scholarly journals The Legal Basis For Control in the Sphere of Use And Protection of the Animal World in Ukraine

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 99-108
Author(s):  
Svitlana Marchenko
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Control ◽  
Control Function ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legislative Support ◽  
The Right ◽  
Object Of Control ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Animal World

The article is devoted to the legal bases for control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world. legislative support of environmental control in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife was considered. Th system and powers of state authorities and bodies of local self-government concerning the implementation of the control function in the field of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world were investigated. On the basis of the analysis of legal literature and legislation of Ukraine, the peculiarities of legal regulation of control in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife were singled out, the classifiation of environmental control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of the animal world by subjects of its implementation and the areas of the use of animal objects has been made. Particular attention was paid to the implementation of control in the field of fisheries as one of the types of agricultural production. It was concluded that control in the sphere of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife is one of the most important functions of the state in ensuring the right to an environment that is safe for life and health and compensation for damage caused by violation of this right, stipulated in Art. 50 of the constitution of Ukraine. Proper regulation of control activities in the fild of use, reproduction and protection of wildlife can become a guarantee of observance of the norms of the current legislation, and substantially balance the relationship between the subject and the object of control.

P–477 The child’s right to know vs. the parents’ right not to tell: the attitudes of couples undergoing fertility treatments towards identity-release gamete donation

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Simas ◽  
D Braga ◽  
A Setti ◽  
R Melamed ◽  
A Iaconell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Well Being ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Right To Know ◽  
Gamete Donation ◽  
Biological Origin ◽  
Gamete Donor ◽  
The Right To Know ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Study question Do couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatments (ART) have a different perception of anonymous vs identity-release gamete donation than a population interested in the subject? Summary answer Compared with a population interested in the subject, more couples undergoing ART believed the child shouldn’t be given information that would identify the gamete-donor. What is known already Recent research has investigated the psychological well-being of parents and children born through gamete donation, focusing on the possibility of having the donor’s identity revealed. Gamete donors have traditionally been anonymous to recipients and offspring; however, there is a global trend towards programs using donors that are identifiable to the resulting offspring at maturity. While some countries only allow the use of identity-release egg donation, others only allow anonymous-donation, and in some countries both types of donation are practiced. However, the attitudes concerning anonymous vs identity-release gamete donation, in a country where only anonymous donation is allowed, are still unknown. Study design, size, duration This cross-sectional study was performed from 01/Sep/2020 to 15/Dec/2020. For that, surveys through online-platforms were conducted, including either patients undergoing ART, (ART-group, n = 358) or those interested in the subject, who accessed the website of a university-affiliated IVF-center (interested-group, n = 122). Participants in the ART-group were invited via e-mail, with a cover-letter outlining the survey and a link to access it and participants in the interested-group accessed the questionnaire via website. Participants/materials, setting, methods The survey collected information on demographic characteristics and the participant’s attitudes towards anonymity of gamete donors. The questions were: (i) In the case of children conceived through ART, do you believe that revealing the method of conception may affect the relationship between children and their parents? (ii) Once the method of conception is revealed, do you believe that the child has the right to know the gamete donor? (iii) If yes, when? Main results and the role of chance Most of the participants answered that the relationship between children and parents wouldn’t be affected by the child’s knowledge of the origin of their conception, regardless of the group (83.6% vs 82.7%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively, p = 0.868). Most participants in the ART-group answered that the sperm donor identity shouldn’t be revealed to the child, while only half of the interested-group stated the same (65.4% vs 50.8%, p = 0.044). The same result was observed when participants were asked if the oocyte donor should be identifiable (64.8% vs 50.8%, p = 0.050). When asked when the donor’s identity should be revealed to the child, no significant differences were noted in the responses among the groups (p = 0.868). Most of the participants who believe that the child has the right of learning the donor’s identity, stated that “the donor’s identity should be revealed if the child questions its biological origin” (67.2% vs 67.5%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively). “Since birth” was the second most common response, (21.0% vs 19.7%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively), while “when the child turns 18 years-old” (9.2% vs 11.2%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively), and “sometime during teenage years” (2.5% vs 2.4%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively) were less common answers. Limitations, reasons for caution Lack of adequate opportunities to conduct face to face interview and lack of knowledge of the real state of the website participants, concerning infertility or being involved in ART. The retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size may also be reasons for caution, Wider implications of the findings: It has been discussed that, whether or not children or parents are harmed by knowing their biological origins, donor offspring have the right to know. However, when facing the situation, couples undergoing ART would argue that in case of gamete donation, there are reasons for not telling the child. Trial registration number Not applicable

„PACIJENTOVO PISMO“ KAO PRAVNI OSNOV ZA PRIMENU PASIVNE EUTANAZIJE

2021 ◽  
pp. 211-229
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Pavićević ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Living Will ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Prolongation Of Life ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Domestic Law ◽  
Dying Patient

