scholarly journals PROBLEM PRACOWNICZEGO PODPORZĄDKOWANIA KADRY KIEROWNICZEJ NAJWYŻSZEGO SZCZEBLA W ORGANIZACJACH GOSPODARCZYCH – ARTYKUŁ DYSKUSYJNY

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 279
Author(s):  
Tomasz Duraj
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Senior Management ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Employment Relations ◽  
Senior Managers ◽  
Management Hierarchy ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Atypical Employment ◽  
Relationship Of

The Problem of Employment Subordination of Senior Management in Economic OrganizationsSummaryThe subject of this study is to show the doubts and controversies that appear in the doctrine of labor law and judicial decisions in the interpretation of employment subordination of senior management in economic organizations.Taking into consideration the specificity of functions performed by senior management, the employment relationship of these employees is so much different from the typical standards that in the literature on the subject there has developed a view that there exists, in the case of the discussed category of senior managers, a not typical or even atypical employment relationship. This untypical nature is the reason why some institutions or requirements regulated in the labor law are not applicable to this group of managers, or lose their usefulness or even sense, as inadequate in view of the specific character of the managerial function. In relation to this issue, the most interesting appears the problem of interpretation of the employment subordination of senior management, taking into consideration the fact, that those employees, being on the top of the management hierarchy in a given organization, work in the condition of relative independence, being characterized by the absence of a superior and considerable freedom in the area of organizing own work in terms of time and place.The author of the article is critical of the multitude of the approaches to understanding the employment subordination of senior management. It must be remembered, that subordination is considered the most important (constitutive) feature of employment relationship, differentiating it from other employment relations (especially those of civil law character), and at the same time indicates the scope of use of employment relationship, also with regard to managers. This situation leads to blurring the differences, which are already vague, between labor law and civil law forms of employing managing personnel, creating a state of uncertainty about a lawful choice of one of the mentioned here in basis of employing senior managing personnel.

scholarly journals The Influence of Atypical Employment on Socioeconomic Development

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Nikita L. Lyutov
Keyword(s):  
Market Segmentation ◽  
Socioeconomic Development ◽  
Employment Relations ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Labour Law ◽  
Labour Market Segmentation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Labour Legislation ◽  
Atypical Employment ◽  
Positive Effect

The Subject of the Study. The article deals with an issue of impact of atypical employment on the socioeconomic development on micro- and macro levels. The Purpose of the Study is to discover the links between the introduction of atypical forms of employment and socioeconomic development. The Main Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Study: as the implementation of various forms of atypical employment is one of the aspects of flexibility in employment relations’ regulation, the author starts with a general analysis of impact of general flexibility of employment on the economy. This section of the article contains the conclusion that a thesis about positive effect of labour law flexibility on the economic effectiveness remains unproven; – the second part of the article contains an analysis of the relations between the specific forms of atypical employment and the state of economy. The conclusion has been made that ill-considered implementation of such forms into the labour legislation leads to such negative consequences to the economy as the labour market segmentation and volatility, rising incomes gap and lowering the purchasing power. – the thesis is made that Russian labour legislation modification in the field of atypical employment development is only acceptable with a view to make the already existing atypical employment come out of informal sector, and in a way that takes into account the interests of both parties of the employment relationship.

PROTECTION OF THE PERMANENCE OF EMPLOYMENT IN GERMANY

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (XVIII) ◽  
pp. 391-402
Author(s):  
Tomasz Świętnicki
Keyword(s):  
Labor Relations ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Extensive Study ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Employment Relationships ◽  
Law System ◽  
The Subject

The aim of this article is to present the protection of the permanence for the employment relationship in Germany and to outline the labor law system prevailing in Germany, as well as attempt to answer the question what are the grounds / prerequisites as a rule of the subject protection. The subject of my analysis are the principles of protection for he permanence of employment relationships established on the basis of a contract for the employee. Labor relations that have their origins in the appointment, and their characteristics remain outside the scope of my article, because it would need a much extensive study.

