scholarly journals Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon ◽  
Arunee Dechaphunkul ◽  
Jiraporn Setakornnukul ◽  
Tanadech Dechaphunkul ◽  
Rungarun Jiratrachu ◽  
...  

Abstract IntroductionChemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high cumulative doses (CDs) of cisplatin has been considered the standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). However, given most patients’ inability to tolerate high CDs due to cisplatin-related toxicities, the optimal CD of cisplatin during CRT remains undetermined.MethodsPatients with LA-NPC who received CRT with cisplatin between 2007 and 2017 were identified through the Thai head and neck cancer multicenter database and then categorized according to cisplatin CD (mg/m2) received. All complications and cisplatin-related toxicities during CRT were recorded.ResultsWe identified 779 LA-NPC patients receiving low (£150; n=97), intermediate (151–250; n=411), and high (>250; n=271) CDs of cisplatin. Low CD patients had significantly lower mean actual radiation dose (p<0.001) and more radiotherapy delay (p=0.010), while intermediate CD patients had the least hospitalization (p<0.001). Overall, 39.3% of the patients experienced cisplatin-related toxicity, which was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (p=0.001). Acute kidney injury was observed in 7% in all patients, which was highest among low CD patients (15.5%; p=0.002). Intermediate CD patients had significantly longer median OS than the low and high groups (64 vs. 49.8 vs. 53.2, respectively; p=0.015). Univariate, but not multivariate, analysis showed that CD of cisplatin was significantly associated with OS.ConclusionCD of cisplatin during CRT was not an independent prognostic factor for OS. An intermediate CD induced minimal toxicity without compromising survival and should be considered the optimal CD. Nonetheless, a randomized phase 3 study evaluating the optimal CD of cisplatin is warranted.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17564-e17564
Author(s):  
Syed Muhammad Mushtaq Ashraf ◽  
Ali Mehmood Raufi ◽  
William R Barnett ◽  
James Benjamin Williams ◽  
Roland T. Skeel

e17564 Background: Different dosing schedules of CDDP are being used as standard of care for CCRT in LA-SCCHN, but there are no adequately powered trials to directly compare other non-CDDP regimens with CDDP to identify the optimal CCRT regimen. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, we reviewed medical records from hospital tumor registry for consecutive patients with LA-SCCHN to retrieve data regarding demographics, diagnosis and treatment with definitive CCRT between December 2012 and December 2016. All patients had followed up for at least 24 months after completion of treatment. Results: 155 patients were included in the analysis. They fell into 2 groups: 89 (57.4%) had been administered CDDP and 66 (42.6%) received non-CDDP based regimen. In the latter group, 30 (45.5%) received cetuximab, 30 (45.5%) received carboplatin with paclitaxel, 1 (1.5%) received carboplatin with 5-fluorouracil and 5 (7.6%) received carboplatin alone. The majority of patients in both groups had oropharyngeal involvement, approximately 65%. All patients completed treatment with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Median age was 57 years in CDDP group and 67 years in non-CDDP group. Patients in both groups were predominantly male, Caucasian, with positive smoking history. 67% patients in CDDP & 59% in non-CDDP group were HPV positive. The 2-year overall survival (OS) from initiation of treatment was 73.9% in CDDP and 62.1% in non-CDDP group (hazard ratio = 1.63, 95% CI 0.92 – 2.87, p = 0.092). Comparing non-CDDP regimens with CDDP, cetuximab appeared to confer better 2 year OS in HPV positive patients (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40 – 0.98, p = 0.040). Median time-to-treatment failure was 33 months in CDDP group and 24 months in non CDDP group. Conclusions: In this retrospective comparison, there was no significant difference in the 2 year overall survival in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancers being treated with cisplatin based concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen versus a non-cisplatin based regimen.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mu-Hung Tsai ◽  
Shang-Yin Wu ◽  
Tsung Yu ◽  
Sen-Tien Tsai ◽  
Yuan-Hua Wu

Abstract Background and purpose Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the established treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, there is no evidence supporting routine adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to demonstrate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and distant metastasis in high-risk N3 NPC patients. Materials and methods We linked the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Cause of Death database to obtain data. Clinical N3 NPC patients were divided as those receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and platinum (PF) chemotherapy and those receiving no chemotherapy after CCRT. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and distant metastasis in both groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results We included 431 patients (152 and 279 patients in the adjuvant PF and observation groups, respectively). Median follow-up was 4.3 years. The 5-year overall survival were 69.1% and 57.4% in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy and observation groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.84; p = 0.003), even after adjusting for baseline prognostic factors (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.86; p = 0.005). Distant metastasis-free survival at 12 months was higher in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy group than in the observation group (98% vs 84.8%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with freedom from distant metastasis (HR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.46; p = 0.003). Conclusion Prospective evaluation of adjuvant PF chemotherapy in N3 NPC patients treated with definitive CCRT is warranted because adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and decreased risk of distant metastasis.


2020 ◽  
pp. 014556132090895
Author(s):  
Nabil Toumi ◽  
Sana Ennouri ◽  
Ilhem Charfeddine ◽  
Jamel Daoud ◽  
Afef Khanfir

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics as well as the therapeutic results in patients with locoregional (LR) relapse after treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with local and/or regional recurrent NPC over 13 years (2003-2015). Results: Twenty-five patients were treated for local or/and local–regional recurrence of NPC. The rate of LR relapse was 7.2%. The mean age of the patients was 46 ± 13.9 years. The median time to relapse was 25 months. The recurrence was nasopharyngeal in 17 patients, nasopharyngeal and neck lymph nodes in 7 patients, and neck lymph nodes in 1 patient. Fifteen relapsed patients had a locally advanced disease (rT3-rT4). Patients who had initially T1 or T2 tumor had a locally advanced relapsed disease (rT3rT4) in 27.3% and patients whose disease was initially classified as T3 or T4 had a locally advanced relapsed disease (rT3T4) in 85.7% ( P = .005, Fisher test). Twelve patients had chemotherapy after relapse. Chemotherapy was followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in 3 patients and by radiotherapy (RT) in 4 patients. Nine patients had concurrent chemoradiotherapy and 1 patient had exclusive RT. The overall survival (OS) at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was, respectively, 58%, 18%, and 10%. The OS was significantly higher in patients with good performance status at the time of relapse (World Health Organization = 1; P = .01) and in patients with late relapse (after 2 years; P = .03). Conclusions: Locoregional relapse rate in our study was 7.2%. Locoregional reirradiation was the mainstay treatment modality in relapsed NPC. Relapsed NPC had a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 18%. The OS was significantly higher in patients with good performance status and in patients with late relapse (after 2 years).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document