scholarly journals Obesity is a Risk Factor for Epidural Lipomatosis: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bi Zhang ◽  
Haifeng Yuan ◽  
Lihong Hu ◽  
Muhammad Saad
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis ◽  
Epidural Lipomatosis ◽  
Bias Risk ◽  
Spinal Epidural

Abstract Background: Many studies have investigated the relationship between spinal epidural lipomatosis and obesity, no meta-analysis of studies have provided definitive evidence. To summarize the evidence of associations between obesity factors and spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) and to evaluate the strength and validity of these associations. Methods: Electronic databases such as Wiley Online Library, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library were searched and manual retrieval of references, the time limit was from the establishment of the database to May 2020. The included literature was case-control studies that reported body mass index (BMI) and SEL correlation, and excluded any primary and secondary tumors or other compression diseases in the spinal canal. Methodological quality evaluations of the included studies were assessed using the bias risk assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane Guidelines. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: Finally, ten studies were included for systematic review, all of which were observational studies with mixed bias risk. These studies involved 1,541 patients, with an average age of 54.9 to 73.6 years, and 60.2 percent of the participants were male. The sample sizes for the included studies ranged from 28 to 398. The results of meta-analysis showed that high BMI was one of the factors affecting SEL. All reviews had a high risk of bias, and the most common source of bias was that there was no strict unified case diagnosis standard between researches, and some studies (four items) did not clearly describe the confounders that they controlled. Conclusions: We suggest that physicians should consider obesity as a factor leading to SEL, and to control body mass index actively should be considered as the preferred treatment strategy before surgical intervention is conducted.

scholarly journals Obesity is a risk factor for epidural lipomatosis: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949902110273
Author(s):  
Bi Zhang ◽  
Haifeng Yuan ◽  
Lihong Hu ◽  
Muhammad Saad
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Body Mass Index ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Epidural Lipomatosis ◽  
Bias Risk ◽  
Control Body ◽  
Online Library

Purpose: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence of associations between obesity factors and spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) and to evaluate the strength and validity of these associations. Methods: Electronic databases such as Wiley Online Library, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library were searched and manual retrieval of references, the time limit was from the establishment of the database to May 2020. Methodological quality evaluations of the included studies were assessed using the bias risk assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane Guidelines. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: Finally, seven studies were included for meta-analysis, all of which were observational studies with mixed bias risk. These studies involved 807 patients, with an average age of 64 to 73.6 years, and 59.4 percent of the participants were male. The sample sizes for the included studies ranged from 28 to 288. The results of meta-analysis showed that high body mass index (BMI) was one of the factors affecting SEL ( P < 0.01, MD 1.37, 95% CI [0.81, 1.92]). All reviews had a high risk of bias, and the most common source of bias was that there was no strict unified case diagnosis standard between researches, and some studies (four items) did not clearly describe the confounders that they controlled. Conclusions: We suggest that physicians should consider high BMI as a factor leading to SEL, and to control body weight actively should be considered as the preferred treatment strategy before surgical intervention is conducted.

scholarly journals Impact of child summertime obesity interventions on body mass index, and weight-related behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e017144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennette P Moreno ◽  
Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im ◽  
Elizabeth M Vaughan ◽  
Tom Baranowski
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
School Age

IntroductionIn previous studies, it has been found that on average, children consistently gained weight during the summer months at an increased rate compared with the 9-month school year. This contributed to an increased prevalence of overweight and obesity in children. Several obesity-related interventions have occurred during or targeting the summer months. We propose to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of obesity prevention and treatment interventions for school-age children conducted during the summer or targeting the summer months when children are not in school on their body mass index (BMI), or weight-related behaviours.Methods and analysesA literature search will be conducted by the first author (JPM) using MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Proquest Dissertations and Theses databases from the date of inception to present. Studies must examine interventions that address the modification or promotion of weight-related behaviours (eg, dietary patterns, eating behaviours, physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour or sleep) and target school-age children (ages 5–18). The primary outcomes will be changes from baseline to postintervention and/or the last available follow-up measurement in weight, BMI, BMI percentile, standardised BMI or per cent body fat. Secondary outcomes will include changes in dietary intake, PA, sedentary behaviour or sleep. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised and non-randomised studies, as appropriate.Ethics and disseminationBecause this is a protocol for a systematic review, ethics approval will not be required. The findings will be disseminated via presentations at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. All amendments to the protocol will be documented and dated and reported in the PROSPERO trial registry.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016041750

