Genomic Selection for the Traits Expressed after Pollination in Allogamous Plants

Crop Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 1448-1457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiori Yabe ◽  
Ryo Ohsawa ◽  
Hiroyoshi Iwata
Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Sang V. Vu ◽  
Cedric Gondro ◽  
Ngoc T. H. Nguyen ◽  
Arthur R. Gilmour ◽  
Rick Tearle ◽  
...  

Genomic selection has been widely used in terrestrial animals but has had limited application in aquaculture due to relatively high genotyping costs. Genomic information has an important role in improving the prediction accuracy of breeding values, especially for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure. The purposes of this study were to (i) further evaluate the use of genomic information to improve prediction accuracies of breeding values from, (ii) compare different prediction methods (BayesA, BayesCπ and GBLUP) on prediction accuracies in our field data, and (iii) investigate the effects of different SNP marker densities on prediction accuracies of traits in the Portuguese oyster (Crassostrea angulata). The traits studied are all of economic importance and included morphometric traits (shell length, shell width, shell depth, shell weight), edibility traits (tenderness, taste, moisture content), and disease traits (Polydora sp. and Marteilioides chungmuensis). A total of 18,849 single nucleotide polymorphisms were obtained from genotyping by sequencing and used to estimate genetic parameters (heritability and genetic correlation) and the prediction accuracy of genomic selection for these traits. Multi-locus mixed model analysis indicated high estimates of heritability for edibility traits; 0.44 for moisture content, 0.59 for taste, and 0.72 for tenderness. The morphometric traits, shell length, shell width, shell depth and shell weight had estimated genomic heritabilities ranging from 0.28 to 0.55. The genomic heritabilities were relatively low for the disease related traits: Polydora sp. prevalence (0.11) and M. chungmuensis (0.10). Genomic correlations between whole weight and other morphometric traits were from moderate to high and positive (0.58–0.90). However, unfavourably positive genomic correlations were observed between whole weight and the disease traits (0.35–0.37). The genomic best linear unbiased prediction method (GBLUP) showed slightly higher accuracy for the traits studied (0.240–0.794) compared with both BayesA and BayesCπ methods but these differences were not significant. In addition, there is a large potential for using low-density SNP markers for genomic selection in this population at a number of 3000 SNPs. Therefore, there is the prospect to improve morphometric, edibility and disease related traits using genomic information in this species.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Aline Fugeray-Scarbel ◽  
Catherine Bastien ◽  
Mathilde Dupont-Nivet ◽  
Stéphane Lemarié

The present study is a transversal analysis of the interest in genomic selection for plant and animal species. It focuses on the arguments that may convince breeders to switch to genomic selection. The arguments are classified into three different “bricks.” The first brick considers the addition of genotyping to improve the accuracy of the prediction of breeding values. The second consists of saving costs and/or shortening the breeding cycle by replacing all or a portion of the phenotyping effort with genotyping. The third concerns population management to improve the choice of parents to either optimize crossbreeding or maintain genetic diversity. We analyse the relevance of these different bricks for a wide range of animal and plant species and sought to explain the differences between species according to their biological specificities and the organization of breeding programs.


Crop Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 1325-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Duhnen ◽  
Amandine Gras ◽  
Simon Teyssèdre ◽  
Michel Romestant ◽  
Bruno Claustres ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahina Rambolarimanana ◽  
Lolona Ramamonjisoa ◽  
Daniel Verhaegen ◽  
Jean-Michel Leong Pock Tsy ◽  
Laval Jacquin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 180090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Hu ◽  
Brett F. Carver ◽  
Carol Powers ◽  
Liuling Yan ◽  
Lan Zhu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1705-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Sun ◽  
Jesse A. Poland ◽  
Suchismita Mondal ◽  
José Crossa ◽  
Philomin Juliana ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica E. Rutkoski ◽  
Jesse A. Poland ◽  
Ravi P. Singh ◽  
Julio Huerta‐Espino ◽  
Sridhar Bhavani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2704-2722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Beaulieu ◽  
Simon Nadeau ◽  
Chen Ding ◽  
Jose M. Celedon ◽  
Aïda Azaiez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document