scholarly journals The Role of Judges in Dealing with Community Development

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Maulana Hasanudin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Community Development ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice ◽  
Important Structure

<p>The purpose of this paper is to determine the role of the judge in facing the development of society. Judges are part of the important structure of the judicial power branch in Indonesia. Judicial power is an independent power to administer justice in order to uphold law and justice. Judges are given the power to judge. Judges have an important role as law enforcement officers in the law enforcement process in Indonesia, so they must pay attention to legal objectives. The role of the judge has consequences for the responsibility of the judge which is very heavy, where the judge has responsibility to one God, to the nation and state, to himself, to the law, to the parties and to society. Judges and society are elements that cannot be separated in a legal system. The judge is a product of the society and culture where he comes from and is. The function of the judiciary is to decide disputes between individuals and individuals, individuals and communities, even individuals or society and the state; forming or making a policy or policy.</p><p align="center">[]</p><p><em>Tujuan penulisan ini adalah mengetahui peranan peranan hakim dalam menghadapi perkembangan masyarakat. Hakim merupakan bagian dari struktur penting cabang kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia. Kekuasaan Kehakiman merupakan kekuasaan yang merdeka untuk menyelenggarakan peradilan guna menegakkan hukum dan keadilan. Hakim diberi wewenang untuk mengadili. Hakim memiliki peranan penting sebagai aparat penegak hukum dalam proses penegakan hukum di Indonesia, sehingga harus memperhatikan tujuan hukum. Peranan hakim memiliki konsekuensi terhadap pertanggungjawaban hakim yang sangat berat, dimana hakim memiliki tanggung jawab terhadap tuhan yang maha esa, terhadap bangsa dan negara, terhadap diri sendiri, terhadap hukum, terhadap para pihak dan terhadap mayarakat. Hakim dan masyarakat merupakan unsur yang tidak bisa dilepaskan dalam suatu sistem hukum. Hakim sebagai produk masyarakat dan budaya tempat dia berasal dan berada. Fungsi kehakiman adalah memutus sengketa antara individu dengan individu, individu dengan masyarakat, bahkan individu atau masyarakat dengan negara; membentuk atau membuat policy atau kebijakan.</em></p>

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH KEPOLISIAN MELALUI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Yunan Hilmy
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice

Sistem peradilan pidana harus selalu mempromosikan kepentingan hukum dan keadilan. Tetapi terdapat pandangan salah bahwa ukuran keberhasilan penegakan hukum hanya ditandai dengan keberhasilan mengajukan tersangka ke pengadilan dan kemudian dijatuhi hukuman. Seharusnya ukuran keberhasilan penegakan hukum oleh aparat penegak hukum ditandai dengan tercapainya nilai-nilai keadilan di dalam masyarakat. Kepolisian sebagai alat negara yang berperan dalam menegakkan hukum diharapkan dapat merespon hal ini dengan menggunakan mekanisme restorative justice . Tulisan ini akan membahas mengapa mekanisme restorative justice bisa dijadikan alternatif penegakan hukum oleh polisi; bagaimana prospek penerapan mekanisme restorative justice yang dilakukan oleh Polisi; serta bagaimana mekanisme restorative justice yang dilakukan oleh polisi dalam sistem hukum nasional. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dapat disimpulkan bahwa dengan menjadikan restorative justice sebagai pendekatan maka ada beberapa keuntungan yang bisa didapatkan. Pertama , masyarakat diberikan ruang untuk menangani sendiri permasalahan hukumnya yang dirasakan lebih adil. Kedua , beban negara dalam beberapa hal menjadi berkurang. Polisi dapat melaksanakan mekanisme restorative justice melalui diskresi yang dimilikinya karena hal merupakan kelengkapan dari sistem pengaturan oleh hukum itu sendiri. Pelaksanaan restorative justice oleh Polri dalam perspektif sistem hukum nasional dapat diterima apabila dilaksanakan berdasar falsafah negara Pancasila, menjamin keadilan serta perlindungan hukum terhadap HAM. Untuk menjamin adanya keseragaman dalam implementasinya, diperlukan suatu norma atau kaidah untuk memberikan legitimasi agar segala tindakan yang dilakukan dalam implementasi restorative justice tidak dianggap ilegal.<p>The Criminal Justice System should be promoting interest of law and justice. However, there is a mistake of view that measuring success on law enforcement simply characterized with success filed a suspect to court and sentenced. Supposed to be success measure of law enforcement by law enforcement officers marked by the achievement of value of justice in society. The police as a state of tool who role in enforcing the law are expected respond by using restorative justice mechanism. Therefore, this paper focus on why restorative justice mechanism could be an alternative on law enforcement by the police; and how the mechanisms of restorative justice by the police in the national legal system. By using normative juridical methode, it can be conclude that by making restorative justice as an approach of, there are several advantages which can be found. First, public givenits own space to handles with his legal issues which preceived fairly. Second, burden on th estate in some way be reduced. The police could be implementing restorative justice mechanism through discretionbecause it is the completeness of regulation by the law itself. Implementation of restorative justice by the police in perspective of national legal system is acceptable if carried out based on the state ohilosophy of Pancasila, ensures of justice and legal protection of human rights.To ensure uniformity in implementation, needs a norm or rule to gave legitimacy that all actions which taken in implementation of restorative justice ha snot considered illegal.</p>

