scholarly journals PENGAWASAN BANK INDONESIA ATAS KERAHASIAAN DAN KEAMANAN DATA/INFORMASI KONSUMEN FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY PADA SEKTOR MOBILE PAYMENT

JURISDICTIE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Dwi Fidhayanti
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Mobile Payment ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
Information Transparency ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Consumer Data ◽  
Financial Technology ◽  
Payment Gateway

<p>Widespread use of Internet and smartphones in Indonesia triggers fintech transactions. Law Number 11 Year 2008 concearning Information and Electronic Transactions Article 26 Paragraph (1) explains that unless otherwise stipulated by statutory regulations, the use of any information through electronic media concerning a personal’s data must be carried out with the concent of the person concerned. However, it is prone to crime by breaking into the security systems of fintech. This study aims to determine the regulation of consumer data confidentiality and security of financial technology in the mobile payment sector and Bank Indonesia’s supervision on that matter. This is a normative study with legislative and conceptual approaches. Regulation on the Consumer Data/Information Confidentiality and Security of Financial Technology in Mobile Payment Sector is made by authorized institutions i.e. Bank Indonesia as regulators and supervisors in payment system and OJK (Financial Services Authority) in managing fintech categorized as non-bank institutions. Bank Indonesia has issued Regulation Number 7/6/PBI/2005 concerning provisions on Information Transparency of Bank Product and the Use of Customer’s Personal Data. Meanwhile, OJK manages data security based on Article 2 Letter d of the OJK Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumer Protection of Financial Services Sector. Bank Indonesia supervises directly through Bank Indonesia Fintech office by holding “meet the start up” to consult and share about fintech. Policy wise, Bank Indonesia issued regulation concerning payment transaction processing, APU/PPT for non-banks, Bank Indonesia Regulations on Fintech and Regulatory Sandboxes and regulations on National Payment Gateway (NPG).</p><p>Meluasnya penggunaan Internet dan smartphone di Indonesia membuat tingginya transaksi fintech. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Pasal 26 ayat (1) menjelaskan bahwa kecuali ditentukan lain oleh Peraturan perundang-undangan, penggunaan setiap informasi melalui media elektronik yang menyangkut data pribadi seseorang harus dilakukan atas persetujuan orang yang bersangkutan. Namun, penggunaan teknologi rentan terhadap kejahatan dengan membobol sistem keamanan fintech. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan atas kerahasiaan dan keamanan data konsumen pada sektor mobile payment dan pengawasan Bank Indonesia atas hal tersebut. Penelitian ini normatif dengan pendekatan perUndang-Undangan dan konseptual. Pengaturan atas Kerahasiaan dan Keamanan Data/Informasi Konsumen Financial Technology pada Sektor Mobile Payment dilakukan oleh lembaga berwenang; Bank Indonesia sebagai pengatur dan pengawas sistem pembayaran dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam pengaturan fintech yang dikategorikan sebagai lembaga non bank. Bank Indonesia mengeluarkan aturan Nomor 7/6/PBI/2005 Tentang Ketentuan Transparasi Informasi Produk Bank dan Penggunaan Data Pribadi Nasabah. Sedangkan, OJK mengatur keamanan data konsumen pada pasal 2 Huruf d Peraturan OJK Nomor 1/POJK.07/2013 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Bank Indonesia mengawas secara langsung melalui Bank Indonesia Fintech office dengan kegiatan meet the start up untuk melakukan konsultasi dan berbagi tentang fintech. Dalam hal kebijakan, Bank Indonesia mengeluarkan Peraturan Bank Indonesia tentang pemrosesan transaksi pembayaran, Regulasi APU/PPT untuk non Bank, Peraturan Bank Indonesia tentang Teknologi Finansial dan Regulatory Sandbox dan peraturan tentang National Payment Gateway (NPG).</p>

scholarly journals The Development of Digital Economy in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Joanita
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Banking Services ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Rapid Changes ◽  
Strategic Role ◽  
Medium Enterprises ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Financial Technology

Industrial Era 4.0 changed the entire chain and management of all branches of industry with various technologies. All financial-based services are developing rapidly in Indonesia marked by the emergence of many start-up companies. Rapid changes to digital banking and financial technology show that technology can play a strategic role in providing financial services that can be accessed quickly. The availability of digital banking services and products is highly valued by customers, both individuals and business people, especially in Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME). The large selection of digital banking products is certainly intended to motivate customers to love and be loyal customers and become part of the modern lifestyle. The presence of the digital economy is a new opportunity as well as a serious threat to the banking industry that is churning into digital banking in order to retain customers and attract new customers from millennials.

