scholarly journals A prospective study of lornoxicam as pre-emptive analgesic in abdominal surgeries in tertiary care hospital in Salem, India

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1778
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ziauddin Sarkhil ◽  
Hemant Kumar Dutt ◽  
Rajaram S.
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Analgesic Regimen ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Background: Preemptive analgesia, involves the introduction of an analgesic regimen before the onset of noxious stimuli, with the goal of preventing sensitization of the nervous system to subsequent stimuli that could amplify pain.Methods: To determine the efficacy and safety of Lornoxicam when administered preemptively by using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating scale. The patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly categorized into group A and B of 25 each. Group A- Received Lornoxicam 8mg (1ml) one hour before surgery. Group B- Not received any analgesic before surgery. Primary measurement of the efficacy was done by using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hour. All parameters were analyzed by using student t test.Results: Surgeries which were included in the study are hernia repair, open appendectomy, laparoscopic (appendectomy, cholecystectomy). Reduction in pain scores at 12th hourly and 24th hourly pain scores (<0.05) was significant. Tramadol usage decreased significantly with laparoscopic surgeries.Conclusions: In this study we could demonstrate that lornoxicam when used preemptively reduces the pain score slightly and reduces the requirement of post-operative analgesics significantly.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF SINGLE-DOSE PREGABALIN ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY SURGERY

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1553-58
Author(s):  
Sana Abbas ◽  
Saquib Naeem ◽  
Amjad Akram ◽  
Beenish Abbas ◽  
Rashid Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Participants

Objective: To evaluate the analgesic potential of pregabalin in ambulatory dacryocystorhinostomy surgeries under general anaesthesia. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Tertiary Care Hospital Rawalpindi, from Nov 2019 to Sep 2020. Methodology: A total of 110 patients undergoing ambulatory dacryocystorhinostomy surgery at our hospital were included in the study. Participants were divided into two groups, group A (n=55) were administered 150 mg oral pregabalin, while a placebo was given to participants of group B (n=55). Post-operative pain was assessed at recovery, four and eight hours after surgery with the help of the visual analogue scale. Results: Mean age of participants was 43.05 ± 7.5 years. Gender wise distribution showed 62 (56.4%) males and 48 (43.6%) females. At recovery, four and eight hours after surgery the mean pain scores in group A (pregabalin) vs group B (placebo) were (2.98 ± 0.8 vs 4.98 ± 0.8, p<0.001, 2.67 ± 0.6 vs 5.02 ± 0.8, p<0.001 and 1.49 ± 2.9 vs 2.95 ± 0.8, p<0.001 respectively). Opioid administration frequency in trial versus placebo group was [11 (20%) vs 32 (58.2%), p<0.001]. Conclusion: Pregabalin has analgesic potential moreover decreased postoperative consumption of opioids and associated adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. Hence making it a suitable agent for pain relief in ambulatory surgeries.

scholarly journals Post-Operative Outcomes of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Major Abdominal Surgery in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Control Trial in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Nirupama Saha ◽  
Nadiuzzaman Khan ◽  
Mirza Kamrul Zahid ◽  
Shah Alam Talukder ◽  
ASM Meftahuzzaman
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Major Abdominal Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intravenous Lidocaine ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Group B

Background: Post-operative outcomes of a major abdominal surgery depend on careful & effective post-operative management. But it is a critical job especially in children. Obtaining adequate analgesia after major surgery is a problematic issue and postoperative pain still imposes a major burden of suffering in surgical patients.Objectives: The principle objectives of the study is to evaluate the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion in pain management of pediatric population undergone in major abdominal surgery; to reduce post-operative morbidity & enhance better surgical outcome in children.Methodology: This is a randomized control trial carried out from January 2015-June2015,in a tertiary care hospital among 60 cases of 4 to 14 years children with major abdominal surgery without having any pulmonary, cardiac, hepatic or renal insufficiency. Grouping of patients that is lidocaine infusion group (Group A) and control group (Group B) was made among admitted cases for elective abdominal surgery by simple random technique by means of lottery. For assessment of postoperative pain FLACC Scale was used in both groups. Clinical examination findings & specifically designed data collection sheet with a set questionnaire were used as research instruments. Formulated data was analyzed by SPSS version 17, taking p value <0.05 as significant.Results: It is noted that, after 24 hours of operation most of the patients 56.7% of group A had mild pain whereas 90% patients of group B had moderate pain (p<0.001)& during that time there was no patient with severe pain in group A whereas in group B 10% patients were with severe pain. At 48 hours, pain was absent in 13.3% children of group A and 6.7% in group B. In group A most of the children 76.7%had mild pain compared to moderate pain 18 (60%) in group B children at that hours (P<0.001). Again, regarding required amount of analgesics, patients received I/V lidocaine required less amount of analgesics than its counterpart. In present study, complications was noted only 3.3% patien in group A, where as in the opposite group it was found in 23.3% & p was <0.05. In group A, in 50% patients post operative bowel sound was returned within 72 hours, compared to 73.3% patients in group B. The p value was 0.001. About post-operative hospital stay, 83.3% children of the group A were released from hospital after 5th P.O.D whereas, in group B, only 50% children were released after 7th P.O.D of operation. The P value was 0.03 that is also significant.Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine could improve immediate and late post-operative pain with early recovery after major abdominal surgery in children & it can contribute to rapid postoperative rehabilitation programs.J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, June 2018, Vol.10(1); 23-27

