scholarly journals CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, PROFITABILITY, AND FIRM VALUE STUDY ON THE INDONESIAN SHARIA STOCK INDEX

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
Sutrisno Sutrisno
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Stock Index ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Fixed Effects Model

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanisms and profitability on firm value. The corporate governance mechanism consists of a board of directors, a board of commissioners, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. Firm value is measured by Tobin's Q, while profitability is measured by return on assets. The population in this study were companies listed on the Indonesian Sharia Stock Index with a total sample of 103 companies taken by purposive sampling method. The observation period is for five years from 2015 to 2019. To test the hypothesis, the author applies panel data regression analysis. In selecting the panel data model, after being tested, the best model is the fixed effect model. The results of the research based on the fixed effects model show that the board of commissioners has a significant but negative effect on firm value, while the board of directors and profitability and ownership of institutions have a significant and positive effect on firm value, but managerial ownership has no significant effect on firm value.

Tingkat Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Nilai Perusahaan: Bukti Empiris pada Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Henry Henry ◽  
Hamin Hamin
Keyword(s):  
Panel Data ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Firm Heterogeneity ◽  
The Other ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
High Level

Initial analyses using panel data for none intercept model show a positive and significant effect of low level of managerial ownership on firm value ond negative and significant effect of high level of managerial ownership on firm value. This conclusion is dffirent when unobserved firm heterogeneity controlled using firm fixed effects model. Thefixed effects analyses suggest that managerial ownership doesn't have significant effect on firm value. The 2SLS analyses show that both managerial ownership and firm value are jointly endogenous. Managerial ownership has positively impacts on firm value, on higher firm value, on the other hand, inspires larger managerial ownershipKeywords: Managerial Ownership, Firm Yalue, Tobin's Q

scholarly journals The effect of corporate governance on company value (Empirical study of LQ 45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2015-2017)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Karmila Febrianti ◽  
Nurul Hasanah Uswati Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Company Value ◽  
Independent Audit

This research aims to examine the effect of corporate governance on company value of LQ 45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The corporate governance mechanism consists of institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioner, managerial ownership, independent audit committee, remuneration and nomination committee, board of directors, and board of commissioners, while firm value is proxied by Tobin’s Q. This research used 106 companies as a sample taken from a population of 135 companies in LQ 45 listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2015-2017. The data were analyzed using a multiple linier regression analysis with SPSS program. The result shows that corporate governance mechanisms which are proxied by institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioners, board of directors, and board of commissioners have an effect on firm value, while the corporate governance which are proxied by managerial ownership, independent audit committee, and remuneration and nomination committee have no effect on firm value.

scholarly journals The Effect of Optimal Cash and Deviation from Target Cash on the Firm Value: Empirical Study in Indonesian Firms

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
R Heru Kristanto HC ◽  
Mamduh M Hanafi ◽  
Wayan Nuka Lantara
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Empirical Study ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Cash Holdings ◽  
Cash Holding ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Dynamic Panel ◽  
Panel Fixed Effects

The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of cash, optimal cash holding, deviation from target cash (the target adjustment model) on the firm value. This research uses a sample of Indonesian publicly traded firms for the period 2001-2017 (3,349 observation). This paper uses a dynamic panel fixed effects model to estimate optimal cash holdings. Hypothesis testing uses GLS fixed effect and interaction effect uses regression moderated analysis. Research finds that: first, cash, optimal cash, and deviation from target cash have an effect on the firm value. Second, corporate governance moderates the effect of cash, optimal cash, and deviation from target cash on the firm value. Third, investment positively moderates the effect of cash on the firm value. Investment negatively moderates the effect of optimal cash, deviation from target cash on the firm value. Debt negatively moderates the effect of cash, optimal cash on the firm value. Debt positively moderates the effect of deviation from target cash on the firm value. 

Corporate governance: institutional arrangement or market choice?