scholarly journals The Existence of Regulatory Sandbox to Encourage the Growth of Financial Technology in Indonesia

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Recca Ayu Hapsari ◽  
Maroni Maroni ◽  
Indah Satria ◽  
Nenni Dwi Ariyani
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Regulatory Regime ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Innovations ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Board Of Governors ◽  
Financial Technology ◽  
Testing Room

Bank Indonesia created an appropriate regulatory regime to drive the pace of innovation carried out by Financial Technology Providers while still applying the principles of consumer protection, risk management and prudence. One of the efforts made by Bank Indonesia was by issuing provisions concerning a regulatory sandbox for Financial Technology Providers along with their products, services, technology and/or business models in a Board of Governors Member Regulation No 19/14/PADG/2017 on the Limited Technology Testing Room (Regulatory Sandbox) Financial Technology. Meanwhile, the Financial Services Authority also issued regulation regarding the Regulatory Sandbox for Financial Technology Organizers in Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 13 / POJK.02/2018 on the Digital Financial Innovations in the Financial Services Sector. The main point of view to be analysed is the existence of regulatory sandbox approach held by Bank Indonesia and the Financial Services Authority as an effort to encourage the growth of Financial Technology in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam Mengawasi Maraknya Pelayanan Financial Technology (Fintech) di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 559
Author(s):  
Elvira Fitriyani Pakpahan ◽  
Jessica Jessica ◽  
Corris Winar ◽  
Andriaman Andriaman
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Electronic Money ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Digital Money ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Financial Transactions ◽  
Financial Technology

The purpose of this research is to give insights on how Fintech and the role of OJK in supervising the services of Fintech in Indonesia. The presence of Fintech in Indonesia greatly helps citizens in accessing and provide easiness in financial transactions. At the moment, Fintech provides several functions that are believed to develop rapidly and Fintech also provides services on electronic money, virtual account, aggregator, lending, crowdfunding and other online monetary transactions. Various businesses that are part of Fintech are startups and online businesses. Therefore, the government should provide legal protection in order to protect both parties, the business organizers and the possible customers. In this case, business organizers with legal Fintech development have potential that is related to consumer protection, stable financial system, economy, and payment methods. The method of the research that is used in conducting this journal is the applied law research method. This research is using normative law with the facts approach and Constitution approach. In this case, Bank Indonesia has issued the Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 18/40/PBI/2016 about the implementation of the payment transaction and the Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 19/12/PBI/2017 about the implementation of Financial Technology. Along with OJK Regulation No. 13/POJK.02/2018 about the innovation of digital money in the financial services sector as a provision that covers the supervision and stipulates financial technology (fintech) industry issued by Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan pengetahuan bagaimana Fintech dan peran OJK dalam mengawasi maraknya pelayanan Fintech di Indonesia. Munculnya Fintech di Indonesia sangat membantu masyarakat untuk mengakses dan mempermudah transaksi keuangan. Saat ini, Fintech memiliki berbagai fungsi yang diyakini mampu berkembang cepat dan Fintech mampu melayani electronic money, virtual account, agregator, lending, crowdfunding dan transaksi keuangan online lainnya. Berbagai usaha yang termasuk dalam Fintech adalah bisnis startup dan bisnis online. Dengan demikian Pemerintah harus memberikan suatu bentuk perlindungan hukum baik itu dari segi penyelenggara bisnis maupun untuk masyarakat yang berperan sebagai nasabah. Dalam hal ini, Pelaksanaan bisnis yang dijalankan secara legalitas untuk pengembangan fintechnya memiliki potensi resiko yang berhubungan dengan perlindungan konsumen, stabilitas sistem keuangan dan ekonomi ,serta sistem pembayaran. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penyusunan jurnal ini adalah metode hukum yuridis normatif. Dimana penelitian ini meneliti hukum secara normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan fakta dan pendekatan Undang-Undang. Dalam Hal ini Bank Indonesia (BI) mengeluarkan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No 18/40/PBI/2016 dan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No 19/12/PBI/2017 serta Peraturan OJK No. 13/POJK.02/2018 sebagai bentu pengawasan dan pengaturan industri financial technology (fintech) yang dikeluarkan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK).

