scholarly journals Compliance with the Principle of Federalism in Bringing to Administrative Responsibility

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
A. V. Rudenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Administrative Code ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The subject of the study is the extension of the principle of federalism on the validity of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The paper raises the issue of its extension to normative legal acts adopted by the public authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipal normative legal acts. The author has analyzed the decisions of courts of different levels on bringing to administrative responsibility on the basis of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation for violations of the law rules of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The article contains conclusions about the need to correct the provisions of Article 1.3 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. The proposed design of the norm will clearly delineate the powers of the Russian Federation and the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in determining administrative responsibility and excluding the possibility of brining to administrative responsibility for the violation of normative legal acts of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipal bodies on the basis of the rules of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation.

Human Rights Activities as a Function of the Prosecutor’s Office

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.

scholarly journals Legal Mechanisms for Protection of Migrants' Rights by the Public Authorities of the Russian Federation

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenia Minakova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Migration Policy ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Special Role ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Normative Documents ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Migrants Rights

The article analyzes methods of ensuring the migrants rights by the public authorities of the Russian Federation, the individual elements of the migration policy of the Russian Federation relating to the activities of public authorities. It considers the activities in the field of protection of the migrants rights by such authorities as the Russian President's Office for Constitutional Rights of Citizens, the Presidential Council for Civil Society and Human Rights, the Council for Interethnic Relations, General Directorate for Migration, Chief Directorate for Migration Issues of Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, their normative documents, that regulate their activities. It examines separately the activities of the RF Government in the field of protection of the migrants rights, as well as judicial authorities; it identifies the special role of the RF Constitutional Court in the field of ensuring the rights of migrants, refugees, the internally displaced and stateless persons. It underlines the role of authority bodies of the RF entities in ensuring the migrants rights in terms of Irkursk Oblast. The article offers to differentiate strictly the role of each authority body in the field of migrants rights protection, as well as to pay specific attention to regulation of activities of the FR entities authority bodies in this direction.

scholarly journals Local Self-Government in the Public Government System: A New Constitutional Dimension

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Kozhevnikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Public ◽  
System A ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The article analyzes certain provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ “On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public power” in terms of regulatory regulation of local self-government. According to the analysis the author comes to the conclusion that with the entry into effect of the mentioned legal act the content of individual elements of the constitutional-legal bases of local self-government will change, but the nature and scope of modifications in many respects will depend on the provisions of the rules of sectoral legislation aimed at implementing the relevant provisions of the Constitution. In this regard, the Federal legislator has a huge responsibility to create an “updated” legal framework for the implementation of the constitutional foundations of local self-government, taking into account the already established law enforcement practice, the positions of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation, as well as the state's international obligations under the European Charter on local self-government.

The Subject of a Crime Under Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
E. G. Bykova ◽  
◽  
A. A. Kazakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Code

The change in the disposition of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation led to questions from law enforcement officers about from what moment a person is considered to be held administratively liable and what to mean by the commission of a similar act. The article carries out a systematic legal analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in order to formulate proposals for solving the indicated problems. The fundamental method was dialectical. The formal legal method was used in the study of regulations governing certain aspects of the legal assessment of unlawful acts that take into account administrative precedence. Using a comparative legal method, a distinction was made between situations where a person was ordered to be held administratively liable and an administrative penalty was imposed. Scientific publications on the subject were analyzed. It was concluded that the current version of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, containing a formally indefinite legal category, raises the problem of calculating the one-year period during which a person can be prosecuted under this norm if there is an administrative precedence. In addition, it is justified that a «similar act» should be understood only as an administrative offense, responsibility for which is provided for in Art. 20.3.1 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. The use of criminal law by analogy is unacceptable, therefore, it is proposed to amend the disposition of Part 1 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code to eliminate the identified gap. The problem identified could be the basis for further scientific research. The practical significance is due to the fact that the positions formulated by the authors can be taken into account in the process of improving criminal law, when amending the relevant explanations of the highest court in this category of cases in order to form a unified practice of applying criminal law.

