scholarly journals LEGAL FORCE OF INHERITANCE CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE HEAD AS THE BASIS FOR OBTAINING THE OWNERSHIP RIGHT TO LAND (IN BLIMBINGSARI VILLAGE, JEMBRANA REGENCY, BALI PROVINCE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Theresa Putri Nusantara ◽  
I Made Suwitra ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana

This study examines the existence of the Bali customary law for the transfer of land rights in Blimbingsari Village, and examines function of the Inheritance Certificate for the transfer of rights to land through inheritance. The research method used in this study is an empirical law research. In this case the research uses empirical legal research conducted in Blimbingsari Village, Jembrana Regency. The results showed that the inheritance law that applies to Christian Balinese tribes in Blimbingsari Village, Jembrana, Bali is receptive to Balinese customary inheritance laws which should only be used for Hindus. In its implementation, it is not the Hindu religious law that was received by the Blimbingsari Village community but the Balinese customary inheritance law that was received. Moreover, legal force of a Certificate of Inheritance issued by the village head for the Christian Balinese community in Blimbingsari Village, Jembrana, Bali can be used as a basis in the transfer of ownership rights to the land for the heirs.  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-188
Author(s):  
I Wayan Bayu Suta ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana

Today's Balinese customary law recognizes two ways to carry out a marriage, namely marrying by memadik (engaging) and marrying by means of Ngerorod (kawin lari). If during the engagement period the parents and families of both parties have the blessing, the marriage will be done by memadik. Conversely, if the engagement period does not get the blessing of the parents and family of one or both parties, while the couple has already fallen in love and it is no longer possible to be separated, then ngerorod is the only way to get married. This study aims to determine the validity of the Ngerorod marriage (kawin lari) in the village of Kelusa, and to determine the legal settlement of the Ngerorod marriage in the village of Kelusa. The research method used is an empirical legal research method with a sociology of law approach. The results showed that the legality of the ngerorod marriage that usually occurs in Kelusa village is that the man and the woman make a statement that the woman is legally in the house of the man she loves. The male family came to Bendesa Adat and Kelian Adat to discuss the ngerorod marriage, then the man picked up the woman in front of her house. Then, the legal settlement in the Ngerorod Marriage in Kelusa village was because the woman was still married to another person, after going through a sangkep (meeting) by the traditional village prajuru giving customary sanctions and being directed or obliged to legally divorce according to the provisions of the Law.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-217
Author(s):  
I Made Krishna Dharma Kusuma ◽  
Putu Gede Seputra ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani

Humans cannot be separated from the name of land, because land is the one who revives humans and living creatures around it in the progress of the current era of land has Economic Value. Land is the main and largest capital of Indonesia, land is the only capital. The problems of this study are 1) what are the procedures for the transfer of Land Rights according to Customary Law? 2) How is the power of the Law of Sale and Purchase of Property Rights on Land according to Customary Law? The research method used is a normative legal research method, with a literature study of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study can be concluded that: 1) the transfer of rights to land according to customary law is valid if the act of light and cash is carried out. The purpose of the sale and purchase agreement is in the presence of PPAT (Land Deed Official) and Witnesses in the transfer of rights to the land and the witness is the head of the village and the local community, which in cash means that there are two actions which are carried out simultaneously, namely the transfer of rights from the seller to the buyer and payment of prices in part or in full from the buyer to the seller. 2). The act of buying and selling that has a good intention is seen when the parties that make a sale and purchase of land rights ask to be done before the Customary Chief / local Village Chief. In the Civil Code the legal protection of buyers with good intentions, if the sale and purchase agreement is carried out based on Customary Law has been protected by the provisions of article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code.  


2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustakim Mustakim ◽  
Kasmar Kasmar

Supervision of Bhabinkamtibmas in the use of village funds, aims to ensure that Bhabinkamtibmas can carry out their duties properly. The method used is a normative legal research method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the supervision of Bhabinkamtibmas in the use of village funds is needed to increase the role of Bhabinkamtibmas in village development and coordinate with village community leaders. Because when many community leaders supervise, it is better for the Village Government not to abuse their positions and KKN in the implementation of village development because village funds can tempt officials to do wrong. Bhabinkamtibmas should be involved since planning or deliberation in the hamlet/village, village deliberations (musrenbangdes) so that the development direction is according to priorities in the village and monitoring the village development process. Thus the task of supervising Bhabinkamtibmas can run smoothly, so that it can build a prosperous village without corruption, collusion and nepotism.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 580
Author(s):  
Mia Hadiati ◽  
Lis Julianti ◽  
Moody R Syailendra ◽  
Luthfi Marfungah ◽  
Anggraeni Sari Gunawan

