scholarly journals Pharmacogenomic considerations for medications in the perioperative setting

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 813-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellie H Jhun ◽  
Jeffrey L Apfelbaum ◽  
David M Dickerson ◽  
Sajid Shahul ◽  
Randall Knoebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Malignant Hyperthermia ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Genetic Screening ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Consideration ◽  
High Profile ◽  
Future Potential ◽  
Prolonged Apnea ◽  
Medication Risk

Several high-profile examples of adverse outcomes from medications used in the perioperative setting are well known (e.g., malignant hyperthermia, prolonged apnea, respiratory depression, inadequate analgesia), leading to an increased understanding of genetic susceptibilities underlying these risks. Pharmacogenomic information is increasingly being utilized in certain areas of medicine. Despite this, routine preoperative genetic screening to inform medication risk is not yet standard practice. In this review, we assess the current readiness of pharmacogenomic information for clinical consideration for several common perioperative medications, including description of key pharmacogenes, pharmacokinetic implications and potential clinical outcomes. The goal is to highlight medications for which emerging or considerable pharmacogenomic information exists and identify areas for future potential research.

scholarly journals Statin use and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2020-139172
Author(s):  
Rimesh Pal ◽  
Mainak Banerjee ◽  
Urmila Yadav ◽  
Sukrita Bhattacharjee
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Risk Estimates ◽  
Statin Use

PurposeObservations studies have shown that prior use of statins is associated with a reduced risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. However, the available data are limited, inconsistent and conflicting. Besides, no randomised controlled trial exists in this regard. Hence, the present meta-analysis was conducted to provide an updated summary and collate the effect of statin use on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 using unadjusted and adjusted risk estimates.MethodsPubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched using appropriate keywords till December 18 2020, to identify observational studies reporting clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients using statins versus those not using statins. Prior and in-hospital use of statins were considered. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Unadjusted and adjusted pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs were calculated.ResultsWe included 14 observational studies pooling data retrieved from 19 988 patients with COVID-19. All the studies were of high/moderate quality. Pooled analysis of unadjusted data showed that statin use was not associated with improved clinical outcomes (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.50, p=0.94, I2=94%, random-effects model). However, on pooling adjusted risk estimates, the use of statin was found to significantly reduce the risk of adverse outcomes (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.63, p<0.0005, I2=0%, fixed-effects model).ConclusionsStatin use is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Individuals with multiple comorbidities on statin therapy should be encouraged to continue the drug amid the ongoing pandemic.

scholarly journals Predictive value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for disease deterioration and serious adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yong Zeng ◽  
Shao-Dan Feng ◽  
Gong-Ping Chen ◽  
Jiang-Nan Wu
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

Abstract Background Early identification of patients who are at high risk of poor clinical outcomes is of great importance in saving the lives of patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the context of limited medical resources. Objective To evaluate the value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), calculated at hospital admission and in isolation, for the prediction of the subsequent presence of disease progression and serious clinical outcomes (e.g., shock, death). Methods We designed a prospective cohort study of 352 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 between January 9 and February 26, 2020, in Yichang City, Hubei Province. Patients with an NLR equal to or higher than the cutoff value derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve method were classified as the exposed group. The primary outcome was disease deterioration, defined as an increase of the clinical disease severity classification during hospitalization (e.g., moderate to severe/critical; severe to critical). The secondary outcomes were shock and death during the treatment. Results During the follow-up period, 51 (14.5%) patients’ conditions deteriorated, 15 patients (4.3%) had complicated septic shock, and 15 patients (4.3%) died. The NLR was higher in patients with deterioration than in those without deterioration (median: 5.33 vs. 2.14, P < 0.001), and higher in patients with serious clinical outcomes than in those without serious clinical outcomes (shock vs. no shock: 6.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001; death vs. survival: 7.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001). The NLR measured at hospital admission had high value in predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death (all the areas under the curve > 0.80). The sensitivity of an NLR ≥ 2.6937 for predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death was 82.0% (95% confidence interval, 69.0 to 91.0), 93.3% (68.0 to 100), and 92.9% (66.0 to 100), and the corresponding negative predictive values were 95.7% (93.0 to 99.2), 99.5% (98.6 to 100) and 99.5% (98.6 to 100), respectively. Conclusions The NLR measured at admission and in isolation can be used to effectively predict the subsequent presence of disease deterioration and serious clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Relation between Vitamin D and COVID-19 in Aged People: A Systematic Review

