scholarly journals Association of Chorioamnionitis With Failed Conversion of Epidural Labor Analgesia to Cesarean Delivery Anesthesia: a Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yumi Katakura ◽  
Yusuke Nagamine ◽  
Takahisa Goto ◽  
Hiroyuki Sumikura
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Labor Analgesia ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Emergency Cesarean

Abstract Background: This study examined the association between clinically diagnosed chorioamnionitis and failed conversion of epidural labor analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia.Methods: This retrospective cohort study, conducted in a single-center university hospital, enrolled term parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section after induction of epidural labor analgesia between September 2015 and May 2019. For the purpose of the study, all cases were re-examined to ensure that they fulfilled the criteria of chorioamnionitis, regardless of the actual indication for cesarean section proposed by obstetricians at the time of application. The primary outcome was failure of conversion of epidural labor analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between chorioamnionitis and failure of anesthesia for cesarean section.Results: Among the 180 parturients, it was found that 58 parturients (43.9%) fulfilled the criteria of chorioamnionitis. Failure of epidural conversion in the chorioamnionitis (+) group was significantly higher than that in the chorioamnionitis (-) group (46.6 % [27/58] vs. 18.9% [14/74], crude odds ratio = 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.7-8.3). After adjustment for potential confounders (age, body mass index, multiparity, and duration for epidural labor analgesia), chorioamnionitis was found to be associated with failure of anesthesia for cesarean sections (adjusted odds ratio = 3.6, 95% confidence interval 1.6-8.4). Conclusions: Chorioamnionitis is associated with the failed conversion of epidural labor analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia.

scholarly journals Understanding patterns and factors associated with place of death in patients with end-stage kidney disease: A retrospective cohort study

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Lovell ◽  
Chris Jones ◽  
Dawn Baynes ◽  
Sarah Dinning ◽  
Katie Vinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Renal Unit ◽  
End Stage Kidney Disease ◽  
End Stage

Background: Meeting place-of-death preferences is an important measure of the quality of end-of-life care. Systematic review shows that 42% of end-stage kidney disease patients prefer home death. Little research has been undertaken on place of death. Aim: To understand patterns of place of death in patients with end-stage kidney disease known in one UK renal unit. Design: A retrospective cohort study of all patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4–5, age ⩾75 and known to one UK renal unit, who died between 2006 and 2012. Patients were categorised into three management pathways: haemodialysis, conservative and pre-dialysis. Results: A total of 321 patients (mean age, 82.7; standard deviation, 5.21) died (61.7% male). In all, 62.9% died in hospital (95% confidence interval, 57.5%–68.1%), 21.8% died in their usual place of residence (95% confidence interval, 17.5%–26.6%) and 15.3% died in an inpatient palliative care unit (95% confidence interval, 11.6%–19.5%). Management pathway and living circumstances were most strongly associated with place of death. Patients on the conservative pathway had four times the odds of dying out of hospital (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.1–7.5; p < 0.01). Patients living alone were less likely to die out of hospital (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.6; p < 0.01). There were also changes in place of death over time, with more patients dying out of hospital in 2012 compared to 2006 (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–9.7; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Most patients with end-stage kidney disease die in hospital, but patients managed without dialysis are significantly more likely to die outside of hospital. Planning ahead is key to be able to meet preference for place of death.

scholarly journals Deep sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a retrospective cohort study*

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
María. E. García Guzzo ◽  
María Sol Fernandez ◽  
Delfina Sánchez Novas ◽  
Sandra S. Salgado ◽  
Sergio A. Terrasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Oxygen Desaturation ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Target Controlled Infusion