Financial Technology Implications

2020 ◽  
pp. 34-62
Author(s):  
Arjun R. ◽  
Nishmitha N. ◽  
Suprabha K. R.
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Systems ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Technology Industry ◽  
Industry Survey ◽  
Start Ups ◽  
Industry Experience ◽  
Financial Technology

The chapter examines the particularities of the financial technology industry and explores how FinTech is defined and how the financial technology solutions can be implemented by companies and categorized. Financial technology companies are generally start-ups founded with the purpose of disrupting financial systems and corporations that rely less on software. But Fintech is not confined to start-ups only. Fintech comprises a vessel of technical aspects that describes an emerging financial services sector in the 21st century. The chapter aims to provide key insights into the evolution of the FinTech sector in emerging markets like ASEAN and India by and industry experience in this area. Both industry survey reports and peer-reviewed research is used as secondary data. The critical challenges to be addressed at the policy level, regional differences and future implications are being discussed thereby creating bridges the FinTech in ASEAN context to create a coherent framework.

scholarly journals INTEGRATED ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION INSTITUTIONS IN THE FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTOR: DISPUTE RESOLUTION EFFORTS IN CONSUMER PROTECTION FRAMEWORK

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Lastuti Abubakar ◽  
Tri Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Analytical Research ◽  
Financial Technology

<em>This study examines and analyzes the legal implications of strengthening the integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector regulations. This study applies a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical research specifications. The data are analyzed using qualitative juridical analysis. Results show that: an Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector is a dispute resolution institution that is in accordance with the characteristics of the financial services sector as an agent of trust and prioritizes consumer protection. It is expected that consumer dispute resolution is faster, cheaper, and fairer for both Business Actors and the consumers; strengthening of regulations on integrated ADR Institutions in the Financial Services Sector aims to create independent, fair, effective, and efficient dispute resolution capable of anticipating developments in the financial services sector that are increasingly complex from a legal perspective, the use of financial technology, and products/services across financial services sectors</em>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEAMANAN DATA KONSUMEN FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-160
Author(s):  
Kornelius Benuf ◽  
Siti Mahmudah ◽  
Ery Agus Priyono
Keyword(s):  
Data Security ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Financial Service ◽  
Financial Service Authority ◽  
Electronic Contract ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Consumer Data ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Financial Technology

The aim of this study is to determine the legal protection of consumer data security in Indonesia Fintech business based on the Financial Service Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan-OJK) Regulation and other related ordinance. The approach method used in this study is normative juridical. The study result explains that the parties of Fintech business consist of Fintech organizer (producer) and Fintech user (consumer). The relation among the parties is created due to an electronic contract. Basically, the protection of Fintech consumer personal data is regulated in Communication and Information Minister Regulation, Bank Indonesia Regulation, and Financial Service Authority Regulation. In addition, the protection of data was regulated in the Financial Service Authority Circular Letter.

scholarly journals Pengawasan Teknologi Finansial Melalui Regulatory Sandbox oleh Bank Indonesia Atau Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Berdasarkan Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-125
Author(s):  
Rizky P.P Karo Karo ◽  
Laurenzia Luna
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Smart Phone ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Scientific Paper ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Transactions ◽  
Financial Technology ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Financial technology (TF) cannot be released by the community both in rural areas or urban areas. TF provides a paradigm shift for the community. TF makes it easy for humans to make financial transactions simply by using a smart phone (HP) that humans can make payment transactions, borrow money. People will certainly choose TF that is safe and reliable and profitable, but sometimes people rarely know that a good and correct TF is a TF that has passed the Regulatory Sandbox (RS) test or a limited trial room. Two Government institutions that are authorized to carry out hospitals are Bank Indonesia (BI) through Bank Indonesia Regulation No: 19/12 / PBI / 2017 concerning Financial Services and Financial Services Authority (OJK) Implementation through “Financial Services Authority Regulation NUMBER 13 /POJK.02/2018 about Digital Financial Innovation in the Financial Services Sector”. The formulation of the problem raised is how is the TF supervision mechanism through the hospital implemented by BI or OJK? The method used in this scientific paper is a normative juridical method, using secondary data in the form of primary legal material consisting of laws and regulations relating to TF, secondary legal material in the form of scientific articles, journals and tertiary legal materials in the form of dictionaries. The research results obtained are that TF must pass the trial in the Regulatory Sandbox applied by BI or OJK. BI and OJK have the authority to determine whether the proposed TF is feasible or not feasible. RS is a significant method, according to the laws and regulations to get a TF that is suitable and safe for consumers and contains dignified justice, justice for business people and consumers.

