scholarly journals Efektivitas PBL setting TTW dan TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Hardiyanto ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) dan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think pair share (TPS) serta mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan antara PBL setting TTW dan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket self-efficacy siswa. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan one sample t-test, dan analisis multivariat (MANOVA). One sample t-test dilakukan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TPS, sedangkan analisis multivariat (MANOVA) dilakukan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua treatment tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan pendekatan PBL setting TPS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Selain itu hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan yang signifikan antara pendekatan PBL setting TTW dengan pendekatan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. The Effectiveness of PBL Setting TTW and TPS Seen from Students Learning Achievement, Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy  AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) and PBL setting think pair share (TPS) and describe the difference of the effectiveness between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and self-efficacy of grade students. This research is quasi-experimental research. The research instruments to collect the data are a learning achievement test, a test to examine the ability to think critically and a self-efficacy questionnaire. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. Meanwhile, multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out to determine the difference between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. The results show that both PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS are effective in terms of students learning achievements, critical thinking ability, and self-efficacy and there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of PBL setting TTW and the effectiveness of PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and student self-efficacy.

scholarly journals Efektivitas guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi, dan self-efficacy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-132
Author(s):  
Imaludin Agus
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
T Test ◽  
Contextual Approach ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Guided Discovery ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Thinking Ability

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan guided discovery meggunakan pendekatan kontekstual dan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy matematika siswa SMP. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi-experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kontukowun, kabupaten Muna dan kelas VIII-1 dan Kelas VIII-2 dipilih secara acak sebagai sampel. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual dan konvensional menggunakan uji one sample t-test, sedangkan untuk perbedaan keefektifan metode pembelajaran menggunakan uji two group manova. Jika terdapat perbedaan maka dilanjutkan dengan uji perbandingan menggunakan independent sample t-test. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy; metode konvensional tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy; dan guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual lebih efektif dibandingkan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy. The effectiveness of guided discovery using the contextual approach in terms of critical thinking ability, achievement, and self-efficacyAbstractThe aim of the study aims to describe the effectiveness of guided discovery using the contextual approach in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement and self-efficacy in the mathematics of junior high school students. The study was quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design method. The population in this research was all 8th-grade students from one public junior high school in Kontukowuna, Muna Regency, Indonesia and class VIII-1 and VIII-2 were randomly selected as a sample. One sample t-test was used to determine the effectiveness of the guided discovery using the contextual approach and the conventional method. Whereas, two groups of Manova was used to know the difference between the learning methods. Then, if the result showed there is a significant difference between the two classes, the independent sample t-test was administered. Result of the study indicates that the guided discovery using the contextual approach is effective in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy; the conventional method is not effective in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy; and the guided discovery using contextual approach is more effective than conventional in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy.

scholarly journals Development of Maquette to Promote Primary School Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Social Sciences

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rindang Hayom Sasami ◽  
Sujarwo Sujarwo
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
T Test ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Main Field ◽  
School Students ◽  
Gain Score ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability

This research aimed to analyse the feasibility of the use of maquette and the effectiveness of maquette in improving students’ critical thinking ability. The research model employed was the development research model developed by Borg & Gall. The research subjects were third graders. The testing was divided into preliminary field testing, main field testing, and operational field testing. The analysis of the medium feasibility was based on the assessment by media experts, the assessment by subject matter experts, students’ response, and teacher’s response. The analysis of maquette effectiveness was carried out using a t-test (two independent samples) to figure out the difference and gain score of the experimental class for the purpose of identifying the improvement after the use of maquette. In the feasibility analysis, a score of 88 in the category “feasible” was gained from the assessment by a media expert and a score of 85 in the category “highly feasible” was gained from the assessment by a subject matter expert. From the preliminary field testing, scores of 60.5 and 65 in the category “highly feasible” were gained for the students’ response and teacher’s response, respectively. Meanwhile, from the main field testing, scores of 56.1 and 66.5 in the category “highly feasible” were gained for the students’ response and teacher’s response to the maquette use, respectively. The t-test results show a significant value in the critical thinking, namely.000 <.05, indicating a significant difference between the control class and the experimental class. The gain score was 0.5 and fell into the “moderate” category. Thus, it can be concluded that maquette is effective in improving critical thinking ability.

