scholarly journals Ubezpieczenia ustawowe w PRL jako instytucja ubezpieczeń w gospodarce centralnie planowanej

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-200
Author(s):  
Ewa Wójtowicz
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Planned Economy ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Compulsory Insurance ◽  
Centrally Planned Economy ◽  
The Law ◽  
The 1950S ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Historical Nature

The article concerns the issue of compulsory insurance known in the period of the Polish People’s Republic, which was created by the law itself — the so-called statutory insurance. The basic methods used are the legal-dogmatic method and the descriptive method, the study of legal literature, and the analysis of legal acts and jurisprudence, mostly of a historical nature. Statutory insurance functioned from the 1950s until the end of the 1980s in a centrally planned economy, being specific to the so-called socialist insurance. The insurance relationship concluded by the operation of law could exist in a monopoly situation — in the different categories of insurance there was only one state insurer. In the literature and jurisprudence of the time, the statutory insurance relationship was usually classified as a civil law relationship. Such an assessment, however, raises doubts due to the number of public-law elements occurring in this type of insurance. Statutory insurance was an artificial insurance element, serving fiscal purposes.

The Common Law Legal Tradition: First Things First

2021 ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Steven Gow Calabresi
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Case Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Legal Tradition ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law

This chapter explains briefly the origins and development of the common law tradition in order to better understand the rise of judicial review in the seven common law countries discussed in this volume. The common law legal tradition is characterized historically, in public law, by limited, constitutional government and by forms of judicial review of the constitutionality of legislation. In private law, the common law tradition is characterized by judge-made case law, which is the primary source of the law, instead of a massive code being the primary source of the law. The common law tradition is also characterized by reliance on the institution of trial by jury. Judges, rather than scholars, are the key figures who are revered in the common law legal tradition, and this is one of the key things that distinguishes the common law legal tradition from the civil law legal tradition. The common law legal tradition emphasizes judicial power, which explains why it has led to judicial review in the countries studied in this volume. It is the prevailing legal tradition in the four countries with the oldest systems of judicial review of the constitutionality of legislation: the United States, Canada, Australia, and India. Thus, judicial review of the constitutionality of legislation in these four countries is very much shaped by common law attitudes about the roles of judges.

scholarly journals Improving the Regulation of Joint Rights in Civil Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (30) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Ekaterine Nandoshvili
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law ◽  
Correct Understanding ◽  
Full Protection

This paper focuses on analyzing the norms regulating joint rights, presents their shortcomings, and criticizes the misconceptions expressed in the legal literature about the types of common property, joint rights, and co-ownership. The paper considers the incompleteness of the provisions regulating the legal consequences of the abolition of joint rights as a serious shortcoming of the Civil Code of Georgia. A novelty is a mechanism proposed in this paper, and it is possible to assign the entire property to one of the participants in case of abolition of joint right, in exchange for compensation for the shareholder who requests the abolition of joint right and the allocation of the amount. The objective of the paper is to analyze certain aspects of the regulation of joint rights, which, together with the theoretical, have the practical importance that will contribute to a correct understanding of a number of issues and the correct qualification of the rights and obligations of participants of the legally binding relationship, rising on the basis of joint rights. To achieve this objective, logical and systematic analysis of norms as well as comparative-legal methods are used. Using these methods, it is possible to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the norms of Georgian law or to better understand their content, to identify gaps in the legislation in court practice, as well as to develop proposals and recommendations for the improvement of norms and practice. The problems are analyzed using the examples of Georgian, German, and Swiss civil law. The common features and shortcomings were identified between the Georgian and German models regarding the issue of the consequences of the abolition of joint rights. The Swiss model appears to be the most perfect and effective model among the named ones. The study found that neither in practice nor under the law is a shareholder allowed to sell the joint item in an auction by redeeming the shares of other owners. The extinction of this opportunity for the owner reduces the essence of ownership. In order to extend the guarantees for full protection of the property rights, a view is proposed on the need to develop an approach, similar to the Swiss model, and the implementation should be ensured by case law before the law is changed.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Pemberian Hibah Dibawah Tangan Dikaitkan Dengan Pendaftarannya Pada Kantor Pertanahan Terhadap Penetapan Pengadilan Agama Medan Kelas I-A Nomor: 125/Pdt.P/2017/PA.Mdn

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-522
Author(s):  
Kharisman Koima Batubara
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Transition Process ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Land Grants ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Gift ◽  
The Law

Grant is one of the transitions of property rights that have been regulated in the Code of Civil Law. The definition of a grant as explained in the provisions of Article 1666 of the Civil Code is something of an agreement with which the donor in his lifetime, free of charge and irrevocably, hand over an object for the purpose of the recipient of the grant who received the surrender. Grant is also one of worship that aims to strengthen the sense of affection between the donor and the recipient of the grant.This type of research is library research by discussing books, both primary and secondary books that explain the concepts of civil law and Islamic law.  Meanwhile, this research is comparative descriptive with normative approach. The research method used in this paper is normative-empirical legal research. The data used are secondary data and primary data derived from books, or legal literature, legislation, interviews and other materials that are included in the scope of the grant.Based on the results of the study, it can be obtained that the problem in this study is about the process of transitions the land rights cannot be carried out because the giving of the grant is done by means of a grant under the hand and the grantor has passed away before the transition process is done before a Notary.This is due to the lack of legal understanding of the procedure for land grants in accordance with the law and it has become their custom to comply with customary law which is allowed to do underhand grants without being done before a Notary and the grant is invalid if it is not done before a Notary except for those who are subject to customary law. Basically the grant is valid and consequently it applies to the parties if the receipt of the grant has received explicitly the gift (with a Notarial deed) this is regulated in article 1683, article 1682 of the Law Code. Based on the underhand grant of the donor who has died first before the transitions process of the rights in the legislation, a religious court decision is needed so that the transitions of land can be carried out. Keywords: Land, Underhand Grant, Notary

