Vestibular Rehabilitation: Useful but not Universally so

2003 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Krebs David ◽  
M. Gill-Body Kathleen ◽  
W. Parker Stephen ◽  
V. Ramirez Jose ◽  
Wernick-Robinson Mara
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Vestibular Rehabilitation ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Gait Velocity ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Large Tertiary Care ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Few Data

OBJECTIVE: Although vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is gaining popularity, few data support its utility in improving locomotor stability, and no good predictors exist of whom will benefit most. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of vestibular rehabilitation was conducted at a large tertiary care hospital on 124 patients (59 ± 18 years old) with unilateral (n = 51) or bilateral (n = 73) vestibular hypofunction, of whom 86 completed a 12-week intervention. Of these 86, 27 returned for long-term (1-year) follow-up testing. The primary outcome measure was locomotor stability. RESULTS: Group A (6 weeks of VR) significantly ( P < 0.01) increased their gait velocity and stability compared with group B (6 weeks of strengthening exercise), but there was a smaller difference ( P = 0.05) between groups at 12 weeks, when both had had VR; there were no group differences at 1 year. Of the 86 who completed the intervention, 52 (61%) had clear locomotor gains. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: VR is helpful for most patients in providing locomotor stability, but further work is needed to determine the factors that prevent VR from being effective for all patients with vestibulopathy.

scholarly journals Post-Operative Outcomes of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Major Abdominal Surgery in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Control Trial in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Nirupama Saha ◽  
Nadiuzzaman Khan ◽  
Mirza Kamrul Zahid ◽  
Shah Alam Talukder ◽  
ASM Meftahuzzaman
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Major Abdominal Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intravenous Lidocaine ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Group B

Background: Post-operative outcomes of a major abdominal surgery depend on careful & effective post-operative management. But it is a critical job especially in children. Obtaining adequate analgesia after major surgery is a problematic issue and postoperative pain still imposes a major burden of suffering in surgical patients.Objectives: The principle objectives of the study is to evaluate the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion in pain management of pediatric population undergone in major abdominal surgery; to reduce post-operative morbidity & enhance better surgical outcome in children.Methodology: This is a randomized control trial carried out from January 2015-June2015,in a tertiary care hospital among 60 cases of 4 to 14 years children with major abdominal surgery without having any pulmonary, cardiac, hepatic or renal insufficiency. Grouping of patients that is lidocaine infusion group (Group A) and control group (Group B) was made among admitted cases for elective abdominal surgery by simple random technique by means of lottery. For assessment of postoperative pain FLACC Scale was used in both groups. Clinical examination findings & specifically designed data collection sheet with a set questionnaire were used as research instruments. Formulated data was analyzed by SPSS version 17, taking p value <0.05 as significant.Results: It is noted that, after 24 hours of operation most of the patients 56.7% of group A had mild pain whereas 90% patients of group B had moderate pain (p<0.001)& during that time there was no patient with severe pain in group A whereas in group B 10% patients were with severe pain. At 48 hours, pain was absent in 13.3% children of group A and 6.7% in group B. In group A most of the children 76.7%had mild pain compared to moderate pain 18 (60%) in group B children at that hours (P<0.001). Again, regarding required amount of analgesics, patients received I/V lidocaine required less amount of analgesics than its counterpart. In present study, complications was noted only 3.3% patien in group A, where as in the opposite group it was found in 23.3% & p was <0.05. In group A, in 50% patients post operative bowel sound was returned within 72 hours, compared to 73.3% patients in group B. The p value was 0.001. About post-operative hospital stay, 83.3% children of the group A were released from hospital after 5th P.O.D whereas, in group B, only 50% children were released after 7th P.O.D of operation. The P value was 0.03 that is also significant.Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine could improve immediate and late post-operative pain with early recovery after major abdominal surgery in children & it can contribute to rapid postoperative rehabilitation programs.J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, June 2018, Vol.10(1); 23-27

scholarly journals Palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: a comparative study in a tertiary care hospital from India

