Santoso’s Jihadism, Deradicalization, and Humanization: A Preliminary Investigation on Indonesian Terrorism

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-178
Author(s):  
Herdi Sahrasad ◽  
Al Chaidar ◽  
Dedy Tabrani ◽  
Teuku Syahrul Ansari ◽  
Mai Dar
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Religious Conflict ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Community Groups ◽  
The Public ◽  
Unity In Diversity ◽  
The Way

Indonesia. The rise of acts of terrorism by Santoso at that time makes the public ask: How far is the deradicalization program? Why do the various community groups become more radical and brave against the apparatus/officers who promote the deradicalization program? Humanization leads to the prevention or overcoming of intensification of conflict and escalation of violence, covering the way for human rights violations or acts of genocide. Humanization refers to a strategy designed to reduce the dynamics of conflict that are destructive and face violence, especially terrorism, as the culmination of radicalism. Indonesia is still not free from inter-religious conflict. Religion, which should be eager to spread liberation and peace for our fellow human beings, is just often breached, even disturbing the integrity of Unity in Diversity. Deradicalization also include humanization because it takes the participation of sincere and serious attention.

scholarly journals How to uphold a Human Right in the World and Indonesia? A Book Review Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, Rahayu Hartini, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2015, 408 Pages, ISBN 978-979-70490-6-5

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
Mohammad Yufi Al Izhar
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Class Group ◽  
Law Students ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Public ◽  
The World ◽  
The Right

Human Rights are basically universal and their rights cannot be taken and revoked by anyone. This is interpreted no matter how bad a person's behavior, a person will still be considered as human as they should be, and will continue to have their rights as human beings, which means that their human rights are inherent and will always be permanently attached to him. Human Rights (HAM) are believed to be the right of life naturally possessed by every human being without exception and a special human thing such as class, group, or social level. Human Rights have basically been championed by humans in all parts of the world throughout the ages. The book written by Prof. Dr. Rahayu, which is very intended for both Faculty of Law students and non-Faculty of Law students, provides an answer to the doubts of the public regarding Human Rights that actually occur in Indonesia and internationally. She also explained the meanings of the struggle of each country that issued their public opinion in the interest of the International, this meant that something that happened in the international arena was certainly a collection of perceptions of settlement within a country. Therefore, Human Rights Law cannot be separated from the main supporting factors which are the material of the countries that make the agreement.

The Public Festival: Inspiration and interconnectivity at the heart of festivals

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Deventer
Keyword(s):  
Interest Groups ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Political Context ◽  
The Political ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Abstract Theory ◽  
The Public ◽  
Fertile Ground ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Way

Festivals have been around, and will always be around; no matter the political context they are embedded in, supported by, or hindered by. Why? Simply because society develops, it transforms, it is dynamic and it needs space for reflection and inspiration. Festivals are platforms for people to meet, and for artists to present their work, their creations. This gives festivals an enduring, quite independent mission and reason to exist: as long as festivals strive to offer a biotope for artists and audiences alike and point to questions which concern the way we live and want to live, they will be a fertile ground for a meaningful development of society – and an offer for serving the public wellbeing. What are the challenges festivals are facing today? There are a series of very complex questions related to festivals’ positioning us as human beings in an interconnected, global society, our relation to nature and the immediate surroundings, our stories of life so that as many citizens as possible can be part of the societal discourse, can be enriched, can be touched, can be heard, can be moved. Individuals, interest groups, nationalities, countries, even continents are interconnected. What does this mean for a festival? Travelling across Europe for work and pleasure and meeting citizens from all walks of life has taught me that citizens, a term that connects individuals to some larger constructed community, are just people, everyday people, going about their lives. People connect with other humans and their human stories, real life encounters. Abstract theory and jargon are meaningless when they lack real life connections. Meaningful festivals of the future will offer possibilities for new connections among people: they invite people to travel in time and in space; they inspire to connect human stories, enriching them with new, unexpected, colourful stories!

The Slippery Slope of UN Peacekeeping: Offensive Peacekeeping in Congo and Beyond

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Kearney
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Security Council ◽  
Slippery Slope ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Military Operations ◽  
Member States ◽  
Un Peacekeeping ◽  
Un Security Council ◽  
Self Defence ◽  
The Way

Fed up with the decades-old violence plaguing the DRC, the UN Security Council broke new ground by granting peacekeepers an offensive mandate to pursue rebels rather than waiting to react in self-defence. This transformation in UN military operations alarmed several States, concerned over a perceived loss of sovereignty and a weakening of the principle of non-intervention. To allay these fears, Resolution 2098’s drafters incorporated a provision expressly assuring Member States that offensive peacekeeping tactics in the DRC would not generate precedent for future UN action. However, examining past UN practice and ‘slippery slope’ theory alike reveals that explicit disavowal of precedent cannot guarantee that offensive peacekeeping will not be used as a template for future UN action. In fact, the incorporation of such language may foster the generation of a slippery slope in UN peacekeeping, ultimately paving the way for increased scope of UN intervention in situations of gross human rights violations. The article concludes by proposing a framework for how actors can manipulate slopes to generate or slow precedent for future UN action.