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mian Du ◽  
Siyan Chen ◽  
Huan Shao
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Institutional Arrangement ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Director Compensation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Market Choice ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanism

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance mechanism and firm value of the listed companies in China. Does the better corporate governance lead to the higher firm value? Or does the higher firm value make it easy to choose a better governance mechanism? Or they affect each other? In other words, this paper tries to answer whether the corporate governance mechanism is only decided by institutional arrangement, or by market choice according to firm value or performance or by the interaction of institutional arrangement and market choice? It tries to answer whether institutional arrangement maximizes the firm value, or an invisible hand pushes them to arrive at its maximum. Design/methodology/approach – This paper establishes an analytic framework of simultaneous equations based on causality, which includes five endogenous variables: ownership of larger shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation, debt financing and firm value. It adopts 1,644 data samples from 274 Chinese listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange during 2007- 2012 after the non-tradable shares reform. Ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation of single equation, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation of simultaneous equations are respectively done to show the differences of these three kinds of estimations. Findings – The empirical results show that differences exist among OLS, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation. Finally, 3SLS estimation should be adopted because the OLS and 2SLS estimation are biased. There are endogenous relationships between corporate governance mechanism and firm value. Through the 3SLS estimation, it is found that first, ownership concentration and firm value affect each other positively. Second, managerial ownership and firm value affect each other positively; third, director compensation and firm value affect each other negatively, while director compensation and firm performance affect each other positively. Finally, debt financing level and firm value are negatively related to each other. Practical implications – It means that ownership of large shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation and debt financing in the Chinese listed companies are found to have a root in the interaction between institutional arrangement and market choice. It is also found that adverse selection occurs when creditors loan to the listed companies. Managerial compensation is positively related to accounting profit, but it is negatively related to firm value because managers increase profit due by earning management. This could only increase the accounting profits and obtain huge cash compensation, but not increase firm value and even harm the interests of shareholders. Originality/value – This paper not only shows the difference between OLS and 2SLS estimation but also compares the estimation of 2SLS and 3SLS in terms of empirical methods. It gives answers to the following questions: whether the relationship is one-way causality or bilateral causality between ownership concentration, managerial ownership, director compensation and firm value; whether governance mechanism affects firm value by institutional arrangement, or market drives both of them to strike a balance by an invisible hand. In other words, does it make them arrive at equilibrium through the competitive selection process when shareholders, directors, managers and creditors attempt to maximize themselves of their interests?

Optimizing good Corporate Governance Mechanism to Improve Performance: Case in Indonesia’s Manufacturing Companies

2020 ◽  
pp. 097215092091987
Author(s):  
Ilham Hidayah Napitupulu ◽  
Anggiat Situngkir ◽  
Ferry Hendro Basuki ◽  
Widyo Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

The application of good corporate governance (GCG) aims to improve company performance. In implementing GCG, a mechanism is needed, namely a procedure and a clear relationship between the decision-maker and the party overseeing the decision. The mechanism of GCG can be measured by the numbers of board of directors, independent board of commissioners, audit committees, and also managerial ownership. This research is conducted at manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, with a total sample of 52 companies determined by purposive sampling technique. Data are analyzed by using multiple regression analysis with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) tools. The findings show that the board of directors and independent commissioners have an influence on company performance, while audit committees and managerial ownership do not affect the company’s performance. The company’s performance is improved by the existence of an independent board of commissioners that provides guidance and direction as well as supervision to the company management. Meanwhile, the audit committee has no influence, because the audit committee is only responsible for assisting the board of commissioners in monitoring the financial reporting process by the management to improve the credibility of financial statements, and managerial ownership does not affect the company’s performance because the number of management shares is quite low, because of which the management cannot influence the decisions taken at the general meeting of shareholders to improve the company’s financial performance. Thus, if the GCG mechanism goes well, then the company’s performance will increase.

scholarly journals Mekanisme Corporate Governance Dan Nilai Perusahaan

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-97
Author(s):  
Nia Yuniarsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Manufacturing Sector ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Financial Report ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanism

The objective of this study is to examine the influence of corporate governance mechanism, namely managerial ownership, institutional ownership, to firm value. This study takes sample from 32 companies in the manufacturing sector at the  Indonesia Stock Exchange, which were published in financial report from 2012-2013. The method of analysis of this research used multi regression and single regression. The results of this study show that (1) managerial ownership had positive significant influence to firm value, (2) institutional ownership had not significant influence to firm value, (3) simultaneously of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, had significant influence to firm value.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF PROFITABILITY, CAPITAL STRUCTURE, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISM ON FIRM VALUE

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Rina Hartanti ◽  
Fahri Yulandani ◽  
M Rizky Riandi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Approach ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanism ◽  
Positive Effect

The purpose of this study is to explain the effect of Profitability, Capital Structure, and the application of Good Corporate Governance to Firm Value. The population of the study includes companies registered in the LQ-45 which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2017. The technique of determining the sample used is purposive sampling. This study uses a multiple linear regression approach. Based on the results of testing, this study proves that profitability, capital structure, and the application of the GCG mechanism together affect firm value. This study also proves that partially profitability proxied by ROA and Managerial Ownership has a positive effect on Firm Value. The results showed that capital, which is proxied by DER and GCG, which is proxied by Institutional Ownership, does not have a positive effect on Corporate Value

scholarly journals CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISM AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON FIRM VALUE

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Jacobus Widiatmoko
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to empirically examine the effect of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on corporate value using agency perspectives and stakeholder theory. Corporate governance is measured using an independent commissioner, a board of directors, and an audit committee. The research data were obtained from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The test results using multiple linear regression indicate that corporate governance as measured by the board of directors and audit committee has a positive effect on company value. Meanwhile, the existence of independent commissioners in the sample companies did not have an impact on increasing the value of the company. The same result also occurs for CSR variables, which have not been proven to affect the firm's value. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the research model is robust, both by measuring PBV or Tobin's Q for the dependent variable. Keywords: independent commissioner, board of directors, audit committe, corporate social responsibility, firm value

scholarly journals Pengaruh Corporate Governance terhadap Nilai Perusahaan pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2011-2014

Telaah Bisnis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Meindarto ◽  
Fitri Lukiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Earnings Quality ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Governance Mechanism

Abstract This study aims to determine the effect of corporate governance on corporate value with the quality of earnings as an intervening variable. Corporate governance mechanism uses four variables managerial: ownership, institutional ownership, the proportion of independent directors and audit committee. The sample consist of 28 banking companies in 2011-2014. The research used Multiple Linear Regression Analysis to test the influence of in­dependent variables on dependent variable. Varible of earnings quality that measured by DA (Discretionary Accrual) has effect on firm value. Institutional ownership of independent board and audit committee have effect on earning quality. Other variables such managerial owner­ship and institutional ownership have no effect on earnings quality. Institutional ownership and independent board have effect on firm value, meanwhile managerial ownership and the audit committee have no effect on firm value. The value of adjusted R2 for the effect of corporate gov­ernance mechanisms on the quality of earnings was 0.170 or 17%. While the value of adjusted R2 for the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on firm value with the quality of earnings as an intervening variable was 0.311 or 31.1%.

scholarly journals Determinan nilai perusahaan

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-47
Author(s):  
Darti Djuharni ◽  
Vanyah Jessica Rajani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Equity Ratio

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (GCG), profitabilitas, dan leverage terhadap nilai perusahaan. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linier berganda dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 39 dari 13 perusahaan sub sektor pertambangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Good Corporate Governance, yang diproksikan dengan kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan managerial, profitabilitas dengan proksi Return On Equity (ROE), dan leverage menggunakan proksi Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), profitability, and leverage on firm value. The method used is multiple linear regression analysis with a total sample of 39 out of 13 mining sub-sector companies. The results of the study indicate Good Corporate Governance, which is proxied by institutional ownership and managerial ownership, profitability with proxy Return On Equity (ROE), and leverage using the proxy Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) to affect the value of the company.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document