Assessment of Seed Protein Quality of A Transgenic Chickpea Event Expressing Cry2Aa Protein

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bidyut Kumar Sarmah ◽  
Rubi Gupta ◽  
Sumita Acharjee
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Seed Protein ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Seed Storage Protein ◽  
Protein Profile ◽  
Seed Storage ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
Factors Affecting

Background: Evaluation of the nutritional composition of genetically modified (GM) crops is mandatory for their deregulation. Chickpea is known for its high-quality protein and demonstrating that the seed protein quality of transgenic chickpea remains unaltered is important for its acceptance. Amino acid content, seed storage protein profile and the digestibility of chickpea protein are important determinants of seed protein quality. Thus, in the present study, we assessed the effect of Bt (Cry2Aa) gene expression on the Bt chickpea seed protein quality. Methods: We assessed the amino acid profile, in vitro protein digestibility and factors affecting protein digestibility like trypsin inhibitor, tannins and phytic acid contents of the transgenic Bt chickpea expressing a codon modified Cry2Aa gene and its non-transgenic counterpart. Furthermore, the seed storage proteins were also fractionated and separated on SDS-PAGE followed by mass spectroscopy of the major peptides. Result: Amino acid profile and factors affecting protein digestibility revealed no significant variations between transgenic and non-transgenic chickpeas. Seed storage protein profile confirmed the presence of legumin, vicilin and albumin. No potential change in the digestibility pattern of seed proteins was revealed. Our findings suggest no potential unintended changes in chickpea seed protein quality due to the expression of Cry2Aa gene.

scholarly journals Meat protein quality of Dormitator latifrons (Pisces: Eleotridae): arguments for use by rural communities

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Ernesto Rafael Basto-Rosales ◽  
Olimpia Carrillo-Farnés ◽  
Cynthia Eugenia Montoya-Martínez ◽  
Daniel Badillo-Zapata ◽  
Gustavo Gustavo Rodríguez-Montes de Oca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Rural Communities ◽  
Essential Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Amino Acid Content ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
Meat Protein ◽  
Reference Protein

The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of meat protein of Dormitator latifrons for humans based on its Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS). Wild and cultured specimens were evaluated for amino acid content using HPLC equipment. The calculation of PDCAAS was performed as follows: milligrams of essential amino acid in 1 g of test protein per milligram of the same amino acid in 1 g of reference protein per true digestibility. To evaluate the protein of D. latifrons in relation to that of other fish, PDCAAS was calculated from the proteins of eight fish usually used in human nutrition. D. latifrons has a good essential amino acid profile, providing the same nutritional quality as those of other fish. Although the meat of wild D. latifrons contributes only 73% of human lysine requirements, it can be complemented with other lysine sources.

Effect of barrel temperature and feed moisture on protein quality in pre-cooked Kabuli chickpea, sorghum, and maize flours

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyang Wang ◽  
Matthew G Nosworthy ◽  
James D House ◽  
Shannon-Hood Niefer ◽  
Michael T Nickerson
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
Extrusion Temperature ◽  
In Vitro Protein Digestibility ◽  
Feed Moisture ◽  
Vitro Protein

The effect of barrel temperature (120 and 150 ℃, held constant in zones 4–6) and feed moisture (20 and 24%) on the protein quality of Kabuli chickpea, sorghum, and maize flours were examined, which included amino acid profile, in vitro protein digestibility and in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (IV-PDCAAS). It was found that the limiting amino acid of chickpea changed from threonine to valine after extrusion, whereas both sorghum and maize were limiting in lysine before and after extrusion. The in vitro protein digestibility increased from 77 to 81% for chickpea and 73 to 76% for maize; values for sorghum remained at 74% after extrusion. However, the IV-PDCAAS for the extruded flours generally remained at the same level, 69% for chickpea, 22% for sorghum, and ∼35% for maize. The effect of extrusion temperature, moisture and their interaction was significant on protein quality of sorghum and maize, but in the case of chickpea, only the extrusion temperature was significant. Only chickpea extruded at 150 ℃ (regardless of the moisture) met the protein quality (PDCAAS > 70%) requirement to be used in food assistance products.

scholarly journals Protein Digestibility of Cereal Products

Foods ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris Joye
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Intact Cell ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
Antinutritional Factors ◽  
Internal Factors ◽  
Cereal Products ◽  
Low Protein ◽  
Cell Structures