scholarly journals A versenytilalmi megállapodás

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Alex Ember
Keyword(s):  
Geographical Area ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Financial Compensation ◽  
Time Period ◽  
The Law ◽  
Employee Needs ◽  
The Relationship

The “agreement on non-competition” is essentially the extension of the protection of the basic economic interest of the employer. While during the employment relationship several labor law provisions protect the interest of both parties, the “agreement on non-competition” is designed to protect the employer’s interests after the termination of the relationship. This means – in return for financial compensation – the former employee needs to refrain from any kind of business competition against his/her former employer. This necessarily involves financial compensation and may have several restrictions, such business or geographical area or time.   The previous Labor Code did not specify for detailed regulation of the issue and the law remained rather vague. It merely referred to the fact that parties – based on their own free will – may enter into such agreement. However the new Labor Code contains explicit regulations under title XVIII of the Act as “Particular Agreements Related to Employment”.   The “agreement on non-competition” belongs to the field of employment law. Unlike the previous Labor Code that categorized this possible agreement as of purely civil law in nature, the new Labor Code declares it to belong under the scope of the Labor Code. The previous regulation even ordered the provisions of the Civil Code to be applied to such agreements however the new legislation brought a conceptual change.   The currently effective regulation provides for a 2-year limitation on such conduct on the employee’s part that would create competition with the employer. The exact amount of the consideration payable for this obligation remains to be decided by the parties however the Labor Code suggests that it shall be based on how difficult the applied restrictions make it for the employee to find another job with his qualifications and experience. As a basic limit the law provides that the amount shall not be less than one-third of the base wage payable for the same period of time.   The “agreement on non-competition” is not to be confused with similar legal institutions. The paper points out two close similarities in the legal system. One being the employee’s obligation of confidentiality; this prevails after termination of the employment relationship as well without any time or similar restrictions and even without any financial compensation. The other one is the so called “non-compete” agreement from the field of competition law. This is applicable after takeovers where the seller shall refrain from engaging into business in the same area as the buyer.   In the field of labor law the time period for the “agreement on non-competition” is up to the agreement of the parties however the new law invokes an upper limit of two years that is following the termination of the employment relationship. This is a decrease from the previous regulation that provided for a period of three years. The agreement can be modified by the consent of both parties just like the employment contract or civil law agreements.   In case of violation of the agreement three cases are to be analyzed. The first is the case of the employee breaching the provisions of the contract. In this case the employee is liable for damages towards his/her former employer. The provisions of the new Civil Code and those of the Labor Code are to be applied to the damages. In the second case the employer may request an injunction to prohibit the employee from any conduct breaching the agreement while the third case involves the breach of the agreement on the employee’s part for which the rules of the Civil Code and the Labor Code are to be applied as well.

scholarly journals Collective Rights of Persons Engaged in Gainful Employment Outside the Employment Relationship – en Outline of the Issue

2021 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 7-18
Author(s):  
Tomasz Duraj
Keyword(s):  
Trade Union ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Collective Agreement ◽  
Employment Relations ◽  
Gainful Employment ◽  
Collective Rights ◽  
Adopted Model ◽  
Atypical Employment ◽  
The Right

The main objective of the following study is to introduce readers to the issue of the 2nd National Scientific Conference in the series “Atypical Employment Relations” organized on 3 October 2019 by the Centre for Atypical Employment Relations of the University of Lodz. The consequence of extending the right of coalition to persons performing paid work outside the employment relationship was that they were guaranteed important collective rights, which until 1 January 2019 were reserved primarily for employees. The rights which Polish legislator ensured to non-employees include the right to equal treatment in employment due to membership in a trade union or performing trade union functions; the right to bargain with a view to the conclusion of collective agreement and other collective agreements; the right to bargain to resolve collective disputes and the right to organize strikes and other forms of protest, as well as the right to protect union activists. The author positively assesses the extension of collective rights to people engaged in gainful employment outside the employment relationship, noting a number of flaws and shortcomings of the analyzed norms. The manner of regulating this matter, through the mechanism of referring to the relevant provisions regulating the situation of employees, the statutory equalization of the scope of collective rights of non-employees with the situation of employees, the lack of criteria differentiating these rights, as well as the adopted model of trade union representation based on company trade unions, not taking into account the specific situation of people working for profit outside the employment relationship, are the reasons why the amendment to the trade union law is seen critically and requires further changes.