Abstract Background: Propofol sedation is effective for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, but its narrow therapeutic window highlights the importance of identifying an optimal administration technique regarding effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to determine the incidence of significant adverse events in adult patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopy under anaesthetist-performed sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion and determine its potentially improved safety over other anaesthetic strategies. Methods: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study took place in a tertiary referral university hospital. Medical records of 823 patients (age >18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification scores I–III) who had undergone elective gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol target-controlled infusion sedation during September 2018 were reviewed. Outcomes included hypoxia, hypotension, and bradycardia events, requirement of vasoactive drugs, unplanned tracheal intubation or supraglottic device insertion, and need for advanced cardiac life support. Results: The most frequently encountered adverse event was oxygen desaturation <95% with an incidence of 22.35%. Vasoactive drug administration, hypotension, and oxygen desaturation <90% followed, with incidences of 19.2%, 12.64%, and 9.92%, respectively. Only 0.5% of patients required advanced airway management. Multivariate analysis revealed an association between hypotension events, colonoscopic procedures, and propofol doses (odds ratio: 3.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.43 to 6.61; P=0.004 and odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.29; P=0.046). A strong dose-effect relationship was found between hypoxia and obesity; patients with body mass index ≥40 were nine times (odds ratio: 10.22, confidence interval: 95% 2.83 to 36.99) more likely to experience oxygen desaturation <90% events. Conclusions: Propofol sedation using target-controlled infusion appears to be a safe and effective anaesthetic technique for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with low rates of adverse events and could be more widely adopted in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Smoking increases the risk of surgical site infection after hydrocelectomy in adults: a retrospective cohort study in Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 950-956
Author(s):  
Thiago Silva Da Costa ◽  
Paulo José De Medeiros ◽  
Mauro José Costa Salles
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Smoking Habits ◽  
Site Infection

Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) following hydrocelectomy is relatively uncommon, but it is one of the main post-operative problems. We aimed to describe the prevalence of SSI following hydrocelectomy among adult patients, and to assess predisposing risk factors for infection. Methodology: This retrospective cohort study was carried out at a university hospital and included hydrocelectomies performed between January 2007 and December 2014. Diagnosis of SSI was performed according to the Center for Diseases Control (CDC) guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors. Results: A total of 196 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 30 patients were diagnosed with SSI (15.3%) and of these, 63.3% (19/30) were classified as having superficial SSI, while 36.7% (11/30) had deep SSI. The main signs and symptoms of infection were the presence of surgical wound secretion (70%) and inflammatory superficial signs such as hyperemia, edema and pain (60%). Among the 53 patients presenting chronic smoking habits, 26.4% (14⁄53) developed SSI, which was associated with a higher risk for SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 6.35, p < 0.01) in the univariate analysis. In the adjusted multivariable analysis, smoking habits were also statistically associated with SSI after hydrocelectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 6.24, p = 0.01). No pre-, intra-, or post-operative variable analyzed showed an independent association to SSI following hydrocelectomy. Conclusions: Smoking was the only independent modifiable risk factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis.

scholarly journals Deep Sedation using Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures: A Retrospective Cohort Study*

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARIA EUGENIA GARCIA GUZZO ◽  
María Sol Fernandez ◽  
Delfina Sánchez Novas ◽  
Sandra S. Salgado ◽  
Sergio A. Terrasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Oxygen Desaturation ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Target Controlled Infusion

Abstract Background: Propofol sedation is effective for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, but its narrow therapeutic window highlights the importance of identifying an optimal administration technique regarding effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to determine the incidence of significant adverse events in adult patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopy under anaesthetist-performed sedation using propofol target-controlled infusion and determine its potentially improved safety over other anaesthetic strategies. Methods: This single-centre, retrospective cohort study took place in a tertiary referral university hospital. Medical records of 823 patients (age >18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification scores I–III) who had undergone elective gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol target-controlled infusion sedation during September 2018 were reviewed. Outcomes included hypoxia, hypotension, and bradycardia events, requirement of vasoactive drugs, unplanned tracheal intubation or supraglottic device insertion, and need for advanced cardiac life support. Results: The most frequently encountered adverse event was oxygen desaturation <95% with an incidence of 22.35%. Vasoactive drug administration, hypotension, and oxygen desaturation <90% followed, with incidences of 19.2%, 12.64%, and 9.92%, respectively. Only 0.5% of patients required advanced airway management. Multivariate analysis revealed an association between hypotension events, colonoscopic procedures, and propofol doses (odds ratio: 3.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.43 to 6.61; P=0.004 and odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.29; P=0.046). A strong dose-effect relationship was found between hypoxia and obesity; patients with body mass index ≥40 were nine times (odds ratio: 10.22, confidence interval: 95% 2.83 to 36.99) more likely to experience oxygen desaturation <90% events. Conclusions: Propofol sedation using target-controlled infusion appears to be a safe and effective anaesthetic technique for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with low rates of adverse events and could be more widely adopted in clinical practice.