The Codification of Civil Law and the Law of Torts

1990 ◽  
Vol 24 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 628-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aharon Barak
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Legislative Authority ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Lawmaking ◽  
The Law

From the establishment of the State until the present day, two quiet “revolutions” have occurred in Israeli law — thefirstin the area of public law, and thesecondin the area of private law. In public law we have witnessed the incorporation of a functional constitution — partly in the form of the Basic Laws, prescribed by the Knesset as constitutive authority; and partly through the consolidation of human rights, the handiwork of the Supreme Court engaged in judicial lawmaking. In private law we have witnessed the coalescing of a civil codification — mainly the product of the Knesset as legislative authority with judicial lawmaking “between the cracks” of the legislation.

Peran Notaris/PPAT Dalam Pembuatan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Pemilikan Rumah (Studi Di Pt. Bank Tabungan Negara Tbk. Cabang Cirebon)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Yusup Sugiarto ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
The Law ◽  
Credit Agreement

ABSTRAKKebutuhan akan lembaga notariat tidak terlepas dari kebutuhan akan perlunya pembuktian tertulis dalam lapangan hukum perdata. Mengingat keadaan ini maka notaris tidak saja berperan sebagai orang yang membuat alat bukti autentik namun juga sebagai penemu hukum. Notaris dalam profesinya sesungguhnya merupakan instansi yang dengan akta-aktanya menimbulkan alat-alat pembuktian tertulis dengan mempunyai sifat autentik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan penandatanganan akta notaris dalam pembuatan SKMHT dan akibat hukum penandatanganan akta SKMHT oleh penerima kuasa tidak di hadapan notaris dalam perjanjian kredit pemilikan rumah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, sedangkan sifat dari penelitiannya sendiri bersifat deskriptif analisis. Penandatanganan akta notaris oleh penerima kuasa dalam akta SKMHT dimungkinkan untuk dilakukan tidak di hadapan notaris, karena lazimnya suatu akta SKMHT ada kaitannya dengan akta perjanjian kredit yang telah dibuat terlebih dahulu oleh para pihak. Akibat hukumnya penerima kuasa dalam akta SKMHT menjadi terikat untuk mematuhi ketentuan-ketentuan yang ada dalam SKMHT.Kata kunci: notaris, akta, perdata, kredit, perjanjian. ABSTRACTThe need for notarial institutions is inseparable from the need for the necessity of verification in the field of civil law. In view of this situation the notary not only plays the role of the person who makes authentic evidence but also the inventor of the law. Notary in his profession is in fact an institution which with its deeds evokes written proof means with authentic nature. This study aims to analyse the execution of the signing of notary deed in the making of SKMHT and the effect of the signing of SKMHT deed by the power of attorney not before the notary in the mortgage agreement. The method used in this study is the normative juridical approach, while the nature of the research itself is descriptive analysis. The signing of notarial deed by the power of attorney in the deed of SKMHT is possible to be done not in the presence of a notary, because usually a deed of SKMHT is related to the credit agreement which has been made beforehand by the parties. As a result of the law the power of attorney in the SKMHT deed becomes bound to comply with the provisions contained in SKMHT.Keywords: notary, deed, civil, credit, agreement.

COMMON OWNERSHIP OF SPOUSES (Analysis of the Georgian Civil Law)

Law and World ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-177
Keyword(s):  
Family Relationships ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Family Relationship ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Common Ownership ◽  
Personal Rights ◽  
The Family ◽  
Inner World ◽  
Legal Fact

The research shows that one of the legal relations in civil matters is the family relationship, having an extensive content. It includes Family Law and the actual family relationships. While there are factual elements in the family relationships, only marriage registration gives rise to the property and personal rights between spouses since marriage is a legal fact of law. However, it has been stated correctly in the legal literature that the actual co-existence of partners is such a family relationship, in which couples enter into marriage without registration. The inner world of unmarried couples is significantly free from legal regulation. Family relationships, by their characteristics, are inconceivable without the personal and intimate aspects contained in certain factual foundations and found in family relationships.

ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEMS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STATE CONTRACTS FOR STATE DEFENSE ORDERS

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 89-92
Author(s):  
S.V. DOROZHINSKY ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Similar System ◽  
Contractual Relations ◽  
State Defense

The article discusses the prospects of building a contract system in Russia in the field of state defense orders in the broadest sense – as a system of civil law contractual relations with direct and indirect participation of public law entities; building a model of a similar system, including its legal support.

Authority by Aggregation and Abstraction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Skreslet Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
Pragmatic Theory ◽  
Legal Thought ◽  
Universal Principles ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Religious Learning ◽  
The Law ◽  
Substantive Law ◽  
Lasting Influence

In addition to his views on ijtihād and tajdīd, al-Suyūṭī’s lasting influence in Islamic legal thought lies in the area of legal precepts (pithy maxims or questions that sum up areas of the law). Al-Suyūṭī’s al-Ashbāh wa-l-naẓāʾir stands as a core work in this genre of legal literature and is still a popular textbook for students at Egypt’s premier institution of religious learning, al-Azhar. Using the pragmatic theory of Grice and others, I argue that legal precepts fulfill a number of key discursive functions for the jurist. It is with al-Suyūṭī’s Ashbāh that he is most successful in asserting his authority as an aggregator, abstractor, and framer of the law. The power of framing lies in the ability to distill key universal principles from the vast corpus of Islamic substantive law and to assert that these principles represent the essence and spirit of the Sharīʿa.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document