scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA KEBIJAKAN DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN KOLEKSI DI PERPUSTAKAAN PERGURUAN TINGGI

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 833
Author(s):  
Batriatul Alfa Dila

<div style="left: 161.167px; top: 317.269px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.00837);">The paper gives a view to librarians to find out the problem of policy in the process</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 340.011px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.992011);">of developing collections in high-rise library. This paper focuses on finding solutions</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 362.754px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.987555);">to policy problems in developing collections in high-education libraries, to determine</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 385.496px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.95665);">the success in developing library materials in the high-rise library. At the writing</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 408.238px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01137);">of this paper the method is more specific by using a literature review. The steps that</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 430.981px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.996362);">must be carried out are as follows: 1. Urgency of collection development policies, 2.</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 453.723px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.999323);">Carrying out activities that have been deemed by the library, 3. Involving users in the</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 476.466px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.949949);">provision of voluntary collections, 4. Planning the selection of library materials to</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 499.208px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01281);">be provided in the library. the process of procuring a collection of library materials</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 521.95px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.986193);">that is relevant to be provided in the library, 6. Always evaluating library materials to</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 544.693px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01443);">support success in the development of library collections. Constraints and solutions</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 567.435px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.976145);">faced in developing collections, with the emergence of this paper provide new insights</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 590.177px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.99941);">/ new ideas in providing the best solutions for the stages in developing collections in</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 612.92px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.00555);">the high-rise library.</div>

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
Sajini Priya Natarajan

This article describes about the Collection Development Policies in University libraries. Collection Development Policy included for Electronic Resources in University libraries, Major Roles in the Selection of Library Collections and the important Selection Tools for Print and Electronic forms, Criteria for Selecting the Book suppliers and Order of Books and Details of the collections in the library for the preceding five years. The Inter library lending/ resource sharing facility for books with other and Subscribe to e-resources.


Author(s):  
Geoffrey Little

Students in graduate theological programs working toward ordination and a career in ministry in the Christian church require library collections that support their study of scripture, doctrine, ancient languages, and Biblical history and interpretation, as well as the practice of pastoral ministry, leadership, and administration. This chapter will discuss how to build collections at theological libraries measured against standards set by the Association of Theological Schools, the accrediting organization for theological schools in Canada and the United States; the importance of print and online reference works such as language dictionaries, atlases, and encyclopedias in theological library collections; indexes and databases for theological studies; important journals; the different categories of theological monographs; collection development policies; special collections in theological libraries; dealing with gifts and donors; and professional development resources for theological librarians.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Ristono ◽  
Pratikto ◽  
Purnomo Budi Santoso ◽  
Ishardita Pambudi Tama

Purpose: This paper proposes a new model for further research on how to select criteria in supplier selection, through a literature review and analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of previously used methods.Design/methodology/approach: The methods used to select criteria in supplier selection were extracted from various online academic databases.  The weaknesses and advantages of these methods were then analyzed. Based on these findings, several opportunities for improvement are proposed for further research. Finally, criteria design methods for the selection of suppliers are proposed using statistical multi-criteria decision making (S-MCDM) methods.Findings: Direction and guidance for subsequent research to select the criteria used in supplier selection, based on the advantages and disadvantages of the decision methods used.Research limitations/implications: Limitations of this study are that it is focused on the methods of criteria design in supplier selection.Practical implications: This study can provide a research direction on the selection of criteria for supplier selection.Social implications: This study provides ongoing guidance and avenues for further research.Originality/value: New ideas for working out the developmental strategy for criteria selection are provided by statistical MCDM methods in supplier selection.


