Problems of legal regulation of the procedure for extending the term of pretrial investigation

2021 ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
V. Zhmudinskyi
Keyword(s):  
International Cooperation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Investigation Period

The article concentrates on the analysis of the main provisions of the criminal procedure legislation on the procedure for extending the term of pre-trial investigation. It is established that a pre-trial investigation shall be conducted within the terms set out in Article 219 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine and unjustified extension of the pre-trial investigation leads to the violation of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings. It is investigated that the term of pre-trial investigation of a crime can be extended by the prosecutor – supervisor of pre-trial proceedings at the request of the investigator, which the prosecutor is obliged to consider no later than three days from the date of its receipt, but in any case before the expiration of the pre-trial investigation period. It is noted that the prosecutor’s decision to extend the pre-trial investigation or to refuse it is not subject to appeal during the pre-trial investigation. Attention is drawn to the fact that in some cases, investigators apply to the prosecutor with a request to extend the pre-trial investigation period several days before its expiration, which may result in an untimely extension of the specified period by the prosecutor. Therefore, in order to prevent missing the deadline, the investigator orders the suspension of the pre-trial investigation on various grounds, mainly due to the need to perform procedural actions within the framework of international cooperation. It is proved that in most cases, based on the results of consideration of the investigator’s request by the prosecutor, an order is issued to extend such period, while a serious disadvantage of the specified procedure for extending the period is that the prosecutor issues an order to extend the period of pre-trial investigation, which is suspended at the time of such order. It is argued that the current criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine prohibits conducting any investigative actions after the suspension of the pre-trial investigation. Proposals have been made to improve the legal regulation of the procedure for extending the term of pre-trial investigation.

REVIEW ON THE MONOGRAPH OF OLEKSANDR TORBAS �DISCRETION IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS OF UKRAINE: THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION AND PRACTICE OF IMPLEMENTATION�

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-150
Author(s):  
Iryna Hloviuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Theoretical Justification ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Current Period ◽  
Legitimate Interests

Current period of development of the legal system of Ukraine is characterized by variability of legislation that regulates, in particular, organization of judicial system and implementation of criminal proceedings. Unfortunately, criminal procedure legislation is no exception, given how many changes and additions have been made to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine since its entry into force in 2020. Undoubtedly, like any other codified legal act, CPC of Ukraine in modern conditions cannot be unchanged, given the dynamics of public relations, the provisions of international law, decisions of ECtHR and number of attempts to solve identified problems of its application. Difficulties of criminal procedural law enforcement are manifested in such an area as the use of discretion of authorities in criminal proceedings, although without it application of legislation is ineffective. At the same time, lawful discretion in criminal proceedings should not turn into its opposite � arbitrariness, which will already violate rights and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities. In criminal proceedings, given the imperative method of legal regulation and possibility of various coercive measures, including those related to the restriction of constitutional human rights, this issue is of particular importance, given, inter alia, that prosecution�s discretion applies within non-adversarial procedure, and the CPC of Ukraine does not always provide for the possibility of appealing such decisions in court. The peer-reviewed monograph consists of four chapters, which contain 10 sections. Structuring of the monograph is logical; the author analyse problems of discretion from questions of concept, signs and limits of discretion, and then moves to the characteristic of realization of discretion by judge, prosecutor, investigator, detective. In general, without a doubt, the monograph of Torbas O. O. �Discretion in the criminal process of Ukraine: theoretical justification and practice of implementation� is relevant, complete and fundamental scientific work, has scientific and practical value. Monograph of Torbas O.O. significantly enriches criminal procedure doctrine regarding the subjects of criminal proceedings, criminal procedure decisions and other areas.

scholarly journals VIDEOCONFERENCE AS A PROCEDURAL FORM OF USING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS OF UKRAINE

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-181
Author(s):  
Maksym Smyrnov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Video Conferencing ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Communication Technologies ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Voice Transmission ◽  
Opposing Party

