scholarly journals Viktor V. Zheltov, the Most Prominent Political Scientist in Siberia

Author(s):  
Sergey Biryukov ◽  
Mikhail Kislyakov ◽  
Sergey Chirun

The article is dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Viktor Vasilievich Zheltov, the first Dean of the Department of Political Sciences and Sociology of Kemerovo State University, the Head of the Department of Political Sciences (2003–2016), and the Head of the Dissertation Council on political and sociological sciences (1994–2007). Today V. V. Zheltov is a recognized expert in all areas of modern political science and sociology. The article contains information on his main achievements as a scientist and a leader. The authors used historical and biographical methods, document analysis, indepth interviews, and event analysis. The paper pays a tribute to V. V. Zheltov’s contribution to the development of Kemerovo State University.

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (04) ◽  
pp. 622-628
Author(s):  
Victoria Schuck

The profile ofFemina Studens rei Publicaewhich has developed from the gross statistics and the 1969 survey of departments of political science shows that the professional woman in academia is primarily in the lower ranks, often not even on the first step of the promotion “ladder” and is teaching undergraduates. Although her habitat is the small college, there are signs that she may be emerging from it to the faculties of the city and state university. Recently she has been receiving Ph.D.'s at a greater rate of growth than that for men, but she still remains a small minority. In considering the following ratios related to her publications, other evidences of scholarship, and the recognition accorded to her in the profession, it is important to stress that the woman political scientist who is teaching constitutes five percent of the membership in the A.P.S.A. and according to the 1969 survey, 8.4 percent of all faculty in political science in colleges and universities.


Author(s):  
Yuliia Sabadash ◽  

To the 70th anniversary of the rector of Mariupol State University, Doctor of Political Science , Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Consul Honorary of Republic of Cyprus in Mariupol., Honored Education Worker Kostyantyn V. BALABANOV


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 762-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond Jagmohan

Woodrow Wilson is the only American political scientist to have served as President of the United States. In the time between his political science Ph.D. (from Johns Hopkins, in 1886) and his tenure as president (1913–21), he also served as president of Princeton University (1902–10) and president of the American Political Science Association (1909–10). Wilson is one of the most revered figures in American political thought and in American political science. The Woodrow Wilson Award is perhaps APSA’s most distinguished award, given annually for the best book on government, politics, or international affairs published in the previous year, and sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson Foundation at Princeton University.Wilson has also recently become the subject of controversy, on the campus of Princeton University, and in the political culture more generally, in connection with racist statements that he made and the segregationist practices of his administration. A group of Princeton students associated with the “Black Lives Matter” movement has demanded that Wilson’s name be removed from two campus buildings, one of which is the famous Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs (see Martha A. Sandweiss, “Woodrow Wilson, Princeton, and the Complex Landscape of Race,” http://www.thenation.com/article/woodrow-wilson-princeton-and-the-complex-landscape-of-race/). Many others have resisted this idea, noting that Wilson is indeed an important figure in the history of twentieth-century liberalism and Progressivism in the United States.A number of colleagues have contacted me suggesting that Perspectives ought to organize a symposium on the Wilson controversy. Although we do not regularly organize symposia around current events, given the valence of the controversy and its connection to issues we have featured in our journal (see especially the September 2015 issue on “The American Politics of Policing and Incarceration”), and given Wilson's importance in the history of our discipline, we have decided to make an exception in this case. We have thus invited a wide range of colleagues whose views on this issue will interest our readers to comment on this controversy. —Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor.


1970 ◽  
Vol 23 (301) ◽  
pp. 129-145
Author(s):  
Joanna Gajda

The article presents the basic assumptions of qualitative research and the possibilities of their application in social (political) sciences. To achieve this goal, is the interview method was chosen. In the first part, basic information about the interview method will be recalled. The idea of research practice based on the story of Halcolm’s ‘master’. In the second part selected individual interview techniques will be analyzed, which, according to the author, may be the most practical for a political scientist, and the summary will present examples of the use of interviewing techniques by researchers from various disciplines in the field of social-political sciences and the possibility of using re-analysis.


Author(s):  
Alexander Bierich ◽  
Olga V. Lomakina ◽  
Elena K. Nikolaeva ◽  
Elena I. Seliverstova ◽  
Ludmila I. Stepanova

The paper is timed to coincide with the 80th anniversary of the birth of Valery M. Mokienko, Doctor of Letters, Professor of Slavic Philology, Philology Department, St Petersburg State University, Honorary Chairman of the Phraseological Commission of the International Committee of Slavists. The paper reviews focal areas of the scholars research, lists his academic interests, the main of those being phraseology and phraseography. V.M. Mokienko proposed to detect dynamic interactions of contradictory properties of the phraseological system, to reveal the mechanism of phrase formation involving broad genetic and typological parallels to determine the nature of a phraseological unit. The method of structural and semantic modeling based on a detailed comparison of dialectal, Slavic and non-Slavic European idiomacy is the basis of modern theoretical and practical studies of the scientists followers. The trilogy of dictionaries edited by V.M. Mokienko distinguishes precise certification of units, references to synonymous turns, which makes it easier for the reader to navigate in the huge source material, outlines the parameters of the phraseological space close to the certified expression, and makes it possible to show the wealth of images of folk speech conveying the same semantics.


Author(s):  
G. Oznobishcheva

The publication is devoted to problems debated at the Academic Board session in IMEMO which took part on January 30, 2013. The main report "Effect of Crisis on EU Foreign and Defence Policy" was delivered by Dr. Sci. (Political Science) N.K. Arbatova, Head of Department on European Political Studies at IMEMO. The fellow workers of IMEMO – Academician of RAS A.A. Dynkin (chairman), Academician of RAS A.G. Arbatov, Dr. Sci. (Economics) S.A. Afontsev, Cand. Sci. (History) K.V. Voronov, Cand. Sci. (Political Science) E.S. Gromoglasova, Dr. Sci. (Technology) V.Z. Dvorkin, G.I. Machavariani, Cand. Sci. (History) S.K. Oznobischev, Dr. Sci. (Philosophy) V.I. Pantin: Cand. Sci. (Political Science) S.V. Utkin, Dr. Sci. (Economics) V.L. Sheinis, – as well as Cand. Sci. (Political Sciences) N.Yu. Kaveshnikov (Professor at MGIMO-University of Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Russia), Cand. Sci. (Political Science) O.Yu. Potemkina (Head of Center on European Integration, Institute of Europe RAS), Cand. Sci. (History) N.V.Yurieva (Assoc. Prof. at the Chair for World Political Processes, MGIMO-University of Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Russia) also took part in the discussion.


1941 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-310
Author(s):  
Frederick M. Davenport ◽  
Lewis B. Sims ◽  
Leonard D. White ◽  
G. Lyle Belsley ◽  
Frances R. Fussell

Only since 1939 have political scientists, as such, had much chance to gain entrance into the permanent federal civil service. This opportunity came as the result of two well-timed phenomena: (1) the demand of a number of federal agencies for young men and women educated in certain branches of political science, and (2) the United States Civil Service Commission's announcement of the Junior Professional Assistant examination, which included an optional called “Junior Administrative Technician.” This combination of happy circumstances, however, did not solve all the problems of the young political scientist or clarify all the requirements for federal employment; so, at the 1939 meeting of the American Political Science Association a committee was appointed to study the question.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document