Treatment and overall survival among anti-PD-1-exposed advanced melanoma patients with evidence of disease progression

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy A Pinto ◽  
Xinyue Liu ◽  
Xiaoyun Li ◽  
Emilie Scherrer ◽  
Mizuho Kalabis
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Mek Inhibitors ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Melanoma Patients

Background: Little is known regarding treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced melanoma who progress after anti-PD-1 exposure. Methods: The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate OS from electronic health records for patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy and received subsequent therapy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize treatment. Results: A total of 304 patients who progressed after anti-PD-1 therapy received subsequent therapy: 50% immunotherapy, 36% BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors, 14% other therapies. Median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.4–8.8), with an association (p < 0.01) with best response to baseline anti-PD-1 therapy and further associations with Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 (p < 0.001 compared with ECOG ≥2), normal LDH (p < 0.001 compared with elevated levels) and treatment with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors (p = 0.02 compared with other treatment). There was an association (p < 0.01) of survival with best response to baseline anti-PD-1 therapy. Conclusions: OS for advanced melanoma patients who progress on anti-PD-1 therapy is suboptimal, which highlights the need for further research to develop new medications and optimize treatment strategies.

scholarly journals Potential Reasons for Unresponsiveness to Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy in Young Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1318
Author(s):  
Devayani Machiraju ◽  
Sarah Schäfer ◽  
Jessica C. Hassel
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Age Dependent ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
The Impact

The impact of age on the clinical benefit of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in advanced melanoma patients has been evolving recently. Due to a reduced immune function in elderly patients, young patients with a robust immune system are theoretically expected to benefit more from the treatment approach. However, in contrast to this hypothesis, recent studies in patients with metastatic melanoma have demonstrated that immunotherapy, especially with anti-PD1 treatment, is less effective in patients below 65 years, on average, with significantly lower responses and reduced overall survival compared to patients above 65 years of age. Besides, data on young patients are even more sparse. Hence, in this review, we will focus on age-dependent differences in the previously described resistance mechanisms to the treatment and discuss the development of potential combination treatment strategies for enhancing the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-PD1 or PDL1 treatment in young melanoma patients.

Panitumumab (Pmab) versus cetuximab (Cmab)/irinotecan (Iri) therapy among patients with KRAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 640-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Leo Chen ◽  
C. D. Blanke ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Kimberly Schaff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Prognostic Variables ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

640 Background: In British Columbia, use of anti-EGFR therapy for KRAS wt MCRC is limited to patients (pts) previously treated with both irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Physicians may choose either Pmab monotherapy or Cmab/Iri combination therapy. We sought to compare the characteristics and outcomes of all pts treated with Pmab/Cmab referred to 5 provincial cancer centers since July, 2009. Methods: Eligible patients received at least one dose of either Pmab (6mg/kg q2w) or Cetuximab (500mg/m2 q2w) plus Iri (180mg/m2 q2w). Baseline characteristics and systemic therapy were prospectively collected, while ECOG and metastatectomy status were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted from the first day of Pmab/Cmab. Results: Among 178 eligible pts, Pmab was chosen 3 times more often than Cmab/Iri (see table). Pts treated with Cmab/Iri were significantly younger and had better performance status than those treated with Pmab. There were no statistically significant differences in other prognostic variables, and a similar proportion received chemotherapy after Pmab vs. Cmab/Iri. Overall survival was slightly longer among patients receiving Cmab/Iri (8.3 mo), vs. Pmab (7.7 mo) (p=.03). Conclusions: Pmab was chosen more often than Cmab/Iri for similarly eligible patients. Cmab/Iri pts were younger, were more likely to have ECOG performance status 0/1 and achieved a modestly longer overall survival. Either regimen appears to be suitable for previously treated pts with KRAS wt MCRC. [Table: see text]

Association between complete response and survival in advanced melanoma treated with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab (ipi).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10029-10029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Alan Chesney ◽  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Frances A. Collichio ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
Axel Hauschild ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Kaplan Meier

