scholarly journals Peculiarities of Proving Damage Caused in Some Civil Case Categories

Russian judge ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Olga A. Derbisheva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Case ◽  
Specific Assessment ◽  
Court Orders ◽  
Civil Cases

The article deals with the General issues of the proof process, which includes: the concept of proof, the duty of proof, the relevance and admissibility of evidence, their specific assessment, the provision of evidence, court orders, as well as the means of proof. These issues are analyzed in the context of proving the harm caused in various categories of civil cases.

scholarly journals Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan Nomor. 52/PDT.G/2015/PN.RAP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-201
Author(s):  
Nur Hikmah ◽  
Darwinsyah Minin ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
District Court ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Case Number ◽  
Selection Of

Peace is the most gentle answer as well as a win-win solutin, the existence of the basic law of mediation in Indonesia as an alternative to the dispute resolution outside the court can be seen in Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBG which has set up a peace institution which then judges shall first reconcile the parties before the case is reviewed, as described in Article 130 HIR / 154 RBG and PERMA Number. 01 of 2008 on Mediation Procedures in Courts. The formulation of the problem is how the rules of mediation law as an alternative to the settlement of civil disputes in the Court, how the implementation and mechanism in the selection of Mediators at the District Court Rantauprapat and how the results of mediation on civil cases Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap generated from the mediation process, the aim is to know and simultaneously find the law of mediation as an alternative to civil disputes settlement in the Court and to know the implementation and mechanism of the selection of Mediator in Rantauprapat District Court and meganalisis the decision of civil case Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap resulting from the mediation process

scholarly journals PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PIDANA SEBAGAI NOVUM DALAM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PERDATA

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
ALI MARWAN HSB
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Literature Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases

ABSTRAKUndang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek mengatur bahwa untuk penyelesaian sengketa atau pelanggaran merek dapat ditempuh melalui dua alternatif penyelesaian, yaitu dengan mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan niaga (secara perdata) dan diadukan kepada penyidik untuk diselesaikan secara pidana. Kedua penyelesaian inilah yang ditempuh sekaligus oleh GG melawan GB. Kasus ini kemudian sampai pada upaya hukum luar biasa yaitu peninjauan kembali. Dalam peninjauan kembali perkara perdata, pihak GG mengajukan putusan peninjauan kembali perkara pidana sebagai novum. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, dapat dirumuskan permasalahan dalam tulisan ini adalah: apakah putusan peninjauan kembali perkara pidana dapat dijadikan novum dalam peninjauan kembali perkara perdata? Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif atau metode penelitian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa jika dikaji dari alasan pengajuan peninjauan kembali yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1985 tentang Mahkamah Agung, suatu putusan pengadilan dapat dijadikan alasan dalam permohonan peninjauan kembali, apabila ada pertentangan antara putusan yang satu dengan yang lain. Pertentangan itu harus antara putusan oleh peradilan yang sama atau sama tingkatan. Pengajuan putusan peninjauan kembali perkara pidana menjadi novum dalam peninjauan kembali perkara perdata atau sebaliknya, tidak dapat dibenarkan.Kata kunci: peninjauan kembali, pidana, perdata, novum. ABSTRACT Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Trademark stipulates that resolution of disputes or violations of brands can be taken through two alternative ways, namely filing a lawsuit to the Commercial Court (civil) and secondly filing a complaint with the investigator for a criminal settlement. These two solutions were taken at the same time by both parties, GG against GB. This case was then up to the extraordinary request for review. In the review of civil cases, GG filed a decision on a criminal case review as novum. Based on this, the problems outlined in this analysis is whether the decision of a criminal case review can be made novum in reviewing a civil case. The method used is a normative juridical research method or literature research method. As stipulated in Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court, pertaining to the reasoning of filing an extraordinary request for case review, the research result shows that a court decision can be used as an excuse to file a case review, provided that there is conflict between one decision and another. Filing a criminal case review decision as novum in civil case review or vice versa cannot be justified. Keywords: case review, criminal, civil, novum.

scholarly journals DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A CAUSE FOR DIVORCE: ARE THERE EFFORTS FOR MEDIATION?