This Is Your Brain on Human Rights: Moral Enhancement and Human Rights

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Glenn Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Science Fiction ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Moral Enhancement ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Alternative Possibility ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Human Brains

Abstract It seems fair to say that human rights law takes the human as given. Human beings are particular kinds of entities with particular kinds of psychologies and propensities, and it is the job of human rights law and human rights enforcement to govern that kind of entity, be it through sanctions, education, incentives, or other mechanisms. More specifically, human rights law takes human brains as given. If humans were different kinds of beings, both the mechanisms of getting compliance and possibly the very rules themselves would be different. The purpose of this essay is to very tentatively start to tie together thinking in neuroscience, bioethics, and human rights law to ask whether human rights law should take the nature of human beings, and more specifically, human brains, as given. I sketch the alternative possibility and examine it from a normative and (to a lesser extent) scientific perspective: instead of merely crafting laws and setting up structures that get human beings such as they are to respect human rights, that the human rights approach should also consider embracing attempts to remake human beings (and more specifically human brains) into the kinds of things that are more respectful of human rights law. This is currently science fiction, but there is some scientific evidence that moral enhancement may one day be possible. I call the alternative “moral enhancement to respect human rights law.” To put the aim of the essay in its mildest form it is to answer the following question: if it becomes possible to use enhancement to increase respect for human rights and fidelity to human rights law (whatever you think is constitutive of those categories), and in particular in a way that reduces serious human rights violations, is it worth “looking into?” Or, by contrast, are the immediate objections to such an endeavor so powerful or hard to refute that going in this direction should be forbidden.

scholarly journals Eritrea and the Migration Dilemma in the Horn of Africa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Stark
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Horn Of Africa ◽  
Stepping Stone ◽  
Shared History ◽  
Shared Culture ◽  
The Way

The state of Eritrea is gradually losing its population. A variety of human rights violations including mandatory indefinite conscription is contributing to many Eritrean citizen’s choice to flee. Those that do flee, tend to go to Sudan or Ethiopia as there is a long historical and cultural connection between the three countries. Additionally, Sudan and Ethiopia have a variety of laws and institutions in place to help the various refugees they take in. However, while there is this legislation, refugees are still vulnerable segments of the population that face many troubles. This shared history, culture and the legal protections afforded to refugees, are some of the reasons why Eritreans choose to flee to Sudan or Ethiopia. Some refugees use Sudan and Ethiopia as a stepping stone on the way to Europe, this shared culture and history provides them of a taste of home while attempting to flee to a better life and the legal institutions offer them protection whether they choose to Sudan and Ethiopia or continue on their journey to Europe.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA DAN BERKEYAKINAN DI INDONESIA (Studi Kasus: Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Konflik Sampang, Madura)

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Rizky Adi Pinandito
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Religious Conflict ◽  
Freedom Of Religion ◽  
State Responsibility ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
Security Forces ◽  
The Government

The purpose of this study is to explain in depth how the responsibility of the state c.q Government of Indonesia against violations of the principle of freedom of religion in the case of Sampang, Madura. The method of approach used in this research is normative juridical in discussing the issue of implementation of protection and guarantee to freedom of religionand belief which is regulated in constitution and Indonesian legislation system and how state responsibility to religious conflict happened in Sampang, Madura, Jawa East. The results of the research conducted in the case of Sampang are, the security forces do not act or do omission(omission) in the event of riots. In addition, the government’s attitude that provoked provocation was shown by the MUI who issued a decree stating that the Shia taught by Tajul Muluk is heretical. The State should (in this case the Police) take precautions. Therefore, the State c.q The Government of Indonesia is obliged to provide compensation, restitution and rehabilitation to victims of human rights violations as well as to give legal assertiveness to all perpetrators of riots including government officials who allow the riots of human rights violations

scholarly journals Reconciliation: The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s contribution to dealing with the past, reconciling and building the nation

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Barry
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
South African ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
National Unity ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Truth And Reconciliation ◽  
The Past ◽  
Political Expediency ◽  
Do So ◽  
The Way

International experience has shown that addressing past human rights violations is a necessary step in the process of reconciliation and nation building. How was post-apartheid, democratic South Africa to deal with its past human rights violations? Would it go the way of retribution in order to settle the scores of the past? Would it go the way of blanket amnesty in the name of political expediency and ignore the fate of its victims?   The Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation, Act 34 of 1995, which established the TRC envisaged that national unity and reconciliation could be promoted by determining the extent, and the fate and whereabouts of the victims, of such human rights violations; giving opportunity for story-telling; recommending reparations and measures to prevent future violations; and by providing a full report. In order to do so the Commission had the power to grant amnesty to those making such disclosures.  This article, while not uncritical of the Commission, is generally positive about its contribution both in attempting to deal with the past, and in building a democratic, human rights and restorative justice culture based on the rule of law. It examines the definitions of reconciliation that emerged during the Commission in the light of a Christian definition where reconciliation is seen to be between God, others and self, and involves integration with the human community. This integration involves taking responsibility for the past, confession and repentance, forgiving and being forgiven, making restitution where possible, ongoing transformation in the present and hope for the future.