The Legal Framework for Foundations in the Habsburg Monarchy from 1750 to 1918

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-172
Author(s):  
Gabriele Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Public Good ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
The State ◽  
Habsburg Monarchy ◽  
The Public ◽  
Regulation And Supervision ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Law

Foundations, as permanent funds established by a certain legal act, can serve manifold purposes, but often pursue charitable goals. As such, they play an important role for the public good. Therefore, states always had an interest in fostering foundations by providing a pertinent legal framework. In Austria, this topic has not yet been the focus of scholarship. Through this study some light is shed on the implementation of the law on foundations in the Habsburg Monarchy. It focuses on the role of the state and its legal system regarding the regulation and supervision of foundations from 1750 to 1918. This period is characterized by the sovereigns’ endeavor to regulate the position of foundations via extensive legislation. In particular, a system of oversight for foundations was created in order to guarantee the attainment of their charitable goals. In fact, this system prevailed until the end of the 20thcentury.

scholarly journals PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ADVOKAT SEBAGAI GATEKEEPER DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG

Media Iuris ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 350
Author(s):  
Rendy Ardy Septia Yuristara
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Legal Profession ◽  
The State ◽  
Professional Responsibilities ◽  
Basic Purpose ◽  
The Law

Advocates are the most vulnerable professions to be Gatekeepers in money laundering. Indeed, the advocate profession is part of the law enforcement apparatus that can contribute better in preventing money laundering activities to develop. Affirmation about the role of advocate that can suppress the occurrence of money laundering crime, that is with the issuance of PP. 43 of 2015, which places advocates as one of the reporting parties in the agenda of eradicating money laundering crime. However, the substance of the rule draws criticism from some misguided advocates in interpreting the intent and purpose of the arrangement. Moreover there are some advocates who consider that the rule is against the rules that regulate immunity rights in the profession advocate. The misinterpretation of some advocates related to the immunity rights inherent in the profession, causing the work of the advocate profession to be considered irrelevant, and not worthy of being called the nobleprofession (OfficiumNobile), But as a bad profession in integrity and promoting commercialization. In fact, the basic purpose of the arrangement of PP. 43 of 2015, which places the advocate profession as one of the reporting parties on the eradication agenda of money laundering, is a form of respect for the profession of advocate who is a noble profession, by prioritizing his professional responsibilities to the state, society and God, as well as his obligations as part of The legal profession to uphold the law and uphold the value of human rights while on duty.