10029 Background: This is the first randomized trial testing the addition of an oncolytic virus to an immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced melanoma. At the 3-year (yr) follow-up, the combination (combo) of T-VEC and ipi demonstrated durable and statistically superior objective response rate (ORR) over ipi alone (36.7% vs. 16.0%; odds ratio, 3.0; 95% Cl, 1.6–6.0; P = 0.002). Complete response (CR) rate was 21.4% with the combo and 6.0% with ipi. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either arm. In this post hoc analysis, we utilized the 3-yr landmark data to explore the relationship between CR and OS in the combo arm. Methods: Pts with unresectable, stage IIIB-IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive combo or ipi alone. T-VEC was administered intratumorally on day 1 of week (wk) 1 at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL followed by subsequent doses at 108 PFU/mL on day 1 of wk 4, and every 2 wks thereafter. Ipi (3 mg/kg) was given every 3 wks starting on day 1 of wk 6 for up to 4 doses. Response was assessed by investigators per immune-related response criteria every 12 wks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was ORR; key secondary endpoints were OS, progression-free survival, and safety. Results: 198 pts were randomized (98 to combo; 100 to ipi). As of February 25, 2019, the median follow-up time was 40.0 mos (range: 0.2–63.7) for the combo arm. Among 98 pts who received combo, 21 (21.4%) had a best overall response of CR including 8 who converted from an initial partial response (PR), 15 (15.3%) had PR, 19 (19.4%) had stable disease, 30 (30.6%) had progressive disease, and 13 (13.2%) were unevaluable. Of 21 pts achieving CR, 17 (81%) had ECOG status of 0, 16 (76.2%) had stage IIIB-IVM1a disease, and 16 (76.2%) had no visceral metastases. Median duration of CR was not reached (range: 5.4[+]–58.2[+] mos); 19 of 21 CRs lasted more than 6 months. The baseline tumor burden was lower in pts with CR than in those with non-CR. Median OS was not reached in pts with CR (range: 25.1[+]–63.7[+] mos) and was 47.6 mos (range: 0.2[+]– 63.7[+] mos) in pts with non-CR (Log-rank P = 0.0005). The Kaplan–Meier estimated 3-year OS rate was 100.0% for patients with CR and 52.3% for those with non-CR. Conclusions: CR rate was higher with T-VEC plus ipi than with ipi alone in pts with advanced melanoma (21.4% vs. 6.0%). In the combo arm, CR was associated with prolonged OS, and pts with CR tended to have better ECOG performance status, earlier-stage disease, and lower baseline tumor burden, as compared with those with non-CR. Clinical trial information: NCT01740297.

scholarly journals Melanoma Brain Metastases in the Era of Targeted Therapy and Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1489
Author(s):  
John M. Rieth ◽  
Umang Swami ◽  
Sarah L. Mott ◽  
Mario Zanaty ◽  
Michael D. Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Melanoma Brain Metastases

Brain metastases commonly develop in melanoma and are associated with poor overall survival of about five to nine months. Fortunately, new therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, have been developed. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of checkpoint inhibitors. Patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma were identified at a single institution. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify baseline and treatment factors, which correlated with progression-free and overall survival. A total of 209 patients with melanoma brain metastases were identified. The median overall survival of the cohort was 5.3 months. On multivariable analysis, the presence of non-cranial metastatic disease, poor performance status (ECOG 2–4), whole-brain radiation therapy, and older age at diagnosis of brain metastasis were associated with poorer overall survival. Craniotomy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.97) and treatment with a CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32–0.94) were the only interventions associated with improved overall survival. Further studies with novel agents are needed to extend lifespan in patients with brain metastases in melanoma.

Overall survival benefit from tebentafusp in patients with best response of progressive disease.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9509-9509
Author(s):  
Anthony M. Joshua ◽  
Jean-Francois Baurain ◽  
Sophie Piperno-Neumann ◽  
Paul Nathan ◽  
Jessica Cecile Hassel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Immortal Time Bias ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Overall Survival Benefit

