scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Ufran Ufran
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Social Problems ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
The Real ◽  
Initial Symptoms ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice

<p><em>The </em><em>Failure to enforce law and justice will be one of the factors of social dis-integration. If it is responded well and systematically it will be a threat to a country's failure. These initial symptoms can be seen from the emergence of various vigilante acts. The empty spaces filled with violence are caused by the vacuum of law. The law fails to do its job to solve social problems that arise. The explanation in this paper seeks to analyze the root problem of the failure of law enforcement in Indonesia seen in the perspective of the legal system by Friedman. To analyze the solution, the perspective used is an analysis of the style of progressive law as stated by Satjipto Rahardjo. The use of these two perspectives is expected to be able to describe well the real fundamental problem in our current law enforcement</em></p>

scholarly journals The Role of Judges in Dealing with Community Development

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Maulana Hasanudin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Community Development ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
The State ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice ◽  
Important Structure

<p>The purpose of this paper is to determine the role of the judge in facing the development of society. Judges are part of the important structure of the judicial power branch in Indonesia. Judicial power is an independent power to administer justice in order to uphold law and justice. Judges are given the power to judge. Judges have an important role as law enforcement officers in the law enforcement process in Indonesia, so they must pay attention to legal objectives. The role of the judge has consequences for the responsibility of the judge which is very heavy, where the judge has responsibility to one God, to the nation and state, to himself, to the law, to the parties and to society. Judges and society are elements that cannot be separated in a legal system. The judge is a product of the society and culture where he comes from and is. The function of the judiciary is to decide disputes between individuals and individuals, individuals and communities, even individuals or society and the state; forming or making a policy or policy.</p><p align="center">[]</p><p><em>Tujuan penulisan ini adalah mengetahui peranan peranan hakim dalam menghadapi perkembangan masyarakat. Hakim merupakan bagian dari struktur penting cabang kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia. Kekuasaan Kehakiman merupakan kekuasaan yang merdeka untuk menyelenggarakan peradilan guna menegakkan hukum dan keadilan. Hakim diberi wewenang untuk mengadili. Hakim memiliki peranan penting sebagai aparat penegak hukum dalam proses penegakan hukum di Indonesia, sehingga harus memperhatikan tujuan hukum. Peranan hakim memiliki konsekuensi terhadap pertanggungjawaban hakim yang sangat berat, dimana hakim memiliki tanggung jawab terhadap tuhan yang maha esa, terhadap bangsa dan negara, terhadap diri sendiri, terhadap hukum, terhadap para pihak dan terhadap mayarakat. Hakim dan masyarakat merupakan unsur yang tidak bisa dilepaskan dalam suatu sistem hukum. Hakim sebagai produk masyarakat dan budaya tempat dia berasal dan berada. Fungsi kehakiman adalah memutus sengketa antara individu dengan individu, individu dengan masyarakat, bahkan individu atau masyarakat dengan negara; membentuk atau membuat policy atau kebijakan.</em></p>

scholarly journals PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH KEPOLISIAN MELALUI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM SISTEM HUKUM NASIONAL

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Yunan Hilmy
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
National Legal System ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice

Sistem peradilan pidana harus selalu mempromosikan kepentingan hukum dan keadilan. Tetapi terdapat pandangan salah bahwa ukuran keberhasilan penegakan hukum hanya ditandai dengan keberhasilan mengajukan tersangka ke pengadilan dan kemudian dijatuhi hukuman. Seharusnya ukuran keberhasilan penegakan hukum oleh aparat penegak hukum ditandai dengan tercapainya nilai-nilai keadilan di dalam masyarakat. Kepolisian sebagai alat negara yang berperan dalam menegakkan hukum diharapkan dapat merespon hal ini dengan menggunakan mekanisme restorative justice . Tulisan ini akan membahas mengapa mekanisme restorative justice bisa dijadikan alternatif penegakan hukum oleh polisi; bagaimana prospek penerapan mekanisme restorative justice yang dilakukan oleh Polisi; serta bagaimana mekanisme restorative justice yang dilakukan oleh polisi dalam sistem hukum nasional. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dapat disimpulkan bahwa dengan menjadikan restorative justice sebagai pendekatan maka ada beberapa keuntungan yang bisa didapatkan. Pertama , masyarakat diberikan ruang untuk menangani sendiri permasalahan hukumnya yang dirasakan lebih adil. Kedua , beban negara dalam beberapa hal menjadi berkurang. Polisi dapat melaksanakan mekanisme restorative justice melalui diskresi yang dimilikinya karena hal merupakan kelengkapan dari sistem pengaturan oleh hukum itu sendiri. Pelaksanaan restorative justice oleh Polri dalam perspektif sistem hukum nasional dapat diterima apabila dilaksanakan berdasar falsafah negara Pancasila, menjamin keadilan serta perlindungan hukum terhadap HAM. Untuk menjamin adanya keseragaman dalam implementasinya, diperlukan suatu norma atau kaidah untuk memberikan legitimasi agar segala tindakan yang dilakukan dalam implementasi restorative justice tidak dianggap ilegal.<p>The Criminal Justice System should be promoting interest of law and justice. However, there is a mistake of view that measuring success on law enforcement simply characterized with success filed a suspect to court and sentenced. Supposed to be success measure of law enforcement by law enforcement officers marked by the achievement of value of justice in society. The police as a state of tool who role in enforcing the law are expected respond by using restorative justice mechanism. Therefore, this paper focus on why restorative justice mechanism could be an alternative on law enforcement by the police; and how the mechanisms of restorative justice by the police in the national legal system. By using normative juridical methode, it can be conclude that by making restorative justice as an approach of, there are several advantages which can be found. First, public givenits own space to handles with his legal issues which preceived fairly. Second, burden on th estate in some way be reduced. The police could be implementing restorative justice mechanism through discretionbecause it is the completeness of regulation by the law itself. Implementation of restorative justice by the police in perspective of national legal system is acceptable if carried out based on the state ohilosophy of Pancasila, ensures of justice and legal protection of human rights.To ensure uniformity in implementation, needs a norm or rule to gave legitimacy that all actions which taken in implementation of restorative justice ha snot considered illegal.</p>