LPD as one of the MicroFinance Institutions is very rapidly growing in Bali Province. LPD is said to be the business center of the informal sector. The existence of LPD as a credit institution in the village has been recognized based on customary law. In 2020 LPD in Bali amounted to about 1,433 LPD from a total of 1,485 Indigenous Villages in Bali which more served loans for villagers for various purposes. Therefore, in the management of LPD must be managed properly, correctly, transparency so that there is no misuse of LPD in its management and designation. The research method used in this research is normative-empirical legal research. This research is a blend of normative legal research and empirical legal research. Normative legal research is legal research that uses secondary data, while empirical legal research is legal research that uses primary data.  Based on the results of this pre-study can be concluded the occurrence of criminal acts of corruption committed both the Board and lpd managers cause disputes. Disputes conducted by lpd managers and managers cause conflicts of interest either between the manager with customary karma or between managers and managers both in the duties and functions of their authority. Disputes over customary issues in the Village within the scope of LPD either indicated that cause village losses or violations of applicable laws and regulations are often resolved through national law compared to customary law that applies in an LPD area. LPD sebagai salah satu Lembaga Keuangan Mikro sangatlah berkembang pesat di Provinsi Bali. LPD dikatakan sebagai pusat usaha sektor informal. Eksistensi LPD sebagai lembaga perkreditan di desa telah diakui keberadaannya berdasarkan hukum adat. Tahun 2020 LPD di Bali berjumlah sekitar 1.433 LPD dari total 1.485 Desa Adat di Bali yang lebih banyak melayani pinjaman bagi masyarakat desa untuk berbagai keperluan. Oleh karena itu didalam pengurusan LPD haruslah dikelola dengan baik, benar, transparansi agar tidak terjadi penyalahgunaan LPD di dalam pengelolaan dan peruntukannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif-empiris. Penelitian ini merupakan perpaduan antara penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum empiris. Penelitian hukum normatif adalah penelitian hukum yang menggunakan data sekunder, sedangkan penelitian hukum empiris adalah penelitian hukum yang menggunakan data primer.  Berdasarkan hasil pra penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan baik itu Pengurus dan pengelola LPD menimbulkan sengketa. Sengketa yang dilakukan oleh Pengurus dan pengelola LPD menimbulkan konflik kepentingan baik antara pengurus dengan karma adat atau antar pengurus dan pengelola baik dalam tugas dan fungsi kewenangannya. Sengketa permasalahan adat di Desa dalam ruang lingkup LPD baik itu terindikasi yang menimbulkan kerugian desa ataupun pelanggaran Peraturan Perundang Undangan yang berlaku seringkali sengketa tersebut diselesaikan melalui hukum Nasional dibandingkan dengan hukum adat yang berlaku di suatu wilayah LPD.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sakti Ramdhon Syah R.

The Papuan traditional communal rights for the Control of Land and Natural Resources, are rights granted by legislation with a number of special authorities. This study aims to analyze and provide a conception about Reinforcement of the Papuan traditional communal rights for the Control of Land and Natural Resources. This research method uses the type of normative-juridical legal research, which refers to the legal norms of statutory approach, as well as legal theories and principles as supporters. This research is descriptive-analytical, using qualitative analysis methods. The results of this study indicate that although the regulation of the customary rights of customary law communities in Papua has been enforced for a long time, but there are some fundamental things that need attention. First, there is no enforceable ownership rights over the land by the customary law community or Papuan individual indigenous people to land that has been owned by other individuals or legal entities, since the enactment of Perdasus. Second, the utilization of natural resources together must use business entities, without considering the skills of indigenous peoples in general are relatively low in relation to the format of business entities. Third, the lack of attention to the development of human resources in the utilization of natural resources.


Author(s):  
Pringgo Soebowo ◽  
Endang Prasetyawati ◽  
Moch. Isnaeni

The sale and purchase of land-based on customary law in daily practice is still practiced by some people in Indonesia. The sale and purchase of land in customary law adhere to the principle of "tunai and terang" which means that the handover of rights by the seller is carried out simultaneously with payment by the buyer and immediately the rights have transferred. This research discusses the Ratio legis of the use of the principle of "tunai and terang" in the sale and purchase of land in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach as a problem approach method. The results showed that the use of "tunai and terang" in the formation of sale and purchase agreements for land rights in Indonesia is because UUPA accommodates Customary Law as the basis for the National Land Law. The existence of cash and light principles is expected to provide legal protection for sellers and buyers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiar Ramon

Land buying and selling according to customary law needs to know the validity and strength of the evidence, so that if a claim can be maintained in court. The formulation of the problem of this research is how a juridical review of the validity and strength of evidence of land buying and selling according to customary law. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the discussion indicate that a juridical review of the validity of buying and selling according to customary law is legal as in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence Number 952k / Sip / 1974 that buying and selling is legal in fulfilling the requirements of customary law, in real, cash and known by the Head of Village / Head The village, while the strength of the evidence is that if the land is bought verbally, the strength of the evidence is free, whereas if done in writing, the strength of the evidence is the beginning and will be perfect if acknowledged by the parties or supported by other evidence tools such as evidence statement from 2 witnesses


