scholarly journals Job Description as a Way of Determining the Employee's Duties

2018 ◽  
pp. 145-152
Author(s):  
T. A. Darbinyan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Structural Element ◽  
Job Description ◽  
Labor Contract ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The problem of the lack of a clear understanding of the legal nature of the employee's job description in the legislation and law enforcement practice is considered. The priority is given to the conditions of the labor contract regarding the labor function in relation to the job description, including disputes related to the establishment and change of the employee's duties. The employee's labor duties are considered as a structural element of the labor contract. The right of the employer to determine the labor obligations of the employee at his own discretion is substantiated. At the same time, the criteria restricting this right are singled out. Based on the example of law-enforcement practice, the specifics of applying qualification directories in determining the employee's duties are also considered. It is proposed to make clarifications of some norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, namely of Art. 21 and 22, with an indication of the establishment of work responsibilities by the employer. These measures will make it possible to avoid collisions that arise in connection with the definition and establishment of the employee's work duties.

scholarly journals Obtaining Samples for a Comparative Study: Theoretical, Normative and Law Enforcement Problems

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-29
Author(s):  
Elena Zaitseva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes the debatable aspects of the normative regulation of obtaining samples for a comparative study according to the current Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Attention is paid to the key problems in the regulation of this action, and to the difficulties that law enforcement employees face due to them. The author examines the questions of defining the legal nature of obtaining samples for a comparative study, and the possibility of using the operative search potential instead of the procedural method to obtain comparative samples. While analyzing the problems of setting the limits of compulsion for this action, the author stresses the incorrectness of some wording in the law (Art. 202 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). In the light of ensuring the right of criminally prosecuted persons to defense, the author also presents a critical assessment of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation reflected in the Definition of July 23, 2020 № 1856-0, in the part where obtaining samples for a comparative study is recognized as an action of urgent nature.

The Mechanism Of Implementation Of The Constitution Of The Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
pp. 36-51
Author(s):  
Anatolii Yugov ◽  
Sergey Belykh
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Cultural Development ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Legal Document ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Favorable Conditions ◽  
Scientific Ideas ◽  
Rational Mechanism

The Constitution, as the main universal and comprehensive legal document, establishes fundamental principles and defines the legal basis for development of public and state life in all politically significant spheres, serves as a guarantor of legitimacy and order, gives a boost to the development of society. The special political and legal nature of the constitution, the issues of its operation and the mechanism of its implementation are of great importance. In accordance to the authors’ approach, the mechanism of implementation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation includes the following components: 1) entry of the constitution into legal force; 2) its functions; 3) constitutional algorithm of unity and differentiation of public authority; 4) forms of implementation; 5) ways of implementation; 6) subjects of implementation; 7) objects of implementation; 8) institutions for modernization; 9) guarantees of implementation. The authors conclude that the modern scientific ideas of a rational mechanism of implementation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation contribute to solving the issues of economic and cultural development of the Russian society, help creating favorable conditions for proper law enforcement, strengthening legitimacy and order.

scholarly journals Extension of a fixed-term employment contract: some theoretical and practical issues

2019 ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
Sergey Kichigin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Necessary Conditions ◽  
Practical Work ◽  
Applied Problem ◽  
Employment Contract ◽  
Labor Contract ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Term Labor

The problem of introducing changes to a fixed-term employment contract in terms of amending (extending) its term is an urgent applied problem in the work of personnel services, which often arises in the course of their practical work. Argued, based on established judicial practice, the solution to this problem will create clarity in the application of the norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. The norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation do not contain a ban on the application of the provisions of art. 72 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. However, to date there is no single, reasoned opinion on whether it is possible to change the term of a fixed-term employment contract, and if possible, under what conditions? On this issue, there are polar opinions. Both the courts and state authorities have repeatedly changed their position on this issue, right up to the diametrically opposite. In this paper, the author attempts to answer this question on the basis of the existing judicial practice and the courts understand the relevant provisions of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, the opinions of the federal authorities of the Russian Federation, as well as their own attempts to interpret the provisions of the law, and concludes that the term of a fixed-term labor contract in the presence of compliance with the necessary conditions dictated by the norms of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, established law enforcement practice.

scholarly journals Recovery of Damages from the Head of an Economic Entity: Legislation of the Russian Federation and Law Enforcement Practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 10003
Author(s):  
Y.A. Dorofeeva ◽  
M.N. Zubkova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Entities

