Problems and prospects for the conservation and rational use of cultural heritage sites of the local (municipal) significance

The object of this research is the immovable cultural heritage. The subject of this research is the activity of the local self-government for the conservation, use, and popularization of cultural heritage sites owned by the municipalities, located in their territories, as well as state protection of cultural heritage sites of local (municipal) significance. Such authority is set in by the Federal Law “On Cultural Heritage Sites (Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law No.131-FZ “On General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation). Leaning on the experience of the colleagues and analysis of the activity of Ufa City Municipal District Administration  of the Republic of Bashkortostan, positive and negative results obtained in the course of exercising the authority granted by the legislation in this sphere, the author acknowledges the need for a more integrated approach towards conservation of immovable cultural heritage of the local (municipal) significance; it includes the stage of its identification, and registration (with the municipal authorities), as well as organization of their rational use, such as leasing, privatization, etc. The article provides a number of recommendations, which are based on the practical experience and comprehension of theoretical material.

Download Full-text

«PRESERVATION» AND «ENSURING PRESERVATION» IN THE DESIGN OF IMPROVEMENT AND GREENING OF CENTERS OF HISTORICAL CITIES

Биосферная совместимость: человек, регион, технологии ◽

10.21869/23-11-1518-2019-27-3-54-70 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 54-70

Author(s):

Elena Belyaeva

Keyword(s):

Urban Planning ◽

Cultural Heritage ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Natural Environment ◽

Public Spaces ◽

Federal Law ◽

Heritage Sites ◽

The Status ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

Historic Cities

The urgency of the problem of comprehensive improvement and greening of the centers of historic cities has increased with the «May» decrees of the President of the Russian Federation V. V. Putin in 2018. Howev-er, the scientific foundations, methodology and design methodology of improvement does not take into ac-count the peculiarities of historical cities, the need to preserve architectural monuments, landscape and gar-den-garden art, valuable urban planning and natural environment. Evaluation of projects implemented in 2010-2018, own design experience in the historical territories of Moscow confirmed that many of the pro-ject’s shortcomings are due to the lack of special regulatory and methodological documents for design. The current GOST regulates the composition and content of works for the preservation and facilitation of the modern use of cultural heritage sites that are works of landscape and landscape art. For ordinary ob-jects of improvement in the centers of historical cities located in protective and protective zones, in the united protective zones, a design technique is necessary taking into account the status and features of such territo-ries according to the current legislation. According to the experience of designing in Moscow, most of the projects of comprehensive landscaping are areas that do not have the status of cultural heritage sites, and ordinary public spaces, landscaped and near-house areas of 0.5–2.5 hectares, located within the boundaries of protected, protected areas, including the united security zone of the historical part of Moscow established within the boundaries of the Kamer-Kollezhsky Val. Often, small parks, squares, boulevards in various functional areas, small public spaces ad-jacent to subway exits are being developed. For a comprehensive improvement and greening of the city center of historic cities, a systematic ap-proach is important – not only the preservation of cultural heritage sites, valuable urban planning, land-scape and natural environment based on the status and mode of use of territories established in accordance with Federal Law No. 73-FZ «Heritage (historical and cultural monuments) of the peoples of the Russian Federation». Within the boundaries of cultural heritage sites, there should be a «conservation» mode, in pro-tected areas and in protected zones, a «security preservation» regime of cultural heritage sites. The prospects for the use of integrated improvement and landscaping as a special type of urban plan-ning activity and means providing a socially and environmentally oriented solution of the issues of regenera-tion of the centers of historic cities are considered.

Download Full-text

Administrative oversight: improving compliance practices

SHS Web of Conferences ◽

10.1051/shsconf/202111803001 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 118 ◽

pp. 03001

Author(s):

Aleksander Nikolaevich Varygin ◽

Irina Alekseevna Efremova ◽

Vladimir Gennadievich Gromov ◽

Pavel Anatolievich Matushkin ◽

Anastasia Mikhailovna Shuvalova

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Preventive Treatment ◽

Integrated Approach ◽

Federal Law ◽

Scientific Methods ◽

Administrative Supervision ◽

Analysis And Synthesis ◽

General Scientific ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

Administrative Oversight

The main purpose of the research is to determine the goals, objectives and functions of administrative supervision and develop proposals for improving the legislation of the Russian Federation regulating issues related to the implementation of administrative supervision. Research methods: general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, logical methods) and private scientific methods of cognition (formally-legally, specifically-sociological etc.). Outcome: the author’s version of the administrative supervision goals and objectives set out in the regulatory documents of the Russian Federation is proposed: 1. Administrative supervision is established to prevent the commission of crimes and other offences by persons. 2. The administrative supervision focuses on implementation by the internal affairs bodies of supervision over the observance by supervised persons of temporary restrictions on their rights and freedoms, as well as over the fulfillment of their duties stipulated by the related federal law; identification of violations by those under the supervision and taking measures in accordance with the law; individual preventive treatment of such persons. The novelty of the study is due to an integrated approach to the research into the goals, objectives and functions of administrative supervision and the developed proposals for improving the Russian legislation regulating issues in that area.