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Banxia Formulae for Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Yan-Hua Lin ◽  
Cong Chen ◽  
Xiu Zhao ◽  
Yi-Fei Mao ◽  
Guang-Xin Xiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Bias Risk

Objective. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Banxia (Pinellia Tuber) formulae in the treatment of insomnia compared with those of conventional western medicines. Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of Banxia formulae in the treatment of insomnia were searched from the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Wanfang database. The literature collected was from the time when the databases were established to April 2020. Quality assessment and meta-analysis were conducted by using Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and RevMan 5.2, respectively. Publication bias was assessed by Egger’s test. Results. Fourteen RCTs with 910 participants were identified. A total of 46 traditional Chinese medicines involving 2 different dosage forms were used in the included studies. Meta-analysis indicated that Banxia formulae had more significant effects on improving the total effective rate (RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.31), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, MD = −1.05, 95% CI −1.63 to −0.47), and the TCM syndrome score (SMD = −0.78, 95% CI −1.18 to −0.39). Meanwhile, on reducing adverse events, Banxia formulae also showed an advantage (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.93). Conclusion. According to the current studies, the efficacy of Banxia formulae in the treatment of insomnia is better than that of the conventional western medicines, and its safety is relatively stable. However, due to the limitations of this study, further research and evaluation are needed.

scholarly journals Diabetes, hypertension, body mass index, smoking and COVID-19-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e052777
Author(s):  
Yahya Mahamat-Saleh ◽  
Thibault Fiolet ◽  
Mathieu Edouard Rebeaud ◽  
Matthieu Mulot ◽  
Anthony Guihur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Relative Risks

ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies to investigate the association between diabetes, hypertension, body mass index (BMI) or smoking with the risk of death in patients with COVID-19 and to estimate the proportion of deaths attributable to these conditions.MethodsRelevant observational studies were identified by searches in the PubMed, Cochrane library and Embase databases through 14 November 2020. Random-effects models were used to estimate summary relative risks (SRRs) and 95% CIs. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane methods and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.ResultsA total of 186 studies representing 210 447 deaths among 1 304 587 patients with COVID-19 were included in this analysis. The SRR for death in patients with COVID-19 was 1.54 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.64, I2=92%, n=145, low certainty) for diabetes and 1.42 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.54, I2=90%, n=127, low certainty) for hypertension compared with patients without each of these comorbidities. Regarding obesity, the SSR was 1.45 (95% CI 1.31 to 1.61, I2=91%, n=54, high certainty) for patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 compared with those with BMI <30 kg/m2 and 1.12 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.17, I2=68%, n=25) per 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI. There was evidence of a J-shaped non-linear dose–response relationship between BMI and mortality from COVID-19, with the nadir of the curve at a BMI of around 22–24, and a 1.5–2-fold increase in COVID-19 mortality with extreme obesity (BMI of 40–45). The SRR was 1.28 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.40, I2=74%, n=28, low certainty) for ever, 1.29 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.62, I2=84%, n=19) for current and 1.25 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.42, I2=75%, n=14) for former smokers compared with never smokers. The absolute risk of COVID-19 death was increased by 14%, 11%, 12% and 7% for diabetes, hypertension, obesity and smoking, respectively. The proportion of deaths attributable to diabetes, hypertension, obesity and smoking was 8%, 7%, 11% and 2%, respectively.ConclusionOur findings suggest that diabetes, hypertension, obesity and smoking were associated with higher COVID-19 mortality, contributing to nearly 30% of COVID-19 deaths.Trial registration numberCRD42020218115.

scholarly journals A New Subform? Fast-Progressing, Severe Neurological Deterioration Caused by Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 366
Author(s):  
Thiemo Florin Dinger ◽  
Maija Susanna Eerikäinen ◽  
Anna Michel ◽  
Oliver Gembruch ◽  
Marvin Darkwah Oppong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Neurological Deterioration ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Critically Ill Patient ◽  
Western World ◽  
Spinal Epidural Lipomatosis ◽  
Hypertrophic Growth ◽  
Epidural Lipomatosis ◽  
Spinal Epidural

