scholarly journals Regorafenib pharmacokinetics and its association with real-world treatment outcomes

Author(s):  
Masahide Fukudo ◽  
Keiko Asai ◽  
Chikayoshi Tani ◽  
Masashi Miyamoto ◽  
Katsuyoshi Ando ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Despite the established activity of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its toxicity profile has limited clinical use. We aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of regorafenib and its active metabolites M-2/M-5, and to clarify the relationships between total drug-related exposure and clinical outcomes in real-world practice.Methods Blood samples were obtained at steady state in Cycle 1 in patients treated with regorafenib. Plasma concentrations of regorafenib and its metabolites were measured by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The efficacy and safety endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), respectively. The exposure–response relationships were assessed.Results Thirty-four Japanese patients with advanced cancers were enrolled (CRC, n = 26; GIST and HCC, each n = 4). Nine patients started regorafenib treatment at the recommended dose of 160 mg once daily (3 weeks on / 1 week off), while the other patients received a reduced starting dose to minimize toxicities. The median PFS was significantly longer in patients achieving total trough concentrations (Ctrough) of regorafenib and M-2/M-5 ≥2.9 µg/mL than those who did not (112 vs. 57 days; p = 0.044). Furthermore, the cumulative incidence of DLTs during the first 2 cycles was significantly higher in patients with summed Ctrough levels ≥4.3 µg/mL than in others (p = 0.0003).Conclusions Dose titration of regorafenib to achieve drug-related Ctrough levels in Cycle 1 between 2.9 and 4.3 µg/mL may improve the efficacy and safety, warranting further investigation in a larger patient population.

Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Takeshi Hatanaka ◽  
Atsushi Naganuma ◽  
Mitsuhiko Shibasaki ◽  
Tatsuya Kohga ◽  
Yosuke Arai ◽  
...  

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab treatment under real-world conditions and to clarify the role of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score in predicting outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between June 2019 and May 2020, a total of 16 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with ramucirumab in Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital and its affiliated hospitals was included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median age was 71 (interquartile range [IQR] 65–74) years old, and 12 patients (75.0%) were male. The modified ALBI (mALBI) grade was 1, 2a, and 2b at baseline in 4 (25.0%), 3 (18.8%), and 9 patients (56.3%), respectively. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage was intermediate and advanced stage in 1 (6.3%) and 15 patients (93.8%), respectively. The serum α-fetoprotein at baseline was 4,911 (IQR 2,091–17,377) ng/mL. The disease control rate in patients with mALBI grade1 + 2a was significantly higher than in those with mALBI grade 2b (100 vs. 28.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.028). The patients with mALBI grade 1 + 2a had a significantly better overall survival (OS) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with mALBI grade 2b (median OS 6.7 vs. 3.0 months; <i>p</i> = 0.036, median PFS 7.5 vs. 1.4 months; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The number of cycles of ramucirumab treatment was significantly correlated with the ALBI score (<i>r</i> = −0.452, <i>p</i> = 0.030). The patients with mALBI grade 1 + 2a showed a low incidence of adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Advanced HCC patients with mALBI grade 1 + 2a may be a good indication for ramucirumab treatment.


Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Myung Ji Goh ◽  
Joo Hyun Oh ◽  
Yewan Park ◽  
Jihye Kim ◽  
Wonseok Kang ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Lenvatinib has been recently approved as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib therapy in a real-world practice and to find prognostic factors related to survival and disease progression. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted on 111 consecutive patients who had unresectable HCC and were treated with lenvatinib at Samsung Medical Center from October 2018 to March 2020. Efficacy was determined using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria in 111 patients who completed 1st tumor assessment. Safety was evaluated in 116 HCC patients including 5 patients who discontinued lenvatinib due to adverse events (AEs) before 1st tumor assessment using Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5.0. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 111 patients with a median age of 59 years were analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 6.2 (4.4–9.0) months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival was 10.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 6.2 months. Based on mRECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 18.9% and disease control rate was 75.7%. AEs developed in 86/116 (74.1%) patients, and grade ≥3 AEs developed in 16/116 (13.8%) patients. Diarrhea, hand-foot skin rash, abdominal pain, hypertension, and anorexia were identified as the AEs with the highest frequencies of any grade. REFLECT eligibility criteria including tumor extent ≥50% liver occupation or inadequate bone marrow function and occurrence of anorexia were prognostic factors for survival, and occurrence of diarrhea was a favorable factor for disease progression. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Lenvatinib therapy showed a favorable efficacy and safety in a real-world practice. The REFLECT eligibility criteria and specific AEs could be one of the prognostic markers.