Download Full-text

Rational use of fish raw materials based on its technological potential

Fisheries ◽

10.37663/0131-6184-2021-4-106-110 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 (4) ◽

pp. 106-110

Author(s):

Eduard kim ◽

Larisa Guseva ◽

Nadezhda Kornienko

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Raw Materials ◽

Integrated Approach ◽

Promising Direction ◽

Rational Use ◽

Biological Resources ◽

Technological Potential ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

The Government ◽

Modern Technologies

The Strategy for the development of the fisheries complex of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030, approved by the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation (dated November 26, 2019 N 2798-r) provides for a set of measures for the rational use of biological resources. The most promising direction of this task is the creation of modern technologies for deep pro-cessing of fish raw materials, providing for an integrated approach and taking into account its technological potential.

Download Full-text

Cultural policy and social practice in the regions of the Russian Federation

Sociologicheskaja nauka i social naja praktika ◽

10.19181/snsp.2018.6.4.6081 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 (4) ◽

pp. 29-40

Author(s):

Sergey N. Komissarov ◽

Vladimir M. Soldatov

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Social Practice ◽

Cultural Policy ◽

Practical Experience ◽

Cultural Development ◽

The State ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government ◽

Main Components

The article analyzes the practical experience of the participation of the authors of the article in the development and implementation of the republican program for the implementation of the state cultural policy in the Republic of Dagestan. In terms of methodology, the analysis is based on the concept of regional cultural policy previously developed for this program in this subject of the Russian Federation (RF). It takes into account the most important provisions of the approved presidential "Fundamentals of the State Cultural Policy" in 2014, the government "Strategies of the State Cultural Policy for the period until 2030" in 2016, as well as other documents of strategic planning and programming of culture in the Russian Federation. The study showed that these documents require a significant update of the main components of cultural development programs in the regions of the Russian Federation. In this connection, the greatest attention is paid to the authors of the new goals and objectives of the state cultural policy in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as indicators (indicators) of evaluating the effectiveness of implementing regional programs in general, the effectiveness of achieving goals and solving problems in its main areas (sub-programs), in particular.

Download Full-text

OPPORTUNITIES AND LEGAL GROUNDS FOR ACTUALIZATION OF THE CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A RESOURCE OF TOURISM INDUSTRY OF THE CRIMEA

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie ◽

10.17223/22220836/42/26 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 287-299

Author(s):

Vera V. Novoselskaya ◽

Keyword(s):

Cultural Heritage ◽

Regional Development ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Cultural Policy ◽

Practical Importance ◽

Tourism Industry ◽

The Crimea ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

Nowadays, one of the most urgent tasks of the socio-cultural policy of the Russian Federation is to solve the problems of preservation and actualization of the cultural heritage as an important factor in the spiritual and material life of people. The study emphasizes that the issues of preservation and the development of the cultural heritage have always been significant for Russia and the Crimea. So, these issues have become particularly relevant as a result of the events of 2014 − the reunification of the Crimea with Russia and the introduction of various measures against the Crimean Republic of “anctions” nature, which caused an active search for additional resources for the regional development – including the field of culture. According to the developed approach of this article, the cultural heritage can be not only an integral part of history in modern conditions, as well as the Keeper of spirituality, etc., but also a source of the development of territories. At the same time, the author emphasizes that the cultural heritage itself, without “the involvement” in a variety of socio-cultural practices, cannot be a factor of the regional development. Particular attention is paid to the assessment of the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea in terms of preservation, the usage and the promotion of the cultural heritage. The author notes that this practical importance of the cultural heritage as a resource acquires in the relevant social and constructive practices, and above all – in tourism, are increasingly supported by the point of view in the domestic expert cultural community. The article describes the features of the representation of the cultural heritage of the Crimea. The author provides a description and analysis the number of measures that can attract the cultural heritage to the tourist activities of the region. At the same time, the author notes a certain positive effect of the use of the cultural heritage as a resource of tourism, draws attention to a number of problems that require the consideration and the solution. The conclusions emphasize that the cultural heritage and tourism are interrelated elements of the socio-cultural sphere. However, if the cultural heritage is considered as a resource for the development of territories at the level of the Federal legislation, then the usage of the cultural heritage will be still fragmented in practice. It has a mosaic character, and so it needs to be formed a systematic, interdepartmental approach. Therefore, there is an urgent need to create special platforms for the interaction of the government and the business nowadays in Russia and in its regions, including the Republic of Crimea. It is necessary to use mechanisms of the inter-sectoral coordination between tourism agencies and cultural entities, the purpose of which should be to support and to present a holistic socio-cultural environment of the territories through the implementation of their cultural potential, by means of tourist activities as well.