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2197
Author(s):  
Shubhatara Swamy ◽  
Vijaya Rajendran ◽  
Durga Prasan ◽  
Pratibha Nadig
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Despite advances in symptom management, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains one of the most dreadful consequences of cancer therapy.Methods: The study was carried out at Medical Oncology Department, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore. Hundred and forty-four cancer patients of either sex, aged 18-65 years with adequate blood counts requiring moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) as per Hesketh classification were included. The patients were prospectively divided into two groups before the initial cycle of chemotherapy. Patients in Group A (n=71) received ondansetron, and dexamethasone along with aprepitant capsules, Whereas, Group B (n=73) received palonosetron, and dexamethasone along with placebo capsules, 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Thereafter the patients were administered with the drugs and observed for nausea and vomiting. The efficiency of both regimens was assessed by adopting validated functional living index emesis (FLIE) questionnaire. Analysis of the data was done using the SPSS 21.0 software.Results: The mean age of the patients was 40.5 years and the male to female ratio was 1:2.4. In all the patients, no changes were detected in the ECG readings after MEC. The nausea and vomiting score were comparable in both groups. No significant difference (p>0.05) was noticed between group A and group B in both mm and in FLIE points. No serious adverse events were found relating to antiemetic treatment.Conclusions: Palonosetron in combination with corticosteroids was non inferior to ondansetron in combination with aprepitant and corticosteroids in controlling acute and delayed stages of CINV in patients requiring MEC. Thus, it can be recommended as first-line therapy for patients treated with MEC.

scholarly journals A prospective study of lornoxicam as pre-emptive analgesic in abdominal surgeries in tertiary care hospital in Salem, India

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1778
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ziauddin Sarkhil ◽  
Hemant Kumar Dutt ◽  
Rajaram S.
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Pain Rating ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Analgesic Regimen ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Background: Preemptive analgesia, involves the introduction of an analgesic regimen before the onset of noxious stimuli, with the goal of preventing sensitization of the nervous system to subsequent stimuli that could amplify pain.Methods: To determine the efficacy and safety of Lornoxicam when administered preemptively by using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating scale. The patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly categorized into group A and B of 25 each. Group A- Received Lornoxicam 8mg (1ml) one hour before surgery. Group B- Not received any analgesic before surgery. Primary measurement of the efficacy was done by using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hour. All parameters were analyzed by using student t test.Results: Surgeries which were included in the study are hernia repair, open appendectomy, laparoscopic (appendectomy, cholecystectomy). Reduction in pain scores at 12th hourly and 24th hourly pain scores (<0.05) was significant. Tramadol usage decreased significantly with laparoscopic surgeries.Conclusions: In this study we could demonstrate that lornoxicam when used preemptively reduces the pain score slightly and reduces the requirement of post-operative analgesics significantly.

scholarly journals Superiority of Spacer/Mask Topical Anesthetic Compared with Conventional Spray and Gargle Method for Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-180
Author(s):  
RC Balkissoon ◽  
L Clelland ◽  
L Whitehead ◽  
MT Newhouse
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Topical Anaesthetic ◽  
Vocal Cords ◽  
Group A ◽  
Gag Reflex ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE:To compare the safety and efficacy of a new spacer-oral nasal mask device with those of the standard needle nozzle spray method for the delivery of aerosolized lidocaine to the upper airway for pre-bronchoscopic anaesthesia in a tertiary care hospital.DESIGN:Single-blind randomized control trial.SETTING:University affiliated tertiary care hospital, ambulatory care bronchoscopy unit.SUBJECTS:Thirty consecutive consenting patients referred for fibreoptic bronchoscopy for various indications.INTERVENTION:Thirty randomized subjects received 150 mg of topical 1% aerosolized lidocaine via standard long needle nosed applicator (group A) or via a new oral/ nasal mask with spacer device (group B). Bronchoscopists, blinded as to the preprocedure topical anaesthetic method used, gave additional topical lidocaine at their discretion.MEASUREMENTS:The study nurse recorded the total dose of lidocaine (mg), timing of the procedure (s), cough frequency expressed as coughs per minute (c/min), vital signs, time for return of gag reflex and patients' subjective comments.RESULTS:Fifteen patients were randomized to each group. The lidocaine dose required for insertion through the vocal cords (mean ± SD) was 282.6±66.3 mg in group A and 203.3±70.6 mg in group B (PÃ0.005). Total lidocaine dose required for the procedure was 330.6±70.2 mg in group A and 256.6±75 mg in group B (PÃ0.01). The mean time for passage of the bronchoscope from mouth entry to through the vocal cords was 82.7±54.5 s in group A and 110.5±64.4 s in group B (P>0.1). The mean total time for the procedure was 699.7±377.5 s in group A and 697.2±409.1 s in group B (not significant). The mean cough frequency was 8.2±6.1 c/min in group A and 7.0±5.7 c/min in group B (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences in heart rate, in return of gag reflex time or in complication rate between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS:A statistically significant reduction in the dose of lidocaine is required to achieve equivalent topical anaesthetic for bronchoscopy with a new mask and spacer device compared with a more conventional method. Since no other variables related to the procedure showed a significant difference, the new method appears to be superior to the previous method.

