scholarly journals Cost analysis of critical patient care at a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care public hospital in an urban metropolis of India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 834
Author(s):  
Renuka P. Munshi ◽  
Alisha Dhiman ◽  
Sushma U. Save
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Allocation Of Resources ◽  
Bed Days ◽  
The Cost

Background: The cost of critical care is widely recognized as being high. However, it remains a challenge to accurately assess the cost of intensive care due to a lack of standardized methodology. There is also considerable heterogeneity with regard to allocation of resources and distribution of critical care services.Methods: We conducted a prospective study to analyse diagnosis-based costs of paediatric patient care at a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a public hospital in Mumbai on the basis of identified cost components; direct (fixed and variable) and indirect costs.Results: Out of 167 (102 boys, 61%) patients enrolled, 65 (39%) were aged 1-7 months. They spent an average of 4±1.46 bed days in the PICU. The cost of direct fixed components (salaries, capital equipment, disposables) was Rs. 64,48,200 for six months. The maximum cost of direct variable components spent by the hospital (physiotherapy intervention, expert opinion, investigations, medicines, blood products, piped gases) amounted to Rs. 548.63/patient/day for treatment of non-infectious diseases. Cost of indirect components (building maintenance) was Rs. 12,500/six months. Linear regression analysis showed 83-99.99% dependency of treatment cost to diagnosis and bed days. The average cost of treatment of infectious and non-infectious diagnoses/patient/day spent by the hospital was Rs. 260 and Rs. 548.63 respectively as compared to Rs. 169.96 and Rs. 356.21 spent by the patients.Conclusions: Our study showed that majority of the treatment costs depended on the diagnosis and number of bed days of the patients. Also being a tertiary care public hospital, 60% of the treatment costs were borne by the hospital. Thus, our study attempts to quantify, in financial terms, the expenditure involved in running a paediatric ICU in a tertiary care public hospital so as to assist doctors and healthcare decision makers in the allocation of resources.

Mortality Review of Children Admitted in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Over One Year in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1369-1372
Author(s):  
Pun Narayan Shrestha ◽  
Sumit Agrawal ◽  
Kosh Raj R C ◽  
Prakash Joshi ◽  
Ajit Rayamajhi
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Female Ratio

Introduction: Childhood mortality is still high in developing countries. This can be reduced with good preventive and curative services especially with critical care. The treatment of critically ill children must be focused for better outcome. The pediatrics deaths audit and review provide feedback to health workers and to the institution. The outcome measures of critical care medicine include mortality, morbidity and disability rate. Objectives: The aim of this study is to review the causes and mode of death in children and length of PICU (pediatric intensive care unit) stay. Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted of the patients who were admitted and died within the period of 16 July 2019 to 15 July, 2020 at PICU of Kanti Children Hospital (KCH). Variables recorded were patient's demography, diagnosis, co- morbidities, complications, length of PICU stay (LOS), mode and time of death. Data were tabulated into MS Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Result: Out of 718 admitted children, 99 (13.78%) died with male to female ratio of 1.8:1. The maximum death (75%) was observed in less than five year of age and most of them were from outside the Kathmandu valley. The leading causes of death were pneumonia (28%), sepsis (20%) and congenital heart diseases (21%). The common complications seen were disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), multi- organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), acute kidney injury (AKI) (5.1 %) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (6.1%) and co- morbidities were congenital heart disease (CHD) (18.2%) and global developmental delay (GDD) (9.1%). Mechanical ventilation was needed in 80.8%. Most of the cases (86%) died despite active treatment and (75%) during off hours (4pm-9am). Conclusion: Pneumonia, sepsis and CHD were the main reason of death and most of them were from outside the valley. 

Code Blue Events in the Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units at a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Groden ◽  
Erwin T. Cabacungan ◽  
Ruby Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Code Blue ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation Program

Objective The authors aim to compare all code blue events, regardless of the need for chest compressions, in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) versus the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We hypothesize that code events in the two units differ, reflecting different disease processes. Study Design This is a retrospective analysis of 107 code events using the code narrator, which is an electronic medical record of real-time code documentation, from April 2018 to March 2019. Events were divided into two groups, NICU and PICU. Neonatal resuscitation program algorithm was used for NICU events and a pediatric advanced life-support algorithm was used for PICU events. Events and outcomes were compared using univariate analysis. The Mann–Whitney test and linear regressions were done to compare the total code duration, time from the start of code to airway insertion, and time from airway insertion to end of code event. Results In the PICU, there were almost four times more code blue events per month and more likely to involve patients with seizures and no chronic condition. NICU events more often involved ventilated patients and those under 2 months of age. The median code duration for NICU events was 2.5 times shorter than for PICU events (11.5 vs. 29 minutes), even when adjusted for patient characteristics. Survival to discharge was not different in the two groups. Conclusion Our study suggests that NICU code events as compared with PICU code events are more likely to be driven by airway problems, involve patients <2 months of age, and resolve quickly once airway is taken care of. This supports the use of a ventilation-focused neonatal resuscitation program for patients in the NICU. Key Points

scholarly journals Quality improvement of delirium status communication and documentation for intensive care unit patients during daily multidisciplinary rounds