The article deals with specific controversial issues concerning features of using videoconferencing in criminal proceedings in general as well as at its specific stages; also own conclusions and propositions are justified which are aimed at further development of criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine with the regard to the questions raised. The essence, meaning, advantages, current state, and perspectives of using videoconferencing in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and the area of international cooperation among the states in criminal justice are examined. The state of legal regulation of using videoconferencing in criminal proceedings is analyzed. Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine provides for using videoconferencing both in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and criminal proceedings with a foreign element. Based on the analysis of grounds and procedure of video-conferencing features of its usage both in criminal proceedings of Ukraine and in the area of international cooperation among the states in criminal justice are identified. Videoconferencing can be used based on the decision of an investigator, prosecutor, investigative judge, or court in each case taking into account circumstances of criminal proceedings and subject to grounds provided for by the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine. Before the start of investigative (search) action or court session using video-conferencing one shall ensure that nothing prevents a person from giving testimony, making motions, providing evidence, etc. This fact is essential for the admissibility of evidence used in criminal proceedings obtained using videoconferencing. Conducting requested procedural actions by video-conferencing ensure that an accused person, a victim, and other participants have an opportunity to express themselves on the raised issues, make arguments aimed to rebut the conclusions of the opposing party, provide evidence and make motions during pre-trial investigation or trial. Specificities of conducting a questioning using videoconferencing in the area of international cooperation as well as advantages of obtaining testimony from individuals put into custody or serving a sentence in a foreign state using videoconferencing compared to traditional means are formulated. The issue of interrelation between videoconferencing and principles of criminal proceedings is examined and it is showed that using videoconferencing is fully consistent with principles of criminal proceedings. Videoconferencing is one of the procedural forms of using information technologies in criminal proceedings and is used to conduct an action, participants of which are geographically separated one from another and thus communication among them are conducted using the communication technologies that support real-time image and voice transmission.

Judicial Control and Prosecutorial Supervision in the System of Guarantees for Observing the Rights and Freedoms of a Suspect Person

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 792
Author(s):  
Talgat T. DYUSSEBAYEV ◽  
Aizhan A. AMANGELDY ◽  
Talgat T. BALASHOV ◽  
Ainur A. AKIMBAYEVA ◽  
Kuanysh ARATULY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Cis Countries ◽  
Special Studies

In the process of reforming the criminal procedure legislation, the institution of the prosecutor’s office has become one of its important aspects. The judiciary, being one of the independent and autonomous branches of power in criminal proceedings, which is a system of protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens, is by far the most effective structure for protecting human rights. The article reveals the essence of judicial control and prosecutorial supervision, identifies a number of problems in the form of potential threats to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of a suspect (accused) in this form of preliminary investigation. As a result of the study, the following was stated. The current provisions of the CIS constitutions regulating the sphere of human rights and freedoms have made it possible to single out separate independent areas in the activities of the prosecutor’s office. Based on the practical problems that arise in the conditions of the new Criminal Procedure Code in the CIS countries, the authors consider it reasonable that the current oversight functions assigned to the prosecution authorities in ensuring the rights and freedoms of a suspect and an accused during the investigation, necessitate further special studies with the aim of development of evidence-based proposals for their resolution.  

scholarly journals ON THE DEFECTS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE CONCEPT OF LIABILITY FOR TAX OFFENCES

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-182
Author(s):  
Zhanna A. Nikolaeva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The author analyzes the content of interrelated tax norms, administrative and criminal laws, which constitute the concept of liability for tax offences. The analysis makes it possible to identify the elements that cause non-compliance with the foundations of legal liability in criminal proceedings: its inevitability, equality of everyone before the law and the court, justice. Representatives of small and medium- sized businesses are placed in unequal, discriminatory circumstances in comparison with large businesses. In addition, the legislation on taxes and fees contains provisions which create obstacles for the operation of criminal and criminal procedure laws. Many instances of tax evasion, the non-payment of fees and/or insurance fees in large and especially large amounts revealed by tax services do not become known to investigative bodies. In this case, the principle of the priority of sectoral legislation ceases to work, since in criminal proceedings the provisions of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation cancel out the effect of the norms which are common to all types of crimes and express the foundations of a particular sector of law. This paper substantiates the need to improve the concept of liability for violations of the legislation on taxes and fees.

