scholarly journals Design of an Optimally-Diagnostic Skin Test for Diagnosis of Sensitivity to Eight Allergens: A First-in-Human Study of Dose Escalation and Simultaneous Administration in Chinese Subjects

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 471-481
Author(s):  
Xiaoyi Ning ◽  
Yun Kuang ◽  
Shuwei Zhao ◽  
Wenjing Hou ◽  
Guoping Yang ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyi Ning ◽  
Yun Kuang ◽  
Shuwei Zhao ◽  
Guoping Yang ◽  
Wenjing Hou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Skin prick test is usually the preferred test in the diagnostic workup for allergic diseases, while there are few types of standardized allergen extracts available. Besides, standardization and composition give no assurance that the allergen extracts are within the concentration range that give the best chance of a true diagnosis. We designed a first-in-human diagnostic skin test with fewer samples to identify the optimally diagnostic concentration for eight standardized extracts from frequent native allergens, and to assess the safety of the eight allergens extracts’ simultaneous administration for supporting clinical allergen screening.Methods: Patients aged 18-45 years who had a history of allergic diseases were enrolled in this two-part open-label, parallel study: Study 1, each patient was given three concentrations of one allergen extract in turn. Study 2, each patient was given two concentrations of eight allergens extracts. Negative and positive controls were given each time the allergen was given. Both safety and sensitivity were evaluated to determine the optimally diagnostic concentration. Related-Samples Friedman's Two-Way Analysis was used to evaluate the difference of wheal diameter between different concentrations of each allergen. SPSS Statistics 26 was used for statistical analysis, and the significance test level was 0.05.Results: The sensitivity of allergens increased with the increasing of concentration. The eight investigated allergens showed good safety and did not reach the dose limit toxicity whether used alone or in combination. The optimally diagnostic concentration for eight aeroallergens were respectively determined as 33333 DU/mL, 12000 DU/mL, 8667 DU/mL, 50000 DU/mL, 40000 DU/mL, 3333 DU/mL, 7000 DU/mL, and 5000 DU/mL.Conclusions: This study designed a solution to determine the optimally diagnostic concentration with fewer subjects for further clinical trials of the eight investigated allergens and the results of this phase I clinical trial support further clinical research of investigated allergens. Trial registration: The trial was registered on www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900023952, 06/19/2019, retrospectively registered).


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3562-3562
Author(s):  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Dok Hyun Yoon ◽  
Ahmad H. Mattour ◽  
Jorge M. Chaves ◽  
Emily Curran ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: BR101801 not only blocks the signaling responsible for cell growth caused by PI3K, but also efficiently induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through inhibition of DNA-PK activation and stimulates decreasing stability of the oncogenic protein, c-Myc(AACR2020 abstract #655). This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary activity of the BR101801 (PI3Kγ/δ and DNA PK inhibitor) in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Method: This is a Phase I, multi-center, open-label, first-in-human study. The Phase Ia (dose escalation) part of the study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of BR101801. BR101801 was administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles. The dose escalation part was initiated with a dose titration in the initial cohort, followed by a 3 + 3 design. Results: 11 patients were enrolled and have been treated at 4 dose levels: 50mg, 100mg, 200mg, 325mg and expanded 200mg through fifth cohort escalation. Pathological subtypes include 7 PTCL, 2 DLBCL, 1 MZBL and 1 composite CTCL/MF. 3 females and 8 males have been treated to date. Median age is 58 (range 30-71) and ECOG PS is in the range of 0-1. All patients had taken at least one prior chemotherapy. 