9509 Background: Tebentafusp (tebe) is the first T cell receptor (TCR) therapeutic to demonstrate an overall survival (OS) benefit in a randomized Phase 3 (Ph3) study [ NCT03070392 ]. In Ph2, 42% of pts with best overall response (BOR) of progressive disease (PD) survived > 1 year (yr), suggesting RECIST-based radiographic assessments underestimate OS benefit of tebe. Here we analyzed OS in the Ph3 study in a cohort of pts with BOR of PD by comparing tebe to the control arm of investigator’s choice (IC). Methods: 378 pts were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to tebe vs. IC. BOR was assessed by investigators using RECIST v1.1. Treatment beyond first disease progression (TBP) was permitted for both arms. On the IC arm, only patients receiving pembrolizumab (pembro) continued with TBP and were included in the TBP-related analyses. No crossover to tebe was permitted; investigators were free to choose subsequent therapy. This analysis was conducted on the first interim analysis (data extracted Nov-2020). Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were based on Day 100 landmark to eliminate immortal time bias and to capture majority of the PDs. Results: By Day 100, PD as BOR occurred in 52% (130/252) of tebe pts (PD-tebe) vs. 60% (76/126) of IC pts (PD-IC). Key baseline characteristics including lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, ECOG performance, age, and sex were similar between PD-tebe vs PD-IC. The proportion of pts with PD due to progression of target lesions (TL), non-TL, or new lesions were also similar between the two groups. More pts received TBP among PD-tebe 53% (69/130) vs PD-pembro 16% (10/61). Median duration of TBP was longer for PD-tebe (7 weeks) vs PD-Pembro (3 weeks). The safety profile of PD-tebe pts during TBP was similar to all tebe-treated pts. OS was superior for PD-tebe vs PD-IC, HR = 0.41 (95%CI 0.25-0.66), even when considering key baseline covariates. While some pts had regression of TL despite diagnosis of PD ( < 10% of pts), the OS benefit remained even when limited to pts with best change of tumor growth of TL, HR 0.46 (0.29, 0.73). 58% (75/130) PD-tebe and 52% (40/76) PD-IC pts received subsequent therapies. In a landmark OS analysis of these pts beginning on 1st day of subsequent therapy, prior tebe was associated with better OS vs. prior IC, HR 0.59 (95%CI 0.36-0.96). Conclusions: Tebe is the first TCR therapeutic to demonstrate an OS benefit in a solid tumor. Surprisingly, a strong OS benefit from tebe is observed even in pts with BOR of PD, suggesting that RECIST-based radiographic assessments do not capture the complete benefit from tebe. The safety profile of tebe during TBP was consistent with that for long-term tebe treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03070392.

Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Azim Jalali ◽  
Hui-Li Wong ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Lucy Gately ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Number Of Patients

71 Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. In Australia, TAS-102 was initially made available locally through patients self-funding, later via an industry sponsored Medicine Access Program (MAP) and then via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in real world Australian population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to all TRACC patients and those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Results: Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102 (non-PBS n = 27, PBS n = 80), The median number of patients per site was 7 (range: 1-17). The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 67 for all TRACC patients and 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102 and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 39% vs 49% were RAS wild type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median clinician assessed progression-free survival was 3.3 compared to RECIST defined PFS of 2 months in RECOURSE study, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths in the real-world series, where TAS102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion. In the RECOURSE study there was a 4% febrile neutropenia rate and one treatment-related death. Conclusions: TRACC registry patients treated with TAS102 were younger than both TRACC patients overall and those from the RECOURSE trial. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS. However overall survival outcomes achieved with TAS102 in real world patients were comparable to findings from this pivotal trial with an acceptable rate of major adverse events.

Impact of ECOG performance status on recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinomas treated with anti-PD1 inhibitors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18004-e18004
Author(s):  
Cameron Chalker ◽  
Vicky Wu ◽  
Jenna M. Voutsinas ◽  
Victoria Hwang ◽  
Christina S Baik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Hpv Status