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN BUDAYA HUKUM HAKIM DAN ADVOKAT DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM

to-ra ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 621
Author(s):  
Hulman Panjaitan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice ◽  
And Behavior

Abstract Legal culture is a very important element and priority is a concern in relation to law enforcement, That’s not limited to the implementation of the legal culture of judges and advocates as part of law enforcement. The execu- tion and implementation of the legal culture of each law enforcement apparatus, including judges and advocates have not become a serious concern. What has become a code of ethics as a guideline for behaving for judges and advocates has not inspired and integrated in the life and behavior of a judge and advocate in carrying out their duties and responsibilities. Therefore, for enforcement of the law and justice, presumably this legal culture as one of the most important elements in the legal system must befully applied and implemented by each law enforcement apparatus.   Keywords: the legal culture; judges and advocates; law enforcement.

Penerapan Hukum Wakaf Uang di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masdar Masdar
Keyword(s):  
System Theory ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Muslim Society ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government

Cash waqf in Indonesia has been long enough implemented based on some rules enacted by government and other rules defined by The Waqf Board of Indonesia (BWI). However, the implementation of cash waqf has not reached the level of success. Therefore, this article studies the application of cash waqf law in Indonesia according to Friedman’s legal system theory. The legal system theory of Friedman firstly looks at the substance of the law, which is the rules or regulations; and secondly it examines the structure of the law, encompassing the law enforcement agencies, such as judge, prosecutor, police and legal counselors. And lastly the theory examines the element of legal culture, which is a response from Muslim society. The first two examinations indicate that there is nothing to be a problem. But from the last examination there is a problem regarding the trust from Muslim society. From the legal culture point of view, the implementation of cash waqf by the government, which is performed by BWI, needs attracting society’s credentials in order to improve and maximize the performance of cash waqf in Indonesia.

The Law Enforcement Weakness of Songs and Musics Copyright Crimes

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Edi Tuahta Putra Saragih ◽  
Muhammad Citra Ramadhan ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Cultural Factor ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Law ◽  
Real Picture

This research aimed to: (a) obtain the forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); (b) understand the role of the police, in this case the Police Precinct, in the law enforcement; (c) identify the factors that influenced the law enforcement. The research method used the normative-empirical legal research, with the initial stages of specifying norms in order to get the proper picture, and then specifying empirical events in order to get the real picture. The research results showed several matters: 1) The forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics) found included: the distribution of the works or the copies, the performances of the works, and the announcements of the works; 2) Police Precinct did notultimately carry out their role as a law enforcer for the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); and 3) The factors that influenced the law enforcement on the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics), namely: legislation factor, in the matter of complaint offenses; law enforcement factor, in terms of the capacity of members; less supportive factor of facilities and infrastructure; legal awareness factor, in the problem of the lack of legal counseling; and cultural factor, related to the differences in norms in the copyright law between those in society and those in regulations. 

Իրավունքի և օրենքի կոլիզիաները իրավունքի փիլիսոփայությունում

2021 ◽  
pp. 64-85
Author(s):  
Artur Ghambaryan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Legislative Policy ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice ◽  
The One ◽  
Legal Understanding

The aim of the article is to reveal the collisional relationship between justice and the law in the philosophical dimension. The main objectives of the article are to analyze the contradictions between law from the point of view of broad legal understanding, as well as the answer to the question of how law enforcement agent should act if, in solving a specific case, an outrageous contradiction between law and justice is encountered. The author used a number of scientific methods, in particular, historical-legal-comparative methods. The author concludes that supporters of a broad legal understanding consider the issue of contradiction between law mainly from the point of view of legislative policy, however, they do not discuss the issue of how the law enforcement agent should act when an obvious contradiction between law is encountered in a particular case. In the article the sayings «dura lex sed lex» (The law [is] harsh, but [it is] the law) and «lex iniusta non est lex» (An unjust law is no law at all) are considered in the dimensions of the legalism and natural law. The author concludes that the Radbruch formula is an exception to the saying «dura lex sed lex» (The law [is] harsh, but [it is] the law), which has undergone practical approbation. On the one hand, this resolution values the certainty and stability of the law, and on the other hand, it protects the person (society) from the unjustly shouting unjust laws.