scholarly journals Peranan Kepolisian dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengeroyokan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak dan Orang Dewasa

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Haryanto Ginting ◽  
Muazzul Muazzul
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
School Students ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Law And Justice

<p class="1judul"><em><span>The Role of the Police in the Application of Restorative Justice to Perpetrators of Criminal Offenses Conducted by Children and Adults</span></em></p><p class="1judul"> </p><h1><span lang="EN-US">The rise of cases of brawl between high school students and even not only between high school students, but also has hit up to campuses, this often happens in big cities such as Jakarta, Surabaya, and Medan. This study aims to determine the role of the Police in implementing Restorative Justice against perpetrators of criminal acts of beating carried out by children and adults that occurred in the District of Namo Rambe District of Deli Serdang. The research method is done by using descriptive qualitative method that is normative. Based on the data obtained in the results of this study, the authors draw conclusions as follows: The criminal justice system must always promote the importance of law and justice. But there is a false view that the measure of the success of law enforcement is only marked by the success of bringing a suspect to court and then being sentenced. The measure of success of law enforcement by law enforcement officers should be characterized by the achievement of values of justice in the community. The police as a state tool that plays a role in enforcing the law is expected to be able to respond to this by implementing a Restorative Justice mechanism.<strong></strong></span></h1>

scholarly journals PERANAN ALAT BUKTI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM MENURUT KUHAP

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Bastianto Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Examination Process

The trial of a criminal case is to find out whether a criminal offense has occurred in an event, therefore in the most important criminal proceedings the proceedings are proved. Evidence is a problem that plays a role in the examination process in court because with this proof is determined the fate of a defendant. The legal function in the State of Indonesia is to regulate the order of society in the life of the nation and the state, whereas the violation of the law itself is an event that must exist in every society and is impossible to be eliminated absolutely, because violation of law is an integral part of development More complex. One of the provisions governing how the law enforcement officers carry out the task in the field of repressive is the criminal procedure law which has the purpose of searching and approaching material truth, the complete truth of a criminal case by applying the provisions of criminal procedure law honestly darn precisely with The purpose of finding out who the perpetrator can be charged with is a violation of the law. 

scholarly journals The Role of Investigators in Disclosing Corruption Cases of Village Fund Allocation in Kuningan District

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Bayu Aji Dewantara ◽  
Handri Wirastuti Sawitri ◽  
Nurani Ajeng Tri Utami
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Full Data ◽  
Administration System ◽  
Fund Allocation ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Community Roles

The number of corruption cases in the state administration system is increasing year after year. One of corruption cases occurred in the state administration system is corruption case of village funds. This study aims to identify the roles of and the obstacles faced by Kuningan District Prosecutor�s Office investigators in disclosing corruption cases of village fund allocation. This qualitative study applied a sociological juridical research method in which the data is presented in a systematic description and is analyzed by employing qualitative data analysis method. The results showed that Kuningan District Prosecutor�s Office investigators as law enforcement officers have a significant role in disclosing corruption cases of village fund allocation, namely identifying the crime of corruption, carrying out actions (full data, full bucket), conducting investigation, checking the suspects� identity, and conducting detention and searches. Further, there are some obstacles faced by Kuningan District Prosecutor�s Office investigators in disclosing corruption cases of village fund allocation, including the mismatch between regulations and actual practices in the field and the lack of human resources, facilities and infrastructures, and community roles.�Peran Penyidik dalam Mengungkap Kasus Korupsi Alokasi Dana Desa di Wilayah Hukum Kabupaten Kuningan�Angka kejadian korupsi dalam sistem penyelenggara negara masih mengalami peningkatan dari tahun ke tahun. Salah satu tindak pidana korupsi yang banyak terjadi dalam sistem penyelenggara negara adalah korupsi dana desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran dan hambatan penyidik Kejaksaan Negeri Kuningan dalam mengungkap kasus korupsi alokasi dana desa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode penelitian yuridis sosiologis. Data disajikan dalam uraian sistematis dan dianalisa dengan menggunakan metode analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa penyidik Kejaksaan Negeri Kuningan sebagai aparat penegak hukum mempunyai peran yang sangat aktif dalam mengungkap kasus korupsi alokasi dana desa yaitu menemukan adanya tindak pidana korupsi, melakukan tindakan (full data full bucket), melakukan tindakan penyidikan, memeriksa identitas tersangka, melakukan penahanan dan penggeledahan. Terdapat beberapa hambatan yang dialami oleh penyidik kejaksaan dalam mengungkap kasus korupsi alokasi dana desa di antaranya ketidaksesuaian antara peraturan dengan tindakan di lapangan, kurangnya sumber daya manusia, fasillitas dan sarana yang belum memadai dan kurangnya peran masyarakat.

