scholarly journals A comparative study of efficacy of oral itraconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole: a clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 435
Author(s):  
Savita C. Koregol ◽  
Soumya R. Naik ◽  
Abhineetha Hosthota ◽  
Arati C. Koregol
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Effective Drug ◽  
First Line ◽  
Considerable Decrease ◽  
Drug Effectiveness ◽  
Topical Drugs ◽  
Oral Itraconazole ◽  
Systemic Drug

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Keeping in view the rising number of cases of dermatophyte infections and also poor response to topical drugs, this study was conducted with the intention to arrive at a conclusion regarding the best available systemic drug.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A total of 270 patients were selected for the study. 90 patients were assigned to each group under itraconazole, terbinafine &amp; fluconazole.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> It was found that itraconazole was the most effective drug which led to a considerable decrease in erythema, peripheral spread, scaling and spread to other body sites. Next drug to be the most effective was terbinafine, which was followed by fluconazole.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We finally arrived at a conclusion that itraconazole is the most effective drug for all types of superficial fungal infections. It was followed by terbinafine &amp; fluconazole in terms of drug effectiveness. Hence in this study we advocate the use of itraconazole as first line of drug in all patients of tinea infections.</p><p class="abstract"> </p>

scholarly journals Efficacy of two-week therapy with doxycycline-based quadruple regimen versus levofloxacin concomitant regimen for helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective single-center randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marouf Alhalabi ◽  
Mohammed Waleed Alassi ◽  
Kamal Alaa Eddin ◽  
Khaled Cheha
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori Infection ◽  
First Line ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Syrian Population

Abstract Background Antibiotic-resistance reduces the efficacy of conventional triple therapy for Helicobacter Pylori infections worldwide, which necessitates using various treatment protocols. We used two protocols, doxycycline-based quadruple regimen and concomitant levofloxacin regimen. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of doxycycline-based quadruple regimen for treating Helicobacter Pylori infections compared with levofloxacin concomitant regimen as empirical first-line therapy based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses (PPA) in Syrian population. Settings and design An open-label, randomised, parallel, superiority clinical trial. Methods We randomly assigned 78 naïve patients who tested positive for Helicobacter Pylori gastric infection, with a 1:1 ratio to (D-group) which received (bismuth subsalicylate 524 mg four times daily, doxycycline 100 mg, tinidazole 500 mg, and esomeprazole 20 mg, each twice per day for 2 weeks), or (L-group) which received (levofloxacin 500 mg daily, tinidazole 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and esomeprazole 20 mg each twice per day for two weeks). We confirmed Helicobacter Pylori eradication by stool antigen test 8 weeks after completing the treatment. Results Thirty-nine patients were allocated in each group. In the D-group, 38 patients completed the follow-up, 30 patients were cured. While in the L-group, 39 completed the follow-up, 32patients were cured. According to ITT, the eradication rates were 76.92%, and 82.05%, for the D-group and L-group respectively. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was 1.371 [0.454–4.146]. According to PPA, the eradication rates were 78.9%, and 82.05% for the D-group and L-group respectively. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was 1.219 [0.394–3.774]. We didn’t report serious adverse effects. Conclusions Levofloxacin concomitant therapy wasn’t superior to doxycycline based quadruple therapy. Further researches are required to identify the optimal first-line treatment for Helicobacter-Pylori Infection in the Syrian population. Trial registration We registered this study as a standard randomized clinical trial (Clinicaltrial.gov, identifier-NCT04348786, date:29-January-2020).

scholarly journals AHR-dependent genes and response to MTX therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Wajda ◽  
Ewa Walczuk ◽  
Barbara Stypińska ◽  
Jakub Lach ◽  
Danat Yermakovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Mrna Level ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Evolutionary Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Aryl Hydrocarbon ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Genes Expression ◽  
Ahr Gene

AbstractMethotrexate (MTX) is the first-line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Nevertheless, MTX resistance is quite a common issue in clinical practice. There are some premises that aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) gene battery may take part in MTX metabolism. In the present retrospective study, we analyzed genes expression of AHR genes battery associated with MTX metabolism in whole blood of RA patients with good and poor response to MTX treatment. Additionally, sequencing, genotyping and bioinformatics analysis of AHR repressor gene (AHRR) c.565C > G (rs2292596) and c.1933G > C (rs34453673) have been performed. Theoretically, both changes may have an impact on H3K36me3 and H3K27me3. Evolutionary analysis revealed that rs2292596 may be possibly damaging. Allele G in rs2292596 and DAS28 seems to be associated with a higher risk of poor response to MTX treatment in RA. RA patients with poor response to MTX treatment revealed upregulated AhR and SLC19A1 mRNA level. Treatment with IL-6 inhibitor may be helpful to overcome the low-dose MTX resistance. Analysis of gene expression revealed possible another cause of poor response to MTX treatment which is different from that observed in the case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

scholarly journals Factors Predicting the Success of Adhesiolysis Using a Steerable Catheter in Lumbar Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 913
Author(s):  
Ji Yeong Kim ◽  
Yong Ho Lee ◽  
Subin Yoo ◽  
Ji Young Kim ◽  
Mina Joo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Poor Response ◽  
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ◽  
Foraminal Stenosis ◽  
Outer Diameter ◽  
Lumbar Surgery ◽  
First Line ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery ◽  
Reasonable Evidence ◽  
Reduction Effect

Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a commonly encountered disease after lumbar surgery. There are many cases where it is difficult to choose a treatment because no specific cause can be found. Nevertheless, according to recent reports, adhesiolysis has shown reasonable evidence. However, considering its poor cost-effectiveness, adhesiolysis cannot be used as the first line of treatment. FBSS patients often suffer from chronic pain; accordingly, they become frustrated when this treatment produces a poor response. Therefore, before the procedure, the target group must be selected carefully. We sought to identify the pre-procedure factors predicting the effect of adhesiolysis in FBSS. A total of 150 patients were evaluated and analyzed retrospectively. Of these 150 patients, 69 were classified as responders three months after the procedure (46%). The outer diameter of the catheter during the procedure and grade of foraminal stenosis were correlated with the procedure effect. In conclusion, of the 2.1 mm diameter of the catheter, 1.7 mm of it was used during the procedure, and the milder the foraminal stenosis, the greater the pain reduction effect was three months after the procedure.

Anlotinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ALTER L012.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21040-e21040
Author(s):  
Qiming Wang ◽  
Xiuli Yang ◽  
Tianjiang Ma ◽  
Qiumin Yang ◽  
Chenghui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment

e21040 Background: The anti-angiogenic drug bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy has achieved positive results in previous studies. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for EGFR-negative patients was increased to 8.3 months in the BEYOND study. Unlike bevacizumab, anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor and can be conveniently orally administered. In the phase III trial ALTER 0303, anlotinib significantly improved overall survival (OS) and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients. This exploratory study aims to establish the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: This is a multi-center, single-arm clinical trial. Adults with treatment-naive, histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV non-squamous NSCLC, ECOG 0-1, and without known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations are included. Patients received anlotinib (12 mg p.o., QD, d1 to 14, 21 days per cycle) combined with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, iv, d15-21, Q3W) + carboplatin (AUC = 5, iv, d15-21, Q3W) for 4 cycles followed by anlotinib and pemetrexed maintenance until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Between Mar 2019 and Dec 2020, 40 patients were enrolled in six centers and 31 of them have received at least one tumor assessment. Median age was 62 (33, 75); 66.7% male, 11.1% brain metastasis. At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2020), patients were followed up for a median of 8.26 months. Median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: NE, NE); ORR was 67.7% (0 CR, 21 PR), DCR was 96.8% (0 CR, 21 PR, 9 SD) and median OS was NE. The most common Grade ≥ 3 AEs were hypertension 22.2%, neutropenia 19.44%, myelosuppression 11.1%, thrombocytopenia 8.33%, leukopenia 5.56%, hand-foot syndrome 5.56% and there were no Grade 5 toxicities. Conclusions: This study finds that anlotinib plus pemetrexed and carboplatin can significantly improve PFS and ORR compared to standard chemotherapy for treatment-naive non-squamous NSCLC patients. The combination was well tolerated, and the AEs were manageable. The follow-up time is not sufficient, and the OS outcomes need further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT03790228.

Racial disparities in biomarker testing and clinical trial enrollment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9005-9005
Author(s):  
Debora S. Bruno ◽  
Lisa M. Hess ◽  
Xiaohong Li ◽  
Eric Wen Su ◽  
Yajun Emily Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
Black Patients ◽  
Biomarker Testing ◽  
Clinical Trial Enrollment ◽  
White Patients

9005 Background: Cancer racial disparities may exist at many levels in the health care system, from screening to timely diagnosis and treatments received, as well as clinical trial enrollment. This study investigated differences in black versus white race among patients with NSCLC undergoing biomarker testing and clinical trial enrollment in the US. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized the Flatiron Health database, which includes longitudinal data of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Patients were eligible if they had evidence of systemic therapy in the database from 1/1/2017 through 10/30/2020. Descriptive analyses summarized differences by race in biomarker testing and trial enrollment. Multivariable regression examined the relationship between these factors. Results: A total of 14,768 patients were eligible: 9,793 (66.3%) were white and 1,288 (8.7%) were black. 76.4% of white patients and 73.6% of black patients underwent at least one single molecular test or comprehensive genomic analysis (p = 0.03). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed among 50.1% of white patients and 39.8% of black patients (p < 0.0001. Trial participation was observed among 3.9% of white and 1.9% of black patients (p = 0.0002). There was a statistically significant association between race (white vs black) and both biomarker testing (ever vs never) and trial participation (yes vs no) (both p < 0.001, unadjusted chi square). Differences in NGS testing, baseline biomarker testing, and race were retained as statistically significant (p < 0.01) in adjusted regression analyses. The receipt of first-line targeted therapy was comparable between white and black patients (10.2% and 9.2%, respectively, p = 0.24); however, this summary did not consider biomarker test results. First line use of pembrolizumab+carboplatin+pemetrexed was observed among 19.8% of white and 22.6% of black patients; carboplatin+paclitaxel was observed among 16.5% and 18.6%, and single-agent pembrolizumab was observed among 14.8% and 11.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The use of NGS-based testing, which is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Guidelines in Oncology for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, is the most notable disparity among black patients, with more than a 10 percentage-point difference in receipt of this testing versus white counterparts. This may in part contribute to the more than double the rate of participation in clinical trials observed among white patients, as many second line and beyond trials utilize molecular targets as inclusion criteria. While multiple factors are known to impact health care disparities, access to and receipt of appropriate biomarker testing may be an attenable goal in order to ensure equal access to quality care.

Phase II clinical trial of PM00104 (Zalypsis®) in urothelial carcinoma patients progressing after first-line platinum-based regimen

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
José Pablo Maroto ◽  
Albert Font-Pous ◽  
Rafael Morales-Barrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
First Line
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document