Subsidies for Illegal Activities?—Reframing IUU Fishing from the Law Enforcement Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-438
Author(s):  
Jaemin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Core ◽  
Iuu Fishing ◽  
The Law ◽  
Illegal Activities ◽  
Fisheries Subsidies ◽  
Real Challenge ◽  
Laws And Regulations

ABSTRACT Fisheries subsidies norms and discussions at present are based on the subsidy framework under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. This approach is pertinent vis-à-vis various types of governmental subsidies provided to fisheries industries. It, however, fails to tackle illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing, one of the core targets of the fisheries subsidies norms, because few governments ‘subsidize’ illegal activities such as IUU. As far as IUU fishing is concerned, the real challenge is not about subsidies but about how to enforce domestic laws and regulations to punish owners, operators, and fishermen engaged in such illegal activities. Future discussion of fisheries subsidies norms regarding IUU should reflect the law enforcement aspect in addition to the present subsidy aspect.

Introduction to The Indonesian Legal System: Major Developments in the Past Decade

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-72
Author(s):  
Hesti Setyowati ◽  
M. Harris S. Toengkagie
Keyword(s):  
National Identity ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Colonial Era ◽  
The Past ◽  
Legal Foundation ◽  
National Ideology ◽  
Customary Laws ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice

Abstract Indonesia is an archipelagic country that has endured 350 years of western colonization. Its people comprise diverse ethnic, cultural and religious backgrounds, all living in more than 17.000 islands spread throughout the archipelago. The development of the Indonesian legal system are considered as unique since it comprises the legacy of colonization, combined with the customary laws of various tribes. It is heavily infl uenced by Islam-the religion of the majority of its citizens, and the people’s own perception of law and justice following the colonial era. The undisputable fact on the variety of ethnic groups, cultures and religions formulate the desire for national ideology which promotes a unity of such diversity. As the result, each of the laws is formulated with reference to the principle of unity and democracy carried out in accordance with the national ideology. 60 years after its independence, the Law in Indonesia has shown great strides in its development. All of the developments are claimed to fulfi ll its goal of achieving a modern nation with solid legal foundation, without sacrifi cing its national identity.

scholarly journals Time for Punishment with Subjectivity: Study Philosophy of Law

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Legal Philosophy ◽  
Public Concern ◽  
Philosophy Of Law ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
The Real ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Law

<p class="IABSSS">The dominance of legal positivism in thought and law enforcement is a reality. Saintism of legal science presents a law that is conceptualized as something that exists in sensory terms, along with its straightforward, rational, and objective nature. Law is always requested objectively. Objectivity is done by freeing the subject's mind to the legal reality that already exists as an object. Therefore, various legal cases such as the case of Asyani, Rasminah, Minah and others, are things that are easily proven as violating the law because it is a violation of the text of the article of law. Such a way of law, is now starting to become a public concern. So, when objectivity begins to be questioned, that's when the real subjectivity of asking begins to be considered - and this will be explained [only] in the study of legal philosophy, especially paradigmatic studies. This paper will discuss the possibility of subjectivity in law, which will be presented in the paradigmatic study.</p>

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dani Amran Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Environmental Pollution ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Environmentally Sustainable ◽  
The People ◽  
The Law

The legal political environment in Indonesia in terms of protection, management and control of environmental pollution in Indonesia and to investigate the implementation of environmental pollution control and law enforcement in Indonesia. the results of the study stated that the renewal law of Environmental management is influenced by a variety of development changes occurring in society, such as the influence of the era of democratization, industrialization, advancement of science and technology and the rise of the welfare demands of various parties. Political aspects contained in the politics of Law Number 32 of 2009 on the protection and management of the environment has not been run in accordance with the legal political objective, because there are natural resources that can not be utilized for the prosperity and welfare of the people. It is also still a lot of water pollution, air pollution, deforestation and other actions of the parties who damage the environment. It is necessary to implement environmental management to preserve the environment and develop skills which are harmonious, consistent and balanced in order to support the implementation of the development of environmentally sustainable. Law enforcement agencies in understanding the perceived environmental legal system are still experiencing difficulties. Lack of understanding of the law enforcement officers will cause rules is formed in one unified national legal system will deviate from the direction of the political objectives of the law. The need for clear law enforcement for the doer / destroyer of the environment in order to create a deterrent effect and between 3 penalties (criminal, civil and administrative) is not overlapping. Law enforcement difficult because of the difficulty of proving and determining the standard criteria of environmental damage. Keywords: Legal Politic, Environment, The Act Number 32 years 2009 on The Protection and Environmental Management

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document