Author(s):  
Chun-Lan Chang ◽  
Xue Song ◽  
Tina Willson ◽  
Carol Duffy

Background: Based on the PARADIGM-HF trial, sacubitril/valsartan was approved for the treatment of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. This study provides an early view of its real-world utilization and dosing in the US before recent guideline updates. Methods: Adult patients with >=1 sacubitril/valsartan claim in 7/7/2015 - 3/31/2016 were selected from a large national claims dataset; their 1st sacubitril/valsartan claim was the index date. Data was required for >=24 months pre-index and >=3 months post-index. Dose at index and the maximum dose achieved post-index were obtained. Dose up-titration, defined as 1st appearance of a sacubitril/valsartan claim with a dose increase from the index strength, and the time to 1st dose increase were reported. Results: Among 981 qualified patients with a mean follow-up of 185 (SD ±81) days, 25% commenced sacubitril/valsartan on the suggested prescribing information (PI) starting dose of 49/51 mg b.i.d.; 58% started on 24/26 mg b.i.d.; 4% started on an even lower dose, and 13% indexed at the target maintenance dose of 97/103 b.i.d.. The target maintenance dose of 97/103 mg b.i.d. was achieved in 30% of patients. For those 856 patients indexing on <=49/51/ mg b.i.d., 58% had no dose up-titration post-index; 31% took >4 weeks to have up-titration initiated and 11% initiated up-titration within 4 weeks. Only 25% of Medicare patients compared to 35% of Commercial patients achieved the target dose of 97/103mg b.i.d.. (Table 1) Conclusion: Most patients commenced sacubitril/valsartan at lower doses than recommended in the PI and were poorly optimized, with the majority of patients having no upward dose titration. Approximately 13% actually indexed at the target maintenance dose. The reasons for these findings need further exploration. Healthcare providers should consider following the appropriate starting doses, with timely dose adjustment of sacubitril/valsartan as recommended in the PI to ensure patients receive the full clinical benefit of this medication as demonstrated in the PARADIGM-HF trial.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 275-275
Author(s):  
Carla Pires Amaro ◽  
Michael J Allen ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Erica S Tsang ◽  
Howard John Lim ◽  
...  

275 Background: The REFLECT trial establishedlenvatinib (LEN) as a first-line treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Compared to sorafenib (S), LEN has a higher objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) with a slightly different toxicity profile. The aim of this study was to gather data regarding the efficacy and safety of LEN when used in the real-world treatment of HCC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine LEN use in HCC patients treated outside of Asia. Methods: HCC patients treated with LEN from 10 cancer centers in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and Nova Scotia between July 2018 to July 2020 were included. Overall survival (OS), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and ORR were retrospectively analyzed and compared across first- and second-to-fourth line use of LEN. ORR was determined radiographically according to the treating physician´s opinion in clinical notes and not RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST. Toxicities were also examined. Results: A total of 220 patients were included in this analysis. Median age was 67 years, 80% were men and 25.5% East Asian. The most frequent causes of liver disease were hepatitis C (37%) and B (26%). 62% of patients received any localized treatment before LEN, of those 26% had TACE, 15% TARE and 7.7% had liver transplant. Before starting LEN 29% of patients were ECOG 0 and 59% were ECOG 1. Most patients were Child-Pugh A (81%) and BCLC stage C (75.5%). Main portal vein invasion was present in 14% of the patients. Median follow-up was 4.5 months. A total of 173 patients (79%) received LEN as first line therapy and 47 patients (21%) were treated in second-to-fourth line. Of patients receiving LEN in first line, 22 (13%) started treatment with S, but switched to LEN before progression due to poor tolerance of S. ORR, DCR, PFS and OS are shown in the table. Toxicities occurred in 86% of patients and led to dose reductions in 76 (35%) patients and drug discontinuation in 53 (24%) patients. The most common side effects were fatigue (59%), hypertension (41%), decreased appetite (25%) and diarrhea (22%). Conclusions: Outcomes of HCC patients treated in Canada with LEN in the first line are comparable to those demonstrated in the REFLECT trial, despite the inclusion of Child-Pugh B and ECOG >1 patients. LEN use in second or later lines also showed similar outcomes, although more conclusions are difficult to draw due to the small numbers. LEN appears to be effective and safe in real world practice outside of Asia in first- and second-to-fourth line treatment of HCC. [Table: see text]