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1339
Author(s):  
Moustapha Dramé ◽  
Cécilia Cofais ◽  
Maxime Hentzien ◽  
Emeline Proye ◽  
Pécory Souleymane Coulibaly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Vitamin D Deficiency ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Aged People ◽  
Severity Of The Disease

Background: Vitamin D has diverse and extensive effects on the immune system, including activating innate immunity and reducing the overactive adaptive immune response. A systematic review was performed to identify and synthesize the best available evidence on the association between vitamin D level and risk of COVID-19, adverse outcomes and possible benefits of supplementation in aged 60 years or over. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed© and Scopus© for all publications from inception published before 15 March 2021. Studies reporting data from aged patients on vitamin D use and COVID-19 were included. Basic science articles, editorials and correspondence were excluded. Publication year, study design and setting, characteristics of the study population were extracted. This study is registered with PROSPERO, under the number CRD42020223993. Results: In total, 707 studies were identified, of which 11 observational studies were included in the final review. Four studies compared vitamin D-supplemented COVID-19 patients to non-supplemented patients, and seven compared patients with vitamin D deficiency to patients without deficiency. In all four studies, patients with vitamin D supplementation had better rates of primary clinical outcomes (death, the severity of the disease, oxygen therapy requirement…). In studies comparing patients with vitamin D deficiency and patients without vitamin D deficiency, those without vitamin D deficiency had better primary clinical outcomes (death rate, the severity of the disease, oxygen therapy requirement, invasive mechanical ventilation need…). Conclusion: This systematic review seems to support an association between vitamin D deficiency and the risk of COVID-19 in aged people. In addition, vitamin D deficiency appears to expose these subjects to a greater risk of adverse outcomes. Because of its simplicity of administration, and the rarity of side effects, including vitamin D in preventive strategies for certain viral diseases, it appears to be an attractive option.

An epidemiological study of concomitant use of herbal medicine and antipsychotics in schizophrenic patients: implication for herb-drug interaction

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1536-1536
Author(s):  
Z.-J. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Epidemiological Study ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Psychiatric Hospitals ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Antipsychotic Treatment ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Association Analyses ◽  
Number Of Patients

Herb-drug interactions are an important issue in drug safety and clinical practice. The aim of this epidemiological study was to characterize associations of clinical outcomes with concomitant herbal and antipsychotic use in patients with schizophrenia. A total of 1795 patients with schizophrenia who were randomly selected from 17 psychiatric hospitals in China were interviewed face-to-face using a structured questionnaire. Association analyses were conducted to examine correlates between Chinese medicine (CM) use and demographic, clinical variables, antipsychotic medication mode, and clinical outcomes. The prevalence of concomitant CM and antipsychotic treatment was 36.4% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 34.2%–38.6%]. Patients using concomitant CM had a significantly greater chance of improved outcomes than non-CM use (61.1% vs. 34.3%, OR = 3.44, 95% CI 2.80–4.24). However, a small but significant number of patients treated concomitantly with CM had a greater risk of developing worse outcomes (7.2% vs. 4.4%, OR = 2.06, 95% CI 2.06–4.83). Significant predictors for concomitant CM treatment-associated outcomes were residence in urban areas, paranoid psychosis, and exceeding 3 months of CM use. Herbal medicine regimens containing Radix Bupleuri, Fructus Gardenia, Fructus Schisandrae, Radix Rehmanniae, Akebia Caulis, and Semen Plantaginis in concomitant use with quetiapine, clozapine, and olanzepine were associated with nearly 60% of the risk of adverse outcomes. Our study suggests that concomitant herbal and antipsychotic treatment could produce either beneficial or adverse clinical effects in schizophrenic population. Potential herb-drug pharmacokinetic interactions need to be further evaluated.

