scholarly journals Combined treatment of patients with localized pancreatic cancer of elderly and senile age

2021 ◽  
pp. 122-128
Author(s):  
L. I. Moskvicheva ◽  
L. V. Bolotina ◽  
A. L. Kornietskaya ◽  
D. V. Sidorov ◽  
N. A. Grishin ◽  
...  

Introduction. The gold standard for the treatment of patients with a localized form of pancreatic cancer is radical surgical intervention. It is characterized by a high frequency of postoperative complications and is not performed in patients with a weakened general functional status and the presence of multiple severe concomitant somatic pathology.Purpose. The aim of this study is a assessment of the safety and effectiveness of combined treatment with the inclusion of gemcitabine chemotherapy and HIFU therapy in somatically inoperable patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the elderly and senile age.Materials and methods. This study involved 15 patients with stage II (T3N0-1M0) disease aged 60 years and older, with a performance status ECOG 2 and a high operational and anesthetic risk, who received palliative combined treatment on the basis of the P. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute in the period from 2017 to 2020. HIFU therapy was performed on the HIFU2001 (Shenzhen Huikang Medical Apparatus Co., Ltd.), local treatment sessions were carried out in the amount of 3–8 per course, conducted daily, in the intervals between days of intravenous administration of gemcitabine at a dosage of 1000 mg/m2 (1, 8, 15 days every 4 weeks).Results. Adverse events of systemic drug therapy were observed in 9 (60%) patients, local complications of HIFU therapy — in 6 (37.5%) patients. 6 months after the start of treatment, pain control was achieved in 87.5% of patients, local progression of the disease was detected in 2 (13.3%) cases, and a partial tumor response was determined in 2 patients and stable disease in 11 patients. The median overall survival was 19 months, and the median progression-free survival was 12 months. The overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rate was 80%, 20%, and 13%, respectively, and the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 54%.Conclusions. The results of this study demonstrate the prospects of using a combination of HIFU therapy and gemcitabine monotherapy in somatically inoperable patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the elderly and senile age.

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1106) ◽  
pp. 20190627
Author(s):  
Marta Scorsetti ◽  
Tiziana Comito ◽  
Davide Franceschini ◽  
Ciro Franzese ◽  
Maria Giuseppina Prete ◽  
...  

Objectives: To evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a local ablative treatment (LAT) in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients affected by histologically confirmed stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis. Endpoints are local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: From 2013 to 2017, a total of 41 patients were treated with SBRT on 64 metastases. Most common sites of disease were lung (29.3%) and liver (56.1%). LC at 1 and 2 years were 88.9% (95% CI 73.2–98.6) and 73.9% (95% CI 50–87.5), respectively. Median LC was 39.9 months (95% CI 23.3—not reached). PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 21.9% (95% CI 10.8–35.4) and 10.9% (95% CI 3.4–23.4), respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI 3.1–11.3). OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 79.9% (95% CI 63.7–89.4) and 46.7% (95% CI 29.6–62.2). Median OS was 23 months (95%CI 14.1–31.8). Conclusions: Our results, although based on a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients, show that patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer may benefit from local treatment with SBRT. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results. Advances in knowledge: Selected patients affected by oligometastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can benefit from local ablative approaches, like SBRT


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14153-e14153
Author(s):  
Yukinori Ozaki ◽  
Yuji Miura ◽  
Taro Yamanaka ◽  
Kohji Takemura ◽  
Rika Kizawa ◽  
...  

e14153 Background: Monoclonal antibodies against the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), e.g., nivolumab, have been shown to exhibit antitumor immunity and improve survival in patients with various cancers. Recently, it was reported that bone metastases are unlikely to respond to immunotherapy, while other reports have suggested that synergistic antitumor effect can be obtained by administration of denosumab in combination with PD-1 blockade using nivolumab. However, there are still very limited data on the efficacy and effects on the prognosis of nivolumab administered in combination with denosumab in patients with bone metastases. Methods: We reviewed the medical records and pharmacy database of patients who had received nivolumab plus denosumab treatment from April 2011 to March 2018 at our institution, in order to analyze the prognosis of patients with bone metastases from various cancers. The primary objective was to compare the progression-free survival between patients with and without bone metastases. The impact of combined nivolumab plus denosumab therapy was evaluated as an exploratory endpoint. Results: We extracted 201 patients who had received denosumab for bone metastasis and 45 patents who had received immune checkpoint inhibitor. We analyzed the data of 39 patients who had received nivolumab treatment; of these 39 patients, 10 had additionally also received denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases. The median age of the patients was 65 years (range 41-87); the primary disease was renal cell carcinoma in 17 patients, gastric cancer in 9 patients, melanoma in 6 patients, non-small cell lung cancer in 4 patients, and head and neck cancer in 3 patients. The median progression-free survival following treatment with nivolumab was 2.1 months in the group with bone metastases and 3.5 months in the group without bone metastases (log-rank test; p = 0.0779); the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 26.7% (95% CI: 21.6-69.2) in the patients with bone metastases and 39.3% (95% CI: 10.4-53.3) in those without bone metastases. Concurrent administration of denosumab, age, and the primary disease had no influence on the progression-free survival rate. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis revealed a trend towards lower immune responses in patients with bone metastases, even when nivolumab is administered in combination with denosumab. Immunotherapy for bone metastasis needs to be further explored.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-27
Author(s):  
L. B. Bolotina ◽  
L. I. Moskvicheva ◽  
A. L. Kornietskaya ◽  
D. V. Sidorov ◽  
N. A. Grishin ◽  
...  