A legal entity as a union recognized in law and absent as an independent entity outside the law, exists and carries out its activities through the governing bodies whose composition and competence are always predetermined by the norms of positive law. Undoubtedly, the rights of the governing bodies of a legal entity, as well as the duties of the head of the organization, must be strictly predetermined and have limits defined by law. Failure of this rule would mean the possibility of abuse of the right by the governing bodies of legal entities, their release from the obligation to lead the organization in good faith and reasonably, evasion from the fulfillment of obligations assumed by the legal entity through the sole executive body or another governing body of the organization. In order to prevent harm to the organization and third parties, the governing bodies of the legal entity, the legislator set certain rules for the activities of the governing bodies of the legal entity, as well as the grounds for applying measures of responsibility for violating such rules. The responsibility of the head includes the recovery of damages caused by his fault to a legal entity. The purpose of the study is to analyze the grounds and conditions for recovery of damages caused by the head of the organization in the legislation of the Russian Federation and arbitration practice. The objectives of the study are to determine the grounds for liability of the head of a legal entity in the form of damages, show the genesis of the formation of Russian legislation and the practice of its use by courts on recovering losses of a legal entity from the head of an organization, identify criteria for determining the presence of both good faith and reasonableness in the behavior of managers of legal entities, brought to responsibility in the form of the obligation to pay damages to the organization they lead. In carrying out the study, such methods were used as: general scientific - analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, historical method; private-scientific: formal-legal, comparative-legal, allowing to consider the issues of bringing to responsibility in the form of recovery of damages of the head of a legal entity; Formal legal method for determining the content of abstract categories - reasonableness, good faith, permissible behavior, method of system-structural analysis - to study the possibility of applying damages as a form of responsibility for the guilty behavior of a special entity - the head of a legal entity The result of the study is the establishment of the grounds and conditions for applying to the head (former head) of a legal entity responsibility in the form of recovery of damages caused to the organization managed by it, in the legislation of the Russian Federation and judicial practice. The findings and results of the study can be used for further research and as educational material, in legislative work and in law enforcement practice.

scholarly journals The Legal Status of Subjects of Corporate Relationships: Doctrinal and Law Enforcement Aspects

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Oksana V. Cherkasova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
Generic Term ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article reviews the legal status of subjects of corporate relationships, analyzes doctrinal and law enforcement aspects. The author analyzes the scientists’ standpoints, various models of interaction between the subjects of corporate relationships existing in foreign law and order, case law, arrives at conclusions about the correlation between the categories of the “right of participation”, “right of membership”, “right of management”. It is noted that the membership concept evolves out of participation by performing the function of a generic term. It is suggested to determine the “right of management” of a corporation as just one of the member’s activity areas along with other rights. The author recommends to ensure consistency of the provision of Article 2 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Articles 65.2, 65.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation where the concept of the “right of participation” would act as a basic one and the “right of management” would be its constituent part.

scholarly journals Legal awareness and legal education as a form of implementation of legal initiative

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Red'ko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Objective Reality ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Destructive Processes ◽  
The Right

The modern society of the Russian Federation is faced with the massive incompetence of specialists in various fields of activity and branches of knowledge. The situation reached such a climax that a person and a citizen began to be openly afraid to get sick, to turn to law enforcement or human rights bodies, to delve into the essence or content of laws in the event of any kind of tort. Setting ourselves the goal of understanding such destructive processes for the state, as well as the ways of their counteraction, we came to the conclusion that these phenomena of objective reality are associated with both external and internal causes, and one of the ways to eliminate them may be recognition and the development of the right of active citizens and civil society to legal initiative. Considering that the sphere of research interests was in the plane of law, it became possible to conduct a study in the field of legal awareness and legal education, which does not exclude the possibility of using the identified positive and negative aspects for other spheres of human and citizen's life.

Questions of employment of convicts to corrective works

2019 ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
Анна Владимировна Мусалева
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Place Of Residence ◽  
Professional Activities ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

Статья посвящена наказанию в виде исправительных работ. На сегодняшний день существуют проблемы в правоприменительной практике, обусловленные, в том числе пробелами в законодательстве. На основе анализа обзоров статистических данных по назначению и исполнению данного вида наказания и практики его применения автор приходит к выводу, что существует ряд проблем при реализации исправительных работ при трудоустройстве осужденных, которые можно подразделить на две группы: первая, связанная с исполнением наказания, например, отсутствие разрешения у осужденных иностранных граждан на осуществление в Российской Федерации профессиональной деятельности; вторая - определяющая отбывание наказания, например, отсутствие правовой регламентации ответственности осужденного за нарушения порядка и условий отбывания наказания. В связи с этим автор предлагает пути совершенствования законодательства в области исполнения и отбывания исправительных работ. The article is devoted to punishment in the form of correctional labor, since today there are problems in law enforcement practice, due, inter alia, to gaps in legislation. Based on the analysis of statistical data on the appointment and execution of this type of punishment and the practice of its application, the author comes to the conclusion that there are a number of problems in the implementation of correctional work, which can be divided into two groups. The first group associated with the execution of this type of punishment: the lack of permission of convicted foreign citizens to carry out professional activities in the Russian Federation, for changing their place of residence; the lack of convicts to correctional labor the right to parole; the second-determining the serving of punishment: the lack of legal regulation of the responsibility of the convicted person for violations of the order and conditions of serving punishment. In this regard, the author suggests ways to improve legislation in the field of execution and serving of correctional labor.