The subject of the paper is the relationship between the duties of physicians and other medical professionals towards the dying patient (as a provider of medical services) and the patient's right to personal choice and preservation of his own right to self-determination in relation to body and life, which is a special subjective civil right. The author discusses the legal-medical (but also ethical) issue of the patient's ability to freely decide not to agree to a medical measure of artificial prolongation of life or suspension of already started measures. The issue is examining the limits of the so-called permissibility of “passive euthanasia”, which is indirectly recognized in domestic law by the Law on Patients' Rights and the legal basis for its application in one particular modality, the so-called "Patient letter" (living will) which is an established legal instrument in some foreign legislation and practice. Analyzing the experience of some foreign countries, the author supports the introduction of such an institute - as a kind of anticipated directives in domestic law, referring to the patient's constitutional right to self-determination, which embodies the supreme good, even more valuable than (unwanted) life. Such a solution is in line with the principle of human will autonomy, freedom to dispose of life as a personal good, and potentially a reflection of the so-called "the right to die", which is the reverse of the right to life

Effects of Angle of Model-Demonstration on Learning of Motor Skill

1995 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadao Ishikura ◽  
Kimihiro Inomata
Keyword(s):  
Visual Information ◽  
Recall Test ◽  
Objective Condition ◽  
Delayed Recall ◽  
Immediate Recall ◽  
Subjective Condition ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Looking Glass

The purpose was to examine the effects of three different demonstrations by a model on acquisition and retention of a sequential gross movement task. The second purpose was to examine the relationship between reversal processing of visual information about skills and coding of skill information. Thirty undergraduates (15 men and 15 women) were assigned into one of three conditions, Objective condition which demonstrated the task with the model facing the subject, Looking-glass condition in which the skill was demonstrated with the model facing the subject who viewed the performance opposite the right and left directions in executing the task, and the Subjective condition in which the subject observed the model from the rear. Number of immediate recall tests required to accomplish the sequential movements completely and the sum of the performance points for reproduced movements at each delayed recall test (1 day, 7 days, and 5 mo. after the immediate recall test) were employed. Analysis indicated the Subjective condition produced a significantly greater modeling effect in immediate recall of the movements than the Looking-glass condition. Retention of the acquired skills was almost equal under the three conditions.

scholarly journals INHERITANCE BY RIGHT OF REPRESENTATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Dmitriy A. Berezin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Representation ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

The article is devoted to the subject composition of heirs by the right of representation. The relationship and difference between the criteria of inheritance by the right of representation and legal representation are investigated. An example from judicial practice is considered.

scholarly journals The Power and Psychology of Power

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Peshraw A. Mohammed Ameen
Keyword(s):  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Kurdistan Region ◽  
Primary Means ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Masses ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Current Reality

Power is the legitimate use of force in a socially acceptable manner, the legitimate force exercised by a person or group over others. The element of legitimacy is an important element of the idea of ​​power, which is the primary means by which power distinguishes itself from other, more general concepts of force. Force can be imposed forcibly or violently. On the other hand, the Authority relies on the acceptance of the subordinates, granting the right to those above them to issue orders or directives. the relationship of psychology and political power is a strong relationship, and through the study of the psychology of the masses and rulers in any state or region can be interpreted and predict the behavior of power and the masses in this country, and the subject of authority in the Kurdistan region as a subject directly related to the subject of psychology of power and the quality of this authority in this region is a place Controversy for everyone who monitors and deals with this power, so determine the quality of power and how to conduct it through the study of the psychology of power, according to current reality and one of the most important jobs for researchers in the Kurdistan Region so we know the quality of political authority in this region, so we try in this modest research to determine the quality and type of power in the Kurdistan Region through the analysis of the psychology of power in Kurdistan region.

scholarly journals To the Definition of Preferential Right in Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
A. V. Pikalov
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Obligation ◽  
Specific Group ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Single Idea ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

The essential features of the preferential right are revealed and the main approaches to understanding its legal nature are considered. According to the first approach, preferential rights are defined as cases when, under all equal conditions, the advantage is granted by law to a specific group of persons with some special characteristics. The second approach does not have a single idea: the authors focus on a certain aspect of preferential rights and propose to understand other preferential rights in the same way. The place of “preferential rights” among other exceptions in the law is determined, the relationship and difference from related legal categories are shown. Based on the results of carried out research, the author's definition of a preferential right is developed as an additional possibility based on the property (corporate) interest of its owner, established by law or contract, to demand from the subject-accomplice in the right or the party in respect of proper behavior in the form of providing advantages over third parties. This right is proposed to be considered an independent subjective right due to the obvious independence of its existence in objective law as a measure of possible behavior defined by law (by contract, constituent document), the presence of a construction corresponding to it of a legal obligation, its own mechanism for the implementation of this right, and for a number of other reasons set out in the work.

scholarly journals Ghostwriters as a Legal Phenomenon: Features and Perspectives of Legal Regulation of Their Activity

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 19-27
Author(s):  
N. V. Zaitseva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Fundamental Property ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Scientific Field ◽  
Property Right ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right