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition caused by hypertrophic growth of epidural fat. The prevalence of SEL in the Western world is approximately 1 in 40 patients and is likely to increase due to current medical and socio-economic developments. Rarely, SEL can lead to rapid severe neurological deterioration. The pathophysiology, optimal treatment, and outcome of these patients remain unclear. This study aims to widen current knowledge about this “SEL subform” and to improve its clinical management. A systematic literature review according to the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was used to identify publications before 7 November 2021 reporting on acute/rapidly progressing, severe SEL. The final analysis comprised 12 patients with acute, severe SEL. The majority of the patients were male (9/12) and multimorbid (10/12). SEL mainly affected the thoracic part of the spinal cord (11/12), extending a median number of 7 spinal levels (range: 4–19). Surgery was the only chosen therapy (11/12), except for one critically ill patient. Regarding the outcome, half of the patients regained independence (6/11; = modified McCormick Scale ≤ II). Acute, severe SEL is a rare condition, mainly affecting multimorbid patients. The prognosis is poor in nearly 50% of the patients, even with maximum therapy. Further research is needed to stratify patients for conservative or surgical treatment.

scholarly journals Prevalence of erectile dysfunction patients with diabetes mellitus and its association with body mass index and glycated hemoglobin in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wondimeneh Shibabaw Shiferaw ◽  
Tadesse Yirga Akalu ◽  
Yared Asmare Aynalem
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Glycated Hemoglobin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

AbstractBackgroundMortality and morbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is attributed to both the micro-vascular and macro-vascular complications. Variation among primary studies was seen on the prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Africa. Therefore, this study was aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of erectile dysfunction patients with diabetes mellitus and its association with body mass index and glycated hemoglobin in Africa.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Scopus, Psyinfo, Africa online journal and Google Scholar were searched. A funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to see publication bias. I-squared statistic was used to check heterogeneity of studies. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was applied to estimate the pooled effect size. The subgroup and Meta regression analysis were conducted by country, sample size, and year of publication. Sensitivity analysis was deployed to see the effect of single study on the overall estimation. STATA version 14 statistical software was used for meta-analysis.ResultA total of 20 studies with 5,177 study participants were included to estimate the pooled prevalence. The pooled prevalence of erectile dysfunction patients with diabetes mellitus was 61.62% (95% CI: 48.35–74.9). BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 (AOR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.73 –2.16), and glycated hemoglobin ≥ 7% (AOR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.5–5.9), were identified factors though not statistically significant associated with erectile dysfunction.ConclusionsThe prevalence of erectile dysfunction in Africa remains high. Therefore, situation based interventions and country context specific preventive strategies could be developed to reduce the magnitude of erectile dysfunction among patients with diabetes mellitus.

scholarly journals Association of Maternal Body Mass Index With Risk of Infant Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nana Huo ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Lina Wang ◽  
Wenhui Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Infant Mortality ◽  
Neonatal Mortality ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Early Neonatal Mortality ◽  
Maternal Overweight ◽  
Maternal Bmi

Objective: This study presumed that a high or low body mass index (BMI) might increase the risk of infant mortality. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to systematically assess the association between maternal BMI and the risk of infant mortality.Methods: The electronic databases, including Pubmed, Embase database, and Cochrane Library, were systemically searched by two investigators from inception to November 26th, 2020, with no language restriction. In parallel, a dose-response was assessed.Results: Finally, 22 cohort studies involving 13,532,293 participants were included into this paper, which showed that compared with normal BMI, maternal overweight significantly increased the risks of infant mortality [risk ratio (RR), 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13–1.19], neonatal mortality (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08–1.39), early neonatal mortality (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.26–1.92) and post-neonatal mortality (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.29). Similarly, maternal obesity significantly increased the risk of infant mortality (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.41–1.70), neonatal mortality (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.28–1.67), early neonatal mortality (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13–1.67), and post-neonatal mortality (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03–1.65), whereas maternal underweight potentially decreased the risk of infant mortality (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88–0.98). In the dose-response analysis, the risk of infant mortality significantly increased when the maternal BMI was &gt;25 kg/m2.Conclusions: Maternal overweight or obesity significantly increases the risks of infant mortality, neonatal mortality, early neonatal mortality, and post-neonatal mortality compared with normal BMI in a dose-dependent manner. Besides, maternal underweight will not increase the risk of infant mortality, neonatal mortality, early neonatal mortality, or postneonatal mortality; instead, it tends to decrease the risk of infant mortality. Early weight management may provide potential benefits to infants, and more large-scale prospective studies are needed to verify this finding in the future.