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e000239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Aparanji ◽  
Shreedhar Kulkarni ◽  
Megan Metzke ◽  
Yvonne Schmudde ◽  
Peter White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Quality Metric ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Simulation Based ◽  
Multidisciplinary Rounds

Delirium is a key quality metric identified by The Society of Critical Care Medicine for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. If not recognised early, delirium can lead to increased length of stay, hospital and societal costs, ventilator days and risk of mortality. Clinical practice guidelines recommend ICU patients be assessed for delirium at least once per shift. An initial audit at our urban tertiary care hospital in Illinois, USA determined that delirium assessments were only being performed 31% of the time. Nurses completed simulation based education and were trained using delirium screening videos. After the educational sessions, delirium documentation increased from 40% (12/30) to 69% (41/59) (two-proportion test, p<0.01) for dayshift nurses and from 27% (8/30) to 61% (36/59) (two-proportion test, p<0.01) during the nightshift. To further increase the frequency of delirium assessments, the delirium screening tool was standardised and a critical care progress note was implemented that included a section on delirium status, management strategy and discussion on rounds. After the documentation changes were implemented, delirium screening during dayshift increased to 93% (75/81) (two-proportion test, p<0.01). Prior to this project, physicians were not required to document delirium screening. After the standardised critical care note was implemented, documentation by physicians was 95% (106/111). Standardising delirium documentation, communication of delirium status on rounds, in addition to education, improved delirium screening compliance for ICU patients.

scholarly journals Bacteriological profile of neonatal and pediatrics sepsis in intensive care unit at a tertiary care hospital in western India

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 460
Author(s):  
Ajit Kumar Shrivastava ◽  
Prema Ram Choudhary ◽  
Santosh Kumar Roy
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bacterial Pathogen ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Western India ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Bacteriological Profile

Background: Neonatal and pediatrics sepsis are one of the main causes of mortality in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units of developing countries. This study was conducted to determine bacteriological profile of neonatal and pediatrics sepsis in the intensive care unit. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit, for the period of two years. All 400 neonates and pediatrics patients admitted with suspected clinical sepsis were included. Sepsis screens and cultures were sent under aseptic conditions. Isolation of microorganisms and their identification was done according to standard microbiological techniques bacteriological profile was analyzed with descriptive statistics.Results: Incidence of septicemia is 35.34% in neonates, 9.83% in post neonates and 22.95% in older children. Most common associated factor in neonates were preterm 41.46% in neonates, fever of unknown origin 50% and 78.57% in post neonates and children respectively. Out of 232 suspected cases on neonates in 36.07% cases bacterial pathogen were isolated, 62 suspected cases on post neonates in 9.83% cases bacterial were isolated and 106 suspected cases of older children in 22.95% cases bacterial pathogen were isolated. Common bacterial species isolated were Klebsiella sp. 39.02% in neonates, S. aureus 50% and 35.71% in post neonates and older children respectively.Conclusions: There is entail prevention of infection control measures and rational antibiotic strategy to decrease the economic burden of hospital and community. 

Physicians' Reactions to Training in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-383
Author(s):  
I. David Todres ◽  
Mary C. Howell ◽  
Daniel C. Shannon
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Emotional Reactions ◽  
Training Period ◽  
Patient Death ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Optimal Patient Care

Physician trainees working in a pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) were interviewed early in their training experience, at the end of their training, and 1 to 12 months after their training had ended. Pediatricians responded significantly differently from anesthesiologists: they commented more often about their own feelings, and less often about procedural-intellectual-technical matters as contrasted with feelings and relationships. Pediatricians were also more likely than anesthesiologists to mention their own emotional reactions to ill children, their sense that patient death meant physician failure, and their dismay early in the training period about the stressful intensity of the work. Physicians who were parents differed from those who were not parents by commenting more frequently about their work with the parents of patients, and about the necessity for teamwork. Physician trainees interviewed early in the training period were less reflective about the experience, and less likely to comment on feelings and relationships, compared to those interviewed later. Analysis of the sources of satisfaction and discontent with work in the ICU, as stated by the physician trainees, has been useful in efforts to improve the climate of work and learning in the unit, and to provide optimal patient care.