scholarly journals Properties of constitutional principles

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-136
Author(s):  
S. A. Mosin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
The State ◽  
Basic Rule ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
The Law ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
The Stability ◽  
The Trinity

The subject. The article is devoted to the study of the trinity of properties of constitutional principles.The purpose of the article is to confirm the hypothesis that constitutional principles, often perceived by researchers and law enforcement officials as abstract norms with declarative content, are in fact full-fledged legal institutions that are endowed with all the necessary properties to achieve constitutional goals. In this regard, the article analyzes the property of axiomaticity, the property of presumptivity and the property of fictitiousness of constitutional principles.The methodology. The systemic-structural, comparative, formal-legal and formal-logical methods made it possible to identify and characterize the properties of constitutional principles, such as axiomaticity, presumptivity and fictitiousness. The use of these methods in their combination predetermined the appeal not only to topical problems of constitutional law, but also to issues of the theory of law, as well as other branches of law, which made it possible to most objectively and comprehensively approach the study of the properties of constitutional principles.The main results of the research. The trinity of the properties of the constitutional principle lies in the fact that the constitutional principle formulates the basic rule and determines the direction of development of the legal system and thereby has the property of axiomaticity. At the same time, the constitutional principle has the property of presumptivity due to the duty of the law enforcement officer to proceed from the assumption of compliance with the provisions of such a principle by all subjects of legal relations. Thereby constitutional principle ensures the necessary stability of the legal system of the state. At the same time, in order to achieve full-fledged stability of the legal system, along with the assumption that the subjects of legal relations comply with the provisions of the constitutional principles, it should be possible to monitor such compliance. In the absence of prior control over compliance with the provisions of the law, the solution is the application of legal presumptions. In this regard, within the framework of the presumptive property of constitutional principles, constitutional presumptions are inextricably linked with the corresponding constitutional principles. In turn, having the property of fictitiousness, the constitutional principle allows to interpret the provisions that make up such a constitutional principle and, as a result, create the necessary regulatory legal framework.Conclusions. Constitutional principles are the driving force of the legal system. They fill all legal relations without exception with legal meaning and content and have a special meaning due to their irreplaceability and the obligation to strictly observe them. In turn, the trinity of properties of the constitutional principles reflects their legal essence as fundamental normative provisions that determine the generally binding basic rules and directions of the development of the legal system, ensure the stability of the legal system of the state, and also have the possibility of timely development and adaptation to the changing legal reality.

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Ufran Ufran
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Social Problems ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
The Real ◽  
Initial Symptoms ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice

<p><em>The </em><em>Failure to enforce law and justice will be one of the factors of social dis-integration. If it is responded well and systematically it will be a threat to a country's failure. These initial symptoms can be seen from the emergence of various vigilante acts. The empty spaces filled with violence are caused by the vacuum of law. The law fails to do its job to solve social problems that arise. The explanation in this paper seeks to analyze the root problem of the failure of law enforcement in Indonesia seen in the perspective of the legal system by Friedman. To analyze the solution, the perspective used is an analysis of the style of progressive law as stated by Satjipto Rahardjo. The use of these two perspectives is expected to be able to describe well the real fundamental problem in our current law enforcement</em></p>

scholarly journals PENERAPAN DIVERSI SEBAGAI IMPLEMENTASI HAK ASASI ANAK BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Luh Sri Widi Artini ◽  
Putu Bagus Sabda Pramesti
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Special Concern ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