 Purpose: to conduct a preliminary analysis of the safety and effectiveness of hifu-therapy with a lowenergy hifu-2001 device (shenzhen Huikang Medical apparatus Co., ltd) performed concurrently with chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients who are not suitable for surgery or chemoradiotherapy.Material and Method. The study included 24 pancreatic cancer patients who were treated at the Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research institute in the period from 2016 to 2019. There were 17 (71 %) women and 7 (29 %) men. The percentage of patients in the elderly group was 79 %. Stage iia pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in 3 (12.5 %) patients, stage ii in 5 (21 %) patients, stage iii in 9 (37.5 %) patients, and stage iv in 7 (29 %) patients. All patients received combination therapy, including systemic chemotherapy and hifu-therapy. Results. The most frequent adverse events of treatment were skin burns (n=6), with third-degree burns occurring in 2 (8.3 %) patients. Local sclerosis of subcutaneous adipose tissue was observed in 4 (17 %) patients; development of asymptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts in the area of hifu exposure was observed in 1 (4 %) patient. Pain control was achieved in 17 (85 %) patients, and local tumor control was achieved in 19 (79.2 %) patients. The follow-up time ranged from 5 to 30 months with a median time of 14.5 months. The median total life expectancy of patients was 16 months, and the median time to progression was 9 months. The overall 6-month survival rate was 100 %. The 1- and 1.5-year survival rates were 75.0 % and 41.7 %, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 17.2 %. The 6-month and 1-year disease-free survival rates were 62.5 % and 12.5 %, respectively. Conclusion. The short- and long-term outcomes were consistent with those described in other studies, which indicated that a combination of systemic drug therapy and hifu-therapy is an appropriate approach for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Yngvar Floisand ◽  
Iris Bigalke ◽  
Dag Josefsen ◽  
Silke Raffegerst ◽  
Frauke Schnorfeil ◽  
...  

