scholarly journals Polyvariety of the Structure of the Normative Element in the Mechanism of Legal Regulation of Civil Relations: Theoretical Aspect

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 23-31
Author(s):  
A. V. Kostruba
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Theoretical Aspect ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Main Element ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Regulatory Influence ◽  
Legal Nature

The mechanism of legal regulation of relations is considered as a system of legal means, methods and forms with the help of which social relations are regulated. The author argues about the variability of the normative element of the mechanism under consideration, since it is not always possible to include the multiplicity of parameters that form its content and essence exclusively into the content of a legal norm. It is argued that the rule of law is not the main element of the mechanism of legal regulation through which relations between members of the society are being regulated. The corresponding regulatory influence is ensured with the help of individual regulators that have a different legal nature due to their limited, personalized obligatoriness. The author proves that, along with a legal norm, an individual normative prescription acts as a legal means of ensuring the operation of the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations, and its form is represented by alter-normative regulators (contract, custom). In addition, along with normative and alter-normative regulators, super-normative (principles of law) and quasi-normative (judicial acts) are highlighted.

scholarly journals Interpretation of Legal Norms as an Optional Component of the Legal Regulation Mechanism

2021 ◽  
pp. 252-256
Author(s):  
T. I. Tarakchonych
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Regulation Mechanism ◽  
Important Place ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
Definition Of

The article draws a special attention to the definition of such important categories of legal science as «interpretation of legal norms», «mechanism of legal regulation», «stages of legal regulation mechanism». The particular attention is paid to the understanding of the mechanism of legal regulation and its stages. The mandatory and optional stages of the legal regulation mechanism is distinguished. It is emphasized that the mandatory stage provides for the need to regulate certain social relations, which, first of all, are modeled, detected and implemented in certain subjective rights and legal obligations. The optional stage includes the necessity for an official interpretation of the legal norm in the process of its application. The place and role of interpretation of the rules of law in the mechanism of legal regulation have been determined. The article defines that the interpretation of legal norms is a process of clarifying of the content of the rule of law by the relevant subjects in order to ensure an unambiguous understanding of the content, its accurate and balanced application by both authorized and relevant entities in specific legal relations. The research at the general theoretical and methodological level distinguishes the essence and peculiarities of interpretation of legal norms, functional orientation, methods and means of its implementation. It is noted that the interpretation of legal norms ensures an unambiguous understanding of the rule of law, has an informational orientation and forms the legal consciousness of the subjects, the motivation for their behavior, is the basic basis for the development of the legal culture of society, the determinant of legal influence and the basis for improving legal regulation. The article states that the interpretation of legal norms has an important place in the mechanism of legal regulation along with its other components. It is characterized by the fact that it is carried out by analyzing of legal norms through a system of legal assessments, views, ideas, etc. Keywords: legal norm, interpretation of legal norms, functions of interpretation of legal norms, legal regulation,mechanism of legal regulation, stages of legal regulation mechanism

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF LEGAL NORMS AND ITS ASSESSMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE RULE OF LAW (ON THE EXAMPLE OF TAX LEGISLATION)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
Volodymyr USTYMENKO ◽  
◽  
Ruslan DZHABRAILOV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Tax Policy ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Project Work ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Economic Criterion ◽  
The Rule Of Law

It is noted that an important quality of legal regulation should be the effectiveness of the method and means chosen by the state to promote the achievement of the planned socio-economic result. Despite the fact that some principles of normative project work have been covered at the legislative level (in particular, on the example of legislation in the field of regulatory policy), the practice of adopting normative legal acts the effectiveness of which remains questionable continues. One of the reasons for this state of legal regulation of social relations is the improper consideration, and sometimes conscious disregard for theoretical and applied constructions that have been substantiated within the framework of legal and economic science. As a result, this leads to the establishment of an unjust order in a certain area of public relations, which threatens the further sustainable development of the state. In view of this, attention is focused on the defects of the implementation of legal principles, especially the principle of the rule of law, in the field of legal regulation of economic relations, which leads to the imaginary effectiveness of the relevant legal acts. It is proved that the effectiveness of legal regulation of public relations will be evidenced not only by the rate of achievement of the expected result at the expense of the minimum necessary resources of economic entities, citizens and the state (i.e. the economic criterion), but also the degree of compliance with the rule of law, which will allow to talk about promoting the adoption by a legal act of the ideology of justice. Based on the analysis of some examples of legislative practice in the field of taxation, it is established that the adoption of regulations contrary to the rule of law has led to the direction of tax policy to achieve socio-economic results that contradict the principles of tax policy as a type of economic policyand principles of social policy of the state in terms of income redistribution set out in strategic documents.