Cardiothoracic Surgery and Postoperative Intensive Care

2019 ◽  
pp. 417-423
Author(s):  
Juan G. Ripoll Sanz ◽  
Robert A. Ratzlaff
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Cardiothoracic Surgery ◽  
Open Heart ◽  
Postoperative Intensive Care ◽  
Main Factor

Cardiothoracic surgical (CTS) critical care responsibilities have progressively shifted away from surgeons and toward intensivists in the past several decades. CTS patients present unique challenges, and optimal patient care in the intensive care unit is a main factor for the prevention of deaths after any type of open heart surgery.

scholarly journals A study of medication errors during the prescription stage in the pediatric critical care services of a secondary-tertiary level public hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Michele Brennan-Bourdon ◽  
Alan O. Vázquez-Alvarez ◽  
Jahaira Gallegos-Llamas ◽  
Manuel Koninckx-Cañada ◽  
José Luis Marco-Garbayo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Care Services

Abstract Background Medication Errors (MEs) are considered the most common type of error in pediatric critical care services. Moreover, the ME rate in pediatric patients is up to three times higher than the rate for adults. Nevertheless, information in pediatric population is still limited, particularly in emergency/critical care practice. The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze MEs in the pediatric critical care services during the prescription stage in a Mexican secondary-tertiary level public hospital. Methods A cross-sectional study to detect MEs was performed in all pediatric critical care services [pediatric emergency care (PEC), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal intermediate care unit (NIMCU)] of a public teaching hospital. A pharmacist identified MEs by direct observation as the error detection method and MEs were classified according to the updated classification for medication errors by the Ruíz-Jarabo 2000 working group. Thereafter, these were subclassified in clinically relevant MEs. Results In 2347 prescriptions from 301 patients from all critical care services, a total of 1252 potential MEs (72%) were identified, and of these 379 were considered as clinically relevant due to their potential harm. The area with the highest number of MEs was PICU (n = 867). The ME rate was > 50% in all pediatric critical care services and PICU had the highest ME/patient index (13.1). The most frequent MEs were use of abbreviations (50.9%) and wrong speed rate of administration (11.4%), and only 11.7% of the total drugs were considered as ideal medication orders. Conclusion Clinically relevant medication errors can range from mild skin reactions to severe conditions that place the patient’s life at risk. The role of pharmacists through the detection and timely intervention during the prescription and other stages of the medication use process can improve drug safety in pediatric critical care services.

scholarly journals 1134. Antibiotic Indications and Appropriateness in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A 10 Center Point Prevalence Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S403-S404
Author(s):  
Kathleen Chiotos ◽  
Jennifer Blumenthal ◽  
Juri Boguniewicz ◽  
Debra Palazzi ◽  
Emily Berkman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Prevalence Study ◽  
Point Prevalence Study

Abstract Background Antibiotics are prescribed in up to 80% of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients, but multicenter studies systematically evaluating antibiotic indications and appropriateness in this high-utilizing population are lacking. Methods A multicenter point prevalence study was conducted at 10 geographically diverse tertiary care US children’s hospitals. All PICU patients < 21 years of age who were receiving systemic antibiotics at 8:00 AM on each study day were included. Study days occurred in February and March 2019. Data were abstracted by critical care and/or infectious diseases trained clinicians using standardized data collection forms and definitions of antibiotic appropriateness. Results 408 of 732 PICU patients (56%) received 618 antibiotics on the two study days. Empiric therapy for suspected bacterial infections without sepsis was the most common indication for antibiotics (22%), followed by treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and empiric therapy for septic shock (12% each, Figure 1). Overall, 194 antibiotic orders (32%) were classified as inappropriate and 158 patients (39%) received at least one inappropriate antibiotic. Vancomycin, cefepime, and ceftriaxone were the antibiotics most often inappropriately prescribed (Figure 2). Antibiotics prescribed inappropriately for the top 5 indications shown in Figure 1 accounted for 77% of all inappropriate antibiotic use. Prolonged ( >4 days) empiric therapy and prolonged ( >24 hours) post-operative prophylaxis were the most common reasons antibiotics prescribed for these indications were classified as inappropriate. Pneumonia and ventilator-associated infections were the most common infections for which antibiotics were prescribed inappropriately (46%). Reasons for inappropriate antibiotic use included lack of evidence supporting a bacterial infection (no radiographic infiltrate or significant increase in respiratory support) and use of unnecessarily broad antibiotics (Table 1). Conclusion Inappropriate antibiotic use is common in the PICU, particularly for pneumonia. Studies focused on defining optimal treatment strategies, as well as improved diagnostic approaches to curtail prolonged courses of empiric therapy, should be prioritized. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document