scholarly journals The Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability of Students on Additives and Addictive Substances Class VIII SMPN 12 Padang

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-132
Author(s):  
Mesia Dewi Hasanah ◽  
Heffi Alberida ◽  
Yosi Laila Rahmi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability

Implementation of Curriculum 2013 requires students to learn actively, independently, and critical thinking. Critical thinking is an activity through thinking about ideas related to concepts or problems. The efforts to improve critical thinking skills of learners can be done by using the appropriate learning model. One of the learning models that can be used to improve the ability of critical thinking is a problem-based learning model. This type of research is quasi experiment with randomized control-group pretest posttest design. The sample of this research choosed by used purposive sampling method. Class VIII6 as experimental class and class VIII4 as control class. Data of this research result are quantitative data of critical thinking ability. Data were analyzed by using t test. The results showed that the mean difference of posttest value with pretest value of critical thinking ability of experimental class learners is higher than control class. Hypothesis testing with t-test obtained tcalculate=2,94>ttable= 1,67, then H1 accepted. Based on these results the authors conclude that the implementation of problem-based learning model has a positive effect on the ability to think critically learners on the material additives and addictive substances.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF GROUP INVESTIGATION TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DITINJAU DARI BAKAT NUMERIK BAGI SISWA KELAS XI SMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
NI NYOMAN SRI ARTINI . ◽  
PROF.DR. I MADE CANDIASA, MI.Komp. . ◽  
DR. I MADE KIRNA, M.Si. .
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
The Difference

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis (1) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, (2) pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan bakat numerik siswa terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa, (3) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik tinggi, (4) perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kritis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dengan siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran langsung, pada siswa yang memiliki bakat numerik rendah. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan yang digunakan adalah two way pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas XI IA SMAN 2 Semarapura tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 sebanyak 171 orang. Sampel 76 orang siswa yang dipilih dengan teknik simple random sampling dengan uji kesetaraan kelas. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik siswa yang dikumpulkan dengan tes keterampilan berpikir kritis dan bakat numerik. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan uji ANAVA dua jalur dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe untuk menguji komparasi pasangan nilai rata-rata tiap kelompok perlakuan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara keterampilan berpikir kritis kelompok siswa yang belajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif Group Investigation dan model pembelajaran langsung (Fh=14,153;pF’(0,05)=4,41).Kata Kunci : Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Bakat Numerik. This research aimed to analyze (1) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, (2) interaction effect between learning model and students’ numerical talent towards students’ critical thinking ability, (3) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on high numerical talent students, (4) the difference of critical thinking ability among the students who joined Group Investigation cooperative learning model with the students who take the direct learning model, on low numerical talent students. The research type was a quasi experimental research with two ways pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The research population was grade XI A1 students of SMAN 2 Semarapura Academic Year 2013/2014, with the amount 171 students. The sample was 76 students chosen by simple random sampling technique and class equality test. The data research was critical thinking ability and students’ numerical talent collected by critical thinking ability test and numerical talent. The hypothesis testing used ANOVA two paths followed by Scheffe test to test the comparative value pairs on average each treatment group. The research result showed (1) there was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model (Fh=14,153;p˂0,05). The students learnt using Group Investigation cooperative learning model showed better critical thinking ability and numerical talent. (2) There was an interaction effect between learning model and numerical talent towards critical thinking ability (Fh=4,502;p˂0,05). (3) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability students’ levels that using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model on high numerical talent students (Fh=16,68˃F’(0,05)=4,41). (4) There was a significant difference between critical thinking ability of the students using Group Investigation cooperative learning model and direct learning model for low numerical talent students (Fh=1,29˃F’(0,05)=4,41). keyword : Group Investigation Cooperative Learning Model, Critical Thinking Ability, Numerical Talent.

