scholarly journals On the issue of state support of the Rostov region enterprises producing import-substituting products

Author(s):  
Anastasia Andreevna Bondarenko ◽  
◽  
Darya Dmitrievna Mironova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
G.А. Malkhasyan ◽  
◽  
О.G. Savelyeva ◽  

The article is devoted to the state support for Russian industrial exports, the development and expansion of which is a lever for the stability of the national economy and the country's competitiveness on the international market. The authors consider the main forms and tools of the state policy to support exports in the Rostov region in the context of implementation of priority national projects. The analysis of the structure of the state system for export support in Russia in general and in the Rostov region in particular.


2021 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 08044
Author(s):  
Gurgen Malkhasyan ◽  
Oksana Savelyeva

The article is devoted to the development of the industrial complex in the conditions of spreading of new coronavirus infection. The following points are considered in the article: the main forms and tools of state support for industrial enterprises in the Rostov region in the context of the pandemic, measures taken by the Government of the Russian Federation and regions to reduce the negative impact of the pandemic on industries and stabilize the work of industrial enterprises.


2020 ◽  
pp. 47-62
Author(s):  
Andrei A. Yakovlev ◽  
Nina V. Ershova ◽  
Olga M. Uvarova

The paper analyzes the shifts in government priorities in terms of support of big and medium manufacturing enterprises amid 2008—2009 and 2014—2015 crises. Based on the data of 2009, 2014 and 2018 surveys of Russian manufacturing firms, using logit regressions we identify factors that affect the receipt of financial and organizational support at different levels of government. The analysis shows that in 2012—2013 the share of manufacturing firms that received state support shrank significantly as compared to 2007—2008; moreover, the support concentrated on enterprises that had access to lobbying resource (such as state participation in the ownership or business associations membership). In 2016—2017 the scale of state support coverage recovered. However, the support at all levels of government was provided to firms that carried out investment and provided assistance to regional or local authorities in social development of the region, while the factor of state participation in the ownership became insignificant. The paper provides possible explanation for these shifts in the criteria of state support provision in Russia.


2020 ◽  
pp. 105-116
Author(s):  
N. I. Shagaida

The article clarifies the concept of “agricultural holding”, using an approach to assessing the size on the basis of the total revenue of all agricultural organizations within the agricultural holding. It has been revealed that only 100 of the total number of agricultural holdings that were identified can be attributed to large business entities. They comprise about 3% of agricultural organizations in the country, while their share in the proceeds is about 37%. A large share of agricultural holdings — large business subjects under the control of Russian entities operate in one, and under the control of foreign legal entities — in three or more regions of the Russian Federation. Vertical integration within the framework of large agricultural holdings with different schemes for including the stages of processing and sale of products produced in their agricultural organizations allows them to receive advantages. Strengthening the role of large business entities in agriculture puts on the agenda the issue of differentiating approaches to taxation and state support in agriculture, depending on the size of the companies’ agricultural businesses.


2019 ◽  
pp. 59-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai M. Svetlov ◽  
Renata G. Yanbykh ◽  
Dariya A. Loginova

In this paper, we assess the effects of agricultural state support of corporate farms on their revenues from agricultural production sales in 14 Russian regions that differ in technology, environment and institutional conditions. In addition to the direct effect of the state support, the indirect effects via labor and capital are revealed. For this purpose, we identify production functions and statistical models of production factors for each of these regions separately. We find out diverse effects of the state support on revenues among the regions. Positive effects prevail. Negative effects are mainly caused by labor reductions that follow subsidy inflows. Another cause of negative effects is the soft budget constraints phenomenon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document