scholarly journals Social Guarantees in the Case of Employees’ Dismissal in Russia Comparative Legal Aspects of Russian and Foreign Labor Law

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 159-173
Author(s):  
Alexander Zavgorodniy
Keyword(s):  
Labor Law ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Labor Standards ◽  
Employment Relations ◽  
International Labor Standards ◽  
International Labor ◽  
Foreign Labor ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
First Time

The main purpose of the article is to identify the contradictions and problems arising when both international labor standards and Russian labor law are applied and separate guarantees to workers are provided in the case of their dismissal. The object of the research is the employment relationship which arises between the employer and the employee when social guarantees are given to the workers when the employment relations are terminated. This article considers the regulations of Russian and foreign labor law which provide workers with certain guarantees if the employment contract is terminated at the initiative of the employer. For the first time, these guarantees are considered from a comparative legal perspective. Specific recommendations about improvement of the Russian labor law and its enforcement.

scholarly journals Responsibility in the employment relationship: Distinctive features of disciplinary liability in the general and special employment relations regime

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (89) ◽  
pp. 285-301
Author(s):  
Slobodanka Kovačević-Perić
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Collective Agreement ◽  
Employment Relations ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Labour Legislation

Establishing an employment relationship involves acquiring or assuming certain rights, duties and responsibilities for both parties in the employment relationship, in accordance with the law, the collective agreement, the employer's general administrative acts, and the employment contract. An employment relationship involves not only the parties' rights and duties but also their responsibility. Responsibility can be of legal and non-legal nature. Legal responsibility (liability) is of greater importance for the employees. On the whole, legal responsibility may be disciplinary, material, administrative (for misdemeanors), economic (for economic offenses) and criminal in nature. The subject matter of labour law includes only disciplinary and material liability of the employee, while other types of legal responsibility are the subject matter of other legal disciplines. Although the former labour legislation of the Republic of Serbia regulated the disciplinary liability of the employees in detail, such practice has been completely abandoned in the new Labour Act, which only regulates the summary dismissal procedure. Unlike the Labour Act, the Civil Servants Act contains numerous provisions on the disciplinary and material liability of civil servants. This Act also regulates procedural issues regarding the rules for initiating and conducting a disciplinary proceeding, entering disciplinary sanctions in or removing them from the personnel files, etc. In this paper, the author analyzes disciplinary liability by examining the specifics of substantive and procedural norms for establishing this form of liability in the general and special employment relations regime. From the aspect of the rule of law, the author provides a critical analysis of such legislative solutions and considers their legal justification.

scholarly journals GRANICE UPRAWNIEŃ KIEROWNICZYCH PRACODAWCY W STOSUNKU PRACY

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Tomasz Duraj
Keyword(s):  
Labor Law ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Work Process ◽  
Type Method ◽  
Employment Contract ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
The Core ◽  
Organizational Functions ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legal Forms

THE LIMITS OF THE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPSummaryManagement authority, which is guaranteed for the employer under the employment relationship with respect to employees, is an essential (necessary) feature of the employment relationship, which very often determines the identity of this relationship, distinguishing it from other legal forms of employment, especially those of a civil nature. The employing entity’s management authority must first of all be identified with the employer’s powers to influence the employee’s actions within the scope of the performance of work (in the work process) and the employee’s corresponding obligations to the employing entity regarding the work he is to perform. Using these powers, the employer specifies the employee’s obligations for the performance of the job, in particular its type, method, the time and place in which it is to be done, as well as the order and organization of the work process. According to the literature on the subject, the employer’s main powers of management include prescriptive rights (the core of management authority), which allow him to specify the employee’s duties by issuing binding instructions to him; punitive (disciplinary) powers associated with the use of disciplinary penalties; regulatory (legislative) powers, primarily to establish the regulations and other acts determining working order (in particular work schedules, holiday timetables etc.); and distributive power (the allocation of prizes and awards). The object of this study is to characterize the limits to the employer’s management authority in the employment relationship. The author concentrates on the limits defined by applicable law, the employment contract, the clause of compliance with socio-economic purpose, and the rules of social coexistence, as well as custom. The analysis of the limits of the employer’s management authority shows the importance of this issue, both in theoretical and practical terms. The appropriate configuration of these limits may help to solve one of the fundamental problems of modern labor law, which is to harmonize its protective and organizational functions.

