Agreement Analysis of LENSTAR With Other Four Techniques of Biometry Before Cataract Surgery.

Preoperative Assessment ◽

Ultrasound Biomicroscopy ◽

Axis Length

Abstract Purpose: To test whether some biometry measurements provided by the Lenstar LS900 compared well with the AL-Scan, Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera, Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM) and Tomey EM-3000. Methods: 201 patients having routine cataract surgery had standard preoperative assessment. In this clinical study, the axis length (AL) and lens thickness (LT) were taken by Lenstar LS900 and AL-Scan; anterior chamber depth (ACD) were taken by Lenstar LS900, A-scan, Pentacam and UBM; central corneal thickness (CCT) were taken by Lenstar LS900, Pentacam and Tomey EM-3000. The results were compared using a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson correlation calculations. Agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.Results: The highest correlation was found between Lenstar and AL-Scan for AL (r = 0.975; P <0.001). For LT measurements, the correlation between these two devices was also good (r = 0.699; P <0.001). Excellent correlations were showed between Lenstar and pentacam or UBM for ACD (r=0.948, 0.704, respectively; both P <0.001), but AL-scan (r=0.453, P <0.001). According to CCT, correlation between Lenstar and Pentacam or Tomey EM-3000 were both excellent (r=0.817, 0.882, respectively; both P <0.001).Conclusions: In phakic eyes of cataract patients, measurements of AL, LT, ACD, and CCT from Lenstar LS900 yielded results that correlated very well with other clinical instruments.

A Quantitative Comparison of Multispectral Refraction Topography and Autorefractometer in Young Adults

Frontiers in Medicine ◽

10.3389/fmed.2021.715640 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

Author(s):

Yunru Liao ◽

Zhenlan Yang ◽

Zijing Li ◽

Rui Zeng ◽

Jing Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Correlation Coefficient ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

High Agreement ◽

Repeatability And Reproducibility ◽

The Mean

Purpose: Purpose of this study is to evaluate the measuring consistency of central refraction between multispectral refraction topography (MRT) and autorefractometry.Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study including subjects in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from September 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, ages 20 to 35 years with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. All patients underwent cycloplegia, and the refractive status was estimated with autorefractometer, experienced optometrist and MRT. We analyzed the central refraction of the autorefractometer and MRT. The repeatability and reproducibility of values measured using both devices were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).Results: A total of 145 subjects ages 20 to 35 (290 eyes) were enrolled. The mean central refraction of the autorefractometer was −4.69 ± 2.64 diopters (D) (range −9.50 to +4.75 D), while the mean central refraction of MRT was −4.49 ± 2.61 diopters (D) (range −8.79 to +5.02 D). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a high correlation between the two devices. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) also showed high agreement. The intrarater and interrater ICC values of central refraction were more than 0.90 in both devices and conditions. At the same time, the mean central refraction of experienced optometrist was −4.74 ± 2.66 diopters (D) (range −9.50 to +4.75D). The intra-class correlation coefficient of central refraction measured by MRT and subjective refraction was 0.939.Conclusions: Results revealed that autorefractometry, experienced optometrist and MRT show high agreement in measuring central refraction. MRT could provide a potential objective method to assess peripheral refraction.

Comparison of Anterior Ocular Biometric Measurements Using Swept-Source and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.1155/2020/9739878 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

Sisi Chen ◽

Rongrong Gao ◽

Colm McAlinden ◽

Junming Ye ◽

Yiran Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Time Domain ◽

Corneal Thickness ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Anterior Segment ◽