Download Full-text

Relevant Problems of Improving the Measures of Criminological Prevention of Extremist Crimes Committed Using Information and Telecommunication Networks

Всероссийский криминологический журнал ◽

10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(6).776-784 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (6) ◽

pp. 776-784 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sergey Ivantsov ◽

Sergey Borisov ◽

Gulfiya Usembaeva ◽

Tatiana Muzychuk ◽

Yuri Tishchenko

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Russian Federation ◽

National Policy ◽

Telecommunication Networks ◽

Federal Law ◽

Republic Of Bashkortostan ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

Internal Affairs ◽

The Republic

The goal of this study is to identify the problems in the existing system of criminological prevention of extremist crimes committed using information and telecommunication networks, and to work out ideas for its improvement. The authors use general and special research methods, primarily, sociological ones. They have studied 184 criminal cases of extremist crimes committed using information and telecommunication networks tried in courts in the cities of Irkutsk, Moscow, Penza, in Kursk, Moscow, Murmansk, Samara and Chelyabinsk Regions and in the Republic of Bashkortostan in 2010–2017. The have also analyzed the published decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and surveyed 158 employees of the internal affairs bodies, 42 judges, 80 employees of the Investigation Committee of the Russian Federation, as well as 46 faculty members from Moscow, Moscow Region and the Republic of Bashkortostan. The authors have analyzed statistical data for 2010–2017 gathered by the Chief Information and Analytics Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and the Court Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The article takes into account novels of criminal legislation regarding the use of information and telecommunication networks for committing extremist crimes introduced in 2013–2017, the clauses of the Federal Law «On the Basics of the System of Preventing Crimes in the Russian Federation» of 2016. The authors also pay attention to the Strategy of State National Policy of the Russian Federation until 2025, the Counter-Extremism Strategy of the Russian Federation until 2025, the Doctrine of Information Security of 2016, the Strategy of Developing Information Society in the Russian Federation in 2017–2030, and the new Clarifications of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. A complex research of the problems of counteracting extremist crimes committed with the use of information and telecommunication networks allowed the authors to formulate suggestions on improving the system of criminological prevention of these criminal acts.

Download Full-text

CURRENT PROBLEMS OF USING CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES IN HISTORICAL CITIES FOR TOURIST PURPOSES (EXPERIENCE OF THE CITY OF KALININGRAD)

Service & Tourism Current Challenges ◽

10.22412/1995-0411-2017-11-2-61-71 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 61-71 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Анна МИТРОФАНОВА ◽

Anna MITROFANOVA ◽

Юрий ФИЛИППОВ ◽

Yuriy Filippov

Keyword(s):

Cultural Heritage ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Legal Framework ◽

Limiting Factors ◽

Heritage Sites ◽

Regional Tourism ◽

Tourism Product ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

State Programs ◽

The City

The article presents an overview of the theoretical and practical approaches of domestic and foreign authors to the using historical and cultural heritage sites for tourist purposes for the development of regional tourism. Most scientists define cultural heritage sites as one of the most important conditions for the development of cultural and educational tourism. Further development of this territory is provided by strategic planning, state policy, the creation of a regulatory and legal framework, the development of specialized state programs, attraction of investments, creation of a specialized infrastructure, and implementation of a competent marketing policy. The article also presents the limiting factors of the using cultural heritage sites in the Russian Federation on the example of Kaliningrad region. Within the study the authors examine institutional capacities and state instruments for the restoration of cultural heritage objects with the aim of including in a regional tourism product. The authors develop authorial methodology of systematizing cultural heritage sites used for tourist purposes. The criterion for ranking cultural heritage sites is the degree of their preservation, accessibility and functional purpose. This methodology has been tested on cultural heritage sites in the city of Kaliningrad functionally related to fortifications. But it can be used in scientific research and in practice for ranking and other categories of cultural heritage sites of the regions of the Russian Federation.