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), not eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), have a significant risk of disease relapse and death due to a lack of long-term disease control. To investigate the possibility of relapse prevention after initial chemotherapy, a safety and feasibility, single-center, open label, first in human phase I/II study using dendritic cells (DC) targeting PRAME and WT-1 was recently completed. Mature autologous DCs were rapidly (3-4 days) generated using full-length PRAME and WT-1 antigens and a maturation cocktail with a TLR 7/8 agonist. Intradermal vaccination of 2.5-5x106 WT-1 and 2.5-5x106 PRAME RNA-loaded DCs was performed at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and then monthly for the remainder of a 2-year study period. Patients with WT1-positive AML, with or without PRAME positivity, had to be in morphological remission (+/- hematological recovery) after induction chemotherapy without being eligible for AHSCT. The study consisted of a phase I part (n=6) to assess early safety followed by a phase II part (n=14) which assessed further safety as well as clinical and immunological effects of vaccination. A total of 20 eligible patients (5 female and 15 male, ECOG score of 0) with a median age of 59 years (range 24 to 73) were included into the study. Risk groups based on HOVON/SAKK 102 criteria at screening identified 13 patients as good, 5 as intermediate and 2 as poor risk. All patients were positive for WT-1 and 17 for PRAME prior to chemotherapy. The mean time from first diagnosis to first vaccination was 10.1±3.7 months. Vaccinations were well tolerated, without any withdrawals from the study due to toxicity. No related serious or unexpected adverse events (AEs) were reported and the most common AEs were injection site related, accounting for 28% of all AEs, which were mild and transient in nature (Grade I; CTCAE v4.03). Grade I/II toxicities were experienced by 18/20 patients, whilst 5 (25%) experienced Grade III toxicity unlikely or not related to treatment. The 2-year survival probability from time of first vaccination was 80% (95% CI: 55-92). Importantly, patients at or above the age of 60 years (n=10) also had an 80% survival rate at 2 years (risk groups: 4 good, 4 intermediate, 2 poor). Nine patients relapsed under vaccination, of whom 4 died thereafter (three due to the underlying disease, one due to GvHD after transplantation) within the 2-year study duration, equating to a probability of progression free survival (PFS) of 55% (95% CI: 31-74). The PFS rate for the elderly patients (≥ 60 years) was 50%, while it was 60% for the younger patient group. Most relapses (5/9) appeared early, within 80 days after first vaccination. Out of the 9 relapsed patients, 6 could be successfully transplanted (104 to 380 days after first vaccination; risk groups: 4 good and 2 poor risk) and 4 were still alive at the end of the 2-year observation period. The DC manufacturing process reproducibly yielded a high number of DCs expressing the transfected tumor antigens, WT-1 or PRAME, as well as high surface levels of co-stimulatory molecules. After freeze-thawing, DCs were capable of CCL19-directed migration and, upon stimulation, secreted IL-12, but not IL-10. These phenotypic and functional characteristics indicate efficient DC maturation and activation despite the patients´ previous therapeutic regimens. DC properties were comparable irrespective of the patients' clinical outcome. Immune-monitoring of bulk T cells from vaccinated patients revealed that patients in stable remission had higher levels of HLA-DR-expressing T cells when compared to relapsing patients, both in peripheral blood and bone marrow. Such difference was observed prior to vaccination and throughout the entire treatment period, suggesting that T cell activation may play a role in maintaining remission. Analysis of 23 common AML mutations revealed that 6/9 relapsed patients had at least 1 mutation, with 4 patients having 3-6 mutations. In contrast, only 1 mutation already present at baseline was found in 4/11 patients in remission. Administration of autologous DC transfected with PRAME- and WT1-RNA is feasible, safe and well tolerated. The 2-year 80% survival rate, particularly in the elderly, and the 55% progression free survival warrant further studies to assess the efficacy of this vaccine approach in improving outcomes in patients with AML. Disclosures Raffegerst: Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schnorfeil:Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH: Current Employment. Addo:Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH: Current Employment. Schendel:Medigene AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pinkernell:Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Author(s):  
Michael Pinkawa ◽  
Daniel M. Aebersold ◽  
Dirk Böhmer ◽  
Michael Flentje ◽  
Pirus Ghadjar ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The current article encompasses a literature review and recommendations for radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Materials and methods A literature review focused on studies comparing metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) vs. external elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) and studies analyzing recurrence patterns after local nodal treatment was performed. The DEGRO Prostate Cancer Expert Panel discussed the results and developed treatment recommendations. Results Metastasis-directed radiotherapy results in high local control (often > 90% within a follow-up of 1–2 years) and can be used to improve progression-free survival or defer androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) according to prospective randomized phase II data. Distant progression after involved-node SABR only occurs within a few months in the majority of patients. ENRT improves metastases-free survival rates with increased toxicity in comparison to SABR according to retrospective comparative studies. The majority of nodal recurrences after initial local treatment of pelvic nodal metastasis are detected within the true pelvis and common iliac vessels. Conclusion ENRT with or without a boost should be preferred to SABR in pelvic nodal recurrences. In oligometastatic prostate cancer with distant (extrapelvic) nodal recurrences, SABR alone can be performed in selected cases. Application of additional systemic treatments should be based on current guidelines, with ADT as first-line treatment for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Only in carefully selected patients can radiotherapy be initially used without additional ADT outside of the current standard recommendations. Results of (randomized) prospective studies are needed for definitive recommendations.


Chemotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kotone Hayuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Akitsu Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii57-ii57
Author(s):  
Qingjun Hu ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Mingyao Lai ◽  
Cheng Zhou ◽  
Zhaoming Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical factors related to the prognosis of basal ganglia germ cell tumors. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 52 cases of the basal ganglia germ cell tumors treated from January 2009 to January 2019 in the department of oncology of Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital. The median age: 12 years (range: 5–32), The median course of disease: 11.7 months (range: 1–54). Thirteen cases were diagnosed by biopsy and 39 cases were diagnosed by elevated tumor markers. There were 31 patients (59.6%) diagnosed with germinomas and 21 patients (40.4%) with non-germ germ cell tumors. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed. RESULTS To October 15, 2019, the median follow-up time was 30.4 months (range 2–124 months). The 5-year survival rate was 85%, and the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 84%. Multivariate analysis found whether serum AFP was greater than 100mIU / ml, (with HR: 11.441,95% CI: 2.09–47.66, P = 0.005),the degree of surgical resection(with HR 5.323 (1.19–23.812), P = 0.029), PD as the effect of radiotherapy (HR: 16.53, (1.19–23.81), P = 0.001) were independent prognostic factor affecting survival. CONCLUSION The pathological type, degree of surgical resection, and response to initial treatment can all affect survival.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110386
Author(s):  
Angela Chen ◽  
Vincent H Ha ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Carole R Chambers ◽  
Michael B Sawyer