e18004 Background: Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent an established standard of care for patients with recurrent/metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC). Landmark studies excluded patients with ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2; the benefit of ICI in this population is therefore unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed RMHNSCC patients who received at least 1 dose of ICI at our institution. Demographic data and clinical outcomes were obtained; the latter included objective response to ICI (ORR), physician-documented CTCAE grade 2+ toxicity (irAE), and any unplanned hospitalization within 100-days of last ICI dose (UH). Associations between demographic data and clinical outcomes were explored using both uni- and multivariate analysis. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model; ORR, irAE, and UH were evaluated with logistic regression. This project was approved by our institutional IRB. Results: We identified 152 RMHNSCC patients who were treated with ICI between 1/2013 and 1/2019. ECOG PS was 0 in 42 (27%), 1 in 75 (50%), 2 in 27 (18%), 3 in 2 (1%), and unknown in 6 (4%) patients. The median age was 61 (range: 25 - 90). 124 (82%) were male, 124 (82%) were white, and 69 (45%) were never-smokers. The most common primary sites were the oropharynx (n = 59, 40%), oral cavity (n = 39, 26%), nasopharynx (n = 11, 7%), and larynx (n = 10, 6%). 54 (36%) were p16+ oropharynx cancers. CPS score was available in 10 (6.6%). Single agent ICI was received by 118 (77%) patients. 66 (44%) had a documented irAE and 54 (36%) had an UH. A multivariate model for OS containing PS, smoking status and HPV status showed a strong association between inferior OS and ECOG 2/3 compared to 0/1 (p < 0.001; HR = 3.30, CI = 2.01-5.41), as well as former (vs. never) smoking status (p < 0.001; HR = 2.17, CI = 1.41-3.35). Current smoking (p = 0.25) did not reach statistical significance. On univariate analysis, poor PS was associated with inferior ORR (p = 0.03; OR = 0.25, CI = 0.06-0.77) and increased UH (p = 0.04; OR = 2.43, CI = 1.05—5.71). There was no significant association between irAE and any patient characteristic. Conclusions: We observed inferior overall survival among ICI-treated RMHNSCC patients with ECOG 2/3 in our single-institution, retrospective series. Our findings help frame discussion of therapeutic options in this poor-risk population. Further study must be done to determine which interventions are of greatest benefit for RMHNSCC patients with declining performance status.

scholarly journals P865 Safety & efficacy of lifileucel (LN-144) tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in metastatic melanoma patients after progression on multiple therapies – independent review committee data update

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A12-A12
Author(s):  
Amod Sarnaik ◽  
Nikhil Khushalani ◽  
Jason Chesney ◽  
Harriet Kluger ◽  
Brendan Curti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Review Committee ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Mek Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Independent Review ◽  
Melanoma Patients

BackgroundTreatment options are limited for patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies such as BRAF/MEK inhibitors (if BRAF-V600E mutated). Adoptive cell therapy utilizing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has shown antitumor efficacy with durable responses in heavily pretreated melanoma patients. Safety and efficacy of lifileucel, a centrally manufactured cryopreserved autologous TIL therapy assessed by both investigator and an independent review committee (IRC), are presented.MethodsC-144-01 is a global Phase 2 open-label, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of lifileucel in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma. We report on Cohort 2 (N = 66) patients with Stage IIIC/IV unresectable melanoma who received lifileucel. Tumors resected at local institutions were processed in central GMP facilities for TIL production in a 22-day process. Final TIL infusion product was cryopreserved and shipped to sites. Patients received one week of cyclophosphamide/fludarabine preconditioning lymphodepletion, a single lifileucel infusion, followed by up to 6 doses of IL-2. All responses were assessed by RECIST 1.1.Results66 patients had the following baseline characteristics: 3.3 mean prior therapies (anti-PD1 100%; anti-CTLA-4 80%; BRAF/MEK inhibitor 23%), relatively high tumor burden (106 mm mean target lesion sum of diameters), 44% with liver and/or brain lesions, median LDH 244 U/L. Objective Response Rate (ORR) by investigator was 36.4% (2 CR, 22 PR, 1 previously confirmed PR is now changed to SD) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) of 80.3%. At a median follow up of 9.7 months, median Duration of Response (DOR) has not been reached. The adverse event profile was generally consistent with the underlying advanced disease and the profile of the lymphodepletion and IL-2 regimens.The ORR per IRC was 34.8% (2 CR, 21 PR) and DCR was 72.7%. At a median follow up of 6.9 months, the median IRC DOR has not been reached. Overall concordance rate of investigator and IRC read of response was 89.4%. The concordance compares favorably with literature reports in a metastatic disease.1ConclusionsLifileucel treatment resulted in a 36.4% ORR in heavily pretreated metastatic melanoma patients with high baseline disease burden who had received prior anti-PD1 and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, if tumor BRAF mutated. The high concordance of 89.4% between investigator and IRC confirms the original assessment of lifileucel efficacy in metastatic melanoma.2AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the patients and their families for participation in the study.The authors would also like to acknowledge the support and dedication of all investigators and site team members from all participating clinical trial institutions.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT02360579Ethics ApprovalEthics Approval This trial was approved by Western Institutional Review Board - IRB Tracking Number: 20160198.ReferencesGhiorghiu DC, et al. Comparison of central and site review of RECIST data in an open randomised phase II trial in advanced melanoma. 10.1594.ecr 2009/C-075.Sarnaik A, et al. Safety and efficacy of cryopreserved autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy (LN-144, lifileucel) in advanced metastatic melanoma patients who progressed on multiple prior therapies including anti-PD-1. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:2518–2518.