Problems of administrative responsibility for violation of the law on banks and banking

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-136
Author(s):  
Гончарук ◽  
Natalya Goncharuk ◽  
Кулаженкова ◽  
Nataliya Kulazhenkova
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Research Topic ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Federal Laws ◽  
The Law ◽  
Banks And Banking ◽  
Administrative Code ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

In the article the phenomenon of discussion in legal science and practice, of administrative responsibility for violation of the law on banks and banking activities is discussed. The relevance of the research topic is determined by the fact that the litigation of violations in this sphere causes difficulties in judicial practice, because the rules of banks and banking activities are also contained in other federal laws, causing significant controversy in determining proper measures of responsibility. The article provides a comparative analysis of the legal liability for violation of the law on banks and banking activities, provided by the rules of the Administrative Code and the Federal Law «On the Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia)»; types of interventions provided for banking offenses are discussed and the ways of solving the problem are indicated.

scholarly journals Criminal Liability for Knowingly Unlawful Sentence, Decision or Other Judicial Act

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-102
Author(s):  
Pavel Metelsky ◽  
Nadezhda Verchenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Considerable Complexity

Introduction. The publication is devoted to the corpus delicti, provided for by Art. 305 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which, being, in fact, a special type of official abuse, stands out as the direct object of a criminal assault and a special subject, since it can be committed exclusively by professional judges. The main features of the objective and subjective parties, qualifying signs of the offense are revealed, some problems that arise when applying this criminal law are outlined. Purpose. The goal is to analyze the design features of the crime and issues that arise when applying this rule. Methodology. The method of a formal legal analysis of the norms of the criminal law and theoretical provisions on problems directly related to the application of this rule was used. Results. The public danger of a criminal act that undermines the very foundations of justice is obvious, in connection with which it stands out as an independent crime by all the Russian Criminal Codes, starting in 1922, the history of criminal responsibility for its commission can be traced in our country in general since the 16th century. The current criminal law prohibition is characterized by considerable complexity, due to both the blanket nature of the disposition of the norm itself and the presence of discrepancies in the understanding of the signs embodied in it. Conclusion. The implementation of criminal liability for this crime involves the establishment of not only circumstances directly related to the corpus delicti that lie in the criminal law field. The subject of an infringement, a judicial act, must be subjected to procedural review without fail, after which, subject to the consent of the Higher Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation, in fact, and the mechanism of criminal prosecution is “launched”. That is, a truly “multi-way” combination of actions is necessary, carried out in several stages, and the problem itself to some extent becomes interdisciplinary, going beyond only criminal law.

scholarly journals Strategic planning of socio-economic development of a large city

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Tatiana Frolova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Large City ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Strategic Goals ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject. The article shows the approaches to the process of creating and realizing strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities in the Russian Federation. Thestrategies of socio-economic development of the largest cities have been fundamental inthe formation of such city agglomerations as “Big Volgograd” (Volgograd), “Big Rostov”(Rostov), Zhigulevskaya agglomeration (Samara), Nizhegorodskaya agglomeration (NizhnyNovgorod), Chelyabinsk city agglomeration (Chelyabinsk) and these strategies contain themain ways of development which go far beyond the competence of local importance.The purpose. The article addresses the problems that arise in the process of creating strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities including the extent of powerbetween public authorities of different levels.The methodology. The systematic approach, methods of formal and comparative analysisof law as well as synthesis are used in the article.Results. Before the adoption of Federal Law “On the Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”(further down the article 172-FZ) strategic planning was unsystematic and therewere no unitary law-based approaches towards the drafting process of strategic planningdocuments. After the adoption of 172-FZ the situation has not dramatically changed.The analysis of strategic planning in the largest cities shows the lack of unitary approachestowards the drafting process of strategic planning documents, the definitions of missionand strategic goals of development, the assessment of largest cities importance in the contextof over-regional, regional and internal city area development. Also, the peculiarities ofterritorial planning and budgetary process in municipal establishments are not taken intoconsideration.

scholarly journals Некоторые вопросы совершенствования отечественного законодательства об административной ответственности

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (52) ◽  
pp. 100-104
Author(s):  
А.С. Кошель
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Business Climate ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
First Time ◽  
Development Prospects ◽  
Insufficient Knowledge ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