10 of total patients have completed at least one cycle except 1 premature drop-out case due to disease progression. First interim analysis after completion of cycle 3 of the last patient of 200mg QD cohort had been conducted, which was to include 5 patients (1 DLBCL and 4 PTCLs). No DLT had been identified in Cohorts 1-3, and 2 patients discontinued the study treatment due to adverse event (G4 thrombocytopenia, not related to IP) and disease progression, respectively. The PK values from multiple dosing range of 50mg to 200mg cohort resulted in an approximate 2.92-fold and 4.97 fold increase in exposure based on Cmax and AUCtau, respectively. BR101801 PK profile showed that the exposure of concentration increased in a dose dependent manner and there was no accumulation observed in the dose range of 50mg to 200mg. 2 DLTs was observed at 325mg QD cohort. The dose was de-escalated to the previous lower dose level (200mg QD) and was expanded to 3 additional patients. The expansion cohort is ongoing at present. 2 of 11 patients had G3 skin reaction and 3 had G3 hepatotoxicites. All adverse effects were manageable and recovered to grade 0-1 upon BR1010801 discontinuation. Total 5 patients have been currently ongoing. For overall tumor response assessment, 4 SDs and 2 PRs have been obsereved. Summary/Conclusion: 200 mg QD of BR101801 was shown to provide target exposure for clinical efficacy with the tolerable and safe profiles. BR101801 was well tolerated and showed preliminary signs of activity in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. The phase Ib/II study of BR101801 is warranted in relapsed/refractory NHL. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04018248. Disclosures Kim: AstraZeneca-KHIDI: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GI CELL: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hanmi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boryung: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeyondBIO: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca/MedImmune: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Curran: Servier pharmaceuticals and Amgen: Consultancy. Kim: Boryung pharmaceuticals: Current Employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltan Magyarics ◽  
Fraser Leslie ◽  
Johann Bartko ◽  
Harald Rouha ◽  
Steven Luperchio ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT ASN100 is a novel antibody combination of two fully human IgG1(κ) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), ASN-1 and ASN-2, which neutralize six Staphylococcus aureus cytotoxins, alpha-hemolysin (Hla) and five bicomponent leukocidins. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and serum and lung pharmacokinetics of ASN100 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single-dose-escalation first-in-human study. Fifty-two healthy volunteers were enrolled and randomized to receive either ASN-1, ASN-2, a combination of both MAbs (ASN100), or a corresponding placebo. Thirty-two subjects in the double-blind dose escalation portion of the study received ASN-1 or ASN-2 at a 200-, 600-, 1,800-, or 4,000-mg dose, or placebo. Eight subjects received both MAbs simultaneously in a 1:1 ratio (ASN100) at 3,600 or 8,000 mg, or they received placebos. Twelve additional subjects received open-label ASN100 at 3,600 or 8,000 mg to assess the pharmacokinetics of ASN-1 and ASN-2 in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sampling. Subjects were monitored for 98 days (double-blind cohorts) or 30 days (open-label cohorts) for safety assessment. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and all adverse events were mild and transient, with only two adverse events considered possibly related to the investigational product. ASN100 exhibited linear serum pharmacokinetics with a half-life of approximately 3 weeks and showed detectable penetration into the ELF. No treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody responses were detected. The toxin neutralizing potency of ASN100 in human serum was confirmed up to 58 days postdosing. The favorable safety profile, ELF penetration, and maintained functional activity in serum supported the further clinical development of ASN100.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16517-e16517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Kyriakopoulos ◽  
Channing Judith Paller ◽  
Ajit Verma ◽  
Karim Kader ◽  
Jeff Kittrelle ◽  
...  