scholarly journals The subject of judicial control in consideration of complaints: controversial issues of legal regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
El'vira Mirgorodskaya
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The purpose of this study was an attempt to theoretically understand the subject of judicial consideration of complaints against decisions, actions (inaction) of officials carrying out criminal prosecution. The research was carried out on the basis of comparative legal, formal logical, empirical, statistical methods. Judicial statistics for the year 2020 have been provided, and legislation has been studied from a historical and contemporary perspective, taking into account the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The problem is that, in practice, for about 20 years the courts have had difficulties in determining the subject of complaints, since neither in theory nor in practice a consensus has been developed on this issue. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation also does not contain a definition of the concept of «subject matter». The situation is aggravated by the presence of evaluative concepts in the text of the law, leading to a varied understanding of the subject of appeal by the courts, which leads to a violation of the constitutional rights of citizens at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. In the article, taking into account the analysis of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, legislation and the opinion of scientists, a recommendation was made to amend the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to specify the subject of consideration of complaints in accordance with Art. 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in order to eliminate existing contradictions in practice and increase the level of protection of individual rights in pre-trial proceedings.

scholarly journals Duty of Proving of a Civil Suit in Criminal Proceedings

2019 ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Serhii Krushynskyi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Active Part ◽  
Unanimous Opinion ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Successful Performance ◽  
Property Damage ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Civil Suit ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of some problematic questions related to the duty of proving of civil suit in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. In the criminal procedure doctrine there is no unanimous opinion of which subjects are required to engage into proving activities aimed at detection of civil suit circumstances in criminal proceedings. Concepts «duty of proving» and «burden of proving» are delineated by author. The position that the burden of proving is determined by the interests of participants in criminal proceedings was supported. The content of the burden of proving of civil suit in criminal proceedings covers the need to representation of evidence to justify (or refute) the amount of property damage, the depth of the suffering, and the amount of property compensation for non-pecuniary damage. The material and procedural interest of the civil plaintiff and the civil defendant in the outcome of the criminal proceedings encourages them to take an active part in the criminal procedural proving, in particular by representation of evidence available to them. The publicity (officiality) of criminal proceedings causes differences in the procedure for proving the grounds and size of a civil suit in criminal proceedings compared to civil proceedings. It is concluded that the duty of proving of civil suit circumstances lies on the prosecution party (investigator, prosecutor). The civil plaintiff, the civil defendant, their representatives are complete subjects of proving, but their activity in proving is a right, but not a duty. For the successful performance of their procedural functions, the defense of their legitimate interests, these persons are empowered to represent evidence, to participate in their research. So, they are given the opportunity to contribute to the correct resolution of criminal proceedings, in particular in the civil suit part. The subjects involved in the criminal proceedings who have a duty of proving should provide a possibility of realization of the right to represent evidence by other participants in the process.

scholarly journals To the admissibility of the civil law exemption of property from arrest, imposed in the criminal proceedings: domestic and foreign experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-200
Author(s):  
Natalia Kashtanova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Judicial Protection

The subject of paper deals with the legal nature of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property.Methodological basis of the article is based on general scientific dialectical methods of cognitionof objective reality of the legal processes and phenomena that allowed us to conduct anobjective assessment of the state of legislation and law enforcement practice in the proceduralaspects of the cancellation of the seizure of property in criminal proceedings of Russia.The results and scope of it’s application. It is submitted that the cancellation of the seizureof the property (or the individual limit) is allowed only on the grounds and in the mannerprescribed by the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation. However, the studyfound serious contradictions in the application of the relevant law. In particular, cases inwhich the question of exemption of property from arrest (exclusion from the inventory),imposed in the criminal case was resolved in a civil procedure that, in the opinion of theauthor of the publication, is extremely unacceptable.On the stated issues topics analyzes opinions of scientists who say that the dispute aboutthe release of impounded property may be allowed in civil proceedings, including pendingresolution of the criminal case on the merits. The author strongly disagrees with this positionand supports those experts who argue that the filing of a claim for exemption of propertyfrom arrest (exclusion from the inventory) the reviewed judicial act of imposing of arrestwithout recognition per se invalid. In this regard, the author cites the legal position ofthe constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, from which clearly follows that of theright of everyone to judicial protection does not imply the possibility of choice of the citizenat its discretion, techniques and procedures of judicial protection, since the features of suchjudicial protection is defined in specific Federal laws.The author analyzes and appreciates Kazakhstan's experience of legal regulation of the permissibilityof filing a civil claim for exemption of property from seizure imposed in criminalproceedings. The author notes that the new civil procedural legislation of the Republic ofKazakhstan, which came into force from 01 January 2016, clearly captures that considerationin the civil proceedings are not subject to claims for exemption of property from seizureby the criminal prosecution body.Conclusions. Necessity of amendment to article 422 of the Civil Procedure Code of Russia:this article should not apply to cases of application of measures of criminal procedural compulsionin the form of seizure of property. Among other things, the author proposed additionsto part 9 of article 115 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Russia.