Protein digestibility is currently a hot research topic and is of big interest to the food industry. Different scoring methods have been developed to describe protein quality. Cereal protein scores are typically low due to a suboptimal amino acid profile and low protein digestibility. Protein digestibility is a result of both external and internal factors. Examples of external factors are physical inaccessibility due to entrapment in e.g., intact cell structures and the presence of antinutritional factors. The main internal factors are the amino acid sequence of the proteins and protein folding and crosslinking. Processing of food is generally designed to increase the overall digestibility through affecting these external and internal factors. However, with proteins, processing may eventually also lead to a decrease in digestibility. In this review, protein digestion and digestibility are discussed with emphasis on the proteins of (pseudo)cereals.

scholarly journals Protein Quality of Rice Drinks Fortified with Bovine and Porcine Blood Plasma

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 7487-7496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piedad Margarita Montero Castillo ◽  
Yesid Alejandro Marrugo Ligardo ◽  
Lesbia Cristina Julio González
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Blood Plasma ◽  
Protein Content ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
Food Sources ◽  
In Vitro Digestibility ◽  
Porcine Blood ◽  
Bovine Plasma

The future of nutrition in Colombia, and perhaps in other developing countries, will depend in large part on the ability of food technology to take full advantage of the food sources available in the country and to adapt and develop new products that will vary and complement the diets of the majority of the population at a low cost. The objective of this study was to evaluate the protein quality of rice-based drinks fortified with bovine and porcine blood plasma. Six treatments were prepared with different levels of fortification (14.5%, 18.5% and 29%). The effects of the plasma type and the addition levels on the protein content, the amino acid profile, and the in vitro digestibility of the drinks were observed. The AOAC method was employed for the determination of the protein content; the amino acid profile was created using HPLC. The protein digestibility was determined by subjecting a dispersion of the drink to the action of a multi-enzymatic solution. The protein content increased with the level of fortification. The drinks fortified with bovine plasma (104%) and porcine plasma (89%) presented a better protein quality index than the unfortified drink. The digestibility of the fortified drinks did not demonstrate significant improvements in comparison with the unfortified drink. The chemical score of the drinks fortified with porcine plasma (71.6) and bovine plasma (78.5) showed that the latter had the best nutritional quality.

scholarly journals The effect of increasing intakes of plant protein on the protein quality of Canadian diets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P.F. Marinangeli ◽  
Hrvoje Fabek ◽  
Mavra Ahmed ◽  
Diana Sanchez-Hernandez ◽  
Samara Foisy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Canadian Community Health Survey ◽  
Plant Protein ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Plant Foods ◽  
Protein Consumption

The 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey was used to investigated the protein content and protein quality of the diets consumed by adults (≥ 19 years) when plant protein is increased. Individuals (n=6498) were allocated to quartiles of increasing proportions of protein from plant foods (Q1:0-24.9%; Q2:25%-49.9%; Q3:50-74.9%; Q4:75-100%). The Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) of diets were estimated using indispensable amino acid concentrations of foods and an assumed digestibility coefficient of 0.8. Corrected protein intakes were determined by aggregating foods consumed over 24hrs and as the sum of corrected protein consumed at eating events within six, four-hour time intervals. Most individuals (51%) consumed 25-49.9% of protein from plant foods. Cereal-based foods represented the majority of plant protein consumed. PDCAAS of diets remained ≥0.87 for Q1-3, but decreased (p<0.0001) to 0.71±0.018 in Q4 vs. Q2 (0.96±0.004). Corrected protein intakes in Q2 (80.66±1.21 g/day; 1.07±0.03 g protein/kg BW) decreased to 37.13±1.88 g/day (0.54±0.03 g/kg BW) in Q4 (p<0.0001). Aggregated daily corrected protein intake strongly correlated (r=0.99; p<0.001) with the sum of corrected protein consumed within time intervals. Intra-time interval analysis revealed that the relative proportions of animal and plant proteins changed at eating events over 24hrs; and did not reflect the allocation to quartiles based on the daily proportion of plant protein consumption. Various tools should be explored and developed to assist Canadians in effectively incorporating plant protein foods into dietary patterns. Novelty: ●Corrected protein intakes decreased as plant protein consumption increased. ●PDCAAS was ≥0.87 for diets with ≤74.9% plant protein.

scholarly journals Background on international activities on protein quality assessment of foods

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (S2) ◽  
pp. S168-S182 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Sarwar Gilani
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Expert Consultation ◽  
Codex Committee ◽  
Vegetable Proteins ◽  
Amino Acid Score