Liver Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaekyung Cheon ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
Yeonghak Bang ◽  
Neung Hwa Park ◽  
Jung Woo Shin ◽  
...  

Introduction/Objective: Lenvatinib demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the randomized phase III REFLECT trial. Considering the discrepancies in patients between clinical trial data and daily practice, an account of practical experience is needed. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in which 3 tertiary referral centers participated. A total of 92 patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib between September 2018 and January 2020 were analyzed. Results: Lenvatinib was used as the first-line therapy for 67 (72.8%) patients, and for 25 (27.2%) patients previously treated with other systemic therapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors. At the time of initiation of lenvatinib, 74 (80.4%) and 18 (19.6%) patients were classified as Child-Pugh A and B, respectively. Thirty-five patients (38.0%) had extensive disease that would have excluded them from the REFLECT trial. In the Child-Pugh A group, the response rate graded according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 was 21.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1–6.1) months, and overall survival (OS) was 10.7 (95% CI 4.8–16.5) months for patients treated with first-line lenvatinib (n = 57). With second- or later-line lenvatinib (n = 17), median PFS and OS were 4.1 (95% CI 3.1–5.1) and 6.4 (95% CI 5.1–7.7) months, respectively. In the Child-Pugh B group (n = 18), median PFS and OS were 2.6 (95% CI 0.6–4.6) and 5.3 (95% CI 2.0–8.5) months, respectively. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were hyperbilirubinemia (n = 8; 8.7%), AST elevation (n = 6; 6.5%), and diarrhea (n = 5; 5.4%) across all study patients. Conclusions: In this real-world study, lenvatinib was found to be well tolerated and effective in more heterogeneous HCC patient populations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1267-1275
Author(s):  
Akira Takahashi ◽  
Kenjiro Namikawa ◽  
Dai Ogata ◽  
Eiji Nakano ◽  
Shunichi Jinnai ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 821-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiro Kudo ◽  
Takeshi Kato ◽  
Yoshinori Kagawa ◽  
Daisuke Sakai ◽  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
...  