Download Full-text

A Comparative Analysis of State Youth Policy in Russia and the Republic of Korea

The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University Series Political Science and Religion Studies ◽

10.26516/2073-3380.2021.38.65 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 38 ◽

pp. 65-72

Author(s):

I. V. Tsoy ◽

◽

P. I. Zaynullina ◽

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Republic Of Korea ◽

Federal Law ◽

Youth Policy ◽

Basic Principles ◽

Comparative Aspect ◽

Transitional Processes ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

The article presents main directions, priorities, and goals of youth policy in Russia and the Republic of Korea. Transitional processes and features of the state youth policy, as well as the key provisions set out in the main legislative acts, have been considered in a comparative aspect. Regarding Russia the authors revised the Federal Law “On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation” of December 31, 2020, and the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 29, 2014, “On the Foundations of State Youth Policy until 2025”. The Republic of Korea is examined with the Basic (November 20, 2020) and Framework (August 5, 2020) Laws of youth and the Sixth Basic Plan for Youth Policy 2018–2022. For the Republic of Korea this is a main document that defines national youth policy in the coming years. The study aims to correlate basic principles and priorities of youth policy in both countries.

Download Full-text

Signs characterizing the person occupying the highest position in criminal hierarchy

Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta ◽

10.53993/2078-3914/2020/1(42)/75-80 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 75-80

Author(s):

Александр Викторович Сенатов

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Organized Crime ◽

Criminal Responsibility ◽

Criminal Liability ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Federal Law ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

The Republic ◽

Definition Of ◽

Criminal Legislation

В связи с изменениями, внесенными Федеральным законом Российской Федерации от 01.04.2019 № 46-ФЗ «О внесении изменений в Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации и Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации в части противодействия организованной преступности» в уголовном законодательстве появилась ст. 210, предусматривающая уголовную ответственность за занятие высшего положения в преступной иерархии. Данное преступление имеет специальный субъект, обладающий дополнительными признаками, которые должны быть закреплены в законе. Однако в уголовном законодательстве, а также постановлениях Пленума Верховного суда Российской Федерации отсутствует определение данного понятия, а также признаки, в соответствии с которыми необходимо привлечь лицо к уголовной ответственности. В статье проанализированы научные определения «преступная иерархия», «иерархическая лестница уголовно-преступной среды», лицо, занимающее высшее положение в преступной иерархии, а также выделены конкретные признаки, характеризующие специальный субъект, закрепленный ст. 210 УК РФ. Рассматривается опыт борьбы с организованной преступностью в Республике Грузия, а также материалы следственной практики в отношении лица, привлекаемого к уголовной ответственности по признакам состава преступления, предусмотренного ст. 210 УК РФ. Due to the changes made by the Federal law of the Russian Federation of 01.04.2009 No. 46-FZ “On modification of the criminal code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation regarding counteraction of organized crime” to the criminal legislation there was Art. 210 providing criminal liability for occupation of the highest position in criminal hierarchy. This crime has a special subject with additional features that must be enshrined in the law. However, in the criminal legislation, as well as the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme court of the Russian Federation, there is no definition of this concept, as well as signs according to which it is necessary to bring a person to criminal responsibility. The article analyzes the scientific definitions of “criminal hierarchy”, “hierarchical ladder of criminal environment”, the person occupying the highest position in the criminal hierarchy, as well as the specific features, fixed Art. 210 of the Criminal Code. The article also discusses the experience of combating organized crime in the Republic of Georgia, as well as materials of investigative practice in relation to a person brought to criminal responsibility on the grounds of a crime under Art. 210 of the Criminal Code.

Download Full-text

Problems and Prospects of Economic Integration of Russia and South Korea in the ASEZs

Vestnik NSU Series History and Philology ◽

10.25205/1818-7919-2021-20-10-117-125 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 (10) ◽

pp. 117-125

Author(s):

Anna S. Shmakova

Keyword(s):

South Korea ◽

Economic Integration ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Integrated Approach ◽

High Tech ◽

Successful Implementation ◽

Environment Analysis ◽

South Korean ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

The Republic

This article analyzes the Advanced Special Economic Zones (ASEZ) initiative in the context of economic integration of the Russian Federation and South Korea. The author of the article, relying on an extensive source base, for the first time attempts to answer the question of what factors impede the successful implementation of projects by the two countries within the framework of this initiative. The purpose of the study is to identify and characterize the main problems and prospects of cooperation between the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation within the ASEZ. The study was carried out within the framework of an integrated approach using the SCAN Interfax media environment analysis system as one of the main forecasting tools. At the same time, the author draws on statistical data reflecting the state of export-import and trade turnover between the two countries over the past five years. The analysis of the source made it possible to determine that despite the huge interest of South Korean business in the emerging markets of the Russian Federation, the project could not be implemented as planned due to the complicated administrative procedures, the fundamental difference in the procedure for investing in high-tech and commercial production, lack of trust in the Russian system of economic planning as well as insufficient experience in ways of doing business with South Korean companies by Russian Far Eastern specialists.

Download Full-text