Al-Bayyinah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-211
Author(s):  
Jasmaniar Jasmaniar ◽  
Sutiawati Sutiawati
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases

AbstractMediation as an alternative to dispute resolution has been integrated in court. Further provisions for mediation as a process that must be carried out are further regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court. This means that cases filed in court including cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence are obliged to undergo mediation. This research is a normative legal research that focuses on solving legal problems by providing a basis for theoretical argumentation and adequate concepts. Sources of data in this study came from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The findings of the study indicate that in cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence, they still take the path of mediation. This is stated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 which requires mediation in civil cases, even in the Supreme Court Regulation states that in the resolution of a civil case a judge does not take mediation, it is considered to have violated the law. Divorce cases on the grounds of domestic violence cannot be categorized as a criminal act, if the filing process is a civil process (divorce), it is different when the wife makes a complaint (complaint offense) and/or an ordinary offense which results in a violation of the Abolition of Domestic Violence. However, divorce cases are considered civil and processed according to other civil cases and on the grounds of domestic violence they still go through mediation. Keywords: Mediation; Divorce; Violence; Household.

scholarly journals Penerapan Contempt Of Court sebagai Terobosan dalam Membangun Efektivitas Eksekusi Riil dalam Perkara Perdata

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoyo Arifardhani
Keyword(s):  
Legal Research ◽  
The Real ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Physical Resistance ◽  
Efficient Execution ◽  
Case Decisions

This study tried to parse the possibility of contempt of court application is a breakthrough to build for effectiveness of real execution of civil cases. The discussion in this study rests on two problem objects, namely; 1) What are the obstacles in the real execution of civil case decisions; and 2) How can a solution be proposed to encourage the effectiveness of the real execution of civil cases. This paper is used to normative legal research so that it rests on the statute approach. The results of this research to indicate that in addition to normative problems in execution arrangements, in practice it is often found that problems occur due to physical resistance from the losing party in the trial. Because of this reason, it is important to apply contempt of court as a legal formulation to create an effective and efficient execution system.Keyword: Contempt of court, Real Execution, Civil CaseAbstrakKajian ini mencoba mengurai kemungkinan Penghinaan terhadap Pengadilan yang merupakan terobosan untuk membangun efektivitas eksekusi nyata dalam perkara perdata. Pembahasan dalam penelitian ini bertumpu pada dua objek masalah, yaitu; 1) Apa saja kendala dalam pelaksanaan putusan perkara perdata; dan 2) Bagaimana solusi yang dapat diajukan untuk mendorong efektivitas pelaksanaan perkara perdata yang sebenarnya. Tulisan ini digunakan untuk penelitian hukum normatif sehingga bertumpu pada pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa selain masalah normatif dalam pengaturan eksekusi, dalam praktiknya sering ditemukan masalah yang terjadi karena adanya perlawanan fisik dari pihak yang kalah dalam persidangan. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk menerapkan Penghinaan terhadap Pengadilan sebagai rumusan hukum untuk menciptakan sistem eksekusi yang efektif dan efisien. Kata kunci; Penghinaan terhadap Pengadilan, Eksekusi Nyata, Perkara Perdata

scholarly journals Forensic Examination as a Condition for the Realization of the Right to a Fair Trial of a Civil Case

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-331
Author(s):  
M. Kochetkova ◽  
K. Shumova
Keyword(s):  
Fair Trial ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Forensic Examination ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Special Knowledge ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
The Right

This article is devoted to forensic examination as a condition for the realization of the right to a fair trial of a civil case in the context of changing legal reality. The study of forensic examination as a form of using special knowledge in civil proceedings is relevant and promising. The article discusses the conditions and guarantees of the right to a fair trial, sets out the theoretical problems of forensic examination, the procedural procedure for the appointment and conduct of forensic examination in civil proceedings, features of the appointment of forensic examination for certain categories of civil cases.

scholarly journals The Law Strength Of Under Hand Deed That Has Passed By Notary as an Authentic Deed in the Proof of Civil Case in District Court of Cirebon

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 661
Author(s):  
Yensih Yensih ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi ◽  
Lathifah Hanim
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Final Conclusion ◽  
Strength Of Evidence ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Literature Data Analysis ◽  
Legal Force