821 Background: The CORRECT study showed significant overall survival (OS) improvement in the regorafenib (REG), compared with the placebo group in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) which progressed after standard chemotherapy. In Japanese subgroup analysis, the hazard ratio of OS also indicated a tendency similar to overall population. The standard starting dose of REG is 160mg/body/d, and not adjusted according to body weight and height, race of the patients, or other parameters, however, some cases require dose reduction to 120mg/d or less due to adverse events (AE). Dose modification due to AE was observed frequently in Japanese compared with non-Japanese during the study (84.6% and 51.3%). Therefore, we performed this dose titration study to investigate efficacy and safety of REG. Methods: This single arm, multicenter phase II study evaluated lower initial dose of REG (120mg/d, for 21 days, followed by 7-day break) in mCRC progressed after standard chemotherapy. Dose escalation to 160mg was allowed in 2nd and subsequent cycle, if patients developed < grade 2 AE, except for liver toxicity. Patients underwent radiographic evaluation every 8 wks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+SD ≥ 6 wks). The major secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), OS and safety. Results: Between September 10, 2015, and March 7, 2017, total 60 patients were enrolled into the study. Median age was 68.5 (range: 30-84), and ECOG PS 0/1 were 70%/30%. DCR was 36.7% (22/60); 7% (4/60) have had SD for 6 months or longer. Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.8 - 2.8). 3.3% of patients (2/60) had protocol defined REG dose escalation to 160mg; one case was from the cycle 2, and the other case was from the cycle 4. 42% (25/60) had dose reduction to 80mg due to AE, and that dose reduction was needed in 10% (6/60) at the first cycle. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 55% (33/60). Conclusions: Starting dose of REG 120mg appears to have comparable efficacy to 160mg. Adverse events were generally consistent with the known safety profile of REG in this setting. Final results with additional follow-up on efficacy and safety outcome measures will be provided at the meeting. Clinical trial information: UMIN000018968.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Shen ◽  
Xian-Shuo Cheng ◽  
Wei-Xun Chunyu ◽  
Hong-Tao Zhang ◽  
Cui-Feng Xia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Large scale randomized trials have demonstrated that bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy as first-line or second-line treatment has significant survival benefits. We aim to explore the clinical impact of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in first-line or second-line in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods The medical records of patients with CRC who received bevacizumab at first or second-line of treatment were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy by survival endpoints i.e. overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcome was to evaluate its safety by incidence of adverse events (AE). Results Fifty-one patients with CRC had met the selection criteria for treatment with bevacizumab to either cetuximab or FOLFOX or both. The median age was 54 years. During follow-up, ten patients had exhibited progression after treatment while 5 patients died. The median OS and PFS of the overall population were not reached. The Cox proportional regression analysis revealed no significant prognostic factors of OS and PFS for treatment with bevacizumab in various demographic subgroups. The 1-year PFS rates of all 51 patients was 76%. The 1-year and 3-year OS rates for all 51 patients were 95% and 88%, respectively. Toxicities were usually mild in nature, with nausea, vomiting, hand and foot syndrome, neutropenia, asthenia and palpitation being the commonly reported adverse events. Conclusion In this real-world setting, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is limited and further research is warranted as to whether bevacizumab with chemotherapy is an optimal treatment as first-line or second-line therapy in Chinese CRC patients.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1990-1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nianhang Chen ◽  
Abderrahmane Laadem ◽  
Dawn M. Wilson ◽  
Xiaosha Zhang ◽  
Matthew L. Sherman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Luspatercept is a modified ActRIIB-IgG Fc fusion protein that corrects ineffective erythropoiesis. In phase 2 studies, luspatercept treatment led to long-term increases in hemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduction in transfusion burden in patients (pts) with IPSS Low- or Intermediate-1-risk MDS. Aims: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of luspatercept and explore the exposure-response relationship for efficacy and safety in pts with MDS, thereby informing selection of the starting dose for phase 3 studies of luspatercept in MDS. Methods : PK, safety, and efficacy data were collected from two phase 2 studies (base and extension). In the base study, luspatercept was administered once every 3 weeks by subcutaneous injection to sequential cohorts for up to 5 doses. The base study included a dose-finding phase (at fixed doses from 0.125 to 1.75 mg/kg), and an expansion cohort (at a starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg followed by individual dose titration up to 1.75 