scholarly journals Components of the normative element in the mechanism of legal regulation of civil relations

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Kostruba A. V.
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Structural Adjustment ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Private Life ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Real Field ◽  
The Real ◽  
Regulatory Influence

The article is devoted to the study of the structure of the normative element of the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations. The mechanism of legal regulation of relations is considered as a system of legal means, methods and forms which regulate social relations. At the same time, under current conditions of the society development such regulation is achieved with minimal normative of the state. Scientists claim the variability of the normative element of the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations. The normative regulator is not the only way of influence on the subject’s assessment of abilities in the social environment. The abovementioned is manifested in the field of relations free of the state imperative pressure – relations, which formation is conditioned by the sphere of a person’s private life. Legal regulation of social relations in this field is achieved through the mediation of other regulators which have a common nature with the legal norm but a subjective limitation of their obligation. Variability of the parameters making their content and essence may not always be fit into previously established normative regulators. Therefore, the legal norm may not regulate certain types of social relations. Moreover, the disposition of legal norms may not even meet the real needs of the subjects of a particular relationship. Or vice versa, a legal norm may contain only declarative principles or definitions, complicating the appropriate level of legal regulation of relations. It is proved that legal norm is not a fundamental element of the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations, through which relations between the society members from the essential field to the real field and formation of corresponding legal relations between them are regulated. Corresponding regulatory influence is provided by other regulators of various legal nature, but of identical axiological significance. The author argues that along with the legal norm the legal means for ensuring the mechanism of legal regulation of public relations include alter-normative regulators (agreement, practice), which represent a mutually agreed formation and further application of a corresponding normative structure to the specific model of behaviour of the participants of legal relations. Besides, over-normative (legal principles) and quasi-normative (judicial acts) regulators are distinguished along with normative and alter-normative regulators. Since regulatory influence on public relations goes beyond the legal norm, the corresponding element of the mechanism of legal regulation requires its structural adjustment. The scientist coins a term a normative construct as set of legal concepts identical to the legal norm for description of an element of the mechanism of legal regulation of social relations Key words: mechanism of legal regulation of social relations, normative construct, agreement, practice, principles of law, legal norm, court decision.

scholarly journals THE ACTIVITY OF THE STATE INSPECTION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF RUSSIA AS A SUBJECT OF SECURITY OF NATIONAL SECURITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 6(72) (3) ◽  
pp. 213-220
Author(s):  
Y. V. Kapranova ◽  
G. M. Ovsepyan
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Public Places ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Police Activity

The article discusses the main approaches to understanding the essence of the rule of law in general, and in public places in particular, and also reveals its features as a field of activity of the police. The positions of scientists studying the rule of law and other categories related to it in the context of police activities are analyzed. The relationship between law and order and public order is demonstrated. It is concluded that the scope of police activity extends mainly to groups of public relations that make up the essence of public order in a narrow (“police”) sense. Attention is focused on the relationship of the «public» of the rule of law with the place where the actions of the subjects of the relevant legal relations are carried out. The groups of legal relations that make up the essence of the rule of law are identified, the protection of which is provided by the police. The content of the rule of law as a field of police activity has been clarified. Attention is drawn to the primacy of public order and the need for legal regulation of social relations, where civil society cannot or should not self-organize to achieve the goals of social development, create a safe environment for life, and also recognize the police as the main subject of law enforcement in public places.

scholarly journals Normative-Instrumental Law-Order Constant

2019 ◽  
pp. 395-403
Author(s):  
Olga GANCHUK
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Dialectical Approach

The article updates the normative and instrumental component as a permanent basis for the sustainable concept of law and order. In this case, the rule of law is defined as a state of ordering social relations based on law; as an objectively and subjectively established state of social life, based on the regulatory needs, principles of law, and on the democratic needs, rights and obligations, freedom and responsibility of all subjects of law. The constant and permanent basis of law and order is the sphere of implementation of legal regulations. The sphere of the legal order is the sphere of the legislation. A prerequisite for the existence of law and order in society is the proper exercise of rights and obligations by all legal entities, which, in turn, requires clear legal regulations, predictability and stability of legal regulation. The unambiguous and relatively stable meaning of the concepts used in the legislation should facilitate the effective realization of the rights and duties of the person, and provide the possibility of foreseeing the legal consequences of her actions. Legal rules should be clearly and unambiguously formulated to prevent the possibility of arbitrariness in the enforcement process. However, when using the dialectical approach, the article draws attention to the fact that in some cases the excessive detail of the legal regulation, associated with it the possibility of incompatibility of legislation with the level of development of social relations, its obsolescence and static, can be a source of violation of human rights and, accordingly, a factor that adversely affects the state of law and order in society. Recognizing the rule of law as the ultimate result of the action of positive law, the author emphasizes that its achievement in a modern self-organized society inevitably involves a reasonable combination of both normative and non-normative regulation (carried out on the basis of values formed in society). It is within the reconciliation of normative and non-normative, positive law and order are judged and qualified as meeting the requirements of due diligence - fair or unfair, timely or untimely, appropriate or impractical, nominal or real, progressive or reactionary, etc.