scholarly journals The role of international bodies and organizations in the development of legal framework for application of video conferencing in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Mariia Aleksandrovna Iurkevich
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Video Conferencing ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
International Agreements ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Short Period ◽  
The Russian Federation

Legal regulation of the use of video technologies in the Russian criminal procedure is conducted on the international and domestic levels. However, based on the primacy of international law recognized by the Russian Federation, the marker is the position of international community that is reflected in the normative legal acts of its special bodies, as well as on the doctrinal level. This article carries out the chronological analysis of the acts issued by international bodies and organizations pertaining to the use video conferencing in criminal proceedings. The subject of this research is the acts of international bodies and organizations that underlie the development of the national legal framework for the use of video conferencing in the Russian Federation. The analysis of normative acts that regulate the use of video conferencing in the Russian criminal procedure demonstrate that for the most part this question is being addressed in the international agreements ratified by the Russian Federation, rather than in the national legislation (considering the provisions of the Part 3 of the Article 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). Leaning on the acquired results, the author concludes that such tendency can be explained by a number of circumstances, namely lag in the rates of digitalization compared to the leading European practices, insignificant period of approbation of the results of using video technologies, as well as relatively short period of intensive implementation of such technologies due to the amendments in criminal procedure policy of the country, which now requires exhaustive normative regulation. The author believes that it is more appropriate to begin the analysis of normative acts that determine the legal framework for application of video conferencing in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation with the general principles and norms of international law and international agreements, since their role in intensification of the process of digital transformation of criminal procedure in Russia cannot be overestimated.

scholarly journals To the question of the implementation of the right to protection of minors, victims of crime

2020 ◽  
Vol - (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
A.I. Glushkov ◽  
◽  
E.E. Smekina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Victims Of Crime ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of issues of legal regulation and the realization in modern conditions of the rights to protection of adolescents who have suffered as a result of the crimes committed against them. Legal literature, legislative acts, as well as judicial and investigative practice on this issue have been analysed. On the basis of the study, problems of ensuring the right to protection of juvenile victims in criminal proceedings were identified, as well as proposals for improving the norms of criminal procedure legislation regulating this sphere of activity and their application were justified.

scholarly journals THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADVERSARIAL PRINCIPLE AT THE PRE-TRIAL STAGES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 108-119
Author(s):  
Ирина Попова ◽  
Анастасия Иванова
Keyword(s):  
Practical Interest ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulation Mechanism ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
The Social ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
General Scientific

To achieve the purpose of criminal proceedings, law enforcers must have an arsenal of procedural tools in order to ensure the operation of the legal regulation mechanism. The system of principles of criminal proceedings, serving as the basis for the effective operation of the norms of criminal procedure law, includes the adversarial principle. The implementation of this principle has a number of features in pre-trial proceedings. In this aspect, a comparative study of the adversarial principle in national criminal proceedings and in foreign criminal proceedings is of both scientific and practical interest. Purpose: analysis of the adversarial principle at the pre-trial stages in national and foreign criminal proceedings, as an element of the legal regulation mechanism. Methods: dialectic methods as a general scientific method of cognition, as well as specific scientific methods: interpretation method, comparative legal, technical legal, formal logical in their various combinations. Results: the study reveals that the adversarial principle operates in various types of criminal process in the mechanism of legal regulation of Russia and foreign countries. To achieve the social purpose of criminal proceedings, which provides for the protection of rights and legitimate interests, the adversarial principle must be implemented, including at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document