The subject of protein quality assessment of foods and diets was addressed at the Codex Committee on Vegetable Proteins (1982–1989), FAO/WHO (1989, 2001) and WHO/FAO (2002) expert reviews. These international developments are summarized in this manuscript. In 1989, a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Protein Quality Evaluation reviewed knowledge of protein quality assessment of foods, and specifically evaluated amino acid score corrected for protein digestibility, the method recommended by the Codex Committee on Vegetable Proteins. The report of the Consultation published in 1991 concluded that the Protein Digestibility-corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) method was the most suitable approach for routine evaluation of protein quality for humans. The Consultation recognized that the amino acid scoring pattern proposed by FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) for preschool children was at that time the most suitable pattern for calculating PDCAAS for all ages except infants in which case the amino acid composition of human milk was recommended to be the basis of the scoring pattern. The rat balance method was considered as the most suitable practical method for predicting protein digestibility by humans. Since its adoption by FAO/WHO (1991), the PDCAAS method has been criticised for a number of reasons. The FAO/WHO (2001) Working Group on analytical issues related to protein quality assessed the validity of criticisms of the PDCAAS method. While recognizing a distinct regulatory use of protein quality data, the Working Group recommended that the PDCAAS method may be inappropriate for the routine prediction of protein quality of novel and sole source foods which contain high levels of anti nutritional factors; and that for regulatory purposes, the method should be revised to permit values of >100 for high quality proteins. In evaluating the recommendations of the Working Group, the WHO/FAO (2002) Expert Consultation on Protein and Amino Acid Requirements endorsed the PDCAAS method with minor modifications to the calculation method but also raised several issues. These included the calculation of scoring patterns; prediction of amino acid digestibility by faecal and ileal methods; reduced bioavailability of lysine in processed proteins; truncation of the amino acid score and consequent PDCAAS value; protein digestibility as a first limiting factor in determining the overall available dietary nitrogen; and the calculation of amino acid score for a dietary protein mixture. These concerns were considered particularly important in relation to the regulatory aspects of protein quality of foods, and their resolution was urgently recommended through a new separate expert review.

scholarly journals Protein intakes in India

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (S2) ◽  
pp. S50-S58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumathi Swaminathan ◽  
Mario Vaz ◽  
Anura V. Kurpad
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Fruits And Vegetables ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Dietary Quality ◽  
Protein Energy ◽  
Amino Acid Score ◽  
Pe Ratio

Indian diets derive almost 60 % of their protein from cereals with relatively low digestibility and quality. There have been several surveys of diets and protein intakes in India by the National Nutrition Monitoring Board (NNMB) over the last 25 years, in urban and rural, as well as in slum dwellers and tribal populations. Data of disadvantaged populations from slums, tribals and sedentary rural Indian populations show that the protein intake (mainly from cereals) is about 1 gm/kg/day. However, the protein intake looks less promising in terms of the protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS), using lysine as the first limiting amino acid, where all populations, particularly rural and tribal, appear to have an inadequate quality to their protein intake. The protein: energy (PE) ratio is a measure of dietary quality, and has been used in the 2007 WHO/FAO/UNU report to define reference requirement values with which the adequacy of diets can be evaluated in terms of a protein quality corrected PE ratio. It is likely that about one third of this sedentary rural population is at risk of not meeting their requirements. These levels of risk of deficiency are in a population with relatively low BMI populations, whose diets are also inadequate in fruits and vegetables. Therefore, while the burden of enhancing the quality of protein intake in rural India exists, the quality of the diet, in general, represents a challenge that must be met.

Evaluation Of Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score Method For Assessing Protein Quality Of Foods

1990 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghulam arwar ◽  
Frank E Mcdonough
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Quality Measurement ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Detailed Examination ◽  
True Digestibility ◽  
Score Method ◽  
Amino Acid Score

Abstract The current concepts of protein quality evaluation were reviewed. A detailed examination of existing animal assays and more promising amino acid scoring methods has been carried out by an Ad Hoc Working Group on Protein Quality Measurement for the Codex Committee on Vegetable Proteins during the last 5 years. Several factors such as Inadequacies of protein efficiency ratio (PER, the poorest test) and other animal assays, advancements made In standardizing methods for amino acid analysis and protein digestibility, availability of data on digestibility of protein and Individual amino acids in a variety of foods, and reliability of human amino acid requirements and scoring patterns were evaluated. On the basis of this evaluation, amino acid score, corrected for true digestibility of protein, was recommended to be the most suitable routine method for predicting protein quality of foods for humans. Amino acid scores corrected for true digestibility of protein (as determined by rat balance method) were termed "protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores." A detailed method for the determination of the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score was proposed, and information about the range of scores to be expected In foods or food products was provided In the present Investigation. The protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score method Is a simple and scientifically sound approach for routine evaluation of protein quality of foods. Accuracy of the method would, however, be confirmed after validation with growth or metabolic balance studies In humans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document