e16517 Background: The combination of PCUR-101 (a synthetic form of the plant-derived medicinal agent, plumbagin) and surgical castration caused regression of androgen dependent tumors in mice. These promising pre-clinical results led to this first-in-human study of PCUR-101 in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in men with metastatic, castrate resistant PCa (mCRPC). Methods: The goal of this phase I multicenter trial was to determine the safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose, clinical activity, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of PCUR-101. A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was employed. Patients (pts) in cohorts of 3 were treated with escalating doses of PCUR-101 (50 mg – 200 mg) orally once daily continuously. Cycles were 28 days. Exploratory correlates of IL-6 and urine polyamines were also included. Results: 12 pts (median age 75 [range 63-86]) with mCRPC on ADT were treated in the dose escalation cohorts. No DLTs were observed during treatment and the MTD was not reached. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea (11 pts; all grade 1 or 2), nausea (7 pts; all grade 1 or 2), vomiting (4 pts; all grade 1 or 2) and constipation (3 pts; all grade 1 or 2). No objective responses were observed but 1 pt had PSA decrease by > 50%. Pts remained on study treatment for a median of 10 weeks (range 3-32 weeks). 5 pts, with stable disease, remain on active treatment. PK data could not be fully evaluated due to issues with the PK assay. Analyses of IL-6 and putrescine levels in pt samples indicate that, as compared to no treatment, PCUR-101 treatment in each cycle was associated with decreases in their levels. Reasons for treatment discontinuation included disease progression (n = 4), adverse event (n = 1; nausea and vomiting), subject withdrawal (n = 1), and investigator or sponsor decision (n = 1). After treating 12 pts, the sponsor decided to stop the trial in order to reformulate the study drug to allow for higher dosing and to redevelop the PK assay. Conclusions: At the doses evaluated, PCUR-101 combined with ADT was seen to be safe and may prolong disease stability in men with mCRPC. A second phase I study is planned using a new drug formulation and PK assay. Clinical trial information: NCT03137758.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 526-526
Author(s):  
Valentina Boni ◽  
Howard A. Burris III ◽  
Joyce F. Liu ◽  
Alexander I. Spira ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
...  

526 Background: CX-2009 is a PROBODY drug conjugate (PDC) directed against CD166 (ALCAM) and conjugated to DM4, a potent microtubule inhibitor (MTI). CD166 is overexpressed in carcinomas but is also ubiquitously expressed in normal epithelium and thus has not been previously considered a viable target for a traditional antibody drug conjugate. PDCs have a peptide mask that blocks normal tissue binding and can be removed by tumor-associated proteases, thereby limiting off-tumor/on-target binding. CX-2009 demonstrated preclinical activity in multiple solid tumor models. Here we report results of the first in human study in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: In this phase I multi-part dose-escalation study, pts with advanced solid tumors received CX-2009 0.25–10 mpk IV every 14 or 21 days (Q2W or Q3W). Tumor types were selected based on expected high CD166 expression and MTI sensitivity. Results: The dose-escalation phase of the trial enrolled 43 pts; 49 additional pts were subsequently enrolled between 4–10 mpk to collect biomarker data and define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), for a total of 92 pts as of 30 Nov 2019 (39 pts with breast cancer [BC], 22 ovarian [OC], 12 non-small cell lung [NSCLC], 9 head/neck squamous cell [HNSCC], 10 other) with a median of 6 (range 1–19) prior therapies. Median number of CX-2009 doses was 2 (range, 1–15). For Q3W dosing, one dose limiting toxicity (DLT; grade 3 vomiting) was observed at 8 mpk; MTD was not reached up to 10 mpk. The RP2D for Q3W schedule was 7 mpk based on safety, dose-response, and population pharmacokinetic simulations. Q2W dosing continues; DLTs were observed at 6 mpk. Common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) at 7 mpk (n=9) were nausea (44%), fatigue, infusion-related reactions (both 33%), vomiting and arthralgias (both 22%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 2 pts (nausea/vomiting; peripheral neuropathy). No pts discontinued at 7 mpk due to TRAEs. Ocular toxicity was dose dependent; mild to moderate reversible keratitis/blurred vision was seen in 3 pts at 7 mpk and mitigated by ocular prophylaxis. Partial responses were seen in 8 pts (2 confirmed, both HR+/HER2- BC) treated between 4–10 mpk, including BC (n=5), OC (n=2), and HNSCC (n=1). SD (≥1 on-study scan) was observed in 21 pts, 5 had SD ≥3 mos. Conclusions: CX-2009 at 7 mpk is the RP2D on Q3W schedule. Phase II expansion has begun in pts with HR+/HER2- BC. The Q2W schedule will continue to enroll pts to define the RP2D. CX-2009 will also be studied in combination with CX-072, a PD-L1 PROBODY therapeutic ( NCT03149549 ) Clinical trial information: NCT03149549 .