scholarly journals EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF FLUPIRTINE VERSUS TRAMADOL IN THE TREATMENT OF MODERATE CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN

2019 ◽  
pp. 84-87
Author(s):  
VINEELA KARTHIK NAGURI ◽  
RAVI BABU KOMARAM ◽  
TAMILISETTI VIDYA SAGAR
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Adverse Drug Reactions ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess and compare the efficacy and tolerability of flupirtine versus tramadol in patients with chronic moderate low back pain (LBP). Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the outpatient department of orthopaedics at tertiary care hospital, Rajamahendravarm. After meeting the inclusion criteria, a total of 60 patients were randomly allocated to tablet flupirtine 100 mg in Group A and tablet tramadol 50 mg in Group B. The efficacy of the study drugs was assessed at baseline and the end of treatment by numerical rating scale11, visual analog scale-100 mm, physician’s, and patient’s global assessment. Statistical analysis was done using paired and unpaired t-test and data were presented as mean±standard deviation. Adverse drug reactions were monitored during the treatment. Results: The study results showed that 90% of the patients in Group A and 78% of the patients in Group B had shown a good response to their respective drugs. 30% of flupirtine group patients reported adverse drug reactions which were mild. Conclusion: Both the drugs are effective in the treatment of moderate chronic LBP, but the advantage of flupirtine was, the incidence of adverse drug reactions was less when compared to tramadol group.

scholarly journals Prevalence, knowledge, attitude and practice regarding self-medication among medical, dental and paramedical students in a tertiary care hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1822
Author(s):  
Madhulika Johnson ◽  
Dinesh Kumar Badyal
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Information Source ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Self Medication ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Self-medication is practiced universally. Having medical knowledge plays a vital role in its prevalence. It is more prevalent in higher education course students especially medical students. However, it is increasing in dental and paramedical students. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate self-medication among medical, dental and para-medical students in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: A cross sectional questionnaire based study was conducted among 449 undergraduate students. They were divided into three groups. A questionnaire was developed based on literature. The questionnaire was validated and finalised. The paper questionnaire was administered to students. The data collected from questionnaires was analysed. The results were expressed as percentages and frequencies.Results: The male female ratio of students who filled questionnaire was 65:35. All the students (100%) reported that they practice self-medication. The most common reason for self-medication was prior experience (36%) in group A as well as in group B (46%), but in group C, 39% mentioned no serious problem. Main information source was family members in all the groups (A 57%, B 53%, C 29%) followed by advice from senior/friends. Fever was most common symptom reported (29%) by group A followed headache (28%) in group C and cough and cold (23%) in group B. The commonest group of drugs used is cough syrups (25%) in group B, followed by analgesics (23%) in group C and antipyretics (21%) in group A.Conclusions: Self-medication is growing among dental and paramedical students too. It is necessary to educate them about self-medication to prevent future disastrous consequences as well as to make them aware of appropriate use of self-medication.

scholarly journals A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OPEN VERSUS CLOSED METHOD OF CREATING PNEUMOPERITONEUM IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Akshar Patel ◽  
Shashank Desai
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Needle Insertion ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Open Method ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group B ◽  
Open Versus

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare open and closed method in terms of time require for creation of pneumoperitoneum and to ascertain safety in laparoscopic surgery. Methodology: This was a prospective comparative study carried out at a tertiary care hospital from January 2019 to December 2019.We selected 100 patients who were planned for laparoscopic surgery and divided them into two equal groups using the envelop method of randomization. Group A comprised of patients in whom we created pneumoperitoneum by classical veress needle insertion and in Group B by open method. Results: In our study, the mean time require for closed method was 6.92 minutes while by open method it was 4.36 minutes. Complication rate was 18% in closed and 16% in open method. Conclusion: open method is quick but comparable to closed method in terms of complications.

scholarly journals Comparative assessment of the efficacy of voglibose and metformin combined with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 2255-2258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kothai Ramalingam ◽  
Veenah Ganesan ◽  
Sooraj Sasi ◽  
Surya Shanmugam ◽  
Arul Balasubramanian
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Type Ii Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospitals ◽  
Salem District