Legal and organizational bases of execution of preventive measures by criminal executive inspections

2020 ◽  
pp. 42-51
Author(s):  
Ольга Васильевна Коростылёва
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
Organizational Issues ◽  
Executive Authority ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation

В статье рассматриваются правовые и организационные вопросы, возникающие при исполнении мер пресечения, которые в соответствии с уголовно-процессуальным законодательством исполняют уголовно-исполнительные инспекции Федеральной службы исполнения наказаний (ФСИН России). Автор исследует исторически сложившиеся традиции исполнения мер пресечения и выявляет несоответствие в задачах, возложенных на ФСИН России, в связи с необоснованным расширением круга обязанностей сотрудников уголовно-исполнительных инспекций, вынужденных исполнять, кроме наказаний без изоляции от общества и иных мер уголовно-правового характера, еще и меры пресечения. В этой связи в теоретическом и прикладном аспектах актуальность и определенный интерес представляет статья, посвященная рассмотрению практики применения мер уголовно-процессуального принуждения уголовно-исполнительными инспекциями. Существенной новизной настоящей работы является отражение современных проблем применения следующих мер пресечения: домашний арест, запрет определенных действий, залог при возложении на подозреваемого/обвиняемого соблюдать запреты в соответствии с ч. 6 ст. 105.1 Уголовно-процессуального кодекса Российской Федерации, основным контролирующим органом - федеральным органом исполнительной власти, осуществляющим правоприменительные функции, функции по контролю и надзору в сфере исполнения уголовных наказаний в отношении осужденных, а именно - уголовно-исполнительными инспекциями. Определяющее значение в обосновании позиции автора играет тот факт, что согласно руководящим нормативным правовым актам исполняемые сегодня уголовно-исполнительными инспекциями меры пресечения, за исключением домашнего ареста, не имеют должного законодательного закрепления. Кроме выделенных проблем, автором предложены пути их решения, которые были получены в ходе системного анализа действующего уголовно-процессуального и уголовно-исполнительного законодательства. The article deals with the legal and organizational issues that arise in the execution of preventive measures, which, in accordance with the criminal procedure legislation, are executed by the criminal Executive inspections of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. The author examines the historical traditions of execution of preventive measures, and identifies inconsistencies in the tasks assigned to the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia in connection with the unjustified expansion of the range of duties of employees of criminal Executive inspections, forced to perform, in addition to punishments without isolation from society and other measures of a criminal legal nature, also preventive measures. In this regard, in theoretical and applied aspects, the article devoted to the review of the practice of applying measures of criminal procedural coercion by criminal Executive inspections is relevant and of some interest. A significant novelty of this work is the reflection of modern problems of applying the following preventive measures: house arrest, prohibition of certain actions, bail when assigning a suspect / accused to comply with prohibitions in accordance with Pt. 6 of Art. 105.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the main controlling body-the Federal Executive authority that performs law enforcement functions, functions of control and supervision in the field of execution of criminal penalties against convicted persons, namely, criminal Executive inspections. The author's position is based on the fact that according to the guiding normative legal acts, the preventive measures implemented by the criminal Executive inspections today, with the exception of house arrest, do not have a proper legislative basis. In addition to the identified problems, the author suggests ways to solve them, which were obtained in the course of a systematic analysis of the current criminal procedure and criminal enforcement legislation.

scholarly journals Unreasonably Privileged Position of a Relocated Employee

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-288
Author(s):  
Sergey Kichigin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Economic Conditions ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Labor Contract ◽  
Start Date ◽  
Privileged Position ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The research features the institution of relocation of an employee to another employer for permanent position. The author compares the legal status of the relocated employee and the employee with a labor contract. According to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, an employee relocated to a full-time job is placed in an unreasonably privileged position in comparison with those who resigned and were routinely hired for a new job. Resignation and relocation do not have significant substantive differences, as well as the routine employment procedure and relocation. However, the law establishes two significant advantages for the relocated employee. First, the new employer is obliged to sign a labor contract with the relocated employee within one month from the date of dismissal. Second, the position is reserved for the relocated employee, even if it is still occupied by another employee who is in the process of dismissal. Therefore, the law denies the resigning employee the right to withdraw the application. This situation is unacceptable as it violates the rights of employees, because the artificially allocated category of relocated employees gets unjustified privileges from the employer. As a result, there is a discrimination of the overwhelming number of employees hired in the general manner, including those who signed a contract with a delayed start date. The author proposes to exclude from the Labor Code of the Russian Federation the norm on relocation of an employee to a permanent job to another employer, as well as the related norms in Articles 64, 70, and 77. The norms do not fit into the current socio-economic conditions and comply neither with international nor with Russian laws. In order to stimulate the parties to pre-register an employment contract, the author proposes to establish job guarantees that are currently applied to relocated workers for those with a labor contract with a postponed date.

scholarly journals ON CERTAIN PROBLEMS OF CONFERMENT OF THE TITLE «LABOR VETERAN»: ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
A. A. Elaev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Rights ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The right to free work and choice of activity is enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. At the same time, ensuring and protecting the labor rights of citizens is one of the main categories of the rule of law. The legislation of the Russian Federation regulating labor relations is aimed at encouraging a conscientious attitude to work for a long time, and one of these types of encouragement is the title Veteran of labor. However, in practice, quite often there are certain difficulties that arise due to departmental and regional rulemaking. The article attempts to analyze the current situation based on judicial practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document