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3509-3509
Author(s):  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
Drew W. Rasco ◽  
Qi Zeng ◽  
Yuefen Tang ◽  
ZHIYAN LIANG ◽  
...  

3509 Background: Targeting Bcl-2/Bcl-xL proteins is considered as an important approach for anticancer drug development. Palcitoclax (APG-1252) was being developed to reduce on-target platelet toxicity without diminishing antitumor potency. Methods: The phase 1 study was to evaluate the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy (assessed per RECIST 1.1) of palcitoclax in US patients with metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) or other solid tumors (NCT03080311). A standard “3+3” design was applied to the dose-escalation stage. Palcitoclax was administered IV infusion for 30 minutes, twice a week (BIW) or once a week (QW) for 3 weeks in a 28-day cycle. Once the maximum tolerated dose / recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D) was determined, additional patients were treated in a dose-expansion stage. Results: The dose-escalation phase has been completed with 42 patients (31 on BIW and 11 on QW) who received palcitoclax at 8 dose cohorts ranging 10 mg - 400 mg. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2 (G1 or G2), and 26.2% patients had ≥ G3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were platelet count decreased (14.3%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (9.5%), and alanine aminotransferase increased (7.1%). Rapid platelet drop was observed in patients treated at 320 mg and 400 mg, which was transient and resolved rapidly within 2-6 days. Palcitoclax at 240 mg once weekly was determined to be MTD/RP2D. Of 36 efficacy-evaluable patients, 3 patients with SCLC, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, and ovarian cancer respectively achieved partial response (PR) and 8 patients had stable disease (SD) as their best overall response. One patient with SCLC had a PR that lasted over 21 cycles. Preliminary PK analyses showed that Cmax and AUC were approximately dose proportional over the range of 10 mg to 320 mg following the IV infusion on Day 1, with a mean T1/2 of 3.0-13.0 hours. Conclusions: Palcitoclax is safe and well tolerated, with a favorable platelet toxicity profile. Its promising antitumor effect supports its further development in combination therapies for treatment of patients with SCLC and other solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03080311 .


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5332-5332
Author(s):  
Junyuan Qi ◽  
Yuqin Song ◽  
Bo Jiang ◽  
Jianyong Li ◽  
Meifeng Tu ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Aberrant activation of the PI3Kδ pathway is associated with increased malignant B-cell proliferation and survival. Recently, several PI3Kδ inhibitors have been reported to play a role in B-cell malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) by mediating abnormal B-cell growth and survival. YY-20394, a novel small molecule, is a highly selective and highly potent PI3Kδ inhibitor. The current study is a phase I, first-in-human, dose escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of YY-20394 in patients with relapse or refractory B-cell malignant hematological tumor (Chinadrugtrials.org.cn ID: CTR20170995). Methods: Adult patients were eligible for study participation if they had relapsed or refractory lymphoid B-cell malignancies, ECOG ≤2, normal hepatic and renal function, and no autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) within 3 months of screening. YY-20394 was given orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. The protocol was initiated with a single-patient cohort, treated with oral YY-20394 20 mg once daily (QD). Subsequent cohorts used a 3+3 design and evaluated doses of 40-320mg QD. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Efficacy was assessed according to IWG-NHL and CLL consensus response criteria. Results: The study enrolment is still ongoing. As of Jul. 14, 2018, total of 10 patients were enrolled. The patients including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, n=1; follicular lymphoma, n=5; mantle cell lymphoma, n=1; lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, n=1 and CLL , n=2, received YY-20394 20 mg (n=1), 40 mg (n=3), 80 mg (n=3) or 140 mg/day (n=3) respectively; All the patients had heavy treatment before participating in the current study including BTK inhibitor therapy (n=3) and CAR-T treatment (n=2). All the patient have completed cycle 1 safety observation and no dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The most common nonhematologic TEAEs (all grade [Gr]; Gr ≥3) were LDH elevation (30%; 0%), dizzy (10%; 0%), pneumonia (10%; 10%), alopecia (10%; 0%), and hyperuricemia (10%; 0%). Gr ≥3 hematologic TEAEs were neutropenia (10%) and lymphocythaemia (20%). 