scholarly journals Keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan discovery ditinjau dari prestasi, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kecemasan matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-180
Author(s):  
Enggar Prasetyawan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Math Anxiety ◽  
T Test ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Nonequivalent Groups ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Contextual Teaching

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan dan perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dan Discovery ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain nonequivalent groups prestest-posttest. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Ngaglik. Sampel penelitian ini adalah kelas X MIA 2 dan X MIA 4 yang diperoleh melalui pemilihan secara acak dari empat kelas yang masing-masing siswanya berjumlah 31 orang. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar berupa soal pilihan ganda yang terdiri dari 20 butir soal, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis berupa soal uraian yang terdiri dari 4 butir soal, dan angket kecemasan matematika yang terdiri dari 32 butir pernyataan. Pengujian keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan discovery dilakukan dengan uji one sample t-test. Pengujian perbedaan keefektifan antara pendekatan CTL dan Discovery dilakukan dengan uji MANOVA (Hotteling’s Trace). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) pendekatan CTL dan discovery efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika, (2) tidak ada perbedaan keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan Discovery ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kecemasan matematika. Effectiveness of CTL and discovery approach viewed from students’ achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety AbstractThis study aimed to describe the effectiveness and difference of effectiveness between of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and discovery approach viewed from students’ learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety. This research was quasi experiment with nonequivalent groups prestest-posttest design. The population in this study was all students of class X of SMAN 2 Ngaglik. The sample of the study was the students of X MIA 2 and X MIA 4 which is determined randomly from four classes which each of that classes consist of 31 students. The instruments used to collect data were a learning achievement test consisting of 20 multiple choice questions, a critical thinking ability test consisting of 5 essays, and math anxiety questionnaires that consisted of 32 statements. To determine the effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Discovery approach, one sample t-test was used. To discover the difference of effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach and Discovery approach MANOVA (Hotteling’s Trace) was used. The results show that (1) Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Discovery approach are effective viewed from student’s learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety,(2) there is no difference in effectiveness between Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach and Discovery approach viewed from student’s learning achievement, critical thinking ability, and math anxiety.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI MODEL PBL (PROBLEM BASED LEARNING) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR DAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Saiful Prayogi ◽  
Muhammad Asy’ari
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Choice Test ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Percentage Score ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Essay Test ◽  
Pbl Model ◽  
Research Show

This research was aimed to improve the students’ learning achievement and critical thinking ability through problem based learning (PBL) model, the method which was applied in this research was classroom action research. It consisted of two cycles and each cycle consisted of planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. The data was taken by giving the students test, it was in form of multiple choice test. The was used to know the students learning achievement to know students critical thinking, essay test was used. The finding of the research show that there was improvement from cycle to cycle. (1) at the first cycle: the percentage score of students mastery was 63.16% ; the mean score of the students critical thinking ability was 51.31 ; (2) at the second cycle : percentage score of the students mastery was 85% ; mean score of the students critical thinking ability was 72.08 and catagorized into critical and between 62.59 – 81.25. based on the finding, it can be concluded that problem based learning (PBL) model can improve the students learning achievement and critical thinking ability.

scholarly journals Analyzing Students’ Critical Thinking Ability on Solving Sequences and Series Problems through Problem-Based Learning with Islamic Nuance

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudy Tri Utami ◽  
Susanto . ◽  
Muhtadi Irvan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Lesson Plan ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Achievement Test ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Instructional Process ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Assessment Sheet

This study aimed to analyse the ability of critical thinking to solve sequences and series problem through Problem-based Learning (PBL) with Islamic Nuance. Research instruments operative included instructional instruments (lesson plan and students’ work sheet); learning achievement test, questionnaire; critical thinking assessment sheet, and documentation. The lesson plan and students’ work sheet validation results evinced values of 3.73 and 3.74. The research generated the data concerning students’ activity during instructional process from the first to third meeting respectively as follows; 60%, which meant good category, 80%, indicating very good category, and 83.33%, evincing very good category. The minimum criterion of learning achievement was achieved because more than 80% of students gained score of at least 60, that was 27 students (90%) passed and 3 students (10%) below passing criteria. From the data analysis, it found that students' critical thinking ability in solving Sequences and Series problem through PBL was very satisfactory.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Prompting Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Sarinawati
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Regression Test ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Control