528 EVALUATING THE PRESCRIPTION OF OPIATES IN PATIENTS WITH NECK OF FEMUR FRACTURES IN OUT OF HOSPITAL AND EMERGENCY CARE SETTING

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii8-ii13
Author(s):  
S Kanabar ◽  
D Mistry ◽  
H Naeem ◽  
R Smith ◽  
F Zahir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Local Governance ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Respiratory Compromise ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Fracture Management

Abstract Introduction Opiate based analgesia forms a key component of Hip Fracture management. If prescribed inappropriately, opiate based analgesia can lead to respiratory depression, nephrotoxicity, and delayed recovery. The aim of this project was to evaluate opiate prescription in NOF patients in both out of hospital (OOH) and Emergency Department (ED). Methods 100 consecutive patients were identified from National Hip Fracture Database between January and August 2019. Medical records were reviewed in both care settings, reviewing dose of morphine in comparison to body weight and renal function. Outcomes measured include constipation, acute kidney injury, respiratory compromise, and mortality. Statistical tests (t-test and chi square) were used to discern significance. Following the first cycle of results, results were disseminated to paramedics and at local governance meetings. Teaching was undertaken to increase awareness of harms associated with inappropriate opiate prescribing. A second cycle evaluated 30 consecutive NOFs from July 2020. Results In our study population, 74% were female and the average age was 84. The range of morphine doses given OOH ranged from 2-40 mg, in comparison to 2.5-20 mg in ED. 18% of patient suffered from Respiratory depression with 48 hours of their admission with a further 7% suffering from an acute kidney injury. After intervention, OOH morphine doses ranged between 5-10 mg, a reduction of 75% on maximum dose, with increased use of adjuvants as guided by the WHO pain ladder. No adverse outcomes were noted within 48 hours of admission. Conclusion Patient safety should be high on the agenda whilst caring for frail patients with Hip Fractures and opiate prescription is one of the most critical in the patient’s journey. Reducing harm by prescribing the optimal opiates helps to reduce mortality, morbidity, improve rehabilitation and patient flow within the NHS pathways. A guideline has been published to aid opiate prescription in elderly patients.

scholarly journals A literature review of the current major intraoral digital impression systems and their accuracy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Mezied ◽  
Norah Alnasser ◽  
Reema Al Owaid ◽  
Rand Bakhsh ◽  
Lama Alkhudhayr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
The Other ◽  
Digital Impression ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
The Future ◽  
Future Potential

The accuracy of the intraoral digital impression systems has been previously reported to refer to the quality of the obtained data from the related scanning procedures, irrespective of the quality of the clinical outcomes and the estimated costs. Trueness and precision have been frequently found among studies in the literature as two terms describing the accuracy of the intraoral digital impression systems. Various digital impression modalities have been proposed among studies in the literature and were investigated for estimation of their accuracy. The paper aims to review and discuss the most common literature regarding the current common systems and their accuracy among the different studies in the literature. According to the results, Chairside Economical Restoration of Esthetic Ceramic (CEREC) systems appear to have the highest estimated rates of trueness and precision as compared to the other modalities while the iTero system appears to have the lowest estimated rates. However, some studies have reported contradicting results and the current evidence is mainly based on findings from in vitro investigations. Accordingly, further studies might be needed for further validation of the current evidence and strengthening the quality of the future potential implications for clinicians. 

Anticancer Therapy in COViD-19 Patients: A Descriptive Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 365-373
Author(s):  
Nishita Tripathi ◽  
Daniya Sheikh ◽  
Demetra Antimisiaris
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Older People ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Anticancer Therapy ◽  
Included Study ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Anticancer Treatment ◽  
American Society

OBJECTIVE: To provide a descriptive literature review about the effects of anticancer treatment on clinical outcomes because of active COVID-19 infection in older people. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Articles published in English between December 1, 2019, to September 1, 2020, were included. STUDY SELECTION: Nine studies assessing the effectiveness of various modalities for cancer treatments in patients infected with COVID-19 infection were reviewed. The studies reviewed the severity of COVID-19 infection outcomes in patients who underwent any anticancer treatment. Studies exclusively focused on older people could not be found, but all studies included older people. DATA SYNTHESiS AND RESULTS: Early pandemic studies suggested avoiding anticancer treatment during a COVID-19 infection because of poor clinical outcomes and increased mortality. However, the totality of studies reviewed found no association between the continuation of anticancer treatment and adverse COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients. Adverse COVID-19 infection outcomes and high mortality rates were associated with older cancer patients independent of anticancer therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment of cancer could be challenging because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interruption or delaying the anticancer therapy could increase the burden of overall mortality. This literature review indicated that adverse outcomes because of COVID-19 are associated with advanced age independent of anticancer therapy. Further exploration of the correlation between cancer, anticancer treatments, and COVID-19 infection outcomes is needed.