Anterior Chamber Depth ◽

Random Order ◽

Optical Coherence ◽

Swept Source ◽

Significant Difference

Purpose. To compare central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements using the swept-source (CASIA SS-1000, Tomey, Japan) and time-domain (Visante, Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA) anterior segment optical coherence tomographers (OCT) in normal eyes. Methods. Sixty-eight eyes of 68 subjects were included. Three consecutive scans of each subject were obtained using both devices in a random order by one experienced operator. Standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of repeatability (CoR), coefficients of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to evaluate the intraoperator repeatability. Agreement was assessed using the Bland–Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Results. All measurements of the swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) and time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) showed high repeatability with low CoR (CCT: 2.34 μm and 6.16 μm; AQD: 0.05 mm and 0.09 mm; ACD: 0.06 mm and 0.09 mm), low CoV (CCT: 0.16% and 0.42%; AQD: 0.61% and 0.97%; ACD: 0.53% and 0.83%), and high ICC (>0.98). The mean CCT with SS-OCT was slightly thicker than the results with TD-OCT (difference = 4.55 ± 2.62 μm, P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in AQD or ACD measurements between the two devices (0.01 ± 0.05 mm, P=0.111; 0.02 ± 0.05 mm, P=0.022, respectively). The 95% LoA between the SS-OCT and TD-OCT were −0.59 to 9.69 μm for CCT, −0.10 to 0.12 mm for AQD, and −0.09 to 0.12 mm for ACD. Conclusions. High levels of repeatability and agreement were found between the two devices for all three parameters, suggesting interchangeability. SS-OCT demonstrated superior repeatability compared with TD-OCT.

Reproducibility and Validity of the 10-Meter Shuttle Ride Test in Wheelchair-Using Children and Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy

Physical Therapy ◽

10.2522/ptj.20120513 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 93 (7) ◽

pp. 967-974 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Olaf Verschuren ◽

Maremka Zwinkels ◽

Marjolijn Ketelaar ◽

Femke Reijnders-van Son ◽

Tim Takken

Keyword(s):

Cerebral Palsy ◽

Cardiorespiratory Fitness ◽

Gold Standard ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation Coefficients

Peak Oxygen Uptake ◽

Repeated Measurements ◽

Manual Wheelchair ◽

BackgroundFor children with cerebral palsy (CP) who are able to walk or run, the 10-m shuttle run test is currently the test of choice to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. This test, however, has not yet been examined in wheelchair-using youth with CP.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest reproducibility and validity of the 10-m shuttle ride test (SRiT) in youth with CP.DesignRepeated measurements of the SRiT were obtained.MethodsTwenty-three individuals with spastic CP (18 boys, 5 girls; mean age=13.3 years, SD=3.6 years) using a manual wheelchair for at least part of the day participated in this study. During the study, all participants performed one graded arm exercise test (GAET) and 2 identical SRiTs within 2 weeks. Peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak), peak heart rate (HRpeak), and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) were recorded. Intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1), the smallest detectable difference, and the limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated. The association between the results of the SRiT and GAET was tested using Pearson correlation coefficients.ResultsIntraclass correlation coefficients (.99, 95% confidence interval=.98–1.00) for all variables indicated highly acceptable reproducibility. The LOA analysis revealed satisfactory levels of agreement. The SRiT variables demonstrated strong, significant positive correlations for V̇o2peak values obtained during the SRiT and the GAET (r=.84, P<.01).LimitationsAlthough the GAET is considered the gold standard, the cardiorespiratory demand during the GAET was significantly lower compared with during the SRiT. Future studies should determine whether the GAET can still be accepted as the gold standard for upper-extremity exercise.ConclusionsThe SRiT is a reproducible and valid test for measuring cardiorespiratory fitness in youth with spastic CP who self-propel a manual wheelchair.

Assessing the Motor Status Score: A Scale for the Evaluation of Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair ◽

10.1177/154596830201600306 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 16 (3) ◽

pp. 283-289 ◽

Cited By ~ 56

Author(s):

Mark Ferraro ◽

Jennifer Hogan Demaio ◽

Jennifer Krol ◽

Chris Trudell ◽

Keren Rannekleiv ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Correlation Coefficient ◽

Upper Limb ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Pearson Correlation Coefficient ◽