Oral paracetamol versus zolmitriptan to treat acute migraine attack in the emergency department

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Acute Migraine ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Treatment provided in an emergency department is aimed at alleviating pain immediately with minimized adverse effects as well as warding off further migraine attacks. The primary aim of this article is to compare the effectiveness of oral paracetamol versus zolmitriptan in treating acute migraine attacks. Methods: This prospective, randomized, and controlled study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital visited by 95,000 patients annually. The study recruited 200 participants who were randomized into two groups. One group received 1000 mg paracetamol while the other group received 2.5 mg zolmitriptan orally. Baseline pain scores were recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 15, 30 and at 60 min following administration of the study drugs. Patients requiring further treatment were provided fentanyl at a dosage of 1 µg/kg as a rescue therapy. Results: A significant decrease was evident in VAS and NRS scores following the administration of the study drugs in both groups (P < 0.001). The change in VAS pain scores after 15, 30 and 60 min was calculated as 17.0 ± 13.9, 41.2 ± 16.3 and 61.2 ± 17.5 mm, respectively, in the paracetamol group and 14.2 ± 11.7, 39.2 ± 17.9 and 59.2± 19.3 mm, respectively, in the zolmitriptan group, which did not indicate significant differences (P = 0.103, P = 0.425, P = 0.483, respectively). Likewise, NRS pain scores showed a downward trend in line with VAS pain scores and did not yield a significant difference (P = 0.422). No significant difference concerning rescue therapy was noted between the two groups (P = 0.596). Conclusion: Oral paracetamol and zolmitriptan prove to be similarly effective and have low incidence of acute side effects in treating acute migraine cases without aura.

scholarly journals Effect of acupuncture TENS versus conventional TENS on post cesarean section incision pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3738
Author(s):  
Priti A. Mehendale ◽  
Mayur T. Revadkar
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Random Allocation ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Background: There is evidence regarding beneficial use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on post Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) incision pain. However, efficacy of different types of TENS following C section pain has not yet been explored adequately.Methods: 96 women who had recently undergone LSCS were included for the study. The subjects were in the age group of 20 to 40 years (25.84±3.96); having pain intensity 4 or more on Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). They were divided into three groups by random allocation method; namely Group A: Acupuncture (Low/Motor) TENS, Group B: Conventional (High/Sensory) TENS and Group C: Control group. Group A and B received specific type of TENS twice a day for 15 minutes. Control group C did not receive any TENS intervention. All subjects received standard post-operative medications and physiotherapy. Pain intensity was recorded on NPRS pre and post intervention.Results: Both Acupuncture TENS and Conventional TENS significantly decreased post-operative pain intensity as compared to control group (p value <0.0001).Conclusions: Both, acupuncture and conventional TENS are equally effective in reducing post LSCS incision pain at a strong and non-painful intensity.

scholarly journals Palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: a comparative study in a tertiary care hospital from India