Atrial fibrillation detected at screening is not a benign condition - a comparison of clinical outcomes in screen-detected vs. hospital-detected atrial fibrillation

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
VW Zwartkruis ◽  
B Geelhoed ◽  
N Suthahar ◽  
RT Gansevoort ◽  
SJL Bakker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Albumin Concentration ◽  
Benign Condition ◽  
National Budget ◽  
History Of ◽  
Time Varying Covariates

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Dutch Heart Foundation Background Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves detection of AF. However, it is unknown whether AF detected at screening carries risks similar to clinically detected AF, and if it should be treated similarly. Purpose We aimed to compare clinical outcomes in individuals with screen-detected vs. hospital-detected incident AF. Methods We studied 8265 individuals (mean age 49 ± 13 years, 50% women) without prevalent AF from the population-based PREVEND (Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease) cohort study. By design, 70% of PREVEND participants had urinary albumin concentration ≥10 mg/l. AF was considered screen-detected when first detected on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) during one of the PREVEND study visits, and hospital-detected when first detected on a hospital ECG. Using Cox regression models with screen-detected and hospital-detected AF as time-varying covariates, we studied the association of screen-detected vs. hospital-detected AF with mortality, incident heart failure (HF), and incident cardiovascular (CV) events. Results During a mean follow-up of 9.7 years, 265 participants (3.2%) developed incident AF (mean age 62 ± 9 years, 30% women, 65% hypertension, 23% obesity, 9% diabetes, 15% history of myocardial infarction, 3% history of stroke, 2% prevalent HF). Of all incident AF cases, 60 (23%) were screen-detected and 205 (77%) hospital-detected. Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between participants with screen-detected and hospital-detected AF. A larger proportion of incident AF was screen-detected in men (26%) compared to women (15%). In univariabe analysis, both screen-detected and hospital-detected AF were strongly associated with death, incident HF, and incident CV events. After multivariable adjustment, hospital-detected AF was significantly associated with death (HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.18-4.00), incident HF (HR 3.98, 95% CI 2.49-6.34), and incident CV events (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.21-3.06). Screen-detected AF was significantly associated with death (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.09-4.47) and incident HF (HR 4.90, 95% CI 2.28-10.57), but not with incident CV events (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.46-2.71). Conclusions In a population-based cohort enriched for microalbuminuria, almost a quarter of incident AF cases was first detected through ECG screening. Compared to hospital-detected AF, screen-detected AF was similarly associated with adverse outcomes. Although randomised trials are needed, this study highlights that AF screening may help decrease the general burden of CV disease.

Abstract 13: Patient-reported Health Status Changes are Associated With Subsequent Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Valve Therapies: Insights From the Sts/tvt Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittal Hejjaji ◽  
Zhuokai Li ◽  
David J Cohen ◽  
John Carroll ◽  
Sreekanth Vemulapalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Reported Health ◽  
Procedure Type

Background: The goals of TAVR and transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) are to prolong survival, reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and improve health status. Most patients report large improvements in health status within 30 days of these procedures. While this is an important patient-centered outcome on its own, if these changes were also associated with subsequent clinical outcomes, this would further support using short-term health status as a quality metric for valve procedures. Methods: Among patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR or TMVr, had KCCQ data at baseline and 30 days, and could be linked to CMS for 1-year outcomes; we constructed sequential models examining the association of KCCQ with death and HF hospitalization from 30 days to 1 year: 1) baseline KCCQ, 2) 30-day KCCQ, 3) baseline and 30-day KCCQ, 4) change in KCCQ from baseline to 30 days. In each model, we tested the interaction between procedure type and KCCQ, examined the linearity of the association of KCCQ with outcomes using restricted cubic splines, and adjusted for patient factors (Figure footnote). Results: Our cohort included 73,699 patients who underwent TAVR or TMVr from 2011-18 (median age 83 [IQR 77-87], 53% men, 92% TAVR). There were no significant interactions between procedure type and KCCQ, so all analyses used the combined cohort. Higher baseline KCCQ (model 1) and 30-day KCCQ (model 2) were both strongly associated with lower risk of death and HF hospitalization (Figure). When both were included in the model (model 3), each assessment was independently associated with subsequent outcomes, with the 30-day being most predictive. Change from baseline to 30 days was nonlinearly associated with outcomes (model 4), with increases up to 25 points associated with lower risk of death or HF hospitalization but no further risk reduction beyond 25 points. There were no meaningful changes in the associations after adjusting for patient factors. Conclusion: Short-term improvements in patient-reported health status after TAVR or TMVr were strongly associated with lower risk of death or HF hospitalization, with the 30-day assessment having a stronger association than baseline. These results support the routine use of 30-day KCCQ as a potential measure of quality after TVTs and to identify those at higher risk for adverse outcomes.

Abstract 359: Unit-Specific Influences on Conscious Sedation Nursing Practices: Comparing Medication Utilization and Patient Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Parone ◽  
Sahil Rawal ◽  
Allison Ellis ◽  
Bryant Peterson ◽  
Lourdes Escalante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Conscious Sedation ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
P Value ◽  
Medication Utilization ◽  
American Society ◽  
Cardiac Catherization

Background: Unit-Specific influences may determine the amount of sedation given to patients and lead to deviations in patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes due to vague guidelines (4). This study aims to compare medication utilization, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in order to determine safety and efficacy of nurse administrated conscious sedation. Methods: Data from outpatient procedures in Cardiac Catherization Lab (Cath Lab) and Interventional Radiology (IR) departments were collected including comorbidities, labs, procedural characteristics, clinical outcomes, and post-sedation questionnaires. Results: Mean age was 63 ± 14 years and 124 (54.9%) were males. Cath Lab n=132 and IR n=94. Procedure duration(min) was found to be longer in the Cath Lab 55 (37,81), than in IR 24 (16,45), p-value of <0.001. The American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores of Cath Lab 26(21%), IR 29(30.9%), p-value (0.1). Total amount of versed (mg) given in the Cath Lab 2 (1,2), significantly less than IR 3 (1,4.5) with a p-value of <0.01. Total amount of fentanyl (mcg) for Cath Lab 50(50,100), and IR 100 (50,100) with a p-value of <0.01. Median time between 1 st and 2 nd dose of versed in Cath Lab 0 (0,1), IR 9 (5, 16). Median time between 2 nd and 3 rd dose of versed for Cath Lab 0 (0,0), IR 6 (0,13.5) with a p-value <0.001. Median time between 1 st and 2 nd dose of fentanyl in Cath Lab 1 (0,14.8), IR 12.5 (6.8, 24) with a p-value <0.001. Median time between 2 nd and 3 rd dose of fentanyl for Cath Lab 0 (0,0), IR 0,(0,15), p-value <0.001. Median second dose of versed in Cath Lab 0 (0,1), IR 1 (1,1). Median second dose of fentanyl in Cath Lab 25 0 (0,25), IR 25 (25,50), p-value <0.001. Post-Sedation Questionnaire completed by 57 patients, Cath Lab n=30, IR n=27. Patients that felt uncomfortable during their procedure in Cath Lab 11(36.7%), compared to IR 1 (3.7%). The choice of sedation that patient would choose if undergoing a similar procedure again if under general anesthesia Cath Lab 6(20%), IR 0(0%), p-value 0.03. Patients stated that they would recommend conscious sedation to others based on their previous experience, Cath Lab 24 (80%), IR 27(100%). Conclusion: Patients receiving conscious sedation while undergoing procedures in both the Cath Lab and IR were found to have no adverse outcomes and were considered safe. The procedural duration of catheterization procedures was significantly longer than IR with no adverse outcomes, but patients in the Cath lab received less sedation medication and were found to be less satisfied with their procedure. Patients from Cath Lab received less initial sedation medication and rarely received an additional dose. Cath Lab patients were more likely to not recommended conscious sedation to others (20%), and 6 (20%) stated they would rather undergo a similar procedure under general anesthesia; 36.7% of Cath Lab patients stated that they were uncomfortable during the procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document