Awake Craniotomy vs Craniotomy Under General Anesthesia for Eloquent Glioma: Postoperative General Functional Preservation
Abstract Background Awake craniotomy (AC) with intraoperative stimulation mapping is the standard treatment for glioma, especially when present on the eloquent cortex. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether functional preservation after AC compromises patient survival as compared with craniotomy under general anesthesia (GA). Methods The medical records of 339 patients who underwent tumor resection surgery for gliomas from January 2010 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 62 underwent AC with intraoperative stimulation mapping. The primary outcome was the Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance score at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A generalized linear model and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate potential factors influencing general functional status and progression-free survival.Results The newly-diagnosed disease AC and repeat-surgery groups were comparable in terms of sex, age, pathologic grade, extent of resection (EOR) and preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Among the patients with newly-diagnosed disease, the postoperative ECOG score of the AC group was significantly better than that of the GA group. Pathologic grade and the EOR determined the PFS and OS in both the AC and GA groups.Conclusion AC with intraoperative stimulation mapping is safe and allows maximal removal of lesions around the eloquent cortex. Greater preservation of neurologic function may have resulted in a better postoperative general functional status in the AC group.