Behavioral Intentions to Employ Financial Technology (Fintech) Services among Commercial Banks' Customers: Empirical Evidence in Malaysia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
Kwee Kim Peong ◽  
Kwee Peng Peong ◽  
Kui Yean Tan
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Finance Industry ◽  
Speed Of Information Processing ◽  
Customer Interface ◽  
Start Up ◽  
The Social ◽  
Automated Technology ◽  
Global Coverage ◽  
Privacy Risks ◽  
Financial Technology

Most recently, the revolution of technology has threatened the current doctrines in labour and the economy (Belanche, Casalo & Flavian, 2019) of a nation. The presence of technology and automation plays a significant role in the financial services market worldwide for shaping the social environment and the economic (Darmansyah, Fianto, Hendratmi & Aziz, 2020). The rationale behind this is that automated technology penetration grows at a 20 per cent rate annually (Belanche et al., 2019) as the speed of information processing, and connectivity are enhanced and expanded in both back-office processes and at the customer interface (Gomber, Koch & Siering, 2017; Gupta & Xia, 2018). The growth of mobile broadband global coverage has grown remarkably in developed markets at 86.7 per 100 inhabitants subscription, whereas, emerging markets have a high subscription of merely 39.1 per 100 inhabitants (Gupta & Xia, 2018). For instance, the growth of broadband penetration in Malaysia with 91.2 per cent coverage in populated areas and 58 per cent in road networks in 2016 is 81.5 per cent higher as compared to 55.6 per cent in 2010 (Economic Planning Unit, 2017). Hence, it anticipates that almost half of current occupations would be replaced with technologies in the next 20 years (Belanche et al., 2019). In the finance industry, financial technology (FinTech) is a key strategy for financial start-up firms and banks (Belanche et al., 2019) particularly in the pre-digital economy (Chanias, Myers & Hess, 2019). Keywords: Social Influence, Trust, Privacy Risks, CyberSecurity Risks, Behavioural Intention to Use

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMBERI PINJAMAN ATAS RISIKO KREDIT DALAM PELAKSANAAN PINJAM MEMINJAM UANG BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI (PEER TO PEER LENDING)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Indah Kusuma Wardhani ◽  
Fawzia Apriandini
Keyword(s):  
Credit Risk ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Peer To Peer ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Financial Services Sector ◽  
Peer Lending ◽  
Very High ◽  
Financial Technology

The fastest growing financial technology (fintech) in Indonesia is peer to peer lending, where customers could obtain loans in a simple, easy, and fast way, yet without collateral. However, in practice, peer to peer lending has a very high credit risk because the ability of fintech companies in assessing prospective loan recipients is not as good as other financial institutions. Therefore, preventive and repressive legal protection are needed, especially for lenders, which are regulated in OJK Regulation Number 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning the Implementation of Information Technology-Based Lending and Borrowing and OJK Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2013 concerning Consumers’ Protection in Financial Services Sector. With the two OJK Regulations, lenders have received sufficient legal protection, but it must be further strengthened, especially in terms of credit risk mitigation.Keywords: Legal Protection for Lenders, Peer To Peer Lending, Credit Risk

scholarly journals Debt Collection Violations in Financial Technology in a Cyber-ethic and Legal Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21
Author(s):  
Wawan Edi Prastiyo ◽  
I Dewa Made Suartha
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Business World ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Debt Collectors ◽  
Psychological Pressure ◽  
Debt Collection ◽  
The One ◽  
Financial Technology

The presence of financial technology (Fintech) on the one hand makes it easy for people to obtain credit, while on the other hand, it creates various problems. In this study, two issues will be discussed, namely the application of cyber-ethic in protecting personal data and legal issues in collecting debt on Fintech. This research is a qualitative research. Data in the study were collected by means of literature study and presented descriptively and analytically. Cyber-ethic is implemented by protecting personal data. It is a transformation of traditional ethics in cyberspace. The cyber-ethic is very necessary in the business world. The application of cyber-ethic in the world of Fintech is carried out by protecting the personal data of both borrowers and third parties. Cyber-ethic violations have implications for breaking the law. Some of the billing violations on the Fintech business are sexual harassment, defamation, threats and stalking. Borrowing customers are powerless to face debt collectors’ behavior, because the debt collectors use the borrowers’ personal data to exert psychological pressure on the debtors to pay according to the bills determined unilaterally by Fintech. This condition usually occurs in illegal Fintechs that are not registered with the Financial Services Authority.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document