Conclusion: An Intersectional Future for Human Rights

2021 ◽  
pp. 245-250
Author(s):  
Johanna Bond
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Human Rights Organizations ◽  
International Human ◽  
Rights Discourse ◽  
Human Rights Discourse ◽  
The Way

Intersectionality has changed the way we think about human rights. It offers a complex, comprehensive, and nuanced approach that redounds to the benefit of victims seeking redress. It allows victims to articulate the multiple and intersecting forms of subordination that have negatively affected their lives. Intersectionality rejects the anemic and siloed approach to human rights that invariably fails to capture and remedy the complex, intersectional violations that characterize the lived experience of subordination for many people. Intersectionality has positively influenced human rights discourse ranging from the UN human rights treaty bodies to local human rights organizations that have incorporated the theory into their organizational missions. The theory is gaining ground in international human rights discourse, and it will continue to transform and expand our vision of appropriate remedies for human rights violations. Only by more accurately conceiving of intersectional human rights violations can we hope to provide meaningful and comprehensive remedies to those who have experienced violations of their rights.

Democracy and Islam in the Arab World: Lessons from Algeria

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos García-Rivero ◽  
Hennie Kotzé
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Political Culture ◽  
General Public ◽  
Arab World ◽  
The State ◽  
Religious Influence ◽  
The Public ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
The Way

AbstractThe study of Arab political culture has been developed extensively in recent times in an attempt to test whether the lack of democracy in the Arab world can be ascribed to its political culture, in which religion plays a major role. There are divergent conclusions with regards to this question. In this article, using quantitative techniques, we have analyzed satisfaction with the way democracy is implemented in Algeria at the elite and general public levels. More specifically, we have looked at whether the demand for more religious influence within the state affects levels of satisfaction with the way democracy is being implemented within Algeria. Our results indicate that the low level of satisfaction with the way democracy is implemented in Algeria amongst elites and the public is not driven by political culture or religion specifically – but by a perception of a lack of respect for human rights in the country and, in the case of the general public, also by a lack of confidence in the Algerian state.

scholarly journals Re-Evaluasi Proses Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-69
Author(s):  
Muhammad Arief
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
The Political ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
University Campus ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Security Forces ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Tujuan Penelitian menganalisis proses penyelesaian pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) berat pada Persitiwa Trisaksi oelh Kejaksanaan Agung Republik Indonesia. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum. Normative dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang diuraikan secara deskriptif. Hasil peneltian menunjukan bahwa pelanggaran HAM berat pada peristiwa penanganan demonstrasi di Kampus Universitas Trisakti pada tahun 1998, oleh aparat keamanan; sehingga menyebabkan tewasnya empat orang mahasiswa dan ratusan lainnya luka. Komnas HAM telah melakukan (investigasi) penyelidikan terhadap peristiwa tersebut, dan laporan Komnas HAM menyimpulkan telah terjadi pelanggaran HAM berat atas insiden tersebut. Hasil penyelidikan tersebut telah dilaporankn Komnas HAM, dan berkas laporan tersebut telah diserahkan kepada Jaksa Agung; tetapi sampai saat ini (±18 tahun) Jaksa Agung belum memproses ke tingkat peneyidikan dan penuntutan. Alasan Jaksa Agung, berkaitan dengan hal-hal teknis yuridis, yang oleh publik dianggap tidak relevan dengan substansi kasus/masalah. Tetapi intinya aspek politis dan non yudisial lebih mengitari kasus-kasus tersebut. The purpose of this research is to analyze the process of resolving gross violations of human rights (HAM) at the Trisaksi event by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method used is legal research methods. Normative with a qualitative approach described descriptively. The research results show that gross human rights violations during the handling of demonstrations at the Trisakti University Campus in 1998, by security forces; causing the death of four students and hundreds of others injured. Komnas HAM has conducted (investigated) investigations into the incident, and the Komnas HAM report concludes that gross human rights violations have occurred in the incident. The results of the investigation have been reported by Komnas HAM, and the report files have been submitted to the Attorney General; but until now (± 18 years) the Attorney General has not yet proceeded to the level of investigation and prosecution. The Attorney General's reasons relate to juridical technical matters which the public deems irrelevant to the substance of the case / problem. But in essence, the political and non-judicial aspects surround these cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document