Maximum Score ◽

Upper Extremity Impairment ◽

Motor Outcomes

The Motor Status Scale (MSS) measures shoulder, elbow (maximum score = 40), wrist, hand, and finger movements (maximum score = 42), and expands the measurement of upper extremity impairment and disability provided by the Fugl-Meyer (FM) score. This work examines the interrater reliability and criterion validity of the MSS performed in patients admitted to a rehabilitation hospital 21 ± 4 days after stroke. Using the MSS and the FM, 7 occupational therapists masked to each other’s judgments, evaluated 12 consecutive patients with stroke. Two therapists evaluated 6 additional patients on consecutive days. Intraclass correlation coefficients were significant for each group of raters for the shoulder/elbow and for the wrist/hand (P < 0.0001); test-retest measures were also significant for the shoulder/elbow (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.99, P < 0.004) and for the wrist/hand (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.99, P < 0.003). The internal item consistency for the overall MSS was significant (Cronbach alpha = 0.98, P < 0.0001). Finally the correlation between the MSS and the FM (R 2 = 0.964) was significant (P < 0.0001). The MSS affords a reliable and valid assessment of upper limb impairment and disability following stroke.

Reliability of a Three-Dimensional Wound Camera and Correlation With Routine Ruler Measurement in Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology ◽

10.1177/1932296820974654 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 193229682097465

Author(s):

Joel Willem Johan Lasschuit ◽

Jill Featherston ◽

Katherine Thuy Trang Tonks

Keyword(s):

Interobserver Reliability ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Area Measurement ◽

Foot Care ◽

Foot Ulceration ◽

Service Setting

Background: In an era of increasing technology and telehealth utilization, three-dimensional (3D) wound cameras promise reliable, rapid, and touch-free ulceration measurements. However, reliability data for commercially available devices in the diabetes foot service setting is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of diabetes-related foot ulceration measurement using a 3D wound camera in comparison to the routinely used ruler and probe. Method: Participants were prospectively recruited from a tertiary interdisciplinary diabetes foot service. Ulcerations were measured at each visit by two blinded observers, first by ruler and probe, and then using a 3D wound camera twice. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Measurement methods were compared by Pearson correlation. Results: Sixty-three ulcerations affecting 38 participants were measured over 122 visits. Interobserver reliability of ruler measurement was excellent for estimated area (ICC 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.98) and depth (ICC 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.95). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the 3D wound camera area was excellent (ICC 0.96, 95%CI 0.95-0.97 and 0.97 95% CI 0.96-0.98, respectively). Depth was unrecordable in over half of 3D wound camera measurements, and reliability was inferior to probe measurement. Area correlation between methods was good ( R = 0.88 and 0.94 per observer); however, depth correlation was poor ( R = 0.49 and 0.65). Conclusions: 3D wound cameras offer practical advantages over ruler-based measurement. In diabetes-related foot ulceration, the reliability and comparability of area measurement was excellent across both methods, although depth was more reliably obtained by the probe. These limitations, together with cost, are important considerations if implementing this technology in diabetes foot care.

Comparison of ocular biometric parameters between concomitant exotropic and orthotropic eyes

10.21203/rs.3.rs-121911/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Weifen Gong ◽

Fan Yang ◽

Shibin Lin ◽

Geng Wang

Keyword(s):

Strong Correlation ◽

Partial Correlation ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Corneal Thickness ◽

Anterior Chamber Depth ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Cover Test

Abstract PurposeTo compare the biometric characteristics between concomitant exotropia (XT) and orthotropia (OT) with OA2000.MethodThis cross-sectional study collected 4–18 years old children. All subjects underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination and prism alternate cover test for ocular alignment measurement. Included subjects had no any eye surgery, structural ocular anomalies, amblyopia of either eyes, ptosis, cataract and nystagmus. OA-2000 was used for the measurement of ocular biological parameters. Spherical equivalent (SE, spherical power + (cylindrical power)/2), keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), white to white distance (WTW), pupil diameter (PD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial lengths (AL) and intereye differences in SE, keratometry, CCT, WTW, PD, ACD, LT and AL were analyzed by independent sample t-tests. Pearson correlation was used for correlations assessment. Partial correlation was used to control for intereye differences in SE.ResultsA total of 156 subjects (79 XT and 77 OT) were collected. Intereye differences in spherical equivalent (SE) (t 2.369, P 0.019), AL (t 3.423, P 0.001), ACD (t 3.782, P < 0.001), LT (t 3.136, P 0.002) and PD (t 3.229, P 0.002) were significantly larger in XT patients than OT patients. The correlation coefficient of XT with SE asymmetry was 0.187 (P 0.020), 0.265 with AL asymmetry (P 0.001), 0.289 with ACD asymmetry (P < 0.001), 0.251 with PD asymmetry (P 0.002) and 0.243 with LT asymmetry (P 0.002). Strong correlation (r 0.875) was found between anisometropia and AL asymmetry. After controlling the effect of anisometropia, the correlation coefficients slightly reduced between XT patients and intereye differences in AL (reduced to 0.213), ACD (reduced to 0.266), PD (reduced to 0.230) and LT (reduced to 0.230). Strong correlation (r 0.855) was found between intereye differences in ACD and LT.ConclusionCompared with OT subjects, intereye differences in SE, AL, ACD, LT and PD were significantly larger in XT patients and had positive correlation with XT and may be associated with the pathogenesis of XT.