A child who commits a legal offence is a special concern from the state. Diversi is the application of versioning is an effort from the government to protect the child from negative stigmatization and based on the best needs and interests for children, by seeking a version through the approach of Restorative justice. This research aims to determine how the implementation is versioned as a child's human rights implementation and what constraints are faced by related parties in the running of versioning. This research uses a qualitative method of research approach with a literature study technique that is further analyzed qualitatively. Children are trusting and give that must be guarded because the child is the hope of the state as a nation's successor so that children should be protected. The results of this study show that versioning is one of the government's efforts to protect the child's rights from adverse influences and the stigmatization of the community and is done for the best interest of the child. Obstacles faced in the form of lack of the presence and the existence of a sectoral ego between the law enforcement officers so that the version has not run optimally and the need to socialize about the law of the Child criminal system Community.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP WHISTLEBLOWER DI INDONESIA: SINERGI ANTARA UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION DAN HUKUM NASIONAL TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN SAKSI DAN KORBAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratna Juwita
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
Victim Protection ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Legal System

AbstractIndonesia ratified the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) through the Law number 7 of 2006. Article 33 of the UNCAC legally obliges the State Parties to provide protection to whistleblowers. The existence of whistleblower is pivotal to uncover the hidden practices of corruption. Anti-corruption strategy encourages whistleblowers to unveil corrupt practices to the law enforcement agencies and public. Due to this task, therefore, whistleblowers must be protected from any kind of retaliation. Indonesia has the Law number 13 of 2006 juncto the Law number 31 of 2014 concerning witness and victim protection which regulates the protection of whistleblower in the Indonesian criminal legal system. This paper analyzes existence of legal protection for whistleblowers in the respective provisions which contained within the Law number 13 of 2006 and the Law number 31 of 2014, specifically on anti-retaliation protection by analyzing the synchronization of the law with Article 33 of the UNCAC. The provisions of national law vis-à-vis with the provisions of UNCAC concerning whistleblower protection, the national law has not provided best protection to whistleblower yet due to the possibility of retaliation be made against the whistleblowers that is not regulated by the national law.Keywords: Indonesia, corruption, whistleblower, United Nations Convention Against Corruption.IntisariIndonesia meratifikasi United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) melalui Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2006. Pasal 33 UNCAC memberikan kewajiban hukum bagi Negara Pihak untuk menyediakan perlindungan terhadap para whistleblowers. Eksistensi whistleblower merupakan hal yang sangat penting untuk membuka praktek tersembunyi korupsi. Strategi anti-korupsi memberikan dorongan bagi para whistleblower untuk membuka praktek-praktek korupsi kepada penegak hukum dan masyarakat. Oleh karena tugasnya tersebut, para whistleblower harus dilindungi dari segala bentuk tindakan pembalasan. Indonesia memiliki Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban  yang di dalamnya mengatur perlindungan terhadap whistleblower dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Tulisan ini menganalisis eksistensi perlindungan hukum bagi whistleblower dalam pasal-pasal tentang perlindungan whistleblower dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, secara spesifik pada perlindungan terhadap tindakan pembalasan dengan menganalisis sinkronisasi hukum terhadap Pasal 33 UNCAC. Pasal-pasal dalam hukum nasional vis-à-vis dengan Ppasal UNCAC tentang perlindungan terhadap whistleblower, hukum nasional belum mampu menyediakan perlindungan terbaik bagi whistleblower dikarenakan adanya kemungkinan untuk dilakukannya tindakan pembalasan terhadap whistleblower yang belum diatur dalam hukum nasional.Kata kunci: Indonesia, korupsi, whistleblower, United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document