Primary Splenic Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (PS-DLBCL): Splenectomy Improves Survival

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4439-4439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osnat Bairey ◽  
Lev Shvidel ◽  
Chava Perry ◽  
Eldad J Dann ◽  
Rosa Ruchlemer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Introduction: Although the spleen is involved in about a third of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), primary splenic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PS-DLBCL) is rare having a reported incidence of less than 1% of all NHL. Most of the described series include small numbers of patients before the rituximab era and the role of splenectomy treatment in addition to immuno-chemotherapy is unknown. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected for 87 patients (pts) with PS-DLBCL treated in 7 medical centers in Israel during the years 1982-2013. Patients presenting with systemic disease with splenic involvement or those having a diagnostic biopsy from other nodal or extranodal disease were excluded. Results: The mean age was 59.6 years (range, 24-89 years); 57.5% were male. Abdominal pain was reported in 61 pts (81%), B symptoms in 49 pts (59%), ECOG performance status 0 - 1 in 85%. Stage I disease was recorded in 28%, II in 33%, III in 18%, and IV in 21%. Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/µl) was recorded in only 6 pts. Lactic dehydrogenase levels (LDH) were elevated in 69 pts (84%). Favorable International Prognostic Index (IPI) 0-2 was recorded in 62 pts (72%). The mean splenic length was 17.34±6 cm (range 7- 37 cm) and the mean splenic weight was 1216 gm±1243 gm (range 180-6000 gm). A splenic mass was found in 97% of pts, and its mean size was 9.26 cm (range 3-18 cm). The diagnostic procedure was core needle biopsy in 46 pts and splenectomy in 39 pts: 27 underwent open splenectomy and 12 laparoscopic splenectomy. Splenectomized pts had lower IPI (p<0.05) and lower stage (p<0.05) compared to non-splenectomized pts. Treatment: The CHOP regimen was given to 80 pts (92%), DA-EPOCH was given to 2 pts (2%) and 5 pts (6%) received other regimens. Rituximab was given to 68 pts (78%). Complete response was achieved in 67 pts (80%) and partial response in 8 (9%). Relapse occurred in 17 pts (22%). Survival: The median follow-up time was 7 years (range 0-19.4 years). During this period 24 pts died (27.5%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 76.6±4.9% and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) 67.2±5.5%. Splenectomy at diagnosis improved survival: the 5-year EFS was 85.4±6% and 54.7±8% for splenectomized and non-splenectomized pts respectively (p=0.02) and the 5-year OS was 91.2±5% and 67.9±7% respectively (p=0.08). For the 53 pts with stage I-II disease, both 5-year EFS and OS were better in the splenectomized pts (p<0.02, Fig 1). The 5-year EFS and OS in pts with stage I and II disease that were splenectomized at diagnosis was 89.6±6% and 96.4±3.5% as compared with 50.5±11% and 63.2±11% in pts who were not splenectomized (p=0.012 and 0.009). The EFS and OS were not influenced by the stage of the disease. Overall survival was associated with B symptoms (p=0.02), weight loss (p=0.04) and ECOG performance status (p=0.03). In a multivariate model, low ECOG PS and splenectomy independently predicted a better EFS (p=0.03 and 0.02 respectively), however for OS, low ECOG PS independently predicted better OS (p=0.03), while splenectomy had only marginal effect on the OS (p=0.056). Conclusions: In our group of pts, PS-DLBCL generally presented with abdominal pain, high LDH and a splenic mass. We demonstrate for the first time that splenectomy at diagnosis improves survival in early stages of PS-DLBCL. Our study is a retrospective one. Therefore, until prospective studies prove that early splenectomy in PS-DLBCL is beneficial in terms of overall survival, the risk and benefit of performing splenectomy should be weighed for each patient. Fig 1: (A) Event-free survival and (B) Overall survival in patients with primary splenic DLBCL and stages I - II disease who did or did not undergo splenectomy at diagnosis. Fig 1:. (A) Event-free survival and (B) Overall survival in patients with primary splenic DLBCL and stages I - II disease who did or did not undergo splenectomy at diagnosis. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document