The effectiveness of telemedicine on body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 389-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Wu Huang ◽  
Yi-Ying Lin ◽  
Nai-Yuan Wu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Obese People ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Object The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine on changes in body mass index for overweight and obese people as well as for diabetes and hypertension patients. Methods A systematic review of articles published before 31 August 2014, was conducted using searches of Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus. The inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials that compared telemedicine interventions with usual care or standard treatment in adults and reported a change in body mass index. A meta-analysis was conducted for eligible studies, and the primary outcome was a change in body mass index. Subgroup analysis was performed for the type of telemedicine, main purpose of intervention, and length of intervention. Results Twenty-five randomised controlled trials comprising 6253 people were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses. The length of intervention ranged from nine weeks to two years. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences in body mass index changes (pooled difference in means = –0.49, 95% confidence interval –0.63 to –0.34, p < 0.001) between the telemedicine and control groups. The subgroup analyses found that either Internet-based or telephone-based intervention was associated with greater changes in body mass index than in controls. Telemedicine intervention was effective in improving body mass index whether it was used for diabetes control, hypertension control, weight loss, or increasing physical activity and was also effective for people with and without diabetes or hypertension. However, only interventions with a duration ≥ 6 months significantly decreased body mass index compared to controls. Conclusion Both patients with chronic disease and overweight/obese people could benefit from telemedicine interventions. We suggest that an effective telemedicine approach should be longer than six months and emphasise the importance of post-interventional follow-ups.

scholarly journals The J-Shaped Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Mortality in Patients With Covid-19: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A28-A29
Author(s):  
Khulood Bukhari ◽  
Huei-Kai Huang ◽  
Duan-Pei Hung ◽  
Carol Chiung-Hui Peng ◽  
Ming-Chieh Shih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Underweight Patients ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Introduction: Several studies have linked obesity to more severe illness and higher mortality in COVID-19 patients. However, the relationship between being underweight and COVID-19 mortality remains inconclusive. Previous dose-response meta-analyses did not enroll or specifically analyze the underweight population. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and mortality in both obese and underweight patients with COVID-19. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until August 12, 2020 using the keywords “COVID-19,” “body mass index,” “obesity,” “overweight”, and “underweight.” Three reviewers independently assessed the relevant articles, including the title, abstract, and full text, to identify eligible studies. We performed a two-stage random-effects dose-response meta-analysis, including only studies with at least three quantitative classifications for BMI. The nonlinear trend was evaluated using a restricted cubic splines model with three-knots at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by pooling only those studies which specifically evaluated underweight patients (BMI&lt;18.5 kg/m2). Results: Thirteen studies comprising 25,828 patients were included in the analysis. In the linear model, the mortality of patients with COVID-19 increased by 1.5% for each 1-kg/m2 increase in BMI (pooled relative risk [RR] =1.015, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.004−1.027). However, a significant non-linear relationship between BMI and mortality was observed (Wald test: Pnon-linearity&lt;0.001). We demonstrated a J-shaped curve, indicating that both underweight and obese patients had a higher mortality than those with normal weight. Interestingly, overweight patients (BMI, 25−30 kg/m2) seemed to have the lowest mortality risk. Using a BMI of 15 kg/m2 as the reference, the RRs of mortality decreased with BMI, and this trend continued until BMI of approximately 28 kg/m2 (RR=0.743, 95% CI=0.576−0.959). The relationship between BMI and mortality was then reversed, and an upward trend was observed when BMI exceeded 30 kg/m2; the RRs (95% CI) at BMIs 30, 35, 40, and 45 kg/m2 were 0.745 (0.570−0.974), 0.841 (0.643−1.100), 1.082 (0.850−1.377), and 1.457 (1.129−1.879), respectively. Conclusion: This study is the first dose-response meta-analysis that showed both underweight and obese COVID-19 patients are at higher risk of increased mortality. A J-curve relationship was demonstrated between BMI and COVID-19 mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document