The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of metformin and voglibose combined with insulin in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. It is a retrospective study was conducted in tertiary care hospitals of Salem district Tamil Nadu with 120 patients who are taking either metformin and insulin or voglibose and insulin according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The total number of patients were divided into two groups each consist of 60. Group A was the patients prescribed with metformin and insulin and group B was the patients prescribed with voglibose and insulin. The average efficacy of metformin and voglibose combined with insulin for 10 days, 20 days, 30 days & 40 days were compared using FBS, PPBS, RBS and HbA1C values. The result shows that patients treated with metformin and insulin, the average efficacy of FBS levels on 10, 20, 30 and 40 days were 22.96%, 27.46%, 30.49% and 36.78% respectively. Whereas in the case of voglibose and insulin the efficacy was 23.48%, 28.38%, 32.57%, 40.47% for 10, 20, 30 and 40 days respectively.In the same way, the PPBS, RBS and HbA1C levels were also calculated. While comparing both the groups of patients, the average efficacy of treatment with voglibose and insulin was more effective than metformin and insulin in the tertiary care hospital of Salem district.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcome of Acute Viral Hepatitis between Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients: A Tertiary Care Hospital Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Riad Md Moshaed Hossain ◽  
Md Anisur Rahman ◽  
Mohammad Golam Azam ◽  
Indrajit Kumar Datta ◽  
Tareq Mahmud Bhuiyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Acute Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Acute Hepatic Failure ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Diabetes and its complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. It has been observedthatpatients who develop prolonged orcomplicated course of acute viral hepatitis (AVH) often have underlying diabetes.This study was designed to compare the outcome of AVH between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Methods: This prospective observational studywas done in BIRDEM General Hospital from July 2011 to December 2013.A total of 60 patients suffering fromAVH admitted in Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disorders (GHPD) Department were included. Of them 30 patients were diabetic (group A) and 30 patients were nondiabetic (group B). Patients’clinicaland biochemical parameters were evaluated during hospital stay. Results: Aetiology of AVH were hepatitis E (76.67%), hepatitis B (16.67%) and hepatitis A (6.67%). Among two groups(group A vs group B respectively); age in years (mean±SD) was 47.8±10.8 vs 30.7±11.0,gender distribution was (M/F) 18/12 vs 25/5; serum bilirubin (mean±SEM) 15.6±6.2 mg/dl vs9.8±5.5 mg/dl (p=0.001), serum ALT (mean±SEM) 735.5±92.2 iu/L vs 1491.3±189.0 iu/L, (p=0.01) and serum AST (mean±SEM) 567.9±66.9 iu/L vs 1024.8±209.2 iu/L (p=0.036). Mean duration of hospital stay in days was 17.9±8.2 vs 11.0±5.1(p<0.001) in group A and group B respectively. Sub-acute hepatic failure developed in 5(16.6%) cases of group A andonly 1(3.3%) case in group B. Three (10%) cases of group A developed acute pancreatitis who recovered with conservative treatment. No case of mortality was observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Complications of AVH in diabetic patients were more than non-diabetics. Rational and appropriatemanagement in diabetic patients may reduce the morbidity and mortality rate. Birdem Med J 2019; 9(1): 14-17

scholarly journals Comparing efficacy of Rifaximin plus Lactulose vs. Lactulose alone in treating Hepatic Encephalopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-343
Author(s):  
Tanveer Hussain ◽  
Misbah Sattar ◽  
Sara Mustafa ◽  
Uzma Batool ◽  
Shafqat Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatic Encephalopathy ◽  
Local Population ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Complete Recovery ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Hepatic Encephalopathy is a syndrome observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. Various treatment modalities are in use for treatment of Porto Systemic Encephalopathy (PSE). Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of Rifaximin plus Lactulose vs.Lactulose alone in treating Hepatic Encephalopathy in local population. Materials & Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital recruiting decompensated chronic liver disease(DCLD) patients with PSE. Using simple random sampling, patients were divided in two groups (A & B). Patients in group A received Lactulose plus Rifaximin while group B received Lactulose alone. Efficacy of treatment was assessed as return of the conscious level to pre-encephalopathy state as per clinical examination within 1 week after  start of the treatment. Results: A total of 124 patients were included in the study with each group (A & B) containing 62 patients. Frequency and percentage of efficacy among group A (Rifaximin plus Lactulose) verses group B (Lactulose alone) in treating Hepatic encephalopathy was 45 (72.6%) and 32 (51.6%) respectively. Conclusion: The study concluded that there is a significant difference in proportions of patients showing complete recovery from Hepatic encephalopathy treated with Lactulose plus Rifaximin as compared to Lactulose alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document