AbstractThe purpose of this study was for knowing whether there was a difference and an effect of Probing Prompting Learning model toward student critical thinking ability. It was a quasi-experimental research, using experimental and control groups that would determine the difference of two variables. There were two sample classes—the tenth-grade students of MIA 4 (experiment) that were 28 students taught by using Probing Prompting Learning model and 28 students of MIA 5 (control) taught by using conventional learning. Collecting the data was done by using written posttest, and the obtained data were analyzed by using Independent sample t-test and Simple linear regression test. Based on the result of processing the final data, it was obtained the score of Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 that was lower than 0.05 (0.000<0.05). It could be concluded that Ha was accepted and H0 was rejected. It meant that there was a difference between Probing Prompting Learning model and conventional learning toward student critical thinking ability. The equation of the regression was Y=56.658+0.351 X. It could be known that the score of the significance (sig.) 0.001 was lower than the probability 0.05 (0.001<0.05), so it could be concluded that Ha was accepted and H0 was rejected. It meant that there was an effect of Probing Prompting Learning model toward student critical thinking ability at the tenth grade of Senior High School of Muhammadiyah 1 Pekanbaru. KeywordsProbing Prompting Learning, Critical Thinking, Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solution

scholarly journals The Effectiveness Of Scientific Approach With Open-Ended Problem Based Learning Worksheet Viewed From Learning Achievement, Creative Thinking Ability, Interest, And Mathematics Self-Efficacy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 292
Author(s):  
Lisda Fitriana Masitoh ◽  
Enggar Prasetyawan
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Creative Thinking Ability

This study aimed to describe the effectiveness and differences of scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach. The population in this study was students of class VII of SMP Negeri 17 Pamulang, South Tangerang. The sample of this study was determined randomly. They were two classes and the results were VII.3 and VII.4. To determine the effectiveness, one sample t-test was used. To discover the difference of effectiveness, MANOVA (Hotteling's Trace) test was used. The results show that (1) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet and scientific approach are effective viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (2) There is no difference in effectiveness between scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet with scientific approach viewed from learning achievement, creative thinking ability, interests and mathematic self-efficacy (3) Scientific approach with open-ended problem based learning worksheet are more effective than scientific approaches viewed from student achievement

scholarly journals Implementation of Problem- Based Learning Model Assisted by E-Modules on Students' Critical Thinking Ability

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
M Rahmat Rahmat ◽  
Asep Ginanjar Arip ◽  
Sofyan H. Nur
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Thinking Ability

Education is a significant factor to shape human beings as a whole. The ability to think for humans plays an important role to develop information. The issue of lack of ability to think critically in Sahida Lemah Abang Vocational High School needed to be addressed. One learning model that can be utilized to guide students to think critically is Problem Based Learning (PBL) using an e-module as the resource of learning material. The study aims to examine the implementation of Problem Based Learning model using e-module and its influence on students' critical thinking ability.  This study used a quasi-experiment with nonequivalent control group design as its research design. In using the research design, two observations have been conducted; one was before the experiment called Pre-Test (O1) and one after the experiment of this study called the post-test (O2). There are two samples in this study; one is the experimental group and the other is the control group. The study was done in Sahida Lemah Abang Vocational High School. The data was gathered by using tests and observation sheets of the learning process. The result in this study shows averagely that the implementation in each of the learning stages has gained 95.7% which is in the category of very good value. The most significant difference is from the fifth indicator "developing strategy and tactic", n gain of experimental class and control class is 5.83 and 0.23 respectively. As the result of the hypothesis test is Sig. 0.035 which means that there is a significant difference in students' ability to think critically between the students in the experimental class and the control class, the students in the experimental class think more critically than the students in the control class.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document