Reliability and Validity of the INFOOT Three-dimensional Foot Digitizer for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association ◽

10.7547/1010198 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 101 (3) ◽

pp. 198-207 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Sophie De Mits ◽

Pascal Coorevits ◽

Dirk De Clercq ◽

Dirk Elewaut ◽

James Woodburn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Measurement Tool ◽

Detectable Difference ◽

Smallest Detectable Difference ◽

Clinical Measurements

Background: Abnormal foot posture and deformities are identified as important features in rheumatoid arthritis. There is still no consensus regarding the optimum technique(s) for quantifying these features; hence, a foot digitizer might be used as an objective measurement tool. We sought to assess the validity and reliability of the INFOOT digitizer. Methods: To investigate the validity of the INFOOT digitizer compared with clinical measurements, we calculated Pearson correlation coefficients. To investigate the reliability of the INFOOT digitizer, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficients, SEMs, smallest detectable differences, and smallest detectable difference percentages. Results: Most of the 38 parameters showed good intraclass correlation coefficients, with values greater than 0.9 for 30 parameters and greater than 0.8 for seven parameters. The left heel bone angle expressed a moderate correlation, with a value of 0.609. The SEM values varied between 0.31 and 3.51 mm for the length and width measures, between 0.74 and 5.58 mm for the height data, between 0.75 and 5.9 mm for the circumferences, and between 0.78° and 2.98° for the angles. The smallest detectable difference values ranged from 0.86 to 16.36 mm for length, width, height, and circumference measures and from 2.17° to 8.26° for the angle measures. For the validity of the INFOOT three-dimensional foot digitizer, Pearson correlation coefficients varied between 0.750 and 0.997. Conclusions: In this rheumatoid arthritis population, good validity was demonstrated compared with clinical measurements, and most of the obtained parameters proved to be reliable. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101(3): 198–207, 2011)

Evaluating Professionalism and Interpersonal and Communication Skills: Implementing a 360-Degree Evaluation Instrument in an Anesthesiology Residency Program

Journal of Graduate Medical Education ◽

10.4300/jgme-d-09-00014.1 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 216-220 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Li Meng ◽

David G. Metro ◽

Rita M. Patel

Keyword(s):

Communication Skills ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Postanesthesia Care Unit ◽

Staff Nurse ◽

Evaluation Instrument ◽

Resident Assessment

Abstract Objectives To implement a 360-degree resident evaluation instrument on the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) rotation and to determine the reliability, feasibility, and validity of this tool for assessing residents' professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills. Methods Thirteen areas of evaluation were selected to assess the professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills of residents during their PACU rotation. Each area was measured on a 9-point Likert scale (1, unsatisfactory performance, to 9, outstanding performance). Rating forms were distributed to raters after the completion of the PACU rotation. Raters included PACU nurses, secretarial staff, nurse aides, and medical technicians. Residents were aware of the 360-degree assessment and participated voluntarily. The multiple raters' evaluations were then compared with those of the traditional faculty. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to measure the reliability of ratings within each category of raters by the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results Four hundred twenty-nine rating forms were returned during the study period. Fifteen residents were evaluated. The response rate was 88%. Residents were ranked highest on availability and lowest on management skill. The average rating across all areas was high (8.23). The average mean rating across all items from PACU nurses was higher (8.34) than from secretarial staff (7.99, P > .08). The highest ranked resident ranked high with all raters and the lowest ranked was low with most raters. The intraclass coefficients of correlations were 0.8719, 0.7860, 0.8268, and 0.8575. Conclusions This type of resident assessment tool may be useful for PACU rotations. It appears to correlate with traditional faculty ratings, is feasible to use, and provides formative feedback to residents regarding their professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills.

Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained with a noncontact tono-pachymeter for clinical use in mass screening

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-88364-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jinho Lee ◽

Hyuk Jin Choi

Keyword(s):

Open Angle Glaucoma ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Corneal Thickness ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Strongly Correlated ◽

Altman Analysis ◽

Applanation Tonometer ◽

Cautious Interpretation ◽

Healthy Participants

AbstractWe evaluated the reliability and accuracy of the noncontact CT-1P tonopachymeter (Topcon, Japan) in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT). One hundred sixty-three healthy participants and 33 patients with open angle glaucoma were enrolled. IOPs were measured by CT-1P (T-IOP) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (G-IOP), and CCTs were measured by the CT-1P (T-CCT) and an ultrasound pachymeter (US-CCT). Both CCT instrument-adjusted (T-IOP-C) and unadjusted T-IOPs (T-IOP-NC) were included. Pearson correlation coefficients and biases assessed with Bland–Altman analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for reliability evaluation. Intrasession repeatability was excellent for both T-IOP (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.91) and T-CCT (ICC 0.98). Intersession reproducibility was also excellent for T-CCT (ICC 0.94). T-IOP-NC and T-IOP-C both showed significant correlations with G-IOP (r = 0.801, P < 0.001 and r = 0.658, P < 0.001, respectively). T-CCT was also strongly correlated with US-CCT (r = 0.958; P < 0.001). T-IOP-NC and T-IOP-C both showed a positive bias (1.37 mmHg, 95% CI [1.14, 1.61] and 2.77 mmHg, 95% CI [2.49, 3.05], respectively). T-CCT showed a negative bias of − 17.3 µm (95% CI [−18.8, − 15.8]). With cautious interpretation, the CT-1P may offer good feasibility for IOP and CCT measurement in screening centers.

Comparison of Methods for Estimating Retinal Shape: Peripheral Refraction vs. Optical Coherence Tomography

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10020174 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 174

Author(s):

Katharina Breher ◽

Alejandro Calabuig ◽

Laura Kühlewein ◽

Focke Ziemssen ◽

Arne Ohlendorf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Optical Coherence Tomography ◽

Axial Length ◽

Pearson Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Intraclass Correlation Coefficients

Clinical Parameter ◽

Mean Difference ◽

Optical Coherence ◽

Shape Estimation ◽

Retinal shape presents a clinical parameter of interest for myopia, and has commonly been inferred indirectly from peripheral refraction (PRX) profiles. Distortion-corrected optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans offer a new and direct possibility for retinal shape estimation. The current study compared retinal curvatures derived from OCT scans vs. PRX measurements in three refractive profiles (0° and 90° meridians, plus spherical equivalent) for 25 participants via Bland–Altman analysis. The radial differences between both procedures were correlated to axial length using Pearson correlation. In general, PRX- and OCT-based retinal radii showed low correlation (all intraclass correlation coefficients < 0.21). PRX found flatter retinal curvatures compared to OCT, with the highest absolute agreement found with the 90° meridian (mean difference +0.08 mm) and lowest in the 0° meridian (mean difference +0.89 mm). Moreover, a negative relation between axial length and the agreement of both methods was detected especially in the 90° meridian (R = −0.38, p = 0.06). PRX measurements tend to underestimate the retinal radius with increasing myopia when compared to OCT measurements. Therefore, future conclusions from PRX on retinal shape should be made cautiously. Rather, faster and more clinically feasible OCT imaging should be performed for this purpose.