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2197
Author(s):  
Shubhatara Swamy ◽  
Vijaya Rajendran ◽  
Durga Prasan ◽  
Pratibha Nadig
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Despite advances in symptom management, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains one of the most dreadful consequences of cancer therapy.Methods: The study was carried out at Medical Oncology Department, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore. Hundred and forty-four cancer patients of either sex, aged 18-65 years with adequate blood counts requiring moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) as per Hesketh classification were included. The patients were prospectively divided into two groups before the initial cycle of chemotherapy. Patients in Group A (n=71) received ondansetron, and dexamethasone along with aprepitant capsules, Whereas, Group B (n=73) received palonosetron, and dexamethasone along with placebo capsules, 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Thereafter the patients were administered with the drugs and observed for nausea and vomiting. The efficiency of both regimens was assessed by adopting validated functional living index emesis (FLIE) questionnaire. Analysis of the data was done using the SPSS 21.0 software.Results: The mean age of the patients was 40.5 years and the male to female ratio was 1:2.4. In all the patients, no changes were detected in the ECG readings after MEC. The nausea and vomiting score were comparable in both groups. No significant difference (p>0.05) was noticed between group A and group B in both mm and in FLIE points. No serious adverse events were found relating to antiemetic treatment.Conclusions: Palonosetron in combination with corticosteroids was non inferior to ondansetron in combination with aprepitant and corticosteroids in controlling acute and delayed stages of CINV in patients requiring MEC. Thus, it can be recommended as first-line therapy for patients treated with MEC.

scholarly journals Superiority of Spacer/Mask Topical Anesthetic Compared with Conventional Spray and Gargle Method for Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-180
Author(s):  
RC Balkissoon ◽  
L Clelland ◽  
L Whitehead ◽  
MT Newhouse
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Topical Anaesthetic ◽  
Vocal Cords ◽  
Group A ◽  
Gag Reflex ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE:To compare the safety and efficacy of a new spacer-oral nasal mask device with those of the standard needle nozzle spray method for the delivery of aerosolized lidocaine to the upper airway for pre-bronchoscopic anaesthesia in a tertiary care hospital.DESIGN:Single-blind randomized control trial.SETTING:University affiliated tertiary care hospital, ambulatory care bronchoscopy unit.SUBJECTS:Thirty consecutive consenting patients referred for fibreoptic bronchoscopy for various indications.INTERVENTION:Thirty randomized subjects received 150 mg of topical 1% aerosolized lidocaine via standard long needle nosed applicator (group A) or via a new oral/ nasal mask with spacer device (group B). Bronchoscopists, blinded as to the preprocedure topical anaesthetic method used, gave additional topical lidocaine at their discretion.MEASUREMENTS:The study nurse recorded the total dose of lidocaine (mg), timing of the procedure (s), cough frequency expressed as coughs per minute (c/min), vital signs, time for return of gag reflex and patients' subjective comments.RESULTS:Fifteen patients were randomized to each group. The lidocaine dose required for insertion through the vocal cords (mean ± SD) was 282.6±66.3 mg in group A and 203.3±70.6 mg in group B (PÃ0.005). Total lidocaine dose required for the procedure was 330.6±70.2 mg in group A and 256.6±75 mg in group B (PÃ0.01). The mean time for passage of the bronchoscope from mouth entry to through the vocal cords was 82.7±54.5 s in group A and 110.5±64.4 s in group B (P>0.1). The mean total time for the procedure was 699.7±377.5 s in group A and 697.2±409.1 s in group B (not significant). The mean cough frequency was 8.2±6.1 c/min in group A and 7.0±5.7 c/min in group B (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate, in return of gag reflex time or in complication rate between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS:A statistically significant reduction in the dose of lidocaine is required to achieve equivalent topical anaesthetic for bronchoscopy with a new mask and spacer device compared with a more conventional method. Since no other variables related to the procedure showed a significant difference, the new method appears to be superior to the previous method.

scholarly journals EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF FLUPIRTINE VERSUS TRAMADOL IN THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN

2019 ◽  
pp. 84-87
Author(s):  
VINEELA KARTHIK NAGURI ◽  
RAVI BABU KOMARAM ◽  
TAMILISETTI VIDYA SAGAR
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess and compare the efficacy and tolerability of flupirtine versus tramadol in patients with chronic moderate low back pain (LBP). Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the outpatient department of orthopaedics at tertiary care hospital, Rajamahendravarm. After meeting the inclusion criteria, a total of 60 patients were randomly allocated to tablet flupirtine 100 mg in Group A and tablet tramadol 50 mg in Group B. The efficacy of the study drugs was assessed at baseline and the end of treatment by numerical rating scale11, visual analog scale-100 mm, physician’s, and patient’s global assessment. Statistical analysis was done using paired and unpaired t-test and data were presented as mean±standard deviation. Adverse drug reactions were monitored during the treatment. Results: The study results showed that 90% of the patients in Group A and 78% of the patients in Group B had shown a good response to their respective drugs. 30% of flupirtine group patients reported adverse drug reactions which were mild. Conclusion: Both the drugs are effective in the treatment of moderate chronic LBP, but the advantage of flupirtine was, the incidence of adverse drug reactions was less when compared to tramadol group.