EXTENSION OF LABOR LAW PROTECTION STANDARDS IN THE ASPECT OF FIXED-TERM CONTRACTS OF ACADEMIC TEACHERS. COMMENTS DE LEGE LATA AND DE LEGE FERENDA

2021 ◽  
Vol specjalny II (XXI) ◽  
pp. 387-400
Author(s):  
Łucja Kobroń-Gąsiorowska
Keyword(s):  
Labor Law ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Employment Contracts ◽  
Protective Function ◽  
Partial Exclusion ◽  
Academic Teachers ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Academic Teacher ◽  
Scope Of Protection

This paper attempts to determine the scope of protection of academic teachers in the context of repeated concluding fixed-term contracts and the partial exclusion by the Act on higher education of the application of Art. 25(1) of the KP to employment contracts of this group of employees. The author does not intend to duplicate the extensive literature in this area presented by labor law doctrine. In this publication, the author defends the thesis that the employment relationship of an academic teacher should be subject to a broader impact of the protective provisions of the Labor Code, including the protective function of labor law, in a situation where there are no normative obstacles to extending such impact.

Das römische Recht vom Error

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Lotmar
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Roman Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Material Basis ◽  
The Subject

For decades, Philipp Lotmar has repeatedly and insistently focussed on the subject of error. In a monumental work, Lotmar set out to examine the countless relevant Roman sources in every area of law inside as well as outside the Corpus Juris Civilis, thus providing the material basis for his criticism of Karl Friedrich von Savigny's leading doctrine of errors in contract law. However, Lotmar could not complete the work he considered the crowning achievement of his research in the field of Roman law, nor did he succeed in publishing the first, almost finished volume. The entire first volume and the introduction to the second volume, i.e. those parts of the intended opus which Lotmar left behind in a form already fit for publication, will now be presented to the public. In this way, the scientific work of a formative civil law teacher, who today is perceived primarily as the creator of modern labor law, is thus finally being made available in his proper field of research, i.e. Roman law and general private law dogmatics, almost a hundred years after his death.

COOPERATIVE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT AS THE BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING AN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP

2021 ◽  
Vol specjalny (XXI) ◽  
pp. 261-273
Author(s):  
Tomasz Duraj
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Employment Relationship ◽  
Basic Form ◽  
Employment Contract ◽  
Entire Duration ◽  
Worker Cooperatives ◽  
The Subject ◽  
One Year ◽  
Worker Cooperative ◽  
The Way

The subject of the foregoing study is the characteristics of the cooperative employment contract, which is the basic form of employment of worker cooperatives members, and, in principle, is used only there. The legislator requires that, in addition to the cases laid down in the provisions of the Cooperative Law, the cooperative member is employed for the entire duration of the membership on the basis of a cooperative employment contract, which has a significant impact on the way in which the contract is concluded and its content. Pursuant to Article 182 of Cooperative Law, as soon as a person joins a worker cooperative, both the cooperative and its member are obliged to enter into and remain in a cooperative employment relationship with each other. Importantly, if the employment relationship is not established through the fault of the cooperative, the member may claim, for the entire duration of the membership, the conclusion of a cooperative employment contract, and apart from that, he may, within one year from the date of becoming a member, claim compensation under the provisions of civil law. These claims are subject to the cognition of the labour court.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document