1 Serious AEs were reported as grade 3 pulmonary infection after the patient received 2 cycles treatment, it is still unknown if the SAE is related with the study drug. The pulmonary infection has been improved after anti-inflammation treatment. Of 10 patients treated, 71.4% of overall response rate and 100% of disease control rate were achieved in 7 patients who were available for efficacy evaluation, including 1 CR (80 mg, FL) , 4 PR (40 mg, n=2 with FL and CLL respectively; 80 mg, n=2 with FL and DLBCL respectively and 2 SD ( 20 mg with MCL, n=1 and 40 mg with CLL ,n=1 respectively. The PK results demonstrated dose-proportional increase in plasma concentrations. Conclusion: YY-20394 is well tolerated and with promised objective response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. The current first-in-human study for dose escalation and dose expansion is still ongoing. Disclosures Song: Peking University Cancer Hospital (Beijing Cancer Hospital): Employment. Zhu:Beijing Cancer Hospital: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 244-244
Author(s):  
Javier Munoz ◽  
Samantha Jaglowski ◽  
Matthew S. McKinney ◽  
Iris Isufi ◽  
Patrick J. Stiff ◽  
...  

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR087 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ-signaling domain and a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Here we present the clinical experience from Study ATTCK-20-2 (NCT02776813), a multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR087 in combination with rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The main objectives of this first-in-human study were to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of ACTR087+rituximab. Other objectives included evaluating ACTR T-cell persistence and other correlative biomarkers. Subjects must have had CD20+ NHL that was R/R after prior treatments, which must have included anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR087. Additional doses of rituximab were administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study included a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR087) and an expansion phase (ACTR087 at the preliminary recommended phase 2 dose [RP2D]); all subjects received rituximab at a fixed dose of 375 mg/m2 q3w. Results: Two dose levels (DL) of ACTR087 were evaluated during dose escalation (n=17). The MTD was exceeded at DL2, with severe cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Statistical analysis of the relationship between non-hematologic toxicity and ACTR+ T-cell doses was retrospectively performed (two-parameter Bayesian logistic regression model) to estimate an RP2D of 35×106 ACTR+ T cells. Nine subjects enrolled in an expansion cohort and received ACTR087 at this RP2D in combination with rituximab. Among all subjects treated (n=26), the majority (69%) were diagnosed with DLBCL. Subjects had received a median of 3 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy, with 77% having received ≥3 prior lines. ACTR087 showed dose-dependent expansion with peak levels generally observed 7 to 14 days post administration. In subjects with ongoing clinical response (CR), ACTR remained detectable through the last timepoint evaluated. Across all cohorts, Grade ≥3 TEAEs reported in >3 subjects regardless of causality were limited to hematologic events. Potential T cell-mediated toxicities were observed, including 4 serious cases of CRS (Gr 4 in 2 subjects, both with fatal sepsis) and 2 serious cases of neurotoxicity (1 Gr 5, 1 Gr 4 in a subject with fatal septic shock). Elevated baseline inflammatory markers (eg, ferritin, CRP) were observed in patients who developed Gr ≥3 CRS and neurotoxicity post ACTR087. Of note, severe CRS presented without fever and events occurred >7 days post ACTR087. Clinical activity was reported with an ORR of 50% in all dose levels tested, including durable complete responses, with one subject in CR for 869+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: ACTR087+rituximab demonstrated antitumor activity, with observed safety events that are expected with other autologous T-cell products. The time to onset and clinical presentation of severe CRS and neurotoxicity events in this study informed the safety monitoring and adverse reaction management guidance across clinical studies of ACTR T-cell products. Data from this first-in-human study of ACTR087+rituximab confirm the proof of concept and will be used to guide further development for the ACTR platform. Updated clinical data, as well as expanded biomarker correlations to efficacy and safety, will be presented. Disclosures Munoz: Pharmacyclics /Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board. Isufi:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Stiff:Gamida-Cell: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Akard:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document