Vestibular Rehabilitation: Useful but not Universally so

2003 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Krebs David ◽  
M. Gill-Body Kathleen ◽  
W. Parker Stephen ◽  
V. Ramirez Jose ◽  
Wernick-Robinson Mara
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Vestibular Rehabilitation ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Gait Velocity ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Large Tertiary Care ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Few Data

OBJECTIVE: Although vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is gaining popularity, few data support its utility in improving locomotor stability, and no good predictors exist of whom will benefit most. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of vestibular rehabilitation was conducted at a large tertiary care hospital on 124 patients (59 ± 18 years old) with unilateral (n = 51) or bilateral (n = 73) vestibular hypofunction, of whom 86 completed a 12-week intervention. Of these 86, 27 returned for long-term (1-year) follow-up testing. The primary outcome measure was locomotor stability. RESULTS: Group A (6 weeks of VR) significantly ( P < 0.01) increased their gait velocity and stability compared with group B (6 weeks of strengthening exercise), but there was a smaller difference ( P = 0.05) between groups at 12 weeks, when both had had VR; there were no group differences at 1 year. Of the 86 who completed the intervention, 52 (61%) had clear locomotor gains. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: VR is helpful for most patients in providing locomotor stability, but further work is needed to determine the factors that prevent VR from being effective for all patients with vestibulopathy.

scholarly journals A randomized clinical study to compare pre-emptive analgesic efficacy of clonidine and diclofenac sodium in patients undergoing major surgeries at a tertiary care hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Prachi Jain ◽  
Uma Bhosale ◽  
Shashank Desai
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Study Results

Background: Pre-emptive analgesia is a method to achieve analgesia even before exposure to a noxious stimulus The purpose of pre-emptive analgesia is to reduce pain caused due to surgical incision triggered inflammatory mechanism activation; and to ensure a good post-operative pain control so that there is no development of chronic pain. Clonidine is an α2 adrenergic agonist thus it decreases the sympathetic outflow, while Diclofenac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Our literature review showed that both clonidine (150 μg) and diclofenac are efficacious pre-emptive analgesics. Literature review also revealed that there is no study available to compare pre-emptive analgesic efficacy as well as safety of oral clonidine with diclofenac, therefore present study was designed to compare pre emptive analgesic efficacy of these two drugs.Methods: This randomized clinical study included 100 patients from surgical departments, of either sex, between 18 to 70 years age and of American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II grade. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups and received either of the treatments 30 minutes prior to induction of anesthesia. Pain scores were recorded using visual analog scale, facial rating scale and behavioral rating scale at awakening and at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours. Postoperative analgesic requirement over 24 hours was recorded. Data were analyzed using OpenEpi statistical softwares.Results: Significantly lower pain scores were observed in clonidine group as compared to Diclofenac at 4 and 6 hours (p<0.05) on all the pain scales. Clonidine group also required less postoperative analgesic as compared to diclofenac (p<0.05).Conclusions: Study results are strongly suggestive of greater pre-emptive analgesic efficacy of clonidine over diclofenac in major surgeries done under spinal anesthesia.

scholarly journals Prevalence, knowledge, attitude and practice regarding self-medication among medical, dental and paramedical students in a tertiary care hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1822
Author(s):  
Madhulika Johnson ◽  
Dinesh Kumar Badyal
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Information Source ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Self Medication ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Self-medication is practiced universally. Having medical knowledge plays a vital role in its prevalence. It is more prevalent in higher education course students especially medical students. However, it is increasing in dental and paramedical students. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate self-medication among medical, dental and para-medical students in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: A cross sectional questionnaire based study was conducted among 449 undergraduate students. They were divided into three groups. A questionnaire was developed based on literature. The questionnaire was validated and finalised. The paper questionnaire was administered to students. The data collected from questionnaires was analysed. The results were expressed as percentages and frequencies.Results: The male female ratio of students who filled questionnaire was 65:35. All the students (100%) reported that they practice self-medication. The most common reason for self-medication was prior experience (36%) in group A as well as in group B (46%), but in group C, 39% mentioned no serious problem. Main information source was family members in all the groups (A 57%, B 53%, C 29%) followed by advice from senior/friends. Fever was most common symptom reported (29%) by group A followed headache (28%) in group C and cough and cold (23%) in group B. The commonest group of drugs used is cough syrups (25%) in group B, followed by analgesics (23%) in group C and antipyretics (21%) in group A.Conclusions: Self-medication is growing among dental and paramedical students too. It is necessary to educate them about self-medication to prevent future disastrous consequences as well as to make them aware of appropriate use of self-medication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document