scholarly journals Legal and Practical Conditionality of the Prosecutor’s Participation in the Consideration of Administrative Off enses Cases in Commercial Courts

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Т. S. Nazritskaya
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
Commercial Courts

The paper examines the prosecutor’s role in the administrative jurisdictional proceedings in a commercial court. The author provides numerous examples from prosecutorial and judicial practice, reflecting the activities of prosecutors to strengthen the rule of law through participation in commercial litigation. The paper also indicates the requirements imposed by legislation, organizational and administrative documents of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation and the prosecutor’s offices of the constituent entities for the work of prosecutors in this direction. Based on statistical data on the number of cases initiated by prosecutors and the corresponding cases considered by the courts, the role of the prosecutor in the consideration of cases of the analyzed category by the courts is determined. According to the results of the study, the author points out the shortcomings of certain provisions of the law, determines the need to improve the theoretical foundations of the participation of the prosecutor in the consideration of cases of administrative offenses in commercial courts, emphasizes that changing the procedure for legal regulation of the participation of the prosecutor in commercial litigation is necessary in connections with changing social relations, and the preservation of the existing order gives rise to stagnation in the development of procedural legislation.

scholarly journals PROCEDURES IN THE SCIENCE OF LABOUR LAW

2020 ◽  
pp. 143-152
Author(s):  
Tatiana S. Nasalevich ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Labour Law ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Imple Mentation ◽  
Logical Norm

The science of labour law distinguishes, among others, between procedural rules of law. According to labour scientists, procedural rules streamline, ensure and guarantee the process of implementing the substantive norms of labour law and determine the procedure for the activities of subjects to enforce the rights and obligations enshrined in the regulatory substan-tive norms. The subject of legal regulation is the activity of creating substantive norms of labour law and ensuring their implementation, as well as the activity of non-jurisdictional bodies involved in resolving individual and collective labour disputes. The definitions of procedural norms proposed by several authors ultimately boil down to the process of implementing the legal norm. It is therefore difficult to agree that procedural norms are a separate kind of legal norm. The separation of procedural norms is unlikely to be justified simply because any norm of labour law cannot be understood, let alone implemented, in isolation from the procedure for its application. Since the separation of procedural norms is questionable, the theory of the autonomy of labour procedural law cannot be justified. The features of the procedural rules of labour law reflected in scientific research are the features of the procedures of labour law. Procedures of labour law are part of the logical norm and are contained in its disposition. Procedures of labour law are the legal means of imple-menting substantive or procedural norms of labour law and their main objective is to maintain the law and order in the company (or individual employer). As an integral part of the rule of law and part of the mechanism of legal regulation, the procedure ensures its effectiveness. The more detailed the procedure in the rule of law is, the fewer disputes arise between the parties to the employment relationship, which has a positive impact on the results of law enforcement. Legal provisions "need" procedures for the imple-mentation of legal provisions, because it is the procedures that "animate" the provision and allow it to achieve the desired result.

scholarly journals THE SUBJECTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF MEDIATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
Ksenia Tokareva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
State Policy ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Local State ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Governmental Institutions

The article is devoted to the study of the subject composition of the administrative and legal regulation of mediation. The development of alternative ways of resolving disputes and conciliation procedures is one of the priority areas for improving the mechanism for protecting violated subjective rights. Mediation has proven its effectiveness for both the state and society, as evidenced by its legal regulation in most foreign countries. A dispute resolution procedure involving a neutral third party can improve access to justice, which is fully in line with the rule of law in any developed state governed by the rule of law. New tendencies towards the peaceful settlement of disputes (conflicts) contribute to the achievement of social harmony in society. As Ukraine is one of the few countries in Europe where there is no legal regulation of mediation, the study of the subjects of administrative and legal regulation of the procedure is relevant. The study took into account the division of legal regulation into state and non-state. Domestic scientific views on the system of subjects of administrative and legal regulation in various spheres of public relations were analyzed. The problem of lack of administrative and legal regulation of the social and legal institution of mediation in Ukraine was emphasized. The author proposed his own list of subjects of administrative and legal regulation of mediation. The system of such entities includes the state, its bodies and non-governmental institutions that exercise powers in the relevant field. The main directions of the state policy in the field of implementation of the mediation procedure in Ukraine were also identified. The importance of actively promoting and stimulating the development of mediation, consolidation and protection of new social relations that arise during the mediation procedure, setting quality standards for mediation and requirements for professional mediators, control of such activities. The author focuses on the disclosure of competence, legal forms of activity of management entities. It is stated that the main subjects of mediation`s regulation in Ukraine are the President of Ukraine, the Parliament of Ukraine, the Parliament’s Commissioner for Human Rights, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, the Supreme Court, local state administrations, NGOs and mediators' associations. It is substantiated that this list can be expanded by a special executive body in the field of mediation. Based on the analysis of current legislation, rule-making and law enforcement practice of Ukraine and European countries, a scientific approach to solving current problems of formation and implementation of state policy in the field of access to justice and mediation is proposed. It is proposed to keep registers of mediation by both central executive bodies and local state bodies or local self-government bodies. The successful foreign experience of functioning of the corresponding mediation services in various branches of law is resulted.