Iron Packaging Regulations in the United States and Pediatric Morbidity: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 375-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Leonard ◽  
Elizabeth Quaal Hines ◽  
Wendy Klein-Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Early Time ◽  
The United States ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Pediatric Morbidity

Iron poisoning was a leading cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. We sought to assess whether the removal of strict iron packaging requirements in 2003 resulted in an increase in iron-related morbidity and mortality in pediatric exposures. We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Poison Data System from 2000 to 2017. A total of 4110 exposures met inclusion criteria: 847 from before (2000-2003) and 3263 after removal of unit-dose package regulations (2004-2017). The incidence of any marker of severity (7.2% vs 3.8%; odds ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-0.69) and frequency of deferoxamine use were both higher in the early time period (2.6% vs 1.0%; odds ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.66). There was no difference in the frequency of key serious effects (acidosis, elevated transaminases, hypotension). Despite removal of iron packaging regulations in the United States, there continues to be a decrease in the incidence of severe iron exposures in children.

scholarly journals Association Between Use of Preoperative Antihypertensive Medication and 90-Day Mortality After Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 534-542
Author(s):  
Chami Im ◽  
Tak Kyu Oh ◽  
In-Ae Song
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Noncardiac Surgery ◽  
Hypertensive Patients

Abstract Background This study aimed to determine whether use of preoperative antihypertensive medication is associated with postoperative 90-day mortality in the hypertensive adult population that underwent elective noncardiac surgery. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, medical records of preoperative hypertensive patients who underwent noncardiac surgery at a single tertiary academic hospital from 2012 to 2018 were reviewed. Among the hypertensive patients, those prescribed to take antihypertensive medication continuously for more than 1 month before admission were defined as the HTN MED group; others were defined as the non-HTN MED group. Multiple imputation, propensity score (PS) matching, and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results Overall, 35,589 preoperative hypertensive adult patients (HTN MED group: 26,154 patients, non-HTN MED group: 9,435 patients) were included in the analysis. After PS matching, each group comprised 6,205 patients; thus, 12,410 patients were included in the final analysis. The odds for 90-day mortality of the HTN MED group in the PS-matched cohort were 41% lower (odds ratio: 0.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.41–0.85; P = 0.005) than those of the non-HTN MED group. Comparable results were obtained in the multivariable logistic regression analysis of the entire cohort (odds ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.41–0.72; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions This study showed that the use of preoperative antihypertensive medication was associated with lower 90-day mortality among hypertensive patients who underwent noncardiac surgery. Therefore, preoperative screening and treatment with appropriate antihypertensive medication are important for hypertensive patients.

scholarly journals Seven-day services in surgery and weekend effect at a Japanese teaching hospital: a retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaaki Matoba ◽  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
Hirotaka Ochiai ◽  
Takako Shirasawa ◽  
Takahiko Yoshimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Academic Medical Centre ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Hospitals deliver 24-hour, 7-day care on a 5-day workweek model, as fewer resources are available on weekends. In prior studies, poorer outcome with weekend admission or surgery was observed. The purpose of this study was to investigate if 7-day service at a hospital affects the likelihood of the “weekend effect” in surgery. The 7-day service included outpatient consultations, diagnostic examinations, and elective surgeries. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery between April 2014 and October 2016 at an academic medical centre in Tokyo, Japan. The main outcome measure was thirty-day in-hospital mortality from the index surgery. The characteristics of the participants were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test or the chi-squared test as appropriate. Logistic regression was used to test for differences in the mortality rate between the two groups, and propensity score adjustments were made. Results A total of 7442 surgeries were identified, of which, 1386 (19%) took place on the weekend. Of the 947 emergency surgeries, 25% (235) were performed on the weekend. The mortality following emergency weekday surgery was 21‰ (15/712), compared with 55‰ (13/235) following weekend surgery. Of the 6495 elective surgeries, 18% (1151) were performed on the weekend. The mortality following elective weekday surgery was 2.3‰ (12/5344), compared with 0.87‰ (1/1151) following weekend surgery. After adjustment, weekend surgeries were associated with an increased risk of death, especially in the emergency setting (emergency odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.2–6.5 vs. elective odds ratio: 0.4, 95% confidence interval: 0.05–3.2). Conclusions Patients undergoing surgery on weekends had higher 30-day mortality than did those undergoing surgery on weekdays, especially in the emergency setting. These findings have potential implications for health administrators and policy makers who may try to restructure the hospital workweek or consider weekend elective surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document