2021 ◽  
pp. 200-211
Author(s):  
Dr. Kasey Garrison

Including award-winning literature in children’s library collections is often openly stated in a library’s collection development policy. Hateley (2012) notes these “meaningful markers” as a way “to grant our wish of someone somewhere, somehow having read all the books, and worked out which one is best” (p. 190). In an age where librarians are pushed to their limits with time, budget, and curriculum, such designators are useful in helping to develop and maintain a quality collection. At the same time, Hateley (2012) enlists readers to acknowledge the unavoidable human subjectivity involved in the judging process of literary book awards: What must not be forgotten, however, is that this superhuman work is undertaken by humans—passionate and knowledgeable humans, to be sure, but humans nonetheless. To automatically rely on award winners for collection development may mask the necessary fallibility and idiosyncrasies of individual judges or judging panels. (p. 197) In a study of “Children’s-Choice” State Book Awards in the US, Storey (1992) further notes censorship issues associated with the selection of books on the award lists and, thus, the availability of books to the children readers meant to select the winners. Storey’s (1992) research reports on a survey of school librarians about censorship related to these book awards. The librarians in the study noted that censorship was “expected and accepted” (Storey, 1992, p. 1). They also supported the use of award lists for selection and collection development which is the focus of the current study reported in this paper. Specifically, the purpose was to investigate youth librarians’ perceptions of using award lists for collection development and to also survey their collections for the presence of five children’s book awards.


2001 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Crawford ◽  
Matthew Harris

Libraries have important collection development decisions to make about best-sellers and popular culture materials. A selection of academic libraries was studied to follow the ownership of best-sellers from 1940 to 1990. The trend is to keep a higher percentage of older best-sellers in fiction than newer ones. Nonfiction appears to be more sporadic but still follows this basic trend. With the influx of popular culture studies, scholars potentially could lose valuable resources. From this study, libraries will see that a new set of collection development policies may need to be developed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 206
Author(s):  
Helen N. Levenson

This paper identifies and reviews some of the currently relevant components of collection development which contribute to the need for having a written collection development policy (CDP) in place. The requisite elements for a pertinent and usable CDP are identified, keeping in mind the need to customize these policies to each library’s unique needs. A literature review is presented to demonstrate the long-standing purposes of collection development policies (CDPs), quantitative studies of existing CDPs, and some of the inherent drawbacks in the creation and application of these policies. The author presents a case study which demonstrates the processes undertaken to create a CDP for a medium-sized academic library. This includes more current and relevant considerations for a modern day CDP. The paper also includes the best practices identified throughout the policy creation process and which has the potential to be applied to other similarly situated libraries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 391
Author(s):  
Fitri Kartika Sari

<div style="left: 161.167px; top: 303.122px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.948582);">This research discuss about material library selection of collection development in</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 325.864px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.960861);">Akper Karya Bakti Husada library. This research aims to know how the material</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 348.606px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.990521);">library selection have been processed in Akper Karya Bakti Husada library. Methode</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 371.349px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.948527);">that used in this research has result that material library selection in Akper Karya</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 394.091px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.00406);">Bakti Husada library do taking down student and lectures suggestion</div><div style="left: 161.167px; top: 433.897px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.951229);">Keyword</div><div style="left: 231.554px; top: 433.897px; font-size: 19.4935px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.977162);">: selection, collection development</div>


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 737
Author(s):  
Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene ◽  
Dalia Streimikiene ◽  
Tomas Balezentis ◽  
Virgilijus Skulskis

The European Commission has recently adopted the Renovation Wave Strategy, aiming at the improvement of the energy performance of buildings. The strategy aims to at least double renovation rates in the next ten years and make sure that renovations lead to higher energy and resource efficiency. The choice of appropriate thermal insulation materials is one of the simplest and, at the same time, the most popular strategies that effectively reduce the energy demand of buildings. Today, the spectrum of insulation materials is quite wide, and each material has its own specific characteristics. It is recognized that the selection of materials is one of the most challenging and difficult steps of a building project. This paper aims to give an in-depth view of existing multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) applications for the selection of insulation materials and to provide major insights in order to simplify the process of methods and criteria selection for future research. A systematic literature review is performed based on the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. In order to determine which MCDM method is the most appropriate for different questions, the main advantages and disadvantages of different methods are provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document