scholarly journals ON THE ISSUE OF THE NEED FOR THE INSTITUTION OF LEGAL PERSONALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AT THE PRESENT DEVELOPMENT STAGE OF THE RULE-OF-LAW STATE

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-33
Author(s):  
Светлана Горохова
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Development Stage ◽  
Legal Capacity ◽  
Present Stage ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Personality ◽  
Strong Artificial Intelligence

An urgent problem of transforming Russian legal system at the present stage of its development is to find an optimal balance in determining fundamental approaches to the legal regulation of public relations complicated by cyberphysical systems, artificial intelligence, various types of robots and robotics objects, as well as to consider the possibility of giving legal personality to weak and strong artificial intelligence in various branches of law and legislation. Purpose: analysis of the issues related to determining the legal status of artificial intellectual systems, taking into account modern requirements dictated by scientific and technological progress, the development of social relations, and the rule-of-law principles, aimed at ensuring respect for the individual rights and legitimate interests, society and the state Methods: on the basis of dialectical and metaphysical methods, general scientific (analysis, synthesis, comparative law, etc.), and specific scientific (legal-dogmatic, cybernetic, interpretation) methods of scientific knowledge are used. Results: at the present stage of technological development, we should talk about the existence of a weak narrow-purpose AI (Narrow AI) and a strong General-purpose AI (General AI). Super-strong intelligence (Super AI) does not yet exist, although its development is predicted in the future. Narrow AI, of course, can not reach natural intelligence, so, based on its internal properties, it can not be considered a subject in relations under any circumstances. In contrast to narrow AI (Narrow AI), General AI (GAI) has a developed intelligence comparable to that of a human in certain characteristics. The theoretical discussion of giving an artificial intelligence the status of a subject or a “quasi” subject of law makes sense only for technological solutions in the rank of General AI and Super AI. In the case of an AIS, it can only be a question of partial legal capacity. Partial legal capacity is a status that applies to subjects that have legal capacity only in accordance with specific legal norms, but are otherwise not obligated or entitled. Therefore, when choosing the concept of legislative assignment of partial legal capacity to the AIS, it is necessary to determine which specific rights or “right obligations” will be granted to General AI and Super AI.

scholarly journals FORENSIC ACTIVITY AS AN OBJECT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-280
Author(s):  
I. Ovsiannykova
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Social ◽  
European Standards ◽  
Stable Development ◽  
Society Today

Any society today is a system consisting of certain objects and entities that constantly interact with each other, it requires introducing an effective social and administrative mechanism that would timely regulate the social relations and norms of participants’ behavior of such relationships, maintain their organization, orderliness and stable development, contributing to proper regulatory order.   Observing the political steps of the Ukrainian government along the path of European standards, we can argue about the actualization of democratic values implementation and the establishment of an effective state power system, where the content and focus of the state determine human rights and freedoms.   Considering the above, the analysis of problematic issues arising during the study of the administrative regulation effectiveness of forensic activities is an urgent need today.   Based on the analysis of scientific sources and Ukrainian legislation, forensic activity in the article is considered as one of the administrative and legal regulation objects, the purpose of which is to establish the rule of law and strengthen institutions at all levels in the field of management in general and in law enforcement and judicial authorities in particular on the basis of the principle of human rights and fundamental freedoms respect. It should also be borne in mind that forensic science occupies a special place in implementation of the principle of rule of law and citizens’ rights and freedoms protection, since the effective functioning of the constitutional foundations of the entire human rights system of power in Ukraine largely depends on it. Thus, the current legislation of Ukraine, as part of the ongoing legal reform, should be aimed at enhancing the role and reassessing the importance of forensic examinations institution, without which investigation of the case cannot be effectively carried out and the crime solved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document