms were revealed in 3 issues. Issue 1 is related to the rights for surrogacy of unmarried persons and the rights of single citizens. In an ethical context, the statement of their rights does not correspond to the rights of children to a dignified upbringing in a family composed of a mother and father. Issue 2 refers to the ethical incorrectness of compensated surrogacy contracts. Commercial surrogacy cannot be separated from transformed forms of child trafficking. Issue 3 is related to the moral degradation of motherhood upon using technologies of surrogate and genetic motherhood.Conclusion. It is necessary to conduct additional studies on using surrogate motherhood in order to prevent abuse and violations upon its application in Russia as well as open up a public discussion on this matter.


Author(s):  
Elena Belyaeva

The urgency of the problem of comprehensive improvement and greening of the centers of historic cities has increased with the «May» decrees of the President of the Russian Federation V. V. Putin in 2018. Howev-er, the scientific foundations, methodology and design methodology of improvement does not take into ac-count the peculiarities of historical cities, the need to preserve architectural monuments, landscape and gar-den-garden art, valuable urban planning and natural environment. Evaluation of projects implemented in 2010-2018, own design experience in the historical territories of Moscow confirmed that many of the pro-ject’s shortcomings are due to the lack of special regulatory and methodological documents for design. The current GOST regulates the composition and content of works for the preservation and facilitation of the modern use of cultural heritage sites that are works of landscape and landscape art. For ordinary ob-jects of improvement in the centers of historical cities located in protective and protective zones, in the united protective zones, a design technique is necessary taking into account the status and features of such territo-ries according to the current legislation. According to the experience of designing in Moscow, most of the projects of comprehensive landscaping are areas that do not have the status of cultural heritage sites, and ordinary public spaces, landscaped and near-house areas of 0.5–2.5 hectares, located within the boundaries of protected, protected areas, including the united security zone of the historical part of Moscow established within the boundaries of the Kamer-Kollezhsky Val. Often, small parks, squares, boulevards in various functional areas, small public spaces ad-jacent to subway exits are being developed. For a comprehensive improvement and greening of the city center of historic cities, a systematic ap-proach is important – not only the preservation of cultural heritage sites, valuable urban planning, land-scape and natural environment based on the status and mode of use of territories established in accordance with Federal Law No. 73-FZ «Heritage (historical and cultural monuments) of the peoples of the Russian Federation». Within the boundaries of cultural heritage sites, there should be a «conservation» mode, in pro-tected areas and in protected zones, a «security preservation» regime of cultural heritage sites. The prospects for the use of integrated improvement and landscaping as a special type of urban plan-ning activity and means providing a socially and environmentally oriented solution of the issues of regenera-tion of the centers of historic cities are considered.


Author(s):  
И.В. Кукина

Развитие современного города подвержено влиянию изменений профессионального сознания, технологий, противоречий существующих регламентов сохранения и развития исторически ценных ареалов, во влиянии «глобалистских» и «региональных» подходов к реконструкции населенных мест. Противоречие заложено в федеральном законе «Об объектах культурного наследия (памятниках истории и культуры) народов Российской Федерации» (№ 73-ФЗ), предусматривающем объектный подход к определению памятника культуры, но не процесс, традицию и форму ее воплощения в материальной среде. В практическом градостроительстве реконструкции подвергаются транспортные системы, инфраструктуры, промышленные и иные зоны и т. д., закладывается технологичный процесс будущего функционирования города. При этом динамика современного градостроительства такова, что материальная история города становится одной из востребованных сил устойчивого развития. На современном этапе градостроительства усиливаются региональные ценности, восстанавливаются и сохраняются традиции при использовании новейших технологий во всех областях знаний и практической деятельности. The development of a modern city is influenced by changes in professional consciousness, technologies, in contradiction to existing regulations for the preservation and development of historically valuable areas, in the influence of «globalist» and «regional» approaches to the reconstruction. Contradiction is laid down in the federal law «On objects of cultural heritage (historical and cultural Monuments) of the nations of the Russian Federation» (No. 73-FZ), which provides for an object approach to defining a heritage but not the process, of its embodiment in the city. In urban design and planning, transport systems, infrastructures, industrial and other zones, etc. are being reconstructed, and a technological process is being laid for the future functioning of the city. Moreover, the dynamics of modern urban planning is such that the material history of the city becomes one of the sought-after forces of sustainable development. At the present stage of urban development, regional values, local features are strengthened, traditions are restored and preserved using the newest technologies in all areas of knowledge and practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document