mg/kg). Pts completing the base study were eligible to enroll in an extension study, where they continued to receive luspatercept every 3 weeks for up to 24 months. Pts who had treatment interruption for ≥ 3 months before enrolling in the extension study received a starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg (followed by dose titration) and were treated as "new" pts in the exposure-response analysis. The main exposure endpoint was area under the luspatercept serum concentration−time curve (AUC). Clinical endpoints included Hb increase, transfusion reduction, and drug-related adverse events (AEs) in weeks 1-15. Responders were defined as pts achieving erythroid hematologic improvement (HI-E) per IWG criteria, i.e. Hb increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL for 8 weeks in low transfusion burden (LTB) pts, and transfusion reduction ≥ 4 RBC units/8 weeks in high transfusion burden (HTB) pts. Results : As of July 20, 2016, preliminary data were available for 66 pts: 22 LTB pts (baseline Hb 6.4-10.1 g/dL) and 44 HTB pts (baseline transfusion burden 4-18 units/8 weeks). Median age was 72 years (range 27-90); 41% were female. A total of 39 pts were eligible for individual dose titration; of these, ~49% had ≥ 1 dose escalation (to 1.33 mg/kg) and ~15% had 2 dose escalations (to 1.75 mg/kg) in the first 3 months. Luspatercept PK was adequately described by a 1-compartment PK model with linear absorption and elimination. Half-life of luspatercept in serum was ~10-14 days across doses. Body weight positively correlated with luspatercept clearance and its volume of distribution. Baseline transfusion burden (LTB vs HTB) and erythropoietin (EPO) level (10-4,752 U/L) had no significant effect on luspatercept PK. In LTB pts who were transfusion-free on treatment, higher luspatercept AUC correlated with greater Hb increase (P < 0.01). In HTB pts, AUC correlated with reduced transfusion units in pts with baseline EPO ≤ 500 U/L (P< 0.01) but not in pts with baseline EPO > 500 U/L. Median AUC was 148 d·µg/mL in LTB responders and 185 d·µg/mL in HTB responders. Luspatercept AUC also correlated with frequency of IWG HI-E responders for LTB pts, HTB pts (baseline EPO ≤ 500 U/L), and the 2 groups combined. In pts requiring transfusion (≥ 2 units/8 weeks) with baseline EPO ≤ 500 U/L, baseline transfusion burden was a significant predictor of achieving transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks, and higher luspatercept AUC was associated with greater TI rate after accounting for baseline transfusion burden. Thus, individualized dosing based on baseline transfusion burden may increase the likelihood of achieving TI in HTB pts. Population PK simulation predicted that the starting dose resulting in 90% of LTB pts and 50% of HTB pts achieving efficacious AUC for HI-E would be 1 mg/kg and 1.1 mg/kg, respectively; higher doses would result in a higher proportion of pts achieving efficacious AUC. There was no significant relationship between severity and frequency of drug-related AEs and luspatercept serum exposure. Conclusions: Higher luspatercept serum exposure correlated with greater erythroid hematopoietic response for both LTB and HTB pts. Exposure-response modeling and PK simulation support a phase 3 starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg and intra-patient dose escalation up to 1.75 mg/kg according to erythroid hematopoietic response. A phase 3 study of luspatercept in regularly transfused ring sideroblast positive patients with lower-risk MDS according to IPSS-R criteria is ongoing (MEDALIST study; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02631070). Disclosures Chen: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Laadem:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wilson:Acceleron Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Acceleron Pharma: Employment. Sherman:Acceleron Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Ritland:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Attie:Acceleron Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang ◽  
Tsuchiya ◽  
Kurosaki ◽  
Yasui ◽  
Inada ◽  
...  

Background: We aimed to explore the relative dose intensity (RDI) and post-regorafenib treatments in regorafenib therapy. Methods: The medical records of 38 patients treated with regorafenib between July 2017 and June 2019 at our institution were collected. The RDI of regorafenib for the first month (1M-RDI) was calculated. Results: The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 12.4 and 3.7 months. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 13.2% and 71.1%. The median total dose of regorafenib in the first month was 2080 mg (240–3360 mg), and the median 1M-RDI was 61.9% (7.1%–100%). Patients with 1M-RDI ≥ 50% showed significantly longer OS and PFS than patients with 1M-RDI < 50% (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08–0.48, p = 0.0004 and HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.08–0.52, p = 0.0008). A 1M-RDI ≥ 50% (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06–0.55, p = 0.002) and hand–foot skin reaction (HR 0.03, 95% CI 0.008–0.16, p < 0.0001) were independently associated with OS. Post-regorafenib therapies were performed in 19 (86.4%) of 22 patients who had stopped regorafenib due to disease progression. Conclusion: A 1M-RDI ≥ 50% is clinically significant. Post-regorafenib therapies are commonly performed in real-world practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document