Introduction The metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical trial (MPACT) trial established gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab) as a standard treatment for pancreatic cancer utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to manage neutropenia. This was a challenge for jurisdictions that do not use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in palliative settings. We developed dosage guidelines to dose modify gem and nab without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the efficacy and safety of these dose adjustment guidelines in the real world. Methods A multi-centered, retrospective chart review was performed on pancreatic patients between December 1, 2014, and August 21, 2018. Provincial electronic medical health records were reviewed. Using Log-rank statistics we determined the patient's progression-free survival and overall survival. Results Of 248 patients, 209 met patient selection criteria. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, on gem alone prior to nab/gem combination therapy or did not receive nab or gem. Patients who received nab/gem as first-line therapy had a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.1–7.4), and median overall survival of 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.8). Those who received gem/nab in the second line had a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8–6.5), and median overall survival of 19.3 months (95% CI, 12.6–26.0). Conclusions The patient’s progression-free survival and overall survival taking nab/gem using our dose modification algorithm were equivalent or superior to the MPACT trial's progression-free survival and overall survival. Gem/nab can be given by our dose modification scheme without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.


2022 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 308-320
Author(s):  
Abhinav V. Reddy ◽  
Shuchi Sehgal ◽  
Colin S. Hill ◽  
Lei Zheng ◽  
Jin He ◽  
...  

Objective: To report on clinical outcomes and toxicity in older (age ≥ 70 years) patients with localized pancreatic cancer treated with upfront chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without surgery. Methods: Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results: A total of 57 older patients were included in the study. Median OS was 19.6 months, with six-month, one-year, and two-year OS rates of 83.4, 66.5, and 42.4%. On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.12–0.91, p = 0.031) was associated with OS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median OS (29.1 vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.17–0.93, p = 0.034) was also associated with PFS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median PFS (12.9 vs. 1.6 months, p < 0.001). There were 3/57 cases (5.3%) of late grade 3 radiation toxicity and 2/38 cases (5.3%) of Clavien-Dindo grade 3b toxicity in those who underwent resection. Conclusion: Multimodality therapy involving SBRT is safe and feasible in older patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Surgical resection was associated with improved clinical outcomes. As such, older patients who complete chemotherapy should not be excluded from aggressive local therapy when possible.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 4997
Author(s):  
Madelon Dijkstra ◽  
Sanne Nieuwenhuizen ◽  
Robbert S. Puijk ◽  
Florentine E. F. Timmer ◽  
Bart Geboers ◽  
...  

This cohort study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by repeat local treatment compared to upfront repeat local treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). A total of 152 patients with 267 tumors from the prospective Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE) met the inclusion criteria. Two cohorts of patients with recurrent CRLM were compared: patients who received chemotherapy prior to repeat local treatment (32 patients) versus upfront repeat local treatment (120 patients). Data from May 2002 to December 2020 were collected. Results on the primary endpoint overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and distant progression-free survival (DPFS) were reviewed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Subsequently, uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models, accounting for potential confounders, were estimated. Additionally, subgroup analyses, according to patient, initial and repeat local treatment characteristics, were conducted. Procedure-related complications and length of hospital stay were compared using chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS from date of diagnosis of recurrent disease was 98.6%, 72.5%, and 47.7% for both cohorts combined. The crude survival analysis did not reveal a significant difference in OS between the two cohorts (p = 0.834), with 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of 100.0%, 73.2%, and 57.5% for the NAC group and 98.2%, 72.3%, and 45.3% for the upfront repeat local treatment group, respectively. After adjusting for two confounders, comorbidities (p = 0.010) and primary tumor location (p = 0.023), the corrected HR in multivariable analysis was 0.839 (95% CI, 0.416–1.691; p = 0.624). No differences between the two cohorts were found with regards to LTPFS (HR = 0.662; 95% CI, 0.249–1.756; p = 0.407) and DPFS (HR = 0.798; 95% CI, 0.483–1.318; p = 0.378). No heterogeneous treatment effects were detected in subgroup analyses according to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics. No significant difference was found in periprocedural complications (p = 0.843) and median length of hospital stay (p = 0.600) between the two cohorts. Chemotherapy-related toxicity was reported in 46.7% of patients. Adding NAC prior to repeat local treatment did not improve OS, LTPFS, or DPFS, nor did it affect periprocedural morbidity or length of hospital stay. The results of this comparative assessment do not substantiate the routine use of NAC prior to repeat local treatment of CRLM. Because the exact role of NAC (in different subgroups) remains inconclusive, we are currently designing a phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT), COLLISION RELAPSE trial, directly comparing upfront repeat local treatment (control) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by repeat local treatment (intervention).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document