The paper is devoted to the problem of using the work of another person in the intellectual field, primarily in literary activity. The involvement of ghostwriters in writing literary works has created a legal phenomenon when the subject matter of contractual relations represents the inalienable non-property right, namely: the right of authorship the transfer of which is not possible in many jurisdictions, and in others, despite the absence of an explicit prohibition, there is no legal regulation of such alienation. However, the existence of ghostwriters cannot be assessed as a unique phenomenon of modernity. In our time, they have only gained new forms and a special place not only in the literary, but also in the scientific field. In this regard, the establishment of legal mechanisms for attracting and regulating ghostwriters is more effective than the establishment of a system of prohibitions.In the conditions of changing publishing businesses and increasing ways and forms of proof, questions about the authenticity of a person's authorship began to arise increasingly, especially in the field of scientific and scholarly literature, where the work of "new" researchers is often used. The issue of assignment of the right of authorship (copyright) — a fundamental property right — is treated differently in different legal systems. The continental system of law relies on impossibility of transferring copyright from one entity to another as part of a civil law transaction. Therefore, instances of attribution of authorship are assessed in the context of criminal or administrative law. It forms the legal essence of the division of rights of authorship into property and nonproperty ones: any commercial rights to intellectual property can be ceded except the authorship.

scholarly journals On the peculiarities of the regional lawmaking process

2020 ◽  
pp. 25-38
Author(s):  
Olga Anatolevna Fomicheva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Process Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Initiative ◽  
The Right

The subject of this research is practice of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation applied in legal regulation of lawmaking process. Analysis is conducted on legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation regarding the establishment of their rights to realization of the legislative initiative. The author’s arguments on carrying out the analysis of regional legislation with regards to establishment of a circle of subjects with the right of legislative initiative are grounded on the scholars’ opinion that the status of the subject of realization of legislative initiative is special. The fact of recognition of the subject of lawmaking process as a subject of legislative initiative is a juridical fact bot only for acquisition of the right to introduction of a bill, but also guarantees for participation in lawmaking process of the parliament. Therefore, establishment of a circle of subjects with the right of legislative initiative is crucial in determination of peculiarities of the regional lawmaking process. Application of the general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, allowed arranging the circle of the subjects of lawmaking process into groups, as well as formulate a conclusion on the specificities of setting rules for the lawmaking process realized in constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The philosophical methods of cognition of legal reality allowed determining the general rules of lawmaking process, summarize the acquired data, and comprehensively examine the research materials. Having analyzed the practice of legal regulation, the author identified the flaws in terminology used in practice of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Recommendations are made to pay closer attention to ambiguity of legislation in some regions of the Russian Federation. A conclusion is formulated on the positive experience that can become an example for other constituent entities of the Russian Federation in setting rules for the lawmaking process.

scholarly journals To the question of the implementation of the right to protection of minors, victims of crime

2020 ◽  
Vol - (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
A.I. Glushkov ◽  
◽  
E.E. Smekina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Victims Of Crime ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of issues of legal regulation and the realization in modern conditions of the rights to protection of adolescents who have suffered as a result of the crimes committed against them. Legal literature, legislative acts, as well as judicial and investigative practice on this issue have been analysed. On the basis of the study, problems of ensuring the right to protection of juvenile victims in criminal proceedings were identified, as well as proposals for improving the norms of criminal procedure legislation regulating this sphere of activity and their application were justified.

scholarly journals Directions of improvement of normative regulation of judicial status of investigating judge

Legal Ukraine ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 38-47
Author(s):  
Svetlana Sharenko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Control Function ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Private Life ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
The Right

The article deals with legal regulation of the procedural status of an investigating judge. The author examines the standards that are formulated in the relevant international legal acts, in the practice of the ECHR, in the positions expressed by European experts, and relates to the activities of an investigating judge. They are classified into three groups: (a) Standards defining as a whole the requirements for the place and role of the court in the implementation of criminal justice, and therefore extend to all judicial functions, including judicial control function; b) standards defining the requirements for the organization and implementation of the judicial control function at the stage of pre-trial investigation; c) standards that determine the requirements for observance of human rights and freedoms, and thus serve as guiding points for subjects exercising judicial control powers. Standards defining in general the requirement for the place and role of the court in the implementation of criminal justice (such as the availability of justice, binding judgments, fair trial, due process hearing, equality before the law and the court, parties’ competition, transparency of the judicial system etc.), as well as standards that define requirements for the observance of human rights and freedoms (such as the right to liberty and security of person, the right to respect for private life, the right to protection, etc.) have already been sufficiently studied at the level of special investigations. The subject of this study is international standards, which determine the requirements for the organization and implementation of judicial control at the stage of pre-trial investigation. The author examines the standards of protection of constitutional rights by the court, a standard for clearly demarcating the role of investigator, prosecutor and investigating judge in order to ensure real competition at the stage of pre-trial investigation; the standard of the materiality of the right of restriction; standard of urgency of judicial control; the standard of the prohibition of the participation of an investigating judge in the examination of the merits. Key words: standards of activity of an investigating judge, judicial control powers, judicial control, the investigating judge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document