scholarly journals HIGHER ORDER THINGKING (HOT) PROBLEMS TO DEVELOP CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY AND STUDENT SELF EFFICACY IN LEARNING MATHEMATICS PRIMARY SCHOOLS

Author(s):  
Triana Jamilatus Syarifah ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi

<p>Kompetensi dalam kurikulum 2013 adalah mengembangkan kreativitas, rasa ingin tahu, kemampuan merumuskan pertanyaan untuk membentuk pikiran kritis yang perlu untuk hidup cerdas dan belajar sepanjang hayat sehingga, siswa perlu dibekali dengan kemampuan-kemampuan tertentu untuk mengembangkan dan mengevaluasi argumen dalam suatu pemecahan masalah tertentu. Salah satu kemampuan yang harus dikembangkan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut adalah kemampuan berpikir kritis. Kemampuan berpikir kritis adalah kemampuan untuk mengidentifikasi, menganalisis, dan memecahkan masalah secara kreatif dan logis sehingga mampu menghasilkan keputusan yang tepat. Sementara itu, kemampuan berpikir kreatif dipengaruhi oleh keyakinan akan kemampuan diri yang dinamakan <em>self efficacy. </em><em>Self-efficacy </em>ini berbeda dengan aspirasi (cita-cita), karena cita-cita menggambarkan sesuatu yang ideal yang seharusnya (dapat dicapai), sedang efikasi menggambarkan penilaian kemampuan diri. Untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir  kritis dan <em>self efficacy</em>, pembelajaran matematika haruslah mengarah pada soal-soal tidak algoritmik dan komplek dalam menyelesaikan suatu masalah atau tugas, dan juga tidak dapat diprediksi, pendekatan latihan yang tepat, atau petunjuk yang tegas yang disarankan oleh tugas, petunjuk tugas atau contoh jalan keluar. Soal-soal yang seperti itu dikategorikan soal <em>Higher Order Thingking</em> (HOT). Oleh karena itu, soal kategori <em>Higher Order Thingking</em> (HOT) dapat digunakan untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan <em>self efficacy </em>siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika siswa di sekolah dasar.</p>

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Hardiyanto ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santoso

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) dan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think pair share (TPS) serta mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan antara PBL setting TTW dan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket self-efficacy siswa. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan one sample t-test, dan analisis multivariat (MANOVA). One sample t-test dilakukan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TPS, sedangkan analisis multivariat (MANOVA) dilakukan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua treatment tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan pendekatan PBL setting TPS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Selain itu hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan yang signifikan antara pendekatan PBL setting TTW dengan pendekatan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. The Effectiveness of PBL Setting TTW and TPS Seen from Students Learning Achievement, Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy  AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) and PBL setting think pair share (TPS) and describe the difference of the effectiveness between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and self-efficacy of grade students. This research is quasi-experimental research. The research instruments to collect the data are a learning achievement test, a test to examine the ability to think critically and a self-efficacy questionnaire. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. Meanwhile, multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out to determine the difference between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. The results show that both PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS are effective in terms of students learning achievements, critical thinking ability, and self-efficacy and there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of PBL setting TTW and the effectiveness of PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and student self-efficacy.


Author(s):  
Masniladevi Masniladevi

Learning activities in primary schools are still dominated by teachers, consequently the students' critical thinking skills are low. The purpose of this study is to describe the implementation and improvement of students' critical thinking skills on the characteristics of wake up flat by using Contextual teaching and learning model. The results showed an improvement in the observation of students' critical thinking skills as well as aspects of teachers and students. The students' critical thinking ability in cycle I was 69 and increased in cycle II to 86. The result of observation of student aspect in cycle I was 76.75% with good qualification, and increased in cycle II to 92% with excellent qualification. It was concluded that, Contextual Teaching And Learning model can improve students' mathematical critical thinking ability.Keywords: critical thinking skills; Contextual Teaching And Learning model


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-339
Author(s):  
Yasin Yasin ◽  
Abin Syamsudin ◽  
Daeng Arifin ◽  
Waska Warta

tudents' critical thinking ability in teaching and learning activities on human digestive system material is still low, where students are less skilled in collecting and analyzing data, relevant facts and identifying problems, so students have difficulty in solving problems with alternatives that fit the logic. Based on the results of the hypothetical test analysis obtained t hit > t daf (1.67), then accept. Hi means that there is an influence on the use of audiovisual learning media on critical thinking ability in human digestive system materials in grade VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu Regency. From the calculation of t test above obtained t count = 4,957 while t table at the level of trust 95% (significance 5%) with dk numerator is 1.70. Because t count (4,957) > t table (1,70) Hi accepted means there is an influence on the use of audiovisual learning media on self-efficacy in human digestive system materials in grade VIII students smp negeri 1 Filled And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu. The result of this study is a description of the efficacy of students of grade VIII SMP Negeri 1 Filled And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu Regency, by using audiovisual media learning system in human digestive system materials belongs to high category. There is an influence of audiovisual media learning system on self-efficacy on human digestive system materials in students VIII SMP Negeri 1 Filled And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu.


Author(s):  
Fathoni Fathoni ◽  
Siti Maghfirotun Amin ◽  
Siti Khabibah

Mathematical learning needs to be given to all students starting from elementary school, so that students practice how to think in drawing conclusions and be able to express their opinions with the beliefs and honesty that comes from someone. But when learning mathematics the problem that often arises is a lack of motivation. Baroody (1993) says that reasoning is an important tool in learning mathematics to produce ideas so students can understand mathematical concepts correctly. Efforts made by teachers to improve thinking skills and motivation in learning mathematics are through the Adobe Flash CS 5.0 game which is expected to provide new and enjoyable experiences for teachers and students. In addition to more varied learning, students can be motivated to learn and enjoy what they learn.


EDUSAINS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-225
Author(s):  
Siti Mulya Agnah ◽  
Rusdi Rusdi ◽  
Yanti Herlanti

PENGARUH METODE PETA ARGUMEN DAN EFIKASI DIRI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS  AbstractThe aim of this study is to know the effect of argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability and interaction between argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability. The method that used in this research is quasi experiment with 2 x 2 factorial design. The instruments that used in this research are critical thinking ability essay test and self efficacy questionnaire. The subject of this study is students of XI IPA 1 and 3 from SMAN in Jakarta totalling 72 students. Samples were taken using simple random sampling. Analysis of data used two way anova. The result showed that : 1) There is effect of argument mapping method on critical thinking ability with p< 0,05, p = 0,000. 2). There is effect of self efficacy on argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability with p< 0,05, p = 0,000. 3) There is no interaction between argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability with p> 0,05, p = 0,602.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh metode peta argumen dan efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis, serta interaksi antara pengaruh metode peta argumen dan efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain ANAVA dua arah dengan rancangan faktorial 2x2. Populasi penelitian ialah XI MIPA SMA Negeri di Jakarta dengan sampel penelitian sebanyak dua kelas, yaitu XI MIPA 1dan 3 yang berisi 72 peserta didik. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini berupa tes uraian dan kuesioner efikasi diri. Berdasarkan analisis data hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) terdapat pengaruh metode peta argumen terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik dengan p<0,05, p = 0,00, (2) terdapat pengaruh efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik dengan p<0,05, p = 0,00, (3) tidak terdapat interaksi pengaruh metode peta argumen dan efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik dengan p>0,05, p = 0,602. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document