The purpose of this study was to determine: 1) The legal force under hand deed that has been approved by Notary as proof of the authentic deed in civil cases in District Court of Cirebon 2) The weakness of the legal strength under hand deed that has been approved by Notary as proof of the authentic deed in civil cases in District Court of CirebonThe approach used in this paper is empirical juridical with the help of primary data or empirical data as the main data. Sources of primary data obtained through interviews, while secondary data obtained rehabilitated and reconstructed by literature. Data analysis techniques with descriptive analysis.The final conclusion is:1.) The legal force under hand deed that has been approved by Notary as proof of the authentic deed in a civil case in court is not the same strength as the authentic deed, but the under hand deed could be evidence in a civil case in court, and the strength of the deed under hand legalized (legalization) Notary Having strength in numbers, the date, and the certainty of the signature of the parties. Under hand deed strength will be strong ruling legalizing if a Notary was brought to trial a witness to the truth of the deed under his hand legalized. 2) The weakness of the under hand deed, and that, if someone in the under hand deed does not admit the truth of the under hand deed strength is lost, but with the legalization of under hand deed can have the strength law even not same as authentic deed which has the perfect law strength.Keywords : Deed under hand; Legalization; and Strength of evidence.

scholarly journals PRINSIP HAKIM AKTIF DALAM PERKARA PERDATA

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Sunarto Sunarto
Keyword(s):  
Active Role ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
The Common ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
The Right

The Justice must be firmly maintained. This demand can not be modified due to it was closely related to the rights enforcement. The common paradigm in civil code perception makes judges passively work in civil cases handling. It can be seen in Article 119 HIR when the general court chief judge give a support as advice and help related to the formality or the terms of the lawsuit for the strike to be acceptable and meets the requirements of formality lawsuit against the plaintiff or attorney. Moreover , Article 130 HIR/RBG Article 154, required that general court chief judge attempted to reconcile the two parties litigant. Furthermore, in Article 132 HIR/RBG Article 156, the Judge has an active role to inform both litigants and provide an explanation to the litigants of their rights to take legal actions and the right to submit evidence on the court.Keywords : active judges, civil case

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM TENGENBEWIJS TERHADAP AKTA OTENTIK DALAM HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN PADA PERKARA PERDATA

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-53
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Riyani Kartika Sari
Keyword(s):  
Civil Case ◽  
Legal Studies ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Proof Strength

As regulated on Article 164 HIR/ Article 284 RBg there are several kinds of evindence in civil cases such as written evidence, proof by witnesses, presumtions, confessions evidence, and oaths. One of the written evidence is authentic deed which was made by and before the authorized public officer at the place where the deed was made. The proof strength of authentic deed is perfect except declined and  proven otherwise by the evidence of the opponent or tengenbewijs. Using notmative legal studies, this written is examining and discussing about the strength of the authentic deed  and legal the strength of the authentic Regarding to the strength of an authentic deed on proofing process was of perfect proof which means what is written in the deed was really happened so that the judge must accept it and may not order the addition of proof anymore. But to the proof strength of the authentic deed can be defended by the evidence of opponent or tengenbewijs. The existence of evidence of the opponent against an authentic deed will invalidate the strength of perfect proof of an authentic deed because it will cause a lack on the authentic deed, so that in the process of proving the civil case, the authentic deed proof strength will be degraded to be an underhanded deed.

Civil Cases and Society: Process and Order in the Civil Justice System

1979 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Engel ◽  
Eric H. Steele
Keyword(s):  
Justice System ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Stage Model ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
Case Processing ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Civil Justice System

It is not an exaggeration to say that we live in an era preoccupied with the problems and challenges of obtaining justice in civil cases. Concerns expressed about the civil justice system range from warnings that civil court dockets are clogged by disputants too litigious for their own good to complaints that the legal system is used too rarely in civil cases.The authors approach their analysis with a sense that this subject area is in need of more and better theory. It is an unfortunate fact that discussions of civil justice—and suggestions for reform—have been marked by contradiction and confusion and have been engrossed with small matters that tend to obscure from view the system as a whole.The first part of this essay focuses on what the civil justice system is and does. It presents a five-stage model of civil case processing and examines relationships between this model and the criminal justice system. The second part of the essay considers this model in a broader context. Here the authors examine two paradigms of civil case processing and their implications for the implementation of legal norms and the pursuit of justice in society.

The Use of Videotape Evidence in Civil Cases

1969 ◽  
pp. 215
Author(s):  
Bruce P. Elman
Keyword(s):  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Cases

The author discusses the role of videotape evidence as testimonial proof and as demonstrative evidence. He surveys the leading cases in the area as well as relevant statutory provisions. The potential hazards associated with the use of videotape evidence are followed by recommended measures to ensure accuracy and objectivity. The author suggests that where these safeguards are taken, a "first-hand" view of the evidence used to prove a civil case may aid the court in reaching a sound decision.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document