В статье кратко рассмотрены перспективы реформы отечественного законодательства об административной ответственности, озвученные в докладе на круглом столе «Законодательство об административной ответственности: современное состояние, перспективы развития», состоявшемся в Дальневосточном федеральном университете 9 апреля 2019 г. Кодекс Российской Федерации об административной ответственности претерпел на 2019 г. уже более 3000 изменений (правок), а нормы об административной ответственности на сегодня содержатся в большом количестве федеральных законов, сам Кодекс содержит большое количество бланкетных норм, а правоприменители отличаются слабыми знаниями законодательства, что в совокупности затрудняет правоохранительную функцию законодательства об административной ответственности. Автором на основе материалов судебной и правоприменительной практики предлагается внесение в концепцию реформы законодательства об административной ответственности инициатив по введению специального общественного квалификационного экзамена для правоприменителей законодательства об административной ответственности; установлению строгой категории вины юридического лица и вины должностного лица, учитывающей избежание наказания двух лиц за совершение одного административного проступка; либерализации административной ответственности по административным проступкам, совершённым впервые, вплоть до ограничения такой ответственности замечанием. Автор убеждён, что реформа федерального и регионального законодательства об административной ответственности в Российской Федерации должна носить комплексный характер и должна быть направлена не на карательную функцию норм, а на правоохранительную, с целью избежания злоупотребления правоприменителями своими полномочиями и создания условий для нормализации функционирования коммерческих и некоммерческих организаций в Российской Федерации, повышения уровня защищенности бизнес-климата в стране. The article reviews the prospects of reforming the legislation on administrative responsibility based on the round table report “Legislation on administrative re-sponsibility: modern state, development prospects” in the Far Eastern Federal University on April 9, 2019. As of 2019, over 3000 changes (amendments) had been introduced into the Russian Federation Code on administrative responsibility; administrative responsibility norms can nowadays be found in many federal laws; the Code contains a lot of blanket norms; law enforcers have an insufficient knowledge of the legislation thus hindering the law-enforcing function of the legislation on administrative responsibility. Based on the material of court and law-enforcement practices, it is suggested to introduce the initiatives on implementing a special public qualifying examination of the law-enforcers for the legislation of administrative responsibility, strict categories of the corporate body’s guilt and office holder’s guilt that would avoid punishing two people for committing the same administrative offence, liberalization of administrative responsibility on administrative offences committed first time including reducing this responsibility to admonition. The author of the article is sure that reforming the federal and regional legislations on administrative responsibility in the Russian Federation has to be complex and switch its function from punishment to preventing the law enforcers from misusing their authority; it also has to create the conditions for normalizing the functioning of commercial and noncommercial organizations in the Russian Federation and increase the level of business climate protection in the country.

scholarly journals Digital Transformation of the procedure for bringing foreign citizens to administrative responsibility

2021 ◽  
pp. 84-97
Author(s):  
Yuliya Viktorovna Paukova ◽  
Konstantin Vladimirovich Popov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The Public ◽  
Proactive Approach ◽  
Other Information ◽  
Automated Information System ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Specific Amount ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

  The subject of this research is the procedure for imposing administrative fine on foreign citizens and stateless persons, with or without administrative expulsion. The object of this research is the public relations that arise in the process of bringing the indicated persons to administrative responsibility. The goal consists in formulation of the proposals aimed at amendment of the procedure for bringing foreign citizens and stateless persons to administrative responsibility in the Russian Federation in the conditions of digitalization of government actions. Recommendation is made to amend the procedure for bringing to administrative responsibility in case of violating the migration legislation of the Russian Federation. Considering the proactive approach of the government towards digitalization of the migration sphere, the author offers the development and implementation of the “Automated Information System for Migration Control”, which would acquire the personal records of a migrant (identity, marital status, fact of committing an offence, or other information affecting the imposition of penalty) from other automated information systems. The article substantiates the need for bringing foreign citizens to administrative responsibility by the internal affairs officials based on the suggestions of the indicated system, formed using the artificial intelligence technologies, namely machine learning. The author offers to implement the rating that in the instance of imposing administrative fine would allow calculating a specific amount, or in the instance of administrative expulsion –the accurate time limit for closing entry. Transformation of the procedure for bringing to administrative responsibility would lead to more equitable court decisions, eliminate the possibility of selecting the norm by an official at his own discretion, and reduce the burden on the courts.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document