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Yanto Sufriadi

This study focuses on the concept of land ownership rights based on Indonesian customary law and Islamic law. This study is a normative legal research with the approach of statutory law, customary law and Islamic law. Data obtained through library research. Based on this study, it is concluded that both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law recognize individual ownership of land, but that ownership has a social function, namely that land rights must provide benefits for welfare, both the welfare of the owner and the welfare of the community. Both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law prohibit land ownership that is detrimental to the welfare of others. This concept is expected to become a reference in formulating the ownership of material rights in Indonesian National Law.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-104
Author(s):  
Agung Basuki Prasetyo

Research Aims to find out the characteristics of crooked land regulation in Indonesia. The research method is legal research. the results of the study indicate that the Characteristics of Crooked Land Regulations in Indonesia can be explained through three bases, among them are about crooked land according to customary law, bent land according to Law number 5 of 1960 and crooked land according to Crooked Land according to Indonesian Law No. 6 of 2014. Crooked land has various forms, can be in the form of rice fields, dry land or in the form of fish ponds or ponds. The surrender of land is crooked to the village head and his device, but this will again be the village's right if the Village Head and his apparatus no longer hold office, so that the crooked land will be handed back to the Village Head and Village Equipment who replaced himPenelitian Bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenal karateristik pengaturan tanah bengkok di Indonesia. Metode penelitian merupakan penelitian hukum. hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa Karateristik Pengaturan Tanah Bengkok Di Indonesia dapat dijelaskan melalui tiga dasar, diantaranya adalah tentang tanah bengkok menurut hukum adat, tanah bengkok menurut UU nomor 5 tahun 1960 dan Tanah bengkok menurut Tanah Bengkok Menurut Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014. Tanah bengkok memiliki bentuk yang bermacam-macam, dapat berupa tanah persawahan, tanah tegalan maupun berupa kolam ikan atau tambak. Penyerahan tanah bengkok kepada kepala desa dan perangkatnya, namun hal tersebut akan kembali menjadi hak desa jika Kepala Desa dan perangkatnya tidak menjabat lagi, sehingga tanah bengkok akan diserahkan kembali kepada Kepala Desa dan Perangkat Desa yang menggantikannya.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Ananda Dwinanti Kinasih , ◽  
M. Hudi Asrori S ,

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims for reviewing how the settlement of compensation as the consequences of the tenure <br />of land rights unlawfully in civil law Surakarta state court verdict number 106/pdt.g/2017/PN.SKT and <br />number 103/pdt.G/2006/PN.SKT where the court’s decision has a permanent legal force. This research is <br />a juridical normative legal research. The location of this research at Notary Office and PPAT Adib Sujarwadi <br />and the State Court Surakarta Class 1A Specific. Kinds and the sources of data in this research are <br />consist of primary data and secondary data. The technique of data collection through interview and library <br />study. The analytical technique used by the author is by the method of syllogism that uses the deduction <br />mindset. Regarding the settlement of compensation due to unlawful tenure of land rights is a compensatory <br />damages, in the form of payment to the victim amounting to a loss that is actually experienced. Based on <br />the decision of the Panel of Judges. Regarding the non-granting of immaterial compensation because <br />the Plaintiff does not attach the appropriate evidence. After the verdict is declared incracht, outside the <br />court, the Defendant and the Plaintiff may hold deliberations to determine the amount of the indemnity or <br />the Plaintiff waived the indemnity obligation, but the Defendant must leave the land of the object of the <br />dispute voluntarily. In the case of still occupy it will be executed by the bailiff from the Court.<br />Keywords: Compensation; Tort; Tenure Of Land Rights.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana penyelesaian ganti rugi akibat penguasaan hak atas <br />tanah secara melawan hukum pada perkara perdata Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Nomor 106/<br />Pdt.G/2017/PN SKT dan Nomor 103/Pdt.G/2006/PN SKT, dimana putusan pengadilan tersebut telah <br />berkekuatan hukum tetap. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yuridis. Lokasi penelitian <br />yaitu di Kantor Notaris dan PPAT Adib Sujarwadi dan Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta Kelas IA Khusus. Jenis <br />dan sumber data penelitian ini meliputi data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui <br />wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah dengan metode <br />silogisme yang menggunakan pola pikir deduksi. Penyelesaian ganti rugi akibat penguasaan hak atas <br />tanah secara melawan hukum yaitu dengan ganti rugi kompensasi, berupa pembayaran kepada korban <br />sebesar kerugian yang benar-benar dialami. Berdasarkan keputusan Majelis Hakim. Mengenai tidak <br />dikabulkannya ganti rugi immateriil dikarenakan Penggugat tidak melampirkan bukti-bukti yang sesuai. <br />Setelah putusan dinyatakan incraht, di luar pengadilan, Tergugat dan Penggugat dapat mengadakan <br />musyawarah untuk menentukan jumlah ganti rugi atau Penggugat membebaskan kewajiban pembayaran <br />ganti rugi, namun Tergugat harus meninggalkan tanah obyek sengketa secara sukarela. Dalam hal masih <br />tetap menempati maka akan dilakukan eksekusi oleh juru sita dari Pengadilan.<br />Kata Kunci : Ganti Kerugian; Perbuatan Melawan Hukum; Penguasaan Hak Atas Tanah.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document