scholarly journals Fresh Apple And Tomato Prices At Direct Marketing Outlets Versus Competing Retailers In The U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve W. Martinez

<p>This study uses Nielsen Homescan panel data to compare average prices of fresh apples and tomatoes purchased at direct-to-consumer outlets (e.g., farmers’ markets) with prices at grocery stores and supercenters in the Mid-Atlantic region. Compared to grocery stores, prices at direct sales outlets are estimated to be lower, on average, for both tomatoes and apples. Tomato prices at direct sales outlets were also less than supercenter prices in all seasons and subregions. Apple prices paid by consumers at direct sales outlets were comparable to prices paid at supercenters, except for the Maryland/Delaware/New Jersey subregion, where direct sales outlet prices were markedly lower. <em></em></p>

2016 ◽  
Vol 118 (7) ◽  
pp. 1665-1681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve W. Martinez

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare prices for fresh tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, and apples at direct-to-consumer sales outlets (e.g. farmers markets, roadside stands, on-farm stores) in the USA to grocery stores and supercenters, while controlling for other attributes. Design/methodology/approach – The author estimates a hedonic regression model to determine price differences at direct sales outlets, grocery stores, and supercenters in various regions and seasons of the year. The analysis is conducted using 2006 Nielsen Homescan data. Other product and market attributes are also considered, along with characteristics of the household sample. Findings – Prices at direct sales outlets are lower than grocery store prices throughout the year and across the USA. Prices at direct sales outlets for some product/location/season combinations were higher than or comparable to supercenter prices. Research limitations/implications – Future research is needed to examine how price differences may vary across the various types of direct marketing outlets. Originality/value – Few studies have examined price differences between direct sales outlets and conventional retail stores. No studies have used nationally representative data to analyze these price differences across produce type, season, and geographic areas.


1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramu Govindasamy ◽  
Rodolfo M. Nayga

This study identifies several socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of individuals who visited farmer-to-consumer direct markets in New Jersey. The analysis was performed for each type of direct marketing facility: pick-your-own farms, roadside stands, farmers’ markets, and direct farm markets. Logit analysis results indicate that various factors affect visitation to each type of facility. Factors examined include consumer's consumption and variety of fruits and vegetables, price expectation, purpose of buying, age, sex, education, race, income, urbanization, and presence of home garden.


2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (01) ◽  
pp. 253-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Hughes ◽  
Cheryl Brown ◽  
Stacy Miller ◽  
Tom McConnell

Farmers' markets presumably benefit local economies through enhanced retention of local dollars. Unlike other studies, the net impact of farmers' markets on the West Virginia economy is examined. Producer survey results are used in estimating annual direct sales ($1,725 million). Using an IMPLAN-based input-output model, gross impacts are 119 jobs (69 full-time equivalent jobs) and $2,389 million in output including $1.48 million in gross state product (GSP). When the effect of direct revenue losses are included (primarily for grocery stores), the impact is reduced to 82 jobs (43 full-time equivalent jobs), $1,075 million in output, and $0,653 million in GSP.


Author(s):  
Grace Bachman ◽  
Sara Lupolt ◽  
Mariya Strauss ◽  
Ryan Kennedy ◽  
Keeve Nachman

This study explores the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Maryland stay-at-home order on fruit and vegetable farmers in Maryland. Focusing on farms’ direct-to-consumer marketing channels, we aim to characterize the diversity of farm responses and identify practices that facilitated adaptation. This research is grounded in the socio-ecological systems framework, which emphasizes the interconnection between social and ecological systems and characterizes the dual-driving forces that impact food producers and their livelihood. The study team conducted interviews with 20 Maryland farm owners/managers who grow and sell produce. The semistructured interviews includ­ed questions relating to production practices, sales and marketing, and resilience. The interviewer fol­lowed up with probes to understand the dimen­sions of response diversity and adaptive capacity. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and responses were analyzed using the framework approach. In the context of a global pandemic, community supported agriculture (CSA), farmers markets, and pick-your-own channels provided a high degree of stability and financial security. No farmer reported relying solely on intermediated markets (e.g., restaurants, grocery stores, institu­tions). Distribution channels that incorporated an online marketplace offering prepacked pre-orders were a notable strength of highly adaptive Mary­land produce farmers. Farmers reported that expanding established CSAs was an important method for reallocating produce originally intended to be sold to reduced/terminated marketing chan­nels. Common challenges among farmers included increased administrative workload, concerns asso­ciated with raising food prices during a crisis, and environmental concerns about the use of additional packaging. We describe a range of adaptive behav­iors that aided farmers in withstanding shocks.


Science ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 211 (4485) ◽  
pp. 935-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. ROBB ◽  
J. C. HAMPSON ◽  
D. C. TWICHELL

Author(s):  
Austin M. Garren ◽  
M. Chad Bolding ◽  
Scott M. Barrett ◽  
W. Michael Aust ◽  
T. Adam Coates
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 118 (8) ◽  
pp. 1946-1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariantonietta Fiore

Purpose – Buying process directly from producers is an expanding trend in advanced economies; then direct sales can be considered a crucial driver in wine sector in order to cope with global challenges and achieve a competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to investigate if management aspects and marketing innovation propensity could have an important role in choosing direct sale tool. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative analysis in Apulia region (Italy) was carried out. Data have been collected through a face to face and web-based exploratory survey submitted to a sample of 280 cellars participating in an Integrated Projects of Food Chains. A logit regression model was run in the research design. Findings – Findings showed that most of interviewed wineries, mainly characterized by agricultural production and direct approach to customers, are more likely inclined to direct sales choice. Research limitations/implications – The sample size could be expanded (e.g. to include farms from other regions or not belonging to an integrated projects). Practical implications – Managerial implications give insight on the role of direct sales as an opportunity to obtain aggregated value for agri-products and to increase bargaining power of farmers. Social implications – Food direct sales could have the important task of straightening the social proximity between rural and urban stakeholders, increasing trust and connection between producers and consumers. Originality/value – This paper can